Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

40 patients were evaluated for skin temperature changes from baseline measurements and after 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan administration. During examination, skin temperature were recorded on a color picture at 10', 20', 30', 60', 90' and 120 minutes after sumatriptan administration. At the some time, heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP), diastolic (BDP) blood pressure and ECG-monitoring were automatically recorded. The patients were subgrouped as follow: 20 non migrainous control subjects (6 males and 14 females) aged 19 to 55 years (mean age 39.5 +/- 15.4); 20 headache free migrainous patients (6 males and 14 females) aged 25 to 46 years (mean age 37.8 +/- 8.4). Our data demonstrate a significant reduction in skin temperature (face) in all patients studied. 10 minutes after sumatriptan administration a significant increase (p > 0.001) both in SBP and BDP was observed. This findings suggest that sumatriptan show a vasoconstrictor effect as demonstrate by reduction in face temperature both in nonmigrainous and in migrainous patients. The unchange in HR and ECG and the transient increase in blood pressure, not associated with clinical symptoms, suggest that this drug may be used in migrainous patients.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of sumatriptan on facial temperature variations, blood pressure and electrocardiogram in healthy subjects and patients with migraine without aura]. 758 99

Pranidipine (OPC-13340), a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was given to 9 elderly hypertensive inpatients aged 64-79 years. Once-daily administration of pranidipine (1-2 mg) for 1-2 weeks decreased the 24-h average BP significantly from 167/92 mmHg to 150/83 mmHg without any change in pulse rate (PR) or the variabilities of BP and PR. The reduction of BP was observed exclusively during daytime (171/95 mmHg to 153/86 mmHg, p < 0.01 for SBP, p < 0.05 for DBP), while BP reduction during nighttime was significant only for DBP (157/84 mmHg to 146/79 mmHg, p > 0.05 for SBP, p < 0.05 for DBP). The analysis of the circadian rhythm by the cosinor method revealed that the acrophases of BP and PR were not changed significantly by the treatment with pranidipine. No adverse effects such as flushing and headache developed during the treatment. These results suggest that once-daily treatment with pranidipine is safe and exerts a sufficient antihypertensive effect during daytime with mild reduction of nighttime BP in elderly hypertensives. Furthermore, it does not alter the circadian patterns or variabilities of BP and PR. Thus, pranidipine may be useful as a monotherapy for elderly hypertensives.
 ...
PMID:Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in elderly hypertensives treated with the new calcium antagonist, pranidipine (OPC-13340). 765 66

This controlled, double-blind, completely randomized study assessed the efficacy and safety of nicardipine and nifedipine, both in slow-release formulations, in patients with unstable angina. Thirty patients (28 M, 2F) were included in the final analysis, mean age 56.5 +/- 9.1 years (SD), mean weight 73.5 +/- 9.2 kg, mean height 171.5 +/- 6.5 cm, all with unstable angina. Nicardipine was given at a daily dosage of 80-120 mg, and nifedipine 40-60 mg, for up to one month. At the end of treatment with nicardipine supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) dropped respectively 7.7% and 5.5% at 8 am and 8.6% and 7.1% at 8 pm. Nifedipine reduced SBP and DBP by respectively 6.5% and 13.1% at 8 am and 5.3% and 9.4% at 8 pm. There was no clinical or statistical difference between the treatments. Heart rate did not change appreciably during either treatment. On completion of nicardipine treatment, 87.5% of patients had suffered no angina attacks, compared with 66.7% for nifedipine. The remaining 12.5% of patients treated with nicardipine presented only one mild angina attack per day, while the other 33.3% of the nifedipine patients had one moderate angina attack per day. No untoward effects were reported with nicardipine; one patient receiving nifedipine presented cardiopalmus and another complained of headache. These results indicate that nicardipine is at least as safe and effective as nifedipine in the treatment of unstable angina.
 ...
PMID:[The efficacy and safety of slow-release nicardipine vs nifedipine in angina]. 775 27

This is the first report of long-term use (one year) of isradipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, in the treatment of elderly patients with essential hypertension. Patients completing a three month, double-blind, multicentre study comparing isradipine to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were eligible to enroll in this open-label, continuation study. At initial baseline, patients were at least 60 years of age and had DBP from 95 mmHg to 120 mmHg. Patients were titrated when necessary every two weeks with isradipine, 5 mg to 15 mg once daily or 2.5 mg to 10 mg twice daily, to maintain sitting DBP < or = 90 mmHg. HCTZ, 12.5 mg to 50 mg once daily, could be added for better BP control. A total of 136 patients completed the one year, open-label phase. One hundred and fourteen patients (84%) received isradipine as monotherapy (mean dose, 9.7 mg/day); 22 received concomitant HCTZ therapy at one year. Reduction in DBP was significant and similar among all age groups and races (mean change of -19 mmHg). Reduction in SBP was similar among all age groups. Ninety-four per cent of those receiving isradipine monotherapy achieved BP control during the last four months of treatment. Twenty-six patients (16%) withdrew from the study: 11 (7%) had adverse reactions (one with headache, two with pedal oedema, eight with other problems); 11 (7%) had nondrug-related problems; and in four (2%), the drugs were ineffective. Based on these observations, isradipine is a well-tolerated, safe and effective agent for long-term BP control in elderly patients with essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:One year experience of elderly hypertensive patients with isradipine therapy. 788 90

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of moexipril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension. The patient population consisted of 281 hypertensive men and women, 30-84 years old, with seated diastolic BP between 95 and 114 mmHg. The study was a two year multicenter (22 centers), open-label protocol of moexipril monotherapy or combination therapy (with hydrochlorothiazide). Blood pressure, pulse rate, weight, adverse side-effects and laboratory studies were assessed following moexipril dosing at 7.5, 15 or 30 mg once daily or 15-30 mg daily in combination with 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide if the DBP was > or = 90 mmHg. The primary measure of efficacy was change from baseline in seated DBP. Secondary outcome measures included changes in seated SBP, heart rate, laboratory parameters and subjective complaints. Following one year of therapy in 183 patients, the BP fell 13/14 mmHg among patients receiving moexipril monotherapy and 18/15 mmHg those receiving combined therapy compared with baseline (P < 0.001 for both). After two years of treatment, reductions were similar in 161 patients. Forty-four (16%) patients were prematurely withdrawn from the study because of inadequate therapeutic response and 34 (12%) secondary to adverse experiences. There were no changes in pulse rate or postural BP reductions. Four adverse side-effects occurred at a frequency exceeding 2% that were possibly or probably attributable to moexipril: fatigue (3%), headache (2%), dizziness (3%) and increased cough (5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Long-term efficacy and safety of moexipril in the treatment of hypertension. 788 91

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine vs enalapril as monotherapy was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe hypertension (supine DBP 105-125 mm Hg, SBP 140-220 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks placebo treatment 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (15 patients) 5-10 mg, or enalapril (16 patients) 5-20 mg for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 177 to 152 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 169 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -22.1, 0.3, P = 0.06) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Clinic supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 110 to 93 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 109-102 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -17.7, -2.7, P < 0.01) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure was greater for the amlodipine treated group, the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (5), peripheral oedema (3), upper respiratory infection (3) and anxiety (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril treated patients were headache (6), dizziness (3) and upper respiratory infection (2).
 ...
PMID:A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension. 851 61

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).
 ...
PMID:A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension. 851 62

The antihypertensive efficacy of calcium antagonists could depend on the concentration of circulating renin. To investigate this hypothesis, 102 hypertensive men or women were included in this study. After an initial 2 week placebo period, the patients were administered slow-release nicardipine, 50 mg twice a day for twelve weeks. The blood pressures were measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer at inclusion (S2) and after 12 weeks of treatment (S14), in addition to home automeasure during the week before inclusion and the two weeks preceding the final visit. The plasma renin activity (RA) was measured at S2 and S14. Its value at inclusion was used to differentiate patients with low renin (< or = 11 ng/l) from those with normal (> 11 < or = 17 ng/l) or high renin activity (> 17 ng/l). The blood pressure measured by sphygmomanometer or automeasure was significantly lower at the end of the active treatment period (SBP: -8 mmHg; DBP: -9.5 mmHg; and SBP: -5.8 mmHg; DBP: -5.7 mmHg respectively); the reduction in blood pressure was significantly higher in the group with low RA than in the group with high RA. The reductions in SBP measured in the morning and evening and in DBP measured in the morning were significantly greater in the group with low RA than in the group with high RA. The reduction of SBP measured in the morning at midday, and in the evening was correlated to the basal value of RA. Mild side effects were observed in 20 patients leading to the interruption of treatment in 11 cases because of headache. The best antihypertensive response is observed in patients with low plasma RA. This could explain the good response to calcium antagonists usually observed in elderly hypertensives.
 ...
PMID:[Relation between plasma renin level and antihypertensive response to nicardipine]. 874 14

The efficacy and safety of trandolapril alone and in combination with a calcium channel blocker were evaluated in 13,147 hypertensive patients over 60 years old. Two patient groups were constituted. After a 2-week wash-out period, the patients in group I received monotherapy with trandolapril 2 mg/day for 4 weeks. Trandolapril was continued for another 4 weeks in responding patient, otherwise the dosage of trandolapril was doubled or another antihypertensive was added. Group 2, composed of patients previously treated with a calcium channel blocker with insufficient efficacy, was treated according to the same treatment regimen, but the calcium channel blocker was maintained throughout the study. 13,147 patients (group 1: 11,329 patients, group 2: 1,818 patients) with a mean age of 68 +/- 7 years were followed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the blood pressure measured by mercury sphygmomanometer decreased from 176 + 11/99 +/- 8 mmHg to 164 +/- 12/87 +/- 7 mmHg (p < 0.0001). This blood pressure fall was similar in group 1 (-22 +/- 12/-12 +/- 8 mmHg) and in group 2 (-21 +/- 11/-12 +/- 8 mmHg). In the pure systolic HT subgroup treated by trandolapril monotherapy, the antihypertensive effect predominantly affected the SBP (-23 +/- 12/- 4 +/- 6 mmHg). The antihypertensive effect was correlated with the initial blood pressure. In group 1, in the case of insufficient response to trandolapril monotherapy, the addition of a calcium channel blocker was the strategy which achieved the most marked antihypertensive effect (ANOVA, p < 0.0001). This bitherapy was more effective than the trandolapril+diuretic combination (-18 +/- 11/- 11 +/- 8 mmHg and -15 +/- 10/- 9 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 1,270 adverse events were reported by 996 patients (7.6%), leading to discontinuation of treatment in 372 patients (2.8%). The most frequent adverse effects were cough (2.8%), headache (0.8%), vertigo (0.8%) and nausea (0.5%). Only one minor equivalent of angioneurotic oedema was reported. In conclusion, trandolapril is effective and well tolerated in elderly hypertensive patients. In the case of pure systolic HTA, its action is essentially exerted on SBP. The combination of trandolapril+calcium channel blocker appears to be the most effective strategy in the case of incomplete blood pressure control by trandolapril alone.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of trandolapril alone or in combination with a calcium channel blocker in hypertensive patients over 60 years of age]. 874 62

The efficacy and tolerability of felodipine, in a low dose of 5-10 mg daily was assessed in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, aged 53 +/- 11 years. The results of office vs 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) were compared. Inclusion criteria included an office systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) > 140/90 mm Hg and a 24 h ABPM SBP/DBP > 135/85 mm Hg. Felodipine was initiated at a dose of 5 mg daily. At day 28 of the study, if office DBP > 90 mm Hg, the dose was doubled to 10 mg daily. At the end of the study (day 84), 24 h ABPM was done again. Side effects were noted throughout the study. Four patients dropped out during the study (two due to headache, one due to pedal edema and one rejected further participation). Of the remaining 28 patients, at day 28, 12 required an increased dose of 10 mg/day. At the end of the study, office BP was below 140 90 mm Hg in 71% of the patients. In the whole group BP decreased from 158 +/- 15/101 +/- 8.4 to 138 +/- 9/85 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < 0.001. ABPM showed that BP was normalized in 82% of the patients. It decreased from 146.8 +/- 9.56/94.8 +/- 7.4 to 130.2 +/- 10.6/83 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, P < 0.001. BP was similarly reduced in working and sleeping hours, with preservation of the circadian rhythm. Heart rate was unaffected by the drug. Five patients showed persistently elevated SBP on office measurements while on ABPM, the values were within normal limits. This finding confirms the existence of a white coat effect in patients with proven hypertension and the superiority of ABPM over office BP measurements in clinical investigations. In summary, ABPM showed that the antihypertensive effect of felodipine was sustained throughout normal 24 h, including the critical (as regards cardiovascular morbidity) awakening hours.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of low felodipine dose monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. 887 49


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>