Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The antihypertensive effects of the regular immediate release formulation of verapamil (verapamil IR) and the newer sustained release formulation of verapamil (verapamil SR) were compared in Hispanic patients with untreated essential hypertension. Verapamil IR was given in 3 divided doses (80 or 160mg 3 times daily) and verapamil SR was given either as a single daily dose of 240mg or as 240mg every 12 hours. With both formulations there was a significant reduction in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); a greater lowering of BP was observed with verapamil 480 mg/day than with 240 mg/day. With verapamil SR 480 mg/day, 91% of patients had reductions in SBP and DBP greater than 20 and 15mm Hg, respectively. In addition, 83% of patients reached normotension. With the lower dose (240mg once daily), 83% of patients had decreases in DBP greater than 10mm Hg and 73% of patients achieved normotension. Comparable effects were achieved with verapamil IR. With verapamil IR there was a more rapid fall in BP which peaked 3 to 4 hours postdose, whereas with verapamil SR a more gradual and sustained BP reduction was observed. Only small changes in heart rate (HR) were observed with verapamil IR and verapamil SR. For verapamil SR, the mean increase in HR was 5 beats/min (to 80 beats/min) and the mean decrease in HR was 13 beats/min (to 62 beats/min). Both verapamil SR and verapamil IR prolonged the PR interval of the ECG. An equal degree of PR prolongation was observed with 240 and 480 mg/day. The incidence of side effects (headache, palpitations, dizziness and flushing) was dose dependent, decreased with continuous treatment and was much higher with verapamil IR than with verapamil SR. Steady-state plasma verapamil concentrations were monitored. Compared with verapamil IR, verapamil SR produced a more gradual rise and a more sustained elevation of plasma verapamil and norverapamil concentrations. Comparable trough verapamil concentrations (Cmin) were observed with verapamil IR (98 micrograms/L) and SR (81 micrograms/L); morning Cmin verapamil concentrations were higher than daytime Cmin values. The normalised area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 10 to 20% greater for verapamil IR than SR. The 2-fold increase in oral dose produced a 2.2- and 2.4-fold increase in AUC for verapamil IR and SR, respectively, associated with a 20% reduction in metabolism to norverapamil. Fasting increased the rate and extent of absorption of verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of verapamil SR vs verapamil IR in hypertensive patients. 128 70

Forty-one patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-114 mmHg) were randomised in a double-blind fashion to treatment with either amlodipine 5-10 mg once daily (n = 21) or captopril 25-50 mg twice daily (n = 20) over a period of 8 weeks. Office BP, heart rate and side effects were assessed during the run-in period on placebo, and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks' treatment. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at the same time at each visit, 12 hours after the last captopril dose and 24 hours after the last amlodipine dose. At the end of the 8 week study, the reduction in sitting DBP was significantly greater (P = 0.002) with amlodipine. Ambulatory BP recordings were performed over a 24-hour period, at baseline and at the end of the study. Both treatment regimes significantly reduced clinic BP without affecting heart rate. However, amlodipine reduced ambulatory systolic (SBP) and DBP almost every hour over the whole circadian cycle, whereas the antihypertensive effect of captopril was attenuated during the final 3 hours of each dosing interval. The incidence of headache and peripheral oedema was identical between the two regimens. Only one patient taking amlodipine withdrew due to ankle swelling. This study demonstrates that the once-daily administration of amlodipine has a more sustained antihypertensive effect than does captopril taken twice daily.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the effects of amlodipine and captopril on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure. 129 5

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, diltiazem was compared with metoprolol as add-on therapy to diuretic treatment in 115 patients with hypertension. Following a placebo and diuretic period of four weeks, patients were randomized to either slow release diltiazem 90 mg twice daily or metoprolol 100 mg once daily using a double dummy technique. If after four weeks a target supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than or equal to 90 mmHg pressure was not reached, the doses of diltiazem and metoprolol were doubled. Supine inclusion systolic/diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP) at randomization were 158 +/- 13 (mean +/- SD)/102 +/- 5 mmHg in the diltiazem group and 158 +/- 17/101 +/- 6 mmHg in the metoprolol group. Active therapy significantly lowered SBP and DBP in both groups by 7-10%. Heart rate was significantly lowered in both groups, although the effect of metoprolol was more pronounced. Response rates (supine DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or decreased by greater than or equal to 10%) were 43% on diltiazem 90 mg twice daily and 52% on metoprolol 100 mg once daily, increasing to 82% and 62%, respectively, after dose escalations. No serious side effects were seen, but three patients, two on diltiazem and one on metoprolol, were withdrawn from the study due to severe headache, nausea and bradycardia respectively. of mild to moderate adverse reactions, tiredness was most frequent, occurring in 14.5% and 15.8% on active diltiazem and metoprolol therapy, respectively. We conclude that both diltiazem and metoprolol lower BP when added to diuretics in hypertensive patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Diltiazem compared with metoprolol as add-on-therapies to diuretics in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group. 207 68

Nicardipine, a new calcium antagonist, was tested in a 14-week double-blind trial including 15 outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. They were randomly assigned to nicardipine (20-30 mg three times daily) or placebo as first-step treatment. When necessary but always after a minimum of 4 weeks, pindolol (15 mg/day) was combined with nicardipine or placebo. At the end of step 1 (85 +/- 6 days with nicardipine vs. 58 +/- 6 days with placebo, p less than 0.01), nicardipine induced larger drops in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) than the placebo (21 +/- 2.5 vs 1.4 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.001, and 13 +/- 2 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, p less than 0.001, respectively). In the nicardipine group (n = 57), 53% of patients had controlled blood pressure (SBP less than 160 mm Hg and DBP less than 95 mm Hg) versus 17% in the placebo group (n = 47), p less than 0.001. There was no significant correlation between the decrease in blood pressure and the age of patients. The most common side effects in the nicardipine group were flushes (12%), headache (8%), ankle edema (5%), and asthenia (4%). When blood pressure was not brought under control and pindolol was prescribed as the second-step treatment, the nicardipine group (n = 52) displayed larger drops in SBP and DBP than the placebo group (n = 40) (27 +/- 5 vs. 15 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01, and 18 +/- 1 vs. 9 +/- 2 mm Hg, p less than 0.001, respectively). These results show that a calcium antagonist is useful for first-step treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:First-step treatment of mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension by a new calcium antagonist: nicardipine. 241 2

A multicentre open study to which 229 investigators participated was carried out to demonstrate the safety of cicletanine, a new therapeutic agent, in routine clinical use. Cicletanine was administered alone for three months and normalized blood pressure (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 63 p. 100 of the 1,238 hypertensive patients who entered the study. There was a significant fall of systolic arterial pressure from 178.4 +/- 14.8 to 151.8 +/- 14.2 mmHg and a similar fall of diastolic arterial pressure from 104.0 +/- 6.7 to 86.3 +/- 6.2 mmHg. The reduction of BP values was accompanied by a significant decrease of differential BP (SBP-DBP) from 72.5 to 65.8 mmHg. The initial dosage (50 mg/day) was doubled in only one-third of the patients. The mean daily dose was 66 mg. This antihypertensive effect was paralleled by a significant and major improvement of signs (dyspnoea, oedema of the lower limbs) and symptoms (mainly dizziness, headache, visual and auditory disorders, asthenia) which existed at inclusion. A modest, but significant, reduction of heart rate from 76.7 to 73.9 beats/mn was also noted. Cicletanine produced no toxic or severe adverse events. Clinical side-effects consisted of pruritus, fatigue, headache, vertigo, lower limb oedema and gastrointestinal disorders. These effects were mild and non-specific (doubtful drug imputability); each of them occurred with an incidence ranging from 4.0 to 1.0 p. 100. They were responsible for the withdrawal of about 30 patients (2.4 p. 100). No significant alteration of biochemical or haematological values was recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with monotherapy in a large population]. 251 75

In order to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new nicardipine formulation, 26 mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients were given slow-release nicardipine, 40 mg, twice daily for 6 weeks. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were measured after a 1 week single-blind placebo run-in period and after 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks of active treatment, just before the morning administration. After 1 week, nicardipine induced a significant blood pressure reduction (p less than 0.01), with a decrease in mean SBP/DBP values of -15/-11 mmHg (from baseline values of 165/104 to 150/93 mmHg) in supine and of -16/-12 mmHg (from 158/110 to 142/98 mmHg) in standing position. After 6 weeks the decrease was of -15/-12 mmHg in supine and of -15/-14 mmHg in standing position. The responder rate (DBP decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 62% (16/26). Normalization rate (DBP less than 95 mmHg with a concomitant decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 54% (14/26). Eleven patients reported adverse events (headache, peripheral oedema, palpitations, nausea, constipation, flush, dizziness and asthenia). Due to an improved pharmacokinetic profile, the slow-release formulation prolongs to 12 hours the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine, thus facilitating patient's compliance.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effect and tolerability of slow-release nicardipine]. 266 Sep 93

Ten migraine patients underwent a tilt test both during migraine attack and headache-free interval, and the following parameters were assessed: plasma levels of norepinephrine (NE), and serum dopamine beta hydroxylase (D beta H), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate (SBP, DBP, HR). SBP during the tilt test showed a fall greater than 30 mmHg in 2 cases in the headache-free interval and in 4 cases during migraine attack. In migraine patients in headache-free interval, tilt test increased NE and D beta H as it did in the control group, while in migraine attack tilt test increased NE and D beta H less than in the control group. This impairment of the sympathetic nervous system during the migraine attack is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Cardiovascular and biochemical assessment in migraine patients submitted to tilt test. 360 61

116 patients from 4 clinics participated in a double blind study to assess the efficacy of (BAY l 5240), a nifedipine-acebutolol fixed combination (10 mg + 100 mg), as compared to nifedipine 20 mg in essential hypertension. During the 10 week study, the mean recumbent blood pressure decreased 1 to 3 h after treatment from 175.5/105.2 to 148.3/88.0 mmHg in the BAY l 5240 group and from 174.3/102.9 to 150.3/86.5 mmHg in the nifedipine group. The results also showed a comparable decrease in the mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures before treatment (24 h after last tablet) and after physical exertion before and after either drug given for 4 weeks. Doubling of the dose for 4 additional weeks produced a moderate and similar additional decrease in blood pressure. The results show the possibility of treating essential hypertension with a low dose of a beta-adrenergic blocking agent in combination with 10 mg nifedipine. Both regimens were well tolerated. One patient in the BAY l 5240 group and 2 in the nifedipine group, all treated by the same investigator, were withdrawn from the study because of headache during the nifedipine pre-period.
 ...
PMID:Effects of BAY l 5240, a fixed combination of low dose nifedipine and acebutolol on hypertension: comparison with standard dose nifedipine. 388 99

A controlled multicentre trial was organised to compare the effects of 20 mg Nifedipine tablets (N) and 2,5 mg Indapamide tablets (I) during a 4 months' treatment period after a placebo period, in 59 patients with moderate essential hypertension (n = 59). The results of blood pressure measurements of 18 patients treated by nifedipine (1 tablet twice daily) and 22 patients treated by indapamide (1 tablet every morning) were compared. The systolic blood pressure, after 10 minutes recumbency, fell from 165 +/- 10 mmHg to 148 +/- 13 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and the diastolic pressure from 104 +/- 6 mmHg to 86 +/- 7 mmHg (p less than 0.01) in the patients treated with nifedipine. In the indapamide group, the SBP fell from 164 +/- 13 mmHg to 152 +/- 15 mmHg (p less than 0.01) and the DBP from 100 +/- 4 mmHg to 87 +/- 6 mmHg (p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes of heart rate with either drug; plasma creatinine, potassium and uric acid concentrations were also unchanged. There was a higher incidence of headaches and tiredness in the nifedipine group, whilst patients treated with indapamide complained more often of muscular cramps. Flushing was observed in nearly a quarter of the patients in both groups. These results confirm that both nifedipine and indapamide induce significant and persistant falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Although the fall was greater with nifedipine than with indapamide, the difference was not statistically significant. The tolerance was satisfactory in both groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Comparative effects of nifedipine and indapamide in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. 393 9

The cardiac hemodynamic effects of bimakalim, a new potassium channel opener, were evaluated in 12 normal volunteers by echocardiography (ECHO)/Doppler in a placebo-controlled, randomized double-blind, cross-over, dose-ranging study. A single oral dose (0.25-1 mg) was given at weekly intervals. Hemodynamic measurements were made at 0, 90, 120, and 240 min after drug intake and ECHO/Doppler was performed at 0 and 90 min. Reproducibility of the ECHO/Doppler study was assessed by comparing predose baseline values of the four different phases of treatment (placebo and 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg) by analysis of variance (ANOVA), which showed no significant differences for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Doppler-derived stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and peak mitral early to late velocity ratio (PEV/PAV). ANOVA showed significant increases in LVEF (p = 0.0003) and SV (p = 0.03), however, and decreases in TPR (p = 0.002) and PEV/PAV (p = 0.005) after bimakalim treatment. Heart rate (HR) showed a dose-dependent increase, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) did not change with bimakalim. Despite vasodilatory headaches, none of the volunteers discontinued the study. Bimakalim appears to be a potent vasodilating drug that may have an important role in management of patients with compromised LV function.
 ...
PMID:Potent hemodynamic effects of bimakalim, a new potassium channel opener, in humans. 750 24


1 2 3 4 Next >>