Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Primary care patients with a major depressive disorder and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (17-HAM-D) score >18 were randomized to 24 weeks of treatment with mirtazapine 30-45 mg/day (n=99) or paroxetine 20-30 mg/day (n=98). Both treatments were efficacious in improving depressive symptomatology, as assessed by group mean 17-HAM-D scores, percentages of HAM-D responders and remitters and Clinical Global Improvement responders. The mirtazapine group showed statistically significantly larger decreases from baseline in group mean 17-HAM-D scores at weeks 1, 2 and 4, and the difference with the paroxetine group reached the level of clinical relevance at weeks 2 and 4. Antidepressant efficacy was maintained throughout both the acute and continuation phase of treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. The only adverse event with a statistically significantly higher incidence in the mirtazapine group was fatigue. Statistically significantly more paroxetine-treated patients complained of increased sweating, headache and nausea. The results demonstrate that both mirtazapine and paroxetine were efficacious and well tolerated when used for 24 weeks in depressed patients treated in primary care. An observed difference in efficacy favouring mirtazapine between weeks 1 and 4 indicates that mirtazapine patients had improved earlier compared to those on paroxetine, and corroborates similar findings in other comparisons of mirtazapine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind, 24-week study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and paroxetine in depressed patients in primary care. 1270 91

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an immediate switch to reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI), in patients with depression unresponsive to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine. The study included 128 adult outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder (MDD) who had not responded to at least 6 to 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment, with at least 3 weeks of treatment on a minimum dose of 40 mg/d. Patients were switched, without a washout period, to reboxetine 4 mg twice daily, with the possibility of increasing the dose to 10 mg/d (given in divided doses) after 4 weeks of treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) and the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S) scales. Safety was evaluated by recording spontaneously reported adverse events.A statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in the mean total HAM-D-17 score was seen from baseline by week 1 of treatment with reboxetine, and the improvement continue to week 8. CGI-I and CGI-S scores were similarly improved. The switch to reboxetine was well tolerated; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were insomnia, headache, dry mouth, diaphoresis, and constipation, all of which were mild to moderate in severity and decreased in frequency as the study progressed.Immediate switching to reboxetine appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with depression who have failed to respond to an adequate dose of fluoxetine.
 ...
PMID:Switching to reboxetine: an efficacy and safety study in patients with major depressive disorder unresponsive to fluoxetine. 1292 Apr 12

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of gepirone immediate-release (gepirone-IR) for relapse prevention in outpatients with MDD who had responded to initial gepirone-IR therapy. Patients with MDD and a HAM-D(25) score > or = 20 were treated with open-label gepirone-IR 20 to 90 mg/day for 6 weeks. Responders with a HAM-D(17) total score < or = 12 or with a > or = 50% reduction in total HAM-D(17) score and at least a "much improved" or "very much improved" CGI improvement score, were randomized to gepirone-IR or placebo for six additional weeks. Time to relapse was defined in six ways [(1) return to > or = 75% of baseline HAM-D(17) total score; (2) CGI improvement score of "no change" or "minimally worse," "much worse" or "very much worse" than baseline (> or = 4); and four more definitions combining the HAM-D(17) or CGI criteria with discontinuation, or discontinuation due to lack of efficacy] and analyzed for the ITT population using the LOCF method. Of 134 patients in the open-label phase, 70 were responders. In the double-blind phase, the relapse rate was significantly lower with gepirone-IR than with placebo (P < or = 0.05) for four of the six definitions of relapse. Discontinuations of gepirone-IR due to adverse events were observed for 26.9% of patients in the open-label phase, and four patients (6%) during the double-blind phase. The most frequent adverse events with gepirone-IR were dizziness, nausea, headache, and somnolence, and with placebo were headache and paresthesia. A relapse-prevention study of longer duration is needed to confirm these preliminary results. Gepirone-IR was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention and demonstrated acceptable tolerability in outpatient responders with MDD.
 ...
PMID:Sustained efficacy of gepirone-IR in major depressive disorder: a double-blind placebo substitution trial. 1500 31

Deramciclane, a camphor derivative, is a novel anxiolytic agent with a unique mechanism of action. It acts as a potent and specific antagonist at serotonin 5-HT2A/2C receptors, and exhibits anxiolytic efficacy in animal models. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a range of doses of deramciclane in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Adult patients with a diagnosis of GAD (DSM-IV) and a Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score >or=18; a score >or=2 for the HAM-A items 'Anxious Mood' and 'Tension'; a score >or=4 on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale; and a score <or=20 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were enrolled in the study. Following a 1-2 week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive deramciclane (10, 30, or 60 mg/day in two divided doses) or placebo for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week placebo wash-out period. The primary efficacy measure was change in HAM-A score from baseline to week 8. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Withdrawal reactions were assessed at the end of the study (week 8) and during the placebo wash-out period using the Physician's Withdrawal Checklist (34 items). In the intent-to-treat population (n=208), both the deramciclane 30 mg/day and 60 mg/day doses provided clinically relevant improvements in HAM-A total score after 8 weeks of treatment, reaching statistical significance compared with placebo in the 60 mg/day dose group (p=0.024) and a clear trend in the 30 mg/day group (p=0.059). On the HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, significant improvements were seen in patients in the deramciclane 30 mg/day and 60 mg/day treatment groups compared with those in the placebo group (p<0.05). Adverse events were reported at a similar frequency across all four treatment groups; the most commonly reported adverse event was headache. No withdrawal reactions were observed on abrupt discontinuation of deramciclane. In conclusion, deramciclane 60 mg/day showed significant evidence of efficacy for the treatment of GAD in adult patients. The efficacy for the 30 mg/day dose was close to the larger dose although not significant in the primary analysis, and there was no significant evidence of efficacy for the 10 mg/day dose. Deramciclane was safe and well-tolerated up to the 60 mg/day dose over an 8-week period.
 ...
PMID:Deramciclane in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding study. 1594 21

Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) at a dose of 60 mg/day (given once daily). Whereas the target dose for the majority of patients is 60 mg/day, higher duloxetine doses (up to 120 mg/day) have been studied using a twice-daily dosing schedule. To further investigate the pharmacological profile of duloxetine within a once-daily dosing regimen at doses above 60 mg, we examined the safety and tolerability of duloxetine during a dose escalation from 60 mg/day to 120 mg/day. This single-arm, non-placebo-controlled study incorporated a 7-week dose escalation phase, in which patients and investigators were blinded as to timing of dose increases, followed by an open-label extension phase of up to 2 years duration. Patients (age >or=18 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD (n=128) received placebo for 1 week, followed by duloxetine (60 mg/day) titrated after 1 week to 90 mg/day, and after a further week to 120 mg/day. The dose of 120 mg/day was then maintained for 4 weeks. The extension phase comprised an initial 6-week dose stabilization period, during which duloxetine was tapered to the lowest effective dose, followed by continuation therapy at the stabilized dose. We assessed safety using spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), laboratory analytes, and visual analogue scales (VAS) for gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance. Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales, and VAS assessments of pain severity and interference. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events during the acute phase of the study was 15.6%. The most frequently reported TEAEs were nausea, headache, dry mouth, dizziness, and decreased appetite. The majority of TEAEs were associated with initial duloxetine dosing; further escalations in dose produced few additional adverse events. VAS measures of GI disturbance worsened significantly compared with baseline values after 1 week of duloxetine treatment. Subsequent assessments of GI disturbance, following dose escalation to 90 mg/day and 120 mg/day, showed either no significant difference or a significant improvement from baseline. Significant improvements (P<.001) were observed in all assessed depression efficacy measures, and in five of six VAS pain outcomes, during acute phase treatment. During 2 years of extension phase therapy, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was 11.9%, and the only TEAEs reported by >10% of patients were upper respiratory tract infection (13.1%), headache (10.7%), and insomnia (10.7%). Mean changes from baseline to the end of the extension phase in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 3.8 and 0.5 mm Hg, respectively, and there were no reports of sustained hypertension. Mean increase in heart rate was 5.9 bpm, while patients exhibited a mean weight increase of 3.1 kg over 2 years of treatment. Results from this study suggest that rapid dose escalation of duloxetine (60 mg/day --> 90 mg/day --> 120 mg/day) is safe and tolerable. Despite weekly escalation, the majority of adverse events were mild and transient and occurred in the first week of duloxetine dosing (at 60 mg once daily). Long-term treatment at a stabilized duloxetine dose was associated with a relatively low incidence of TEAEs and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Time course profiles of body weight and heart rate showed modest increases during 2 years of treatment [ClinicalTrials.gov number, NC T000 42575].
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: safety and tolerability associated with dose escalation. 1684 41

This open, multicenter, prospective study in France assessed the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in patients with depression, with or without comorbid anxiety. Escitalopram was administered over a 12-week treatment period to 790 depressed patients, including 482 patients with at least one concomitant anxiety disorder. The study was completed by 649 patients. At baseline, the mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was 31.5 and decreased to 12.4 at end point (last observation carried forward [LOCF]). The MADRS score decreased by 20.5 points in patients with no anxiety disorder and by 18.3 points in patients with at least one concomitant anxiety disorder. The mean Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score at baseline was 25.6, which decreased to 10.8 at end point (LOCF). The HAM-A score decreased by 13.8 points in patients with no anxiety disorder and by 15.5 points in patients with at least one anxiety disorder. Adverse events were reported by 246 patients (31%). The most frequent adverse events were nausea in 65 patients (8%) and headache in 38 patients (5%); 61 patients (8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Escitalopram was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing symptoms of depression in patients with or without comorbid anxiety over a 12-week treatment period.
 ...
PMID:A prospective study of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive episodes in the presence or absence of anxiety. 1704 22

PRX-00023, a serotonin 1A receptor agonist, was designed to provide high potency and selectivity for its target. To assess the possible therapeutic utility in anxiety, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 311 subjects who met the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, for generalized anxiety disorder. All subjects underwent a 1-week placebo run-in and were randomized to receive once-daily capsules containing either PRX-00023 (80 mg/d) or placebo for an additional 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A). The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used as a secondary endpoint to measure depressive symptoms. Statistical testing was performed with analysis of covariance, between baseline and week 8, with baseline values as a covariate. The anxiolytic effect of PRX-00023, compared with placebo, showed trends across all anxiolytic measures but failed to reach significance on the primary endpoint (HAM-A total score). Among the components of the HAM-A total score, the anxious mood item was significantly different from placebo in the PRX-00023-treated group (-1.015 vs -0.748; P = 0.02). The scores of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale were significantly improved compared with placebo at week 8 (-4.5 vs -1.6; P = 0.0094 in the last observation carried forward analysis). PRX-00023 was well tolerated; of note, there were no drug-related serious adverse events, and more patients discontinued due to adverse events in the placebo group (2.9%) than in the PRX-00023 group (1.4%). The most common adverse event was headache, observed in 15.7% and 10.9% of PRX-00023- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Furthermore, there was no evidence of impaired sexual function, as measured by the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Function Scale. Collectively, these results support further clinical investigation of higher doses of PRX-00023 in anxiety and depression.
 ...
PMID:Effects of PRX-00023, a novel, selective serotonin 1A receptor agonist on measures of anxiety and depression in generalized anxiety disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 1834 38

The objective of these studies was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine, a selective gamma-aminobutyric acid reuptake inhibitor, in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Patients with a diagnosis of GAD were enrolled in 1 of 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, 10-week studies. In each study, tiagabine was taken twice daily in divided doses--4, 8, or 12 mg/d in a fixed-dose study and 4-16 mg/d in two flexible-dose trials. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score at the final visit (last observation carried forward). Additional measures included change from baseline in the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Sheehan Disability Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. Tolerability was assessed via spontaneous reports as well as rating scales throughout the study period. In all 3 studies, there was no significant differentiation from placebo on the primary measure (change in HAM-A) for any tiagabine dose (P > 0.05). In the 2 flexible-dose studies, the tiagabine group showed improvements over time in the HAM-A that reached significance only in those patients who completed 10 weeks of treatment (study 2, P = 0.018; study 3, P = 0.036). The most common adverse events were dizziness, headache, nausea, fatigue, and somnolence. In conclusion, the results of these studies do not support the efficacy of tiagabine in adult patients with GAD.
 ...
PMID:Tiagabine in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies. 1848 Jun 88

Guidelines of the American Psychiatric Association for borderline personality disorder (BPD) indicate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine for treating affective dysregulation and impulsive behavioural dyscontrol symptoms. The SNRI duloxetine has been studied in patients with major depression, generalized anxiety disorder and fibromyalgia, showing particular efficacy on somatic complaints. This study investigates duloxetine in the treatment of patients with BPD. Eighteen outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BPD were treated with open-label duloxetine, 60 mg/day, for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline, week 4 and 12 with the CGI Severity item, the BPRS, the HAM-D, the HAM-A, the SOFAS, the BPD Severity Index (BPDSI) and the HSCL-90-Somatization Subscale (HSCL-90 SOM). Adverse effects were evaluated using the Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Statistics were performed with the analysis of variance. Significant P values were <or=0.05. Fourteen patients completed the study. Four patients (22.2%) discontinued treatment in the first 4 weeks because of non-compliance. A significant change was found for: BPRS, HAM-D, SOFAS, BPDSI total score and items 'impulsivity', 'outbursts of anger' and 'affective instability' and HSCL-90 SOM. Adverse effects were mild headache and nausea. Initial results suggest that duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for BPD, with positive effects on somatic symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: a pilot study. 1871 47

Information is available on aripiprazole as a treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), but no data have yet been presented concerning the use of this drug as an adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant BPD patients. This study investigates aripiprazole augmentation of ongoing sertraline therapy in drug-resistant BPD patients. Twenty-one outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BPD who did not respond to sertraline, 100-200 mg/day for 12 weeks, were treated for 12 weeks with the addition of aripiprazole, 10-15 mg/day. Patients were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 12 with the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity item (CGI-S), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Hamilton scales for depression and anxiety (HAM-D, HAM-A), the Social Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) for social functioning, the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI), and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). Adverse effects were evaluated using the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES). Sixteen patients completed the study. Five patients (23.8%) dropped out due to anxiety/insomnia or non-compliance. Nine patients (56.3%) were responders. Analysis of variance revealed significant changes in the following measures: CGI-S, BPRS, BPDSI total score, BPDSI "impulsivity" and "dissociation/paranoid ideation" items, and BIS-11. Adverse effects were mild headache, insomnia, and anxiety. Aripiprazole is an efficacious and well-tolerated add-on treatment for sertraline-resistant BPD patients. It acts on impulsive and psychotic-like symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation in sertraline-resistant patients with borderline personality disorder. 1884 60


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>