Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in preventing cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting was studied in 2 open trials and compared with the efficacy and tolerability of metoclopramide plus lorazepam in a randomised crossover trial. In the first study, tropisetron 10mg was administered intravenously over 15 minutes before the cisplatin infusion and a second 10mg dose was given after the 60-minute infusion of cisplatin (greater than 50 mg/m2) in 54 patients with advanced cancers, for a total of 165 courses. Good responses for nausea and vomiting were recorded in 83.0% and 87.9% of courses, respectively, with complete protection from nausea and vomiting in 44.8% and 66.1% of courses, respectively. In the second study in 25 patients whose characteristics and cisplatin schedule were comparable with those of the first study, very similar results were achieved in 104 courses of chemotherapy, despite a reduction in tropisetron dose to a single 5mg intravenous infusion 15 minutes before cisplatin. The efficacies of intravenous tropisetron 5mg and metoclopramide 2 mg/kg plus lorazepam administered 15 minutes before cisplatin in preventing acute and delayed nausea and vomiting were compared in a randomised crossover study involving 20 patients. Tropisetron was significantly superior (p less than 0.001) in controlling both acute and delayed (day 1) symptoms. In all studies, the tolerability of tropisetron was excellent. The most frequent side effect was mild to moderate headache, occurring in 5 to 7% of patients. In conclusion, our experience suggests that tropisetron is an effective and well tolerated antiemetic drug that improves the quality of life of cancer patients administered highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:Three years' experience with tropisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients. 138 Apr 32

A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and emesis. One hundred and eighty two patients received a loading dose of 8 mg of ondansetron followed by a 24 h infusion of 1 mg h-1 (group 1); 180 and 173 patients received single doses of 32 mg (group II) and 8 mg (group III) respectively, followed by a 24 h placebo infusion. Complete and major control (less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes) of acute emesis was achieved in 74% of patients in group I, 78% in group II and 74% in group III. Seventy seven per cent of the patients in group I, and 75% of patients in groups II and III respectively experienced no or mild nausea during the 24 h observation period. A retrospective stratification of the efficacy data on the basis of patient gender showed the response rate in females to be significant lower (43% vs 67%; less than 0.001). Ondanestron was well tolerated; mild headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (11% of patients) with a similar incidence in the three groups of patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous dose of 8 mg of ondansetron given prior to chemotherapy is as effective as a 32 mg daily dose given as either a single dose of a continuous infusion in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis.
Br J Cancer 1992 Jul
PMID:Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. 138 45

Inhibitory effects on acute nausea and emesis, safety and usefulness of a single oral dose of Ondansetron tablet were evaluated in 3 different dose levels for comparison by telephone registration system, in patients receiving non-platinum anti-cancer drugs. A single dose of ondansetron at 4 mg, 8 mg or 12 mg was given orally at 2 hrs before the initial administration of anti-cancer drugs. The patients were observed for 24 hours after administration of anti-cancer drugs, for occurrence of nausea and emesis. Efficacy rates of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis were 83.3% (10/12 cases) in 4 mg dose group, 78.6% (11/14 cases) in 8 mg dose group and 84.6% (11/13 cases) in 12 mg dose group, without statistically significant difference. Side effects were observed in 3 cases (headache, cold feeling and trembling in limbs, sleepiness) in 12 mg dose group, but these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after several hours or several days. No abnormality in clinical laboratory findings attributable to Ondansetron was observed. From the above, it was considered that Ondansetron was a clinically useful anti-emetic for nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs and that 4 mg once daily was the optimal dose.
 ...
PMID:[Examination of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of single oral dose of ondansetron tablet in nausea and emesis induced by anti-cancer drugs--dose-finding study of ondansetron tablet in patients receiving non-platinum anti-cancer drugs]. 138 76

Anti-emetic effects, safety and usefulness of Ondansetron given intravenously at 4 mg once daily for consecutive 3-5 days were investigated against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anticancer drugs. Efficacy rates in control of nausea and emesis were 59% (20/34 cases) and 68% (23/34 cases), respectively. The efficacy rate for inhibition of nausea and emesis, calculated based on the control of nausea and emesis, was 68% (23/34 cases). Adverse events (headache and constipation) were observed in 1 case and abnormal change in clinical laboratory findings (increase in eosinophil count) in another case. Out of 42 cases in which safety was evaluated, 41 (98%) cases were assessed as "no problem in safety." However, one case with side effect was assessed as a "Minor problem in safety." From the above, it was confirmed that Ondansetron injection exerted excellent inhibitory effects against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs, and this drug was a highly safe and useful anti-emetic.
 ...
PMID:[Examination of anti-emetic effect and safety of multiple intravenous doses of ondansetron in patients receiving nonplatinum anti-cancer drugs]. 138 78

Phase I studies of intravenous (IV) ondansetron in cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy were designed to assess the degree of antiemetic protection and pattern of adverse events produced by ondansetron at various doses. In a study of 44 patients receiving various forms of chemotherapy (including cisplatin), ondansetron was administered in three IV doses 2 hours apart beginning 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy. Antiemetic efficacy was seen at all dose levels (0.04 mg/kg to 0.35 mg/kg), with 54% of patients experiencing no vomiting and 76% experiencing two or fewer vomiting episodes within the first 24 hours. Overall, ondansetron was well tolerated, and no dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The most common adverse events were mild sedation, mild headache, and transient elevations of transaminases. In a second phase I study, 45 patients receiving cisplatin (median dose 100 mg/m2) were given ondansetron in three IV doses (range, 0.01 mg/kg to 0.48 mg/kg) 4 hours apart. There was no statistically significant difference in antiemetic efficacy among dose levels from 0.06 mg/kg to 0.48 mg/kg; however, there was a trend toward a decrease in the number of patients with failure of antiemetic protection at the higher exposures. Overall, 44% of patients had no emetic episodes, and 81% of patients had two or fewer emetic episodes within the first 24 hours. The number and intensity of adverse events, of which headache was the most common, appeared to increase at the 0.48 mg/kg dose level. A randomized double-blind study that compared three dose levels of ondansetron indicated that three doses of 0.15 mg/kg was superior in efficacy to three doses of 0.015 mg/kg, and not significantly different from three doses of 0.30 mg/kg. Dystonic reactions or akathisia were not noted in any study.
 ...
PMID:Phase I and other dose-ranging studies of ondansetron. 138 46

The safety of ondansetron has been carefully evaluated through laboratory studies and clinical trials. Preclinical studies demonstrated that there is no end-organ toxicity in rats and dogs administered ondansetron doses 30 to 100 times those used in humans. At near-lethal doses of ondansetron, animals developed subdued activity, ataxia, and convulsions. Modest transient increases in serum transaminase values were observed. Concurrent administration of ondansetron with chemotherapy had no effect on tumor response in animals. The clinical safety of ondansetron has been evaluated in more than 2,500 cancer patients who received intravenous doses as large as 1.5 mg/kg. In adult patients receiving single-day chemotherapy, the incidence of adverse events was 36% with ondansetron (n = 647) and 50% with metoclopramide (n = 498). Diarrhea occurred in 9% of ondansetron patients and 19% of metoclopramide patients. Headache occurred in 14% of ondansetron patients and 8% of metoclopramide patients. Extra-pyramidal symptoms were reported in none of the ondansetron patients and 5% of the metoclopramide patients. The incidence of vascular occlusive events and seizure disorders was nearly identical with ondansetron and metoclopramide and similar to the cancer population in general. In a group of 209 pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy, the incidence of adverse events was 19% with ondansetron. Serum transaminase values increased significantly in 6% to 8% of ondansetron patients and 2% of metoclopramide patients. There was no apparent relationship between the cumulative dose of ondansetron administered and the incidence of increased transaminase values. However, there was an apparent relationship between the cumulative dose of cisplatin administered and the incidence of transaminase abnormalities. These data demonstrate that ondansetron is better tolerated than metoclopramide and is safe for intravenous administration to pediatric and adult patients receiving chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Toxicity and side effects of ondansetron. 138 51

We examined the anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron hydrochloride, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, given orally once daily at the dosage of 4 mg, for 3 to 5 consecutive days to patients with nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and carboplatin. Out of 84 cases where anti-emetic effects were evaluated, numbers of cases assessed as excellent and good were 36 (83.3%) and 34 (40.5%), respectively, the efficacy rate being 83.3% (70/84). Side effects, such as moderate constipation (3 cases) and mild headache (3 cases), were observed in 8/85 cases (9.4%). Abnormalities in clinical laboratory findings including elevation of hepatic function and uricacid values and increase in eosinocyte counts, were observed in 3/85 cases (3.5%). As to overall safety, 78/85 cases (91.8%) were evaluated as having no problem in safety, and 7/85 cases (8.2%), as having minor problem in safety. As to clinical usefulness based on anti-emetic effect and overall safety, out of 79 cases the drug was assessed as very useful in 29 cases (36.7%) and useful in 35 cases (44.3%), the rate of "useful" or above being 81.0% (64/79). Furthermore, when ondansetron was administered in 3 courses of chemotherapy, though the number of patients was small, it was shown that anti-emetic effect of ondansetron did not decline and no problem in safety was observed. From the above, ondansetron which exerted adequate anti-emetic effect in 4 mg once daily doses was considered as a useful and safe anti-emetic in treatment of nausea and emesis associated with cancer chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:[Examination of inhibitory effect, safety and usefulness of SN-307 (ondansetron) administered orally once daily for 3-5 consecutive days on nausea and emesis associated with non-platinum anti-cancer drugs]. 138 75

Ondansetron was given as anti-emetic prophylaxis to 429 children receiving a variety of emetogenic cancer treatments for up to 8 days, in three, open, multicentre, European studies. Children aged between 6 months and 17 years with a variety of tumours and receiving chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus total body irradiation (TBI) were studied. Ondansetron was given intravenously, 5 mg/m2 or 8 mg, according to the surface area of the child, immediately before chemotherapy. Intravenous or oral treatment (2, 4 or 8 mg, according to surface area) was continued 3 times a day during chemotherapy or TBI, and for a further 2 days (non-cisplatin chemotherapy or TBI) or 5 days (cisplatin chemotherapy). The number of vomits and retches (each counting as an emetic episode) were recorded daily, as was an assessment of nausea, which was graded as none (not feeling sick at all), mild (feeling sick) or severe (feeling very sick). Responses were graded according to the number of emetic episodes during the worst 24-hour period. In addition, response was expressed in terms of emesis-free days as a proportion of all ondansetron treatment days. During chemotherapy, 66% of children experienced less than 3 emetic episodes on their 'worst day' and 88% had none or mild nausea. Sixty-eight percent of all ondansetron treatment days (2,131) were free of emesis. Of the patients who were poorly controlled with 'customary' anti-emetics, at least 81% experienced better control with ondansetron. When analysed according to the most emetogenic agent given 36, 59 and 75% of children reported less than 3 emetic episodes on their 'worst day' respectively, during cisplatin, ifosfamide and other less emetogenic chemotherapy. During conditioning for bone marrow transplantation with cyclophosphamide and TBI, 80 and 57% of patients, respectively, experienced less than 3 emetic episodes. The overall incidence of adverse events was low and headache (reported in 4% of patients) was the only event reported by more than 1% of patients. These studies show that ondansetron is a safe, well tolerated and an effective anti-emetic in the treatment of children receiving a wide variety of chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron as prophylaxis for chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced emesis in children. 138 28

Pain causes considerable disability and discomfort in HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) infected individuals. A large number of patients infected with HIV suffer from one or more pain-related syndromes. Pain is under-reported and suboptimally managed in these patients. An outline of the different pain syndromes, including headache, oral cavity pain, chest pain, abdominal pain, anorectal pain, musculoskeletal pain and peripheral neuropathic pain, and their aetiologies are discussed. Current pain management modalities, including non-narcotic and narcotic analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, physical therapy and psychological techniques, are outlined. Treatment should be based on the same principles applied to the management of cancer-related pain. A multi-disciplinary, comprehensive approach to pain management will assist these individuals to achieve improved levels of comfort, function and quality of life in this ultimately terminal illness.
 ...
PMID:Pain syndromes in HIV infection. 139 63

A 50-year-old man, presenting with headache, was suspected of having a malignant nasopharyngeal tumor on the basis of his CT results. A CT scan revealed diffuse calcification in a large nasopharyngeal polyp. Xeroradiography of the specimen demonstrated the calcifications to extend centrally along the stroma. The histology and the radiologic features of this choanal polyp, resulting from diffuse central calcification of the stroma, are a unique feature that might mimic malignancy.
 ...
PMID:Stromal calcification in choanal polyp. 140 72


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>