Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017636 (glioblastoma)
 18,345 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this study was to identify key genes associated with gliomas and glioblastoma and to explore the related signaling pathways. Gene expression profiles of three glioma stem cell line samples, three normal astrocyte samples, three astrocyte overexpressing 4 iPSC-inducing and oncogenic factors (myc(T58A), OCT-4, p53DD, and H-Ras(G12V)) samples, three astrocyte overexpressing 7 iPSC-inducing and oncogenic factors (OCT4, H-Ras(G12V), myc(T58A), p53DD, cyclin D1, CDK4(RC24) and hTERT) samples and three glioblastoma cell line samples were downloaded from the ArrayExpress database (accession: E-MTAB-4771). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in gliomas and glioblastoma were identified using FDR and t tests, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks for these DEGs were constructed using the protein interaction network analysis. The GeneTrail2 1.5 tool was used to identify potentially enriched biological processes among the DEGs using gene ontology (GO) terms and to identify the related pathways using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Reactome and WikiPathways pathway database. In addition, crucial modules of the constructed PPI networks were identified using the PEWCC1 plug-in, and their topological properties were analyzed using NetworkAnalyzer, both available from Cytoscape. We also constructed microRNA-target gene regulatory network and transcription factor-target gene regulatory network for these DEGs were constructed using the miRNet and binding and expression target analysis. We identified 200 genes that could potentially be involved in the gliomas and glioblastoma. Among them, bioinformatics analysis identified 137 up-regulated and 63 down-regulated DEGs in gliomas and glioblastoma. The significant enriched pathway (PI3K-Akt) for up-regulated genes such as COL4A1, COL4A2, EGFR, FGFR1, LAPR6, MYC, PDGFA, SPP1 were selected as well as significant GO term (ear development) for up-regulated genes such as CELSR1, CHRNA9, DDR1, FGFR1, GLI2, LGR5, SOX2, TSHR were selected, while the significant enriched pathway (amebiasis) for down-regulated gene such as COL3A1, COL5A2, LAMA2 were selected as well as significant GO term (RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding (5) such as MEIS2, MEOX2, NR2E1, PITX2, TFAP2B, ZFPM2 were selected. Importantly, MYC and SOX2 were hub proteins in the up-regulated PPI network, while MET and CDKN2A were hub proteins in the down-regulated PPI network. After network module analysis, MYC, FGFR1 and HOXA10 were selected as the up-regulated coexpressed genes in the gliomas and glioblastoma, while SH3GL3 and SNRPN were selected as the down-regulated coexpressed genes in the gliomas and glioblastoma. MicroRNA hsa-mir-22-3p had a regulatory effect on the most up DEGs, including VSNL1, while hsa-mir-103a-3p had a regulatory effect on the most down DEGs, including DAPK1. Transcription factor EZH2 had a regulatory effect on the both up and down DEGs, including CD9, CHI3L1, MEIS2 and NR2E1. The DEGs, such as MYC, FGFR1, CDKN2A, HOXA10 and MET, may be used for targeted diagnosis and treatment of gliomas and glioblastoma.
 ...
PMID:Molecular mechanisms underlying gliomas and glioblastoma pathogenesis revealed by bioinformatics analysis of microarray data. 2895 34

Background: Although the diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) is significantly improved with recent progresses, there is still a large heterogeneity in therapeutic effects and overall survival. The aim of this study is to analyze gene expressions of transcription factors (TFs) in GBM so as to discover new tumor markers. Methods: Differentially expressed TFs are identified by data mining using public databases. The GBM transcriptome profile is downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method is used to cluster the differentially expressed genes to discover hub genes and signal pathways. The TFs affecting the prognosis of GBM are screened by univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is determined. The GBM hazard model and nomogram map are constructed by integrating the clinical data. Finally, the TFs involving potential signaling pathways in GBM are screened by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. Results: There are 68 differentially expressed TFs in GBM, of which 43 genes are upregulated and 25 genes are downregulated. NMF clustering analysis suggested that GBM patients are divided into three groups: Clusters A, B, and C. LHX2, MEOX2, SNAI2, and ZNF22 are identified from the above differential genes by univariate/multivariate regression analysis. The risk score of those four genes are calculated based on the beta coefficient of each gene, and we found that the predictive ability of the risk score gradually increased with the prolonged predicted termination time by time-dependent ROC curve analysis. The nomogram results have showed that the integration of risk score, age, gender, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and 1p/19q can further improve predictive ability towards the survival of GBM. The pathways in cancer, phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K)-Akt signaling, Hippo signaling, and proteoglycans, are highly enriched in high-risk groups by GSEA. These genes are mainly involved in cell migration, cell adhesion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell cycle, and other signaling pathways by GO and KEGG analysis. Conclusion: The four-factor combined scoring model of LHX2, MEOX2, SNAI2, and ZNF22 can precisely predict the prognosis of patients with GBM.
 ...
PMID:A Novel Prognostic Signature of Transcription Factors for the Prediction in Patients With GBM. 3163 39