Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Meningeal carcinomatosis is characterized by diffuse infiltration of the leptomeninges by metastatic cancer in patients usually with a previous history of malignancy. Primary tumors are usually adenocarcinomas of the breast or lung, or malignant melanoma. Meningeal carcinomatosis can present with headache and/or a variety of cranial neuropathies. We report a case of meningeal carcinomatosis presenting as a complete, bilateral, sudden hearing loss without other cranial nerve findings--a previously unreported presentation. Our patient also exhibited an unusual primary tumor site (esophagus) and histopathology for meningeal carcinomatosis. The case was impressive for the subsequent abrupt onset of a series of cranial neuropathies and the rapid deterioration in the patient's condition.
 ...
PMID:Meningeal carcinomatosis producing bilateral sudden hearing loss: a case report. 141 3

In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron injection in nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, we carried out a double-blind placebo controlled comparative study in patients receiving high-single dose (50 mg/m2 or more) of cisplatin. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or saline injection was given intravenously at 15 min. before administration of cisplatin. If anti-emetic effect of the test drug was insufficient, an additional dose of 4mg of ondansetron was given intravenously, as the rescue medication. Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in anti-emetic effect (p < 0.001). Efficacy rates were 66.7% (22/33 cases) in ondansetron and 20.0% (6/30 cases) in placebo groups. Seven and 21 cases required rescue medication with 4 mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron due to insufficiency of anti-emetic effect, in ondansetron group and placebo group, respectively. Thus the number of patients who required rescue medication was obviously greater in placebo group than that in ondansetron group. The rates of inhibitory effect of rescue medication on nausea and emesis were 14.3% (1/7 cases) in ondansetron group and 61.9% (13/21 cases) in placebo group. Side effects were observed in 1 case (eruption) in ondansetron group and in 2 cases (headache, diarrhoea; 1 case each) in placebo group. Furthermore, fever developed in 1 case in placebo group after the rescue medication. Elevation of total bilirubin value was observed in 2 cases in ondansetron group and 1 case in placebo group, however, these changes were mild and did not pose noteworthy clinical problem. From these results, ondansetron was shown to possess an excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by highly emetogenic anti-cancer drugs, such as cisplatin, and to have no problem in safety, and thus it was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.
 ...
PMID:[Anti-emetic effect and safety of single dose of ondansetron injection in double-blind comparison study with placebo]. 141 13

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has already been reported to have a marked effect to alleviate or prevent nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, after its intravenous administration. The present study was planned to examine the usefulness of its tablet form, which was prepared for the convenient use in outpatients receiving chemotherapy. In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron 4 mg tablet, this study was conducted in double-blind comparison versus placebo in patients receiving cisplatin at a single dose of 50mg/m2 or higher. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or placebo (lactose tablet) was administered orally once at 2 hrs prior to administration of cisplatin. If any satisfactory anti-emetic effects were not obtained, 4 mg of ondansetron injection was given once intravenously as a rescue medication. The inhibitory effect on nausea and vomiting was assessed in 4 grades as "excellent", "good", "fair" and "poor" based on severity of nausea and number of vomiting that occurred during the first 24hrs after administration of cisplatin. When rescue medication was conducted, the case was assessed as "poor". Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in inhibition of nausea and vomiting, in which efficacy rates (excellent+good) of ondansetron and placebo groups were 58.1% (25/43 cases) and 16.7% (7/42 cases), respectively. Number of cases requiring rescue medication with ondansetron injection was obviously greater in placebo group (31 cases) than that in ondansetron group (12 cases). In those patients given ondansetron injection as the rescue medication, satisfactory effects were obtained in 5 cases in ondansetron group and in 18 cases in placebo group. Although side effects including chest itching (ondansetron group), headache and dull headache (placebo group) were observed after the rescue medication with ondansetron injection, these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after 1-2 days. As mentioned above, ondansetron tablet was shown to possess excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by high dose of cisplatin and to have no problem in safety. Hence ondansetron was proven to be clinically very useful anti-emetic.
 ...
PMID:[Anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron tablet in double-blind comparison with placebo]. 141 14

Ondansetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist which is effective and well tolerated as an antiemetic for emesis induced by cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and in the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron is rapidly absorbed after oral administration (tmax 1.9 h) with an absolute bioavailability of around 60%. Its terminal elimination half-life is 3.5 h and it is extensively hepatically metabolized. Plasma clearance is 0.38 litre h-1 kg-1 and volume of distribution is 1.8 litre kg-1. Plasma clearance is reduced by age (31% reduction) and hepatic failure (80% reduction in severe failure). In patients undergoing general anaesthesia there is a slight prolongation of terminal half-life, which is not of clinical significance. Ondansetron is very well tolerated in volunteer studies. Headache, mild abdominal pain, and constipation occur infrequently. There is no evidence for effects of ondansetron on cardiac function (electrocardiogram, cardiac output, blood pressure and heart rate), and haemostatic function in volunteers and patients. Respiratory depression induced during general anaesthesia is not potentiated by ondansetron. No drug interactions have been noted with temazepam, atracurium, alfentanil and alcohol in man. There are also no interactions seen in animal studies using pentobarbitone, morphine, neostigmine, prednisolone and diazepam.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of ondansetron in postoperative nausea and vomiting. 142 20

Nineteen patients with advanced cancer were entered into a phase I clinical trial of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) which was designed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the recombinant human cytokine in vivo. TNF was administered by continuous infusion for 24 hours followed by pharmacokinetics and a 120-hour infusion repeated every 3 weeks. The initial dose was 40 micrograms/m2 and was ultimately escalated to 200 micrograms/m2. A total of forty 5-day cycles were administered to 18 of these patients; and all were evaluable for toxicity. Toxicities in this trial included fever, chills, rigors, hypotension, headaches, seizures, lethargy, weight loss, and malaise. At all dose levels, but more significantly at the highest doses, hematological toxicities were observed and grade 3 neurotoxicity (headache and confusion), and hypotension were noted. Two patients expired during the study, and this was felt to be related to septic episodes. Because of these severe toxicities, 160 micrograms/m2 was defined as the MTD. At 160 micrograms/m2 peak serum levels occurred within 5-20 minutes of initiation and were not detectable 1 hour later. No anti-tumor responses were observed. No measurable plasma levels of TNF were observed with the administration of doses of 80 micrograms/m2. This dose level could be further studied in phase II studies alone and in combination with other agents, utilizing a continuous infusion schedule.
 ...
PMID:A phase I pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor administered by a 5-day continuous infusion. 142 28

Thirty-eight workers from a factory producing nickel-cadmium and other types of batteries came to us for medical evaluation. They included 21 women and 17 men (seniority 2-20 years, age range 31-63 years), and represented a self-selected subset of 700-900 ever-employed and 200+ recently or currently employed workers in the factory. Thirty-four worked on the nickel-cadmium assembly line. Symptoms and signs included: headache in 34; weakness, fatigue and lassitude in 26; dizziness in 16; pruritus and skin eruptions in 37; gingivitis, teeth loss and caries in 34; nasal congestion, nosebleeds and anosmia in 30; cough, phlegm production, wheezing and shortness of breath in 26; "asthma" in 14; bone pain in 18; urinary frequency, beta 2 microglobulinuria and kidney stones in 17; and sterility or multiple abortions (33) in 8 of 21 women. One additional patient had died from an "amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-like syndrome", while CT scans in six workers revealed brain atrophy. One other worker had leukemia, and two had died from cancer (lung and pancreas). Those who had worked for more than 10 years had more symptoms and signs than shorter-term employees, especially neurological illness, bone pain and urinary tract problems, including beta 2 microglobulinuria. Past blood and urinary cadmium levels were in the range of 1.6-8.7 micrograms/dl and 8-306 micrograms/l, respectively. Our findings indicated that: a) health risks for workers were not confined to the nickel-cadmium assembly line or to older workers, b) hazardous exposures still existed and illness appeared in new workers after a clean-up and intervention program, and c) exposures involved increased risks for renal disease and cancers. Finally, there is a need to control exposures and determine health risks in the full cohort of those ever employed, in the workers' children, and in the surrounding environment (air, ground, water) due to the dumping of waste from the plant.
 ...
PMID:Medical findings in nickel-cadmium battery workers. 142 13

A phase I study of NK 622 (toremifene citrate), a novel antiestrogen, was conducted in female patients with cancer. Patients received a single oral dosing or daily once oral dosing for five consecutive days. Any adverse effects were not experienced in the single dosing of 40 or 60 mg of NK 622. In the daily administration of 10, 20, 40, 60, 120, 240 and 480 mg/day, one of three patients who received 20 mg/day experienced grade 1 anorexia, three of four patients received 240 mg/day experienced adverse effects: Grade 1 leukopenia in one patient, Grade 1 general hot flush in one patient, and Grade 1 nausea, hot flush in the face and vertigo, Grade 2 anorexia, fatigue, dull headache and general hot flush in another one patient. These symptoms recovered to normal levels after treatment. Serum hormone levels were examined in postmenopausal patients, and a significant increase of the sex hormone binding globulin level was observed in the patients received 120 and 240 mg/day doses. Serum levels of NK 622 determined as free base (TOR) reached the peak levels in 2 to 4 hours after administration on the 1st and 5th day in daily treatment, while a metabolite N-demethyltoremifene (TOR-1) reached the peak level in 4 to 170 hours. Maximum serum levels and area under the concentration versus time curves of TOR and TOR-1 increased dose-dependently. These values also increased by repetition of the treatment. Half-lives of TOR and TOR-1 in serum ranged in 74.5 to 148.9 hours and 154.1 to 653.1 hours, respectively. From these results, it was concluded that safety and efficacy of NK 622 should be assessed by using 240 mg or less doses in clinical phase II studies where breast cancer patients received long term treatment with NK 622.
 ...
PMID:[Phase I study of NK 622 (toremifene citrate)]. 146 43

In addition to oral contraceptives (OCs), the morning-after pill, the minipill, and depot preparations also belong to hormonal contraceptives. The latter two contraceptives have not become established among young women because of inadequate cycle control. For postcoital contraception in Austria, Neogynon and Stediril-D, consisting of 0.05 mg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 0.25 mg of levonorgestrel, are used within 48 hours of unprotected intercourse. Lower dose OCs have considerably reduced the risks of side effects. Micropills are the optimal OCs with EE under 50 mcg combined with the new generation of gestagens. The beneficial effects include menstrual regularity and the prevention of anemia, ovarian cysts, and fibrocystic mastopathy. Nausea, headache, spotting, and weight gain do occur in individual cases, even among young people. The potential risk of thromboembolism is the most important, although arterial cardiovascular risk is minimal in young age. The probability of postpill amenorrhea is less than 1%. Micropills can be used by young diabetics provided the disease is not beyond 10 years' duration and there is no angiopathy. Acne, seborrhea, and hirsutism are beneficially influenced by a combination of 0.035 mg of EE with 2 mg of cyproterone acetate. The relative risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer are only about half as high among OC users as among nonusers. The risk of breast cancer in young OC users has not been conclusively explained. Regular colposcopy and cytology is recommended for young OC users to preclude the risk of malignancies of the genital tract. Sex education and the use of OCs that are the most suitable and effective for young people can reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and abortion. The comparison of two 5-year periods in the 1970s and 1980s at the University Obstetrical-Gynecological Clinic in Graz showed that the incidence of births among women under 18 years of age decreased from 3.6% (778) to 1.6% (353).
 ...
PMID:[Benefits and risks of hormonal contraception]. 146 64

The safety of intravenous (IV) and oral ondansetron has been evaluated in over 7,000 cancer patients in world-wide clinical trials. In adult patients receiving single-day chemotherapy, the incidence of adverse events was 45% with IV ondansetron (n = 317) and 59% with metoclopramide (n = 279). Headache occurred in 17% of ondansetron patients and 10% of metoclopramide patients, whereas diarrhea symptoms were reported in 15% of the former and 29% of the latter. The incidence and types of adverse events were similar following three 0.15 mg/kg IV ondansetron doses and 8- or 32-mg single IV doses. There was a slight increase in the incidence of headache following a single 32-mg dose (25%) compared with a single 8-mg dose (18%) or three 0.15 mg/kg doses (18%). The safety profile of oral ondansetron was similar to that of the IV formulation. Following an 8-mg oral dose administered three times a day for 3 days, the most frequently reported adverse events were headache (21%), constipation (7%), and abdominal pain (5%). In a group of 209 pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy, the incidence of adverse events following IV and oral ondansetron was 19%. The most commonly reported adverse event was headache (4%). In comparative clinical trials, extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 5% of the metoclopramide patients but none of the ondansetron patients. In open-label trials, two patients who received ondansetron reported symptoms consistent with, but not diagnostic of, extrapyramidal reactions. The incidence of vascular occlusive events and seizure disorders was identical for ondansetron and comparative agents. Serum transaminase values increased significantly in 6% to 8% of ondansetron patients and 2% of metoclopramide patients who received cisplatin. There was no apparent relationship between the dose of ondansetron administered and the incidence of increased transaminase abnormalities. However, there was an apparent relationship between the dose of cisplatin administered and the incidence of transaminase abnormalities. In patients who received non-cisplatin chemotherapy, there was no difference in serum transaminase values between oral ondansetron and placebo. These data demonstrate that ondansetron is better tolerated than metoclopramide and is safe for IV and oral administration to patients receiving chemotherapy. In addition, ondansetron is well tolerated when administered as a single 32-mg infusion over 15 minutes.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety of ondansetron. 148 79

This study reports the effectiveness and side effects of intravenous ondansetron as a single-agent antiemetic therapy for patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy under a compassionate-use program for patients not enrolled in controlled clinical trials. Patients were > or = 7 years old and had uncontrolled nausea and vomiting or intolerable side effects with standard antiemetics administered with previous cancer chemotherapy. All patients received ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours x 3 daily doses beginning 30 minutes prior to emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients could receive ondansetron for up to 5 consecutive days of chemotherapy. One hundred ninety patients received ondansetron during chemotherapy treatments that were similar to previous cycles of chemotherapy during which the patients had received standard antiemetics (identical chemotherapy or differing only by addition/deletion of chemotherapy agents of low emetogenicity). Chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (n = 99; 52%), doxorubicin (without cisplatin, n = 52; 27%), and other drugs (n = 39; 21%). Patient experiences with nausea and vomiting and side effects with ondansetron and with previous standard antiemetics were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1, did not experience; 10, as bad as could be). On the nausea and vomiting scale, 74% of patients improved on ondansetron relative to standard antiemetics. Mean nausea and vomiting scales were 3.9 for ondansetron and 7.7 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). On the side effects scale, 62% of patients improved with ondansetron. Mean side effect scores were 1.8 for ondansetron and 4.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). One hundred nine patients assessed the effect of nausea and vomiting on their quality of life by means of the Functional Living Index-Emesis. On a 100-point scale (100=best quality of life), quality of life scores were 65.5 for ondansetron and 39.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .01). Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were higher for 76% of patients during ondansetron treatment as compared with previous chemotherapy with standard antiemetic regimens. Twenty-eight patients (15%) were withdrawn from the study because of nausea and vomiting. Forty-four patients (23%) experienced other adverse effects (headache, 17 patients; diarrhea, eight patients; all other events occurred in two or fewer patients). Only six patients were withdrawn due to adverse effects. In conclusion, ondansetron therapy resulted in significantly improved control of nausea and vomiting, fewer side effects, and better quality of life than standard antiemetic therapy in the same patients receiving similar chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:Results of a compassionate-use program using intravenous ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. 148 80


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>