Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (
gastroesophageal reflux disease
)
11,783
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The effect on the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) of a new H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine, has been tested during manometry in normal man. Basal tone and LES pentagastrin response were not significantly different after oral ranitidine administration in 10 healthy subjects. No significant variation of LESP was observed in six additional patients during 1 mg/kg body wt ranitidine infusion as compared to placebo. These results show that despite the difference in chemical structure and a greater inhibitory effect on gastric secretion, ranitidine, like cimetidine, does not alter resting pressure or LES response to pentagastrin in man.
Ranitidine
may therefore benefit patients with
gastroesophageal reflux
.
...
PMID:Effect of ranitidine on resting pressure and pentagastrin response of human lower esophageal sphincter. 611 34
The effect of oral ranitidine on oesophageal peristalsis, LOS basal pressure and gastro-oesophageal acid reflux, was investigated in 6 healthy men in a double-blind randomized study. Simultaneous manometry and pH measurements were performed twice in each volunteer during a five hour study period which included the administration of a standard meal.
Ranitidine
did not affect the motor parameters studied (amplitude, duration and velocity of the peristaltic waves and LOS basal tone), whereas it almost abolished acid
gastroesophageal reflux
. Our results show that ranitidine, like cimetidine, does not alter the motor function of the oesophagus, while it virtually abolishes acid gastro-
oesophageal reflux
in normal man.
...
PMID:Oesophageal function after oral ranitidine: an acute double blind study in normal subjects. 632 11
We undertook a multicenter double-blind study comparing ranitidine to placebo in 73 patients with symptomatic
gastroesophageal reflux
ranging in age from 22 to 80 years (mean 49). Initially, all patients had moderate to severe symptoms associated with abnormal endoscopic and/or microscopic appearance of the mucosa. After six weeks, 46% of ranitidine-treated patients had a one-grade improvement in their symptom of regurgitation, as compared with 19% treated with placebo (p less than 0.01); ranitidine was no better than placebo in the improvement of pain or dysphagia. Endoscopic improvement occurred in 61% of ranitidine- and 48% of placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.05). Histological improvement occurred in a similar and small portion of patients treated with ranitidine and placebo; there was no correlation between clinical, endoscopic, and histological improvement. Antacid consumption was only half as great in the ranitidine as in the placebo group. Therapy with ranitidine was maintained for up to 12 months. The patients remained free of regurgitation or pain and there was a trend towards further improvement in the endoscopic or histopathologic appearance of the esophagus.
Ranitidine
150 mg b.i.d. is recommended for the relief of symptoms and improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the esophagus. Treatment should be for a minimum of 6 weeks, but may be continued for up to a year if the patient's symptoms persist or return.
...
PMID:Ranitidine in the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. 632 88
Information on the relationships between gastro-
oesophageal reflux
(GOR), reflux symptoms, hiatal hernia (HH) and oesophagitis, and the response to antisecretory treatment is lacking. In a multicentre study endoscopy, ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring and symptom assessment were carried out in 142 patients with symptomatic reflux disease before and during treatment with ranitidine. Using a randomized, double-blind design, patients took ranitidine 150 mg bid or 300 mg bid. Macroscopic oesophagitis (grade I or II) was found in 85 patients; the remaining 57 patients had normal oesophageal mucosa. A significant correlation was found between the presence of an HH and the presence of oesophagitis. Symptom scores were similar in patients with and without oesophagitis, and in patients with and without HH. Patients with oesophagitis had significantly greater oesophageal acid exposure during the night, and in the total 24-h period, but not during the day. Likewise, patients with HH had greater acid exposure during the night (p < 0.008). Both doses of ranitidine significantly decreased oesophageal acid exposure and the effect was independent of baseline acid exposure. Reflux symptoms cannot be used to differentiate between presence or absence of oesophagitis and/or HH. Reflux patients without oesophagitis have less night-time reflux.
Ranitidine
dose-dependently decreases oesophageal acid exposure, and the effect is independent of baseline reflux.
...
PMID:Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in The Netherlands. Results of a multicentre pH study. 886 45
Ranitidine
150 mg twice daily (BID) is an approved therapeutic approach for relieving the symptoms of
gastroesophageal reflux disease
.
Ranitidine
150 mg four times daily (QID) and cimetidine 800 mg BID are indicated for endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis. This 12-week, randomized, multicenter trial involving 696 patients compared ranitidine 150 mg BID and ranitidine 150 mg QID with cimetidine 800 mg BID in healing erosive esophagitis. Healing rates, as determined by endoscopy, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks were comparable with ranitidine 150 mg BID (38%, 56%, and 71%, respectively) and cimetidine 800 mg BID (37%, 52%, and 68%, respectively), as were reductions in heartburn frequency and antacid consumption. However, ranitidine 150 mg QID produced significantly higher healing rates (49%, 67%, and 77%, respectively) and greater reductions in heartburn frequency and antacid consumption than cimetidine 800 mg BID. All treatment regimens were well tolerated. Thus ranitidine 150 mg BID is as effective as cimetidine 800 mg BID, and ranitidine 150 mg QID is more effective than cimetidine 800 mg BID in healing erosive esophagitis and reducing heartburn frequency and antacid consumption.
...
PMID:Ranitidine versus cimetidine in the healing of erosive esophagitis. 900 31
Gastroesophageal reflux
(
GOR
) is a major cause of morbidity and failure to thrive particularly in neurologically impaired children. Clinical manifestations of
GOR
in children range from regurgitation, food refusal, irritability, failure to thrive, hematemesis, wheezing and aspiration pneumonia, apnoea and apparent life threatening events in infants to clinically silent reflux. Although, no one test is always best to diagnose
GOR
, 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosis. Barium radiography is useful for the diagnosis of associated anatomical abnormalities and endoscopy enables a histological diagnosis of esophagitis. Therapy for
gastroesophageal reflux disease
is now well established. Proper positioning of the baby and thickening of feeds is beneficial in uncomplicated
GOR
. Prokinetic agents like cisapride should be tried if dietary management and antacids are ineffective. Metoclopramide or domperidone may be tried in neurologically impaired children. H2-receptor antagonists are indicated in
GOR
complicated by esophagitis.
Ranitidine
is regarded to be more potent. Cimetidine has additional spectrum of adverse effects and sufficient information is not available on famotidine. Omeprazole has been shown to be effective in treating
GOR
-esophagitis resistant to H2 antagonist therapy even in high risk patients.
...
PMID:Gastroesophageal reflux in children. 1113 70
Approximately two thirds of pregnant patients develop heartburn. The origin is multifactorial, but the predominant factor is a decrease in LES pressure caused by female sex hormones, especially progesterone. Mechanical factors play a small role. Serious reflux complications during pregnancy are rare; therefore EGD and other diagnostic tests are infrequently needed. Symptomatic
GERD
during pregnancy should be managed with a step-up algorithm beginning with lifestyle modifications and dietary changes. Antacids or sucralfate are considered the first-line medical therapy. If symptoms persist, H2RAs should be used.
Ranitidine
is probably preferred because of its documented efficacy and safety profile in pregnancy, even in the first trimester. Proton-pump inhibitors are reserved for the woman with intractable symptoms or complicated reflux disease. Lansoprazole may be the preferred PPI because of its safety profile in animals and case reports of safety in human pregnancies.
...
PMID:Gastroesophageal reflux disease during pregnancy. 1263 18
The frequency, symptoms, and complication rate of PUD seem to decrease during pregnancy. Yet clinicians often have to treat dyspepsia or pyrosis of undetermined origin during pregnancy because the frequency of pyrosis significantly increases during pregnancy, and clinicians reluctantly perform EGD during pregnancy for pyrosis to differentiate reliably between
GERD
and PUD. Dyspepsia or pyrosis during pregnancy is initially treated with dietary and lifestyle modifications. If the symptoms do not remit with these modifications, sucralfate or antacids, preferably magnesium-containing or aluminum-containing antacids, should be administered. Histamine2 receptor antagonists are recommended when symptoms are refractory to antacid or sucralfate therapy.
Ranitidine
seems to be a relatively safe H2 receptor antagonist. If symptoms continue despite H2 receptor antagonist therapy, the patient should be evaluated for possible EGD or PPI therapy. Pregnant women with hemodynamically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding or other worrisome clinical findings should undergo EGD. Indications for surgery include ulcer perforation, ongoing active bleeding from an ulcer requiring transfusion of six or more units of packed erythrocytes, gastric outlet obstruction refractory to intense medical therapy, and a malignant gastric ulcer without evident metastases.
...
PMID:Gastric and duodenal ulcers during pregnancy. 1263 19
Since the incidence of peptic ulcer and
gastroesophageal reflux
(
GER
) is more common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than normal population, H(2) receptor blockers are given more extensively to COPD patients. This study evaluated the effects of
Ranitidine
on pulmonary function tests (PFT) of the patients having COPD and peptic ulcer or
GER
, and of healthy volunteers. Fifty milligrams of
Ranitidine
was given intravenously to 30 COPD patients and 25 healthy volunteers. PFT were done before and 15, 30, 60, 120min after
Ranitidine
injection. Although mean forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) and forced midexpiratory flow rate (FEF(25-75%)) of COPD patients were found to be decreased 60 and 120min after
Ranitidine
injection, the decrements were statistically insignificant. The decrements in PFT of healthy volunteers were also not statistically significant.H(2) receptor blockers can be used safely for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders in COPD patients who have mild or moderate obstruction. Minimal decreases in FEV(1) and FVC due to treatment by H(2) receptor blockers may clinically worsen COPD patients who have severe obstruction.
...
PMID:Effects of ranitidine on pulmonary function tests of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 1274 8
The objective of the open, randomised, four-period crossover study was to compare the time of onset of effect of sodium alginate (SA), omeprazole, ranitidine and control, based on oesophageal and intragastric pH and to determine any correlation between reflux symptoms and episodes in volunteers suffering from occasional gastro-
oesophageal reflux
. SA showed extensive prevention of acid exposure in the oesophagus compared with other treatments during the first hour. Overall, SA was more effective than control or omeprazole and comparable with ranitidine. There was little evidence of association between 'oesophageal' symptoms and reflux episodes, but associations between 'gastric' symptoms and acidity in the oesophagus, fundus and corpus were apparent. For an immediate reduction in gastro-
oesophageal reflux
into the oesophagus and gastric acidity during the first hour, SA was significantly superior to control, ranitidine and omeprazole.
Ranitidine
showed a superior effect from 2 h, consistent with its pharmacological mode of action.
...
PMID:Rapid onset of effect of sodium alginate on gastro-oesophageal reflux compared with ranitidine and omeprazole, and relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes. 1649 41
<< Previous
1
2
3
Next >>