Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This prospectively randomized study compared fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, with ofloxacin, 200 mg twice daily, administered orally for 7-14 days for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) in hospitalized, urologic patients. A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 30 patients treated with fleroxacin and 35 treated with ofloxacin could be evaluated for therapeutic efficacy. Of the causative organisms, 29 of 30 in the fleroxacin group and 33 of 35 in the ofloxacin group were eliminated. One relapse occurred in the fleroxacin group and two in the ofloxacin group. Reinfection with gram-positive isolates was seen in five patients treated with fleroxacin and in one treated with ofloxacin. Thus, the cure rate was 24 (80%) of 30 in the fleroxacin group and 32 (91%) of 35 in the ofloxacin group. In general, both antibiotics were well tolerated. Four patients in the fleroxacin group and five in the ofloxacin group claimed mild, possibly drug-related adverse effects. The treatment of one patient in the ofloxacin group had to be discontinued because of an adverse effect (headache). Both fleroxacin and ofloxacin are effective and well-tolerated antibiotics for the treatment of complicated UTI.
 ...
PMID:Fleroxacin versus ofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: a controlled clinical study. 845 66

Cephalosporins are one of the mainstays of antibiotic therapy, and third-generation cephalosporins are first-line agents for the treatment of many types of serious infections, including those of nosocomial origin. Gaps in activity of currently available third-generation cephalosporins such as cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime, and increasing reports of gram-negative bacilli resistance to some of these agents, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp., make it necessary to investigate new compounds. Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a wide range of activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including multi-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, was evaluated in comparison with ceftazidime for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients. Ceftazidime is a commonly prescribed third-generation cephalosporin used for empiric treatment of serious infections such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and skin and skin-structure infection. This investigation was an open, randomized comparative study involving 882 patients in North America. Cefepime 2 g every 12 hours demonstrated similar efficacy to that of ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hours for the treatment of pneumonia and urinary tract infection (including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia), and skin and skin-structure infections. The bacteriologic responses were generally >85%. The most common pathogens isolated were Escherichia coll, Streptococcus pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus, group B. Overall, approximately 94% of pathogens isolated in pretreatment cultures were susceptible to cefepime and ceftazidime. Cefepime and ceftazidime were well tolerated; only 3% of patients in each group discontinued therapy because of an adverse event. The most common adverse events were headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and rash. The results of this study indicate that cefepime is a promising, effective, and safe single-agent therapy for serious infections in hospitalized patients.
 ...
PMID:Clinical applications of a new parenteral antibiotic in the treatment of severe bacterial infections. 867 98

Clinical and in vitro data indicate that cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, may be a valuable addition in the treatment of serious infections. In this study, hospitalized patients with complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), for which parenteral therapy was appropriate, were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio open, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of cefepime and ceftazidime. A total of 180 patients, including 6 with concurrent bacteremia, were evaluated for their response to cefepime (n = 118) or ceftazidime (n = 62), both of which were administered by intravenous infusion or intramuscular injection in doses of 500 mg every 12 hours. In cases of complicated UTI, cefepime produced a satisfactory clinical response in 83 of 93 (89%) patients and eradicated 83 of 98 (85%) pathogens. A satisfactory clinical response to ceftazidime was experienced by 43 of 50 (86%) patients; and in 39 of 50 (78%) cases pathogens were eradicated. In uncomplicated cases, the clinical response and bacterial eradication rates for cefepime were 23 of 25 (92%) and 22 of 26 (85%), respectively, and for ceftazidime 12 of 12 (100%) and 11 of 12 (92%). Of the 6 patients with concomitant bacteremia, 5 received cefepime and 1, ceftazidime. The infecting organisms, Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, were eradicated in all cases, although one cefepime-treated patient had an unsatisfactory clinical response. The most common adverse events in both groups were headache, diarrhea, and vomiting; most events were unrelated to therapy. Adverse events forced only a 2% withdrawal of patients in either group. There was local tolerance to both agents, and abnormalities in laboratory values were judged to be clinically insignificant. The results of this study indicate that cefepime can be used safely and successfully to treat both complicated and uncomplicated nosocomial infection of the urinary tract, including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia. Moreover, its safety profile appears comparable to those of other cephalosporins, and local tolerance is similar to that of ceftazidime. No patient in either group required discontinuation of therapy because of local intolerance at the infusion or injection site.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of urinary tract infections: selecting an appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic for nosocomial infections. 867 1

Sildenafil citrate, an oral therapy for erectile dysfunction, is a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), the predominant isozyme metabolizing cGMP in the corpus cavernosum. Chemically, it is a compound of the pyrazolo-pyrimidinyl-methylpiperazine class. Sildenafil has no direct relaxant effect on human corpus cavernosum but enhances the relaxant effect of nitric oxide (NO) on the corpus cavernosum by inhibiting PDE5, which is responsible for degradation of cGMP in this tissue. When sexual stimulation causes local release of NO, inhibition of PDE5 by sildenafil increases concentrations of cGMP in the corpus cavernosum, causing smooth muscle relaxation and blood flow into the penis, resulting in an erection. Sildenafil at recommended doses has no effect in the absence of sexual stimulation. The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with absolute bioavailability of 40%. Its pharmacokinetics are dose proportional over the recommended dosage range. Maximum plasma concentrations are reached within 30 to 120 minutes after oral dosing in the fasting state. Sildenafil is cleared predominantly by the hepatic microsomal isoenzymes CYP3A4 (major route) and CYP2C9 (minor route). Clinical studies assessed the effect of sildenafil on the ability of men with erectile dysfunction to engage in sexual activity and, specifically, to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Sildenafil was evaluated at doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg in randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials of up to 6 months' duration. The drug was administered to hundreds of patients aged 19 to 87 years having erectile dysfunction of various etiologies for a mean duration of 5 years. Sildenafil was associated with statistically significant improvement in erectile function compared with placebo. Adverse effects reported at a rate of >2% were headache, flushing, dyspepsia, nasal congestion, urinary tract infection, abnormal vision, diarrhea, dizziness, and rash. No cases of priapism were reported. The use of sildenafil is contraindicated in men who are taking organic nitrates, because of the potential for a precipitous decrease in blood pressure. Postmarketing reports and surveillance have revealed at least 39 deaths with sildenafil use in men having a history of heart disease, men taking nitrate medications, and men in poor physical health due to lack of exercise. Many of the men who experienced serious adverse effects or death had a variety of concomitant diseases and were taking multiple medications.
 ...
PMID:Safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. 991 1

Hypertension, bradycardia, and severe headache have been associated with autonomic dysreflexia. Autonomic dysreflexia affects those with spinal transection above the level of T6 after plastic changes of the afferent pathways. This restructuring in the presence of noxious stimuli below the level of the lesion leads to autonomic dysreflexia. The onset of the first episode of autonomic dysreflexia has been documented as soon as 30 days and as late as 13 years after the injury. This report presents a case study of a paraplegic man 8 years after injury with autonomic dysreflexia associated with a urinary tract infection.
 ...
PMID:Autonomic dysreflexia presenting as a severe headache. 1033 78

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common illness, with > or =30% of all women experiencing a UTI during their lifetime. Less than a decade ago, the standard therapy for acute uncomplicated UTIs involved treatment with > or =7 days of an antibacterial agent, but recent studies using a variety of newly introduced antibiotics, including the fluoroquinolones, have demonstrated that a 1- to 5-day treatment regimen can be equally effective. This randomized, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of sparfloxacin with those of a 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin and a 7-day regimen of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of women with community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection. A total of 1175 women were enrolled; 395 received sparfloxacin as a single 400-mg dose on day 1, 394 received sparfloxacin as a 400-mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 200 mg once daily for 2 additional days, and 386 received ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for 7 days. Patients were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics and underlying conditions. A total of 954 patients were clinically assessable; 490 of these were also bacteriologically assessable. All patients treated were included in the tolerability analysis. Escherichia coli (75.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.9%), Enterococcus faecalis (4.6%), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.1%) were the most commonly isolated organisms. In the all-treated population, clinical success was achieved 5 to 9 days after therapy in 91.8%, 92.2%, and 91.6% of patients in the single-dose sparfloxacin, 3-day sparfloxacin, and 7-day ciprofloxacin groups, respectively; bacteriologic success was observed in 91.7%, 92.6%, and 96.6% of those in the 3 groups. Sustained clinical success rates 4 to 6 weeks after therapy were 76.6%, 80.2%, and 79.5% in the single-dose sparfloxacin, 3-day sparfloxacin, and 7-day ciprofloxacin groups, respectively; sustained bacteriologic success rates were 80.7%, 90.1%, and 92.6%. The most common adverse events were nausea, headache, vaginal thrush, dizziness, and diarrhea; >92% of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. The 2 drugs had comparable frequencies of adverse events, except for photosensitivity, which occurred in 3.3% of the 3-day sparfloxacin group, 1.3% of the single-dose sparfloxacin group, and 0.3% of the ciprofloxacin group (P = 0.005). The 3-day sparfloxacin regimen was effective and well tolerated. The initial response to single-dose sparfloxacin treatment was comparable to the response to the other 2 regimens, but the single-dose regimen proved less effective over time, with higher rates of clinical recurrence and bacteriologic relapse. Sparfloxacin provides an alternative to ciprofloxacin for patients with acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection who are not at risk for photosensitivity reactions or adverse events associated with a prolonged corrected QT interval.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Sparfloxacin Multicenter Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Study Group. 1044 Jun 21

A 28-year-old woman had chief complaints of headache and a 40 degrees C fever. At this time, findings indicative of inflammation including elevated CRP and increased WBC were observed, and E. coli was detected on blood and urine culture. As a result, the patient was diagnosed with pyelonephritis and sepsis. Furthermore, markedly increased hepatobiliary enzymes and elevated anti-mitochondrial antibody were confirmed. The administration of antimicrobial agents resulted in improvement of the pyelonephritis and sepsis and normalization of hepatobiliary enzyme and anti-mitochondrial antibody levels. It has been documented that the incidence of urinary tract infection is high among patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The findings obtained from the present patient are of considerable interest in elucidating the mechanism of onset in PBC.
 ...
PMID:A patient with E. coli-induced pyelonephritis and sepsis who transiently exhibited symptoms associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. 1468 42

Gemifloxacin is a broad-spectrum quinolone antibacterial with enhanced potency against Gram-positive bacteria, including multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and retained potency against Gram-negative bacilli and bacterial strains resistant to other antibiotics. It has proven particularly effective in respiratory and urinary tract infection. This review presents safety data from 6775 patients included in clinical trials, receiving either the recommended 320 mg once daily oral dose of gemifloxacin, or standard dose of other quinolones, macrolides or beta-lactams (n = 5248). Studies in healthy volunteer and special populations are also reported. Adverse experiences (AEs) were observed in 44.7% of gemifloxacin-treated patients and 47.5% of those who received comparator drugs. Mild gastro-intestinal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (diarrhoea 5.1%, nausea 3.9%) predominated. Rash, usually maculo-papular and in no case proceeding to more severe eruptions, was observed in 3.6% of those receiving gemifloxacin. A higher incidence of rash (>20%) was observed in young women and was the subject of further study. Adverse drug reactions suspected or probably related to treatment occurred in 17.4% of patients receiving gemifloxacin and in 20% of those receiving comparator antibiotics. Diarrhoea and nausea were experienced by 3.6 and 2.7%, respectively, of gemifloxacin-treated patients (4.6 and 3.2% of comparators), rash by 2.8% (0.6% of comparators) and headache by 1.2% (1.5% of comparators). Gemifloxacin-related vomiting (0.9%), dizziness (0.8%) and taste perversion (0.3%) were uncommon. Treatment discontinuation followed one or more adverse drug reactions in 2.2% of gemifloxacin-treated patients (0.9% due to rash) and 2.1% of comparator-treated patients. A total of 63 deaths (33 receiving gemifloxacin) occurred in the trial population: none were considered related to treatment. A slight prolongation in QT interval (2.56 ms (S.D. +/-24.5)) was observed in gemifloxacin-treated patients: no cardiac arrhythmias were reported. There was a low incidence of liver function tests (LFTs) classified as of potential clinical concern: gemifloxacin (0.4-1.2%), comparators (0.2-1.3%). Serious adverse events (SAEs), occurring during but not necessarily related to therapy, occurred in 3.6% of gemifloxacin-treated patients (4.3% of comparators). SAEs related to treatment agents were rare (0.4% in each group) and included rash (0.1%) and elevated liver enzymes (<0.1%). Gemifloxacin was well tolerated by the elderly, those with renal or hepatic impairment and when co-administered with omeprazole, digoxin, theophylline, warfarin (with which there were no significant interactions) and Maalox. In conclusion, gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile similar to that of comparator antibiotics, including other quinolones.
 ...
PMID:A new respiratory fluoroquinolone, oral gemifloxacin: a safety profile in context. 1512 Jul 18

To provide a descriptive analysis of emergency department (ED) patients with spina bifida, a retrospective chart review was conducted of ED patients with spina bifida. Data describing demographics, chief complaints, diagnostics, diagnoses, and disposition were collected. There were 125 patients with 258 ED visits. The most common presenting complaints included fever (n = 55), vomiting (36), headache (32), abdominal pain (23), and genitourinary symptoms (20). The most common diagnoses included urinary tract infection (n = 55), cellulitis (26), seizure (21), headache (17), dehydration (12), and shunt failure (11). Atypical presentations of conditions commonly associated with spina bifida occurred frequently. Forty-three percent of patients were admitted. In conclusion, spina bifida patients often present with serious illness requiring admission and with complications of their underlying condition. Therefore, atypical presentations of commonly associated conditions must be considered.
 ...
PMID:Descriptive analysis of 258 emergency department visits by spina bifida patients. 1679 48

Ramelteon is a selective MT(1)/MT(2)-receptor agonist indicated for insomnia treatment. Because it has no depressant effects on the nervous system, it is not expected to affect the control of breathing. The potential effects of ramelteon on apneic and hypopneic events and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea were assessed. In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 26 adults with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea received ramelteon 16 mg and placebo for one night each, with a 5- to 12-day washout period between treatments. Treatments were administered 30 min before habitual bedtime. Respiratory effort was monitored using respiratory inductance plethysmography, SaO(2) was measured by pulse oximetry, and sleep onset and duration were measured by polysomnography and post-sleep questionnaire. Post-sleep questionnaire also measured next-day residual effects. The primary measure was apnea-hypopnea index. Apnea-hypopnea index was similar in ramelteon and placebo groups (11.4 vs 11.1, respectively; CI = -2.1, 2.6, P = 0.812). Ramelteon had no effect on the number of central, obstructive, or mixed apnea episodes. No significant differences were observed in SaO(2) for the entire night between ramelteon and placebo (95.1 vs 94.7%; P = 0.070). Ramelteon did not meaningfully affect sleep when evaluated by polysomnography and post-sleep questionnaire. Compared with placebo, ramelteon had no significant effect on next-day residual effects. Adverse events were reported by three subjects in the ramelteon group: headache (n = 2) and urinary tract infection (n = 1). No adverse events were reported with placebo. Ramelteon was well-tolerated and, as expected, did not worsen sleep apnea when administered to subjects with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.
 ...
PMID:Safety of ramelteon in individuals with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. 1729 32


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>