Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Oral therapy has become first line treatment for patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED). Studies have shown that sildenafil may not be effective in all patients, and has been associated with a variety of adverse effects and an adverse interaction with nitrates and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes. The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of three different oral combinations with the highest dose of sildenafil in men with moderate to severe ED. Randomized, double blind, unblinded active-controlled, Phase II study was carried out at three sites in Mexico. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients received all four of the following treatments using a 4-way cross-over design: 40 mg phentolamine (PM) +6 mg apomorphine (Apo); 40 mg PM +150 mg papaverine (Pap); 40 mg PM +6 mg Apo +150 mg Pap (Tricombo); 100 mg sildenafil (SC). With the exception of sildenafil tablets, all study medication was blinded. Moderate to severe ED was defined as a less than 50% vaginal penetration success rate during the placebo run-in period. A total of 44 patients were enrolled, of whom 36 completed all four treatment periods. All treatments produced a significant effect in primary efficacy variable (Sexual Encounter Profile) compared to baseline, however, no statistically significant differences were found between treatments. A significant period effect was observed. Also, the four treatments were found not to differ significantly in five out of six secondary efficacy variables. The lowest incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in the 40 mg PM +6 mg Apo group (9.8%), followed by 100 mg SC (15%), and the other two combinations (16.7 and 17.5%, respectively). Nasocongestion and headache were the most frequently reported AE. An oral combination of vasoactive agents may provide an alternative approach to sildenafil. Based on these results a combination of phentolamine and apomorphine warrants further clinical investigation.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy for erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double blind, unblinded active-controlled, cross-over study of the pharmacodynamics and safety of combined oral formulations of apomorphine hydrochloride, phentolamine mesylate and papaverine hydrochloride in men with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction. 1189 79

Evodia rutaecarpa is a traditional Chinese medicine used for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders and headache. To assess the possible drug interactions, effects of methanol and aqueous extracts of E. rutaecarpa on drug-metabolizing enzymes, cytochrome P450 (CYP), UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) were studied in C57BL/6J mice. Treatment of mice with methanol extract by gastrogavage caused a dose-dependent increase of liver microsomal 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylation (EROD) activity. In liver, methanol extract at 2 g/kg caused 47%, 7-, 8-, 4-fold, 81% and 26% increases of benzo(a)pyrene hydroxylation (AHH), EROD, 7-methoxyresorufin O-demethylation (MROD), 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylation (ECOD), benzphetamine N-demethylation, and N-nitrosodimethylamine N-demethylation activities, respectively. Aqueous extract at 2 g/kg caused 68%, 2-fold, and 83% increases of EROD, MROD, and ECOD activities, respectively. For conjugation activities, methanol extract elevated UGT and GST activities. Aqueous extract elevated UGT activity without affecting GST activity. Immunoblot analyses showed that methanol extract increased the levels of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B-, and GSTYb-immunoreactive proteins. Aqueous extract increased CYP1A2 protein level. In kidney, both extracts had no effects on AHH, ECOD, UGT, and GST activities. Three major bioactive alkaloids rutaecarpine, evodiamine, and dehydroevodiamine were present in both extracts. These alkaloids at 25 mg/kg increased hepatic EROD activity. These results demonstrated that E. rutaecarpa methanol and aqueous extracts could affect drug-metabolizing enzyme activities. Rutaecarpine, evodiamine, and dehydroevodiamine contributed at least in part to the increase of hepatic EROD activity by extracts of E. rutaecarpa. Thus, caution should be paid to the possible drug interactions of E. rutaecarpa and CYP substrates.
 ...
PMID:Modulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes by extracts of a herbal medicine Evodia rutaecarpa in C57BL/6J mice. 1210 92

Severe migraine affects more than 28 million Americans. It is associated with episodic as well as long-term disability and suffering, yet it is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Acute treatments have advanced considerably, ignited by sumatriptan and the subsequent triptans; unfortunately migraine prevention has lagged far behind. There are no great migraine preventives! No migraine preventive agent studied in good randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials proved to be 50% better than placebo. Migraine trials typically focus on episodic migraine, a milder, gentler type of migraine that is selected for low frequency, lack of daily headaches, no preventive need, and previous failure to no more than a few preventive agents. These features are not typical of the usual migraine patient seen in most neurologic practices, thus the results of clinical trials may not carryover to real world situations. Treatment of frequent, chronic, or pervasive migraine is inadequate, and never has been studied in randomized controlled trials. Traditional migraine preventives, eg, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants, are often ineffective in difficult or complicated populations. The antiepileptic drugs represent a category of pharmaceutics that target the neuronal instability and central hyperexcitability of migraine, and, through these actions, may be more effective than traditional preventives. Episodic migraine attacks are associated with peripheral and central sensitization; however, if attacks are frequent, severe, or long lasting, this sensitization may increase the risk of developing daily headaches. If antiepileptic drugs have an effect on central sensitization, perhaps mediated via glutamate inhibition or gamma-aminobutyric acid potentiation, it is appropriate to use these agents early in migraine treatment, particularly in the highly comorbid patient, possibly in conjunction with agents that antagonize the 5HT2 receptor. This report reviews the best currently available evidence on antiepileptic drugs in the prevention of episodic migraine, and tabulates potential drug-drug and cytochrome P450 interactions. All antiepileptic drugs presented are effective in migraine prevention. However, deciding on the best agent for each individual patient will require recognizing comorbidity and assessing antiepileptic drug pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and safety.
 ...
PMID:Antiepileptic Drug Therapy in Migraine Headache. 1216 27

Frovatriptan is a potent 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist and has the highest 5-HT(1B) potency in the triptan class. preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that frovatriptan is apparently cerebro-selective. In clinical pharmacology studies, frovatriptan was shown to have a long-terminal elimination half-life of 26 h and to be well-tolerated across a broad dose range of 1-100 mg. Frovatriptan has no inhibiting or inducing effects on cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and is only slightly bound to plasma proteins; thus it has a low potential for drug interactions. No dosage adjustments are necessary based on age or renal or hepatic impairment. Efficacy studies show significantly higher response rates compared with placebo and the lowest reported range of headache recurrence rates in the triptan class. Safety studies show a side effect profile similar to placebo. The combination of cerebro-selectivity, long half-life, reliable efficacy, low recurrence rates and good tolerability make frovatriptan a valuable new choice for acute treatment of migraine. Frovatriptan may be particularly well suited to patients with migraine of long duration, those prone to recurrence and those troubled by "triptan-type" side effects.
 ...
PMID:Frovatriptan: a review. 1251 45

(1) Macrolides are an alternative to beta-lactam agents for treating uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, sinusitis and throat infections. The choice of macrolides is based mainly on the risk of interactions, which is lowest with spiramycin. (2) Telithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic derived from erythromycin. It was first marketed in France in 2002, for the above indications. (3) Telithromycin is no more effective than the antibiotics with which it has been compared, namely amoxicillin and clarithromycin in non life-threatening pneumonia; amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefuroxime axetil in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis; and clarithromycin and phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) in pharyngotonsillitis. (4) In clinical trials, telithromycin was not more effective than comparator antibiotics on infections thought to be due to pneumococcal strains resistant to penicillin and/or erythromycin. Cases of erythromycin cross-resistance have been observed. (5) The adverse effects of telithromycin are the same as those of other macrolides, mainly gastrointestinal disturbances, headache, dizziness, and hepatotoxicity. Telithromycin also carries a risk of torsades de pointes, and seems to cause more visual problems than other macrolides. (6) Telithromycin inhibits cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, so there is a high risk of drug interactions. (7) In practice, spiramycin remains the standard option when a macrolide is indicated for the treatment of common ENT and pulmonary infections.
 ...
PMID:Telithromycin: new preparation. A needless addition to the other macrolides. 1260 73

Granisetron (Kytril, Roche) is a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist indicated for the prevention of nausea and/or vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of emetogenic chemotherapy, including high-dose cisplatin. Its indication expanded in August 2002, with approval from the FDA for the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Granisetron strongly and selectively binds to the 5-HT(3) receptor with a binding constant of 0.26 nM and exhibits a 4000 - 40,000 times greater binding affinity for the 5-HT(3) receptor than other binding sites, including other 5HT subtypes and adrenergic, histaminergic and opioid receptors. Its selectivity to the 5-HT(3) receptor over other receptor types is > 1000:1. Granisetron noncompetitively binds to the 5-HT(3) receptor and is associated with a long duration of action as shown by the inhibition of a 5-HT axonal response flare for up to 24 h. Granisetron is unique among the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists because it is not metabolised via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 pathway and is, therefore, less susceptible to variation in patient response because of factors such as pharmacogenomic differences. Granisetron and other 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists are first-line agents for acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), whereas combination therapy with 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, dexamethasone and neurokinin (NK)-1 receptor antagonism (i.e., with the recently approved aprepitant) is an effective approach to prevent delayed CINV. Granisetron has been shown to be an effective within-class rescue antiemetic for prophylactic failures, which may be linked to its pharmacological properties including non-competitive, insurmountable binding to the 5-HT(3) receptor. As with other 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, granisetron is well-tolerated with adverse events of mild severity including headache, asthenia and constipation. Overall, data demonstrate that granisetron is an efficacious, safe and cost-effective member of the 5HT(3)-receptor antagonist class for the prevention of CINV.
 ...
PMID:Granisetron: new insights into its use for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. 1294 86

5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists are highly selective competitive inhibitors of the 5-HT(3)-receptor with negligible affinity for other receptors. They are potent, rapidly absorbed and easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier; metabolized by the cytochrome P450-system with half-life varying from 3-10 hours. The compounds investigated so far do not modify normal behaviour in animals or man and are well tolerated over wide dose ranges, the most common side effects being headache or constipation. Clinical efficacy was first established in chemotherapy-induced emesis (and then in radiotherapy-induced and post-operative emesis), where 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists set a new standard of antiemetic efficacy and tolerability. The 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists, via a central and / or peripheral action, have been shown to reduce secretion and motility in the gut and possess clinical utility in irritable bowel syndrome, and possibly other visceral pain disorders. Their value in fibromyalgia is being evaluated. In preclinical behavioural assays they induce effects consistent with anxiolysis, improved cognition, anti-dopaminergic activity and use in drug abuse and withdrawal. There is some evidence that ondansetron may reduce alcohol consumption in moderate alcohol abusers but overall, 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists seem to be of limited use in psychiatric disorders: where effects have been seen, they seem to be unusually sensitive to dose and stage of disease. Nevertheless, their antiemetic potential has been of great benefit to cancer patients and the possible extension of their use to bowel disorders may yet fulfil their initial exciting promise.
 ...
PMID:5-HT3 receptors. 1496 42

Repaglinide (Prandin), NovoNorm, GlucoNorm, an oral insulin secretagogue, was the first meglitinide analogue to become available for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The drug lowers postprandial glucose excursions by targeting early-phase insulin release, an effect thought to be important in reducing long-term cardiovascular complications of diabetes. Repaglinide provided similar overall glycaemic control to that achieved with glibenclamide (glyburide), as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting blood glucose levels, and was generally well tolerated in well designed clinical trials. Its rapid onset and relatively short duration of action allow for flexible meal schedules. Two modelled US cost-effectiveness analyses projected lifetime costs and outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Both analyses projected long-term complications using data on HbA(1c) level changes from short-term clinical trials. Repaglinide plus rosiglitazone was dominant over rosiglitazone in one analysis, and repaglinide plus metformin was dominant over nateglinide plus metformin in the other. A similar Canadian analysis showed a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (<dollars US 1000 per QALY gained; 2001 values) for patients who switched from a sulphonylurea to repaglinide versus those who remained on sulphonylurea therapy. Long-term outcomes were projected using short-term clinical trial data on postprandial blood glucose level changes in the Canadian study. All three cost-effectiveness analyses are available as abstracts/posters. Two US cost analyses (both published in full) have also been conducted comparing the short-term costs (<or=3 years) of repaglinide, with or without metformin, versus other oral antidiabetic regimens. Results of these analyses are somewhat equivocal because of study design issues and/or a lack of statistically significant differences between treatment groups. In conclusion, repaglinide as monotherapy or in combination with other antidiabetic agents, such as metformin or rosiglitazone, achieves good metabolic control, similar to that achieved with comparable glibenclamide regimens. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes are less common with repaglinide than some sulphonylureas, including glibenclamide. Modelled cost-effectiveness analyses conducted in North America showed favourable results for repaglinide-containing regimens versus comparators, largely attributed to projected reductions in long-term cardiovascular complications using short-term data on changes in glycaemic parameters from clinical trials. Results of these cost-effectiveness analyses (all of which have been published as abstracts/posters) should be interpreted with caution since various assumptions regarding long-term costs and outcomes were necessarily incorporated into the economic models. While repaglinide is a useful addition to the available treatment options in type 2 diabetes, potential long-term advantages versus other agents, such as reducing cardiovascular complications, require confirmation. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is projected to increase to over 3% of the world's population ( approximate, equals 220 million people) by the year 2010. Globally, 97% of patients with diabetes have type 2 disease, although in industrialised countries the proportion of type 2 disease is about 90%. In 2010, an estimated 14.85 million individuals in the US and 2.88 million in the UK will be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. In addition, approximately one-third to one-half of individuals with diabetes are unaware that they have the disease, and are therefore undiagnosed. Diabetes is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and economic consequences. For the year 2002 in the US, direct medical costs associated with diabetes (type 1 and 2) were estimated at dollars US 91.8 billion (70% of total costs) and indirect costs at dollars US 39.8 billion (30%), for a total of dollars US 132 billion. Data from more than 7000 patients in eight European countries indicate tha the mean cost per patient with diabetes was dollars US 2928 annually (1999 values), and the proportion of total healthcare expenditure directed toward diabetes ranged from 1.6% to 6.6% depending on the country. Several analyses focusing specifically on type 2 disease showed, not surprisingly, that costs were higher among patients with diabetic complications than in those without complications. Repaglinide, a meglitinide analogue, is an oral insulin secretagogue that reduces postprandial glucose excursions by targeting postprandial insulin release. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes, repaglinide was usually administered at a dosage of 0.5-4 mg three times daily before meals as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. In placebo-controlled trials of up to 24 weeks' duration in patients with type 2 diabetes, repaglinide achieved statistically significant improvements in glycaemic control, as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and/or postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels compared with placebo. Preprandial administration of repaglinide achieved similar glycaemic control to glibenclamide (glyburide) 1.75-15 mg/day and better glycaemic control than glipizide 5-15 mg/day in 1-year, double-blind, randomised trials in patients with type 2 disease, the vast majority of whom had previously received oral antidiabetic therapy. Several randomised, open-label studies have evaluated repaglinide as part of combination therapy over 3-6 months in patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control with previous drug therapy. In general, results showed statistically significant improvements in glycaemic control when repaglinide was used in combination with metformin, various thiazolidinediones, or metformin plus bedtime insulin compared with monotherapy with either comparator drug in each study (or metformin plus bedtime insulin in one trial). Other studies in this patient population indicate that metformin plus repaglinide is associated with significantly better glycaemic control than metformin plus nateglinide 60-120 mg three times daily over 16 weeks, and similar glycaemic control to that achieved with metformin in combination with either glibenclamide or glimepiride for up to 1 year. Good glycaemic control has also been achieved with preprandial administration of repaglinide in flexible meal schedules. This was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial and in a large, prospective survey of patients receiving repaglinide in a clinical setting. The tolerability profile of repaglinide is characterised by adverse events of mild-to-moderate intensity similar to those associated with sulphonylureas. The most frequently reported adverse events with repaglinide include hypoglycaemia, upper respiratory infection, headache, other respiratory events, musculoskeletal events and gastrointestinal events. Severe episodes of hypoglycaemia are rare with repaglinide and occur approximately 2-2.5 times less frequently than with sulphonylureas. In addition, available data indicate that repaglinide may be less likely to increase bodyweight than various commonly used sulphonylurea agents. In general, repaglinide is also well tolerated when used as part of combination therapy. Repaglinide is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme system and therefore has the potential to interact with other CYP3A4 substrates when administered concurrently. A number of studies in healthy volunteers have shown no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions when repaglinide was administered concomitantly with digoxin, theophylline, warfarin, cimetidine, ketoconazole, rifampicin (rifampin), ethinylestradiol, simvastatin or nifedipine. However, a clinically significant increase in systemic exposure to repaglinide occurs when clarithromycin and repaglinide are administered concurrently, which may necessitate a reduction in repaglinide dosage. Moreover, a potentially hazardous interaction occurs when gemfibrozil (alone or with itraconazole) is used concomitantly with repaglinide. In view of the marked increase in systemic exposure to repaglinide, the combination of repaglinide and gemfibrozil should be avoided if possible. Pharmacoeconomic Analyses of RepaglinideTwo US cost analyses have been conducted with repaglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes (both published in full). One was a retrospective analysis of pharmacy and medical claims data from a large managed care organisation in which costs were adjusted for age, gender and comorbidities. Total adjusted (year 2000) cost per patient over a 9-month period was numerically lower for those treated with a combination of repaglinide plus metformin (dollars US 8924) than for patients who received metformin only (dollars US 9448), metformin plus glibenclamide (dollars US 9576) or repaglinide only (dollars US 11910), although there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. The other study, a literature-based decision-tree analysis, projected the proportion of patients achieving a target HbA(1c) level (<7%) and the associated direct medical costs over a 3-year period from the time of diagnosis. Among six different treatment regimens evaluated, costs ranged from dollars US 6106 with glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) to dollars US 9298 with repaglinide monotherapy (2001/2002 values). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that first-line therapy with glipizide GITS or metformin would be associated with lower total medical costs than rosiglitazone or repaglinide monotherapy. Three cost-effectiveness analyses, all of which are modelled studies published as abstracts and/or posters, have been conducted with repaglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
 ...
PMID:Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1509 24

This article reviews the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod, a novel selective partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor. Tegaserod was recently approved for the treatment of women with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation. Tegaserod exhibits rapid absorption from the small intestine, and is excreted unchanged in the faeces and as metabolites in the urine. Meal ingestion decreases its bioavailability. There is little effect of age or gender on pharmacokinetics, although plasma levels may be slightly higher in the elderly. Tegaserod has no effect on plasma levels of other drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzyme systems. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of tegaserod therapy. In data pooled from phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in IBS with constipation patients, diarrhoea was reported by 8.8% of patients treated with tegaserod 6mg twice daily versus 3.8% of patients receiving placebo. Similar rates have been observed in international post-US marketing RCTs. In most patients, tegaserod-induced diarrhoea was mild and transient. In RCTs, it did not elicit fluid or electrolyte disturbances, and fewer than 3% of IBS patients discontinued tegaserod due to diarrhoea. Since its release, rare cases of more severe diarrhoea and ischaemic colitis have been reported. The incidence of other gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, nausea, and flatulence) has been similar among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs and post-US marketing RCTs have not demonstrated significant differences between tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients in the incidence of abdominal-pelvic surgery. There is no convincing evidence that rebound gastrointestinal symptoms occur upon termination of tegaserod therapy. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs demonstrated an increase in the incidence of headaches among tegaserod-treated patients (6mg twice daily) compared with placebo-treated patients (15% vs 12.3%, respectively, p < 0.05), although post-US marketing RCTs have not observed this increase. Other extra-gastrointestinal adverse events occur with similar frequency among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Tegaserod-treated patients in RCTs have not demonstrated significant prolongation of the QTc interval or cardiac arrhythmias compared with placebo-treated patients. Supra-therapeutic doses in healthy volunteers did not effect electrocardiographic parameters. Laboratory parameters are mostly unaffected by tegaserod, although several individuals have exhibited increased eosinophil counts. In summary, tegaserod exhibits a favourable safety and tolerability profile in IBS patients based on data from clinical trials. Diarrhoea is the most common adverse event associated with tegaserod use. Continued post-US marketing surveillance will further define the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. 1523 Jun 44

Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Following oral administration, bosentan attains peak plasma concentrations after approximately 3 hours. The absolute bioavailability is about 50%. Food does not exert a clinically relevant effect on absorption at the recommended dose of 125 mg. Bosentan is approximately 98% bound to albumin and, during multiple-dose administration, has a volume of distribution of 30 L and a clearance of 17 L/h. The terminal half-life after oral administration is 5.4 hours and is unchanged at steady state. Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3-5 days after multiple-dose administration, when plasma concentrations are decreased by about 50% because of a 2-fold increase in clearance, probably due to induction of metabolising enzymes. Bosentan is mainly eliminated from the body by hepatic metabolism and subsequent biliary excretion of the metabolites. Three metabolites have been identified, formed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. The metabolite Ro 48-5033 may contribute 20% to the total response following administration of bosentan. The pharmacokinetics of bosentan are dose-proportional up to 600 mg (single dose) and 500 mg/day (multiple doses). The pharmacokinetics of bosentan in paediatric PAH patients are comparable to those in healthy subjects, whereas adult PAH patients show a 2-fold increased exposure. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 15-30 mL/min) and mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A) do not have a clinically relevant influence on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. No dosage adjustment in adults is required based on sex, age, ethnic origin and bodyweight. Bosentan should generally be avoided in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and/or elevated liver aminotransferases. Ketoconazole approximately doubles the exposure to bosentan because of inhibition of CYP3A4. Bosentan decreases exposure to ciclosporin, glibenclamide, simvastatin (and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin) and (R)- and (S)-warfarin by up to 50% because of induction of CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C9. Coadministration of ciclosporin and bosentan markedly increases initial bosentan trough concentrations. Concomitant treatment with glibenclamide and bosentan leads to an increase in the incidence of aminotransferase elevations. Therefore, combined use with ciclosporin and glibenclamide is contraindicated and not recommended, respectively. The possibility of reduced efficacy of CYP2C9 and 3A4 substrates should be considered when coadministered with bosentan. No clinically relevant interaction was detected with the P-glycoprotein substrate digoxin. In healthy subjects, bosentan doses >300 mg increase plasma levels of endothelin-1. The drug moderately reduces blood pressure, and its main adverse effects are headache, flushing, increased liver aminotransferases, leg oedema and anaemia. In a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study in PAH patients, the haemodynamic effects lagged the plasma concentrations of bosentan.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist. 1556 89


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>