Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Recurring substernal chest pain is an important clinical problem, causing anxiety for patients and their physicians because of the fear of possible cardiac disease. The differential diagnosis includes coronary artery disease, oesophageal disorders such as acid reflux disease and motility disturbances, musculoskeletal problems, psychological disorders including panic attacks, and a new 'fly in the ointment'--microvascular angina. History alone usually cannot distinguish cardiac from non-cardiac chest pain. After exclusion of significant coronary artery disease, attention must be turned to oesophageal disorders, which may be seen in as many as 50% of these patients. Oesophageal motility disorders, particularly the nutcracker oesophagus, are common, but the relationship between pain and abnormal contraction pressures is not well established. Provocative tests such as edrophonium (Tensilon) and balloon distension help to identify the oesophagus as the source of chest pain but do not direct therapy. Recent studies with ambulatory oesophageal monitoring suggest that gastro-oesophageal reflux may be a more common cause of chest pain than motility disorders. This is an important finding as acid reflux is a treatable problem, while therapies for motility disorders may only worsen reflux disease. The recent observation that oesophageal disorders are frequently associated and interact with psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression, somatization and panic attacks complicates the evaluation and understanding of chest pain. How these various abnormalities may be linked is an unresolved issue. Increased central nervous system stimulation and altered visceral and/or central pain sensitivity could be the common factors. It is hoped that further research into these areas will lead to new understandings of and possible solutions to the complex problem of non-cardiac chest pain.
 ...
PMID:Investigation and management of non-cardiac chest pain. 191 53

The clinical relevance of a system of ambulatory 24-hour oesophageal pressure and pH recording with automated data analysis was investigated in 33 unselected patients with non-cardiac chest pain. After conventional manometry with edrophonium (Tensilon) provocation, 24-hour oesophageal pH and pressure monitoring was performed. In 17 patients conventional manometry, edrophonium provocation and 24-hour pH recording revealed an oesophageal origin of the symptoms: 6 patients had oesophageal motility disorders, 3 were positive responders to edrophonium and 8 had chest pain associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux. In none of the patients who had a pain attack during prolonged oesophageal pressure recording, was a new motility disorder detected.
 ...
PMID:[The value of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in the diagnosis of retrosternal pain of non-cardiac origin]. 281 4

The contractile activity of the oesophageal body and of the upper and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) can reliably be portrayed by means of low compliance recording systems, either pneumohydraulic or with strain gauge force transducers, and at least two pressure sensors. LOS resting pressure can be assessed by both station and rapid pull-through techniques, or by the sleeve method. States of disordered LOS function, such as achalasia, can be diagnosed dependably only by manometric means. Manometry is of high diagnostic yield for motor disorders of the oesophageal body as well, although generally accepted diagnostic criteria are still lacking. In patients with angina-like chest pain, provocation tests can prove that oesophageal contraction abnormalities cause the symptoms. Edrophonium has been shown to be the most effective and best tolerated provocative agent. Transport of swallowed material through the oesophagus can reliably be recorded by radionuclide transit studies. Such studies are valuable in identifying patients with absent or impaired peristalsis and in evaluating treatment effects, e. g., the effects of mechanic dilatation in achalasia. Gastrooesophageal reflux should be recorded not only qualitatively but also quantitatively, although a definition of what is pathological and what is not has not been generally agreed upon. Recording of oesophageal intraluminal pH over longer periods of time, preferably 24 h, may have the best diagnostic yield. The advent of computer-aided analysis techniques will replace the cumbersome handscoring of motor and pH tracings and, hopefully, contribute to a better understanding and classification of oesophageal pathophysiology.
 ...
PMID:[Methods for measuring the motor activity of the esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux]. 377 64