Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pathophysiology and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are discussed. GERD is a clinical syndrome involving the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. It is distinguished from the reflux that occurs normally in the general population. A low pressure exerted by the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and inappropriate spontaneous relaxation of the LES may contribute to the development of GERD. Other possible contributory factors are increased intra-abdominal pressure and impaired esophageal clearance. The amount and concentration of refluxed gastric acid, proteolytic enzymes, and bile acids are among the determinants of the extent of esophageal injury. Heartburn is a specific symptom of GERD. Other symptoms include coughing, wheezing, hoarseness, epigastric pain, and regurgitation. Upper-GI roentgenography, endoscopy, biopsy, 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry have been used to diagnose and evaluate the disease. The complications of GERD are strictures, hemorrhaging, perforation, aspiration, and Barrett esophagus. The causes of GERD are incompletely understood, but low LES pressure seems important. GERD may lead to serious complications. A broad array of diagnostic approaches is available.
 ...
PMID:Pathophysiology and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. 847 26

Certain foods and drinks such as alcohol, heavily spiced or fatty meals are known to provoke gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR). This may give rise to symptoms of heartburn, epigastric pain and occasionally oral regurgitation of the gastric contents. Oral regurgitation of gastric juice is important in dentistry because of its association with dental erosion. This study measured oesophageal and oral reflux in 12 healthy subjects after a curry meal taken with alcohol 2 h before sleep. Each subject repeated the test with a bland non-reflux provoking control meal. GOR was measured by recording distal and proximal oesophageal pH on a dual channel, portable pH monitor. Oral pH was measured with a pH sensitive radio-telemetry capsule (RTC) held on the palate in a vacuum formed splint. Signals from the RTC were received by an aerial worn around the head. The pH change produced by GOR was estimated as the percentage time that pH (PTpH) was less than 4 in the distal oesophagus. Similarly, the PTpH was estimated < 4 and < 5 in the proximal oesophagus and < 5.5 and < 6 in the mouth over a period of 16 h. All subjects tolerated the monitors overnight with little loss of data and data were collected from all studies. The curry meal provoked GOR in all subjects, but only in six subjects to pathological levels according to international guidelines. The results show that GOR measured as the PTpH < 4 was significantly higher in the distal oesophagus whilst subjects were supine after the curry meal than with the control meal (P = 0.0006) and in the proximal oesophagus in the upright position (P = 0.006). There was a significant difference in the oral PTpH < 5.5 between the two meals for the total study period (P = 0.005). The bland meal provoked pathological levels of reflux in only two subjects. In one of these subjects the bland meal provoked oral regurgitation with a PTpH < 5.5 of 13.5%. In the remaining subjects little oral regurgitation occurred.
 ...
PMID:Oral regurgitation after reflux provoking meals: a possible cause of dental erosion? 906 19

The authors determined the clinical yield, endoscopic time, and patient tolerance of routine upper endoscopy beyond the duodenal bulb. From May through October 1994, all patients undergoing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were recruited for study. Each procedure was timed from start to finish by the endoscopy nurse, and, in addition, the time of the postbulbar examination was recorded. The endoscopy nurse assessed the patient's comfort level when the endoscope was advanced into the duodenal bulb and again at the postbulbar region. A total of 250 EGDs were performed. There were 152 males and 98 females, with a mean age of 57.1 (range, 23-91) years. Indications for the procedure were as follows: gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms 82, epigastric pain 64, dysphagia 46, Barrett's surveillance 25, anemia 23, other research study 16, and other 61. The mean time for the procedure was 11 min and 54 s, whereas the mean time for the postbulbar examination was 46.6 s. Patients tolerated endoscope insertion well both before and during examination of the postbulbar duodenum. The only postbulbar finding that affected clinical management was a postbulbar ulcer in a patient without other ulcers who was positive for Helicobacter pylori. Although routine endoscopic examination beyond the duodenal bulb involves minimal time and is well tolerated by patients, the yield of pathologic findings is low (3.6%) and the yield of findings that alter clinical management even lower (0.4%). In patients without prior GI surgery undergoing routine EGD for indications other than suspected small bowel pathology or active upper GI bleeding, examination of the postbulbar duodenum can be considered an elective part of the procedure.
 ...
PMID:Yield of routine endoscopy beyond the duodenal bulb. 917 32

In industrialized countries, surgical gastroplasty is performed more and more frequently in patients with morbid obesity. The aims of this prospective study were to determine the incidence of upper gastrointestinal lesions in obese patients and to assess the place of digestive endoscopy in symptomatic patients after gastroplasty. A consecutive group of 159 obese patients were studied before and after vertical banded gastroplasty. In the preoperative evaluation, reflux esophagitis and gastroduodenal lesions were endoscopically observed in 31% and 37% of the patients, respectively. Interestingly, the majority of the obese patients with upper gastrointestinal lesions were asymptomatic. In the postoperative follow-up period, 55 of the 159 patients complained of upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting (72%), esophageal reflux (17%), and epigastric pain (3%). Stenosis of the outlet of the gastric pouch was described in 40 of the 55 symptomatic patients. Esophagitis was observed in 60% of these patients. Endoscopic dilation using Savary bougies or TTS balloon was successfully performed in all the patients with symptomatic stenosis of the gastric outlet. Food impaction was endoscopically removed in four patients. Thus, we recommend performing an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in obese patients who are candidates for surgical gastroplasty because of the high incidence of upper gastrointestinal peptic lesions. Endoscopy is also helpful in patients with digestive disorders occurring after gastroplasty in order to define and to treat the lesions.
 ...
PMID:The place of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy before and after vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity. 939 14

Nine patients underwent redo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication because of failed primary laparoscopic antireflux procedure. Symptoms prior to reoperation included heartburn (n = 5), dysphagia (n = 2), dysphagia and heartburn (n = 1), and early satiety and epigastric pain (n = 1). Endoscopic and radiologic findings prior to reoperation included esophagitis (n = 6), reflux (n = 6), stenosis (n = 2), and hiatal hernia (n = 1). Findings at reoperation included fundoplication positioned on the stomach (n = 5); a disrupted cruroplasty (n = 1); gastric volvulus (n = 1); and an excessively tight wrap (n = 1) or cruroplasty (n = 1). Reconstruction of the fundoplication was performed according to accepted principles for this procedure. All patients were discharged within 2 days after the redo procedure. Follow-up time is 4-14 months. Preoperative symptoms were relieved in all patients and all antireflux medication have been discontinued. Routine postoperative esophagram and endoscopy demonstrated intact repair and without gastroesophageal reflux or stenosis. Reoperative laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is feasible and effective.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic redo Nissen fundoplication. 944 18

While many definitions exist, dyspepsia is best considered a symptom complex (not a diagnosis) thought to arise in the upper gastrointestinal tract, unrelated to defecation. The symptom complex includes: upper abdominal/epigastric pain or discomfort, postprandial fullness, bloating, belching, early satiety, anorexia, nausea, retching, vomiting, heartburn and regurgitation. Patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux, biliary colic and irritable bowel syndrome should not be considered to have dyspepsia. After investigations, if a cause of dyspepsia is found, this is 'organic or structural' dyspepsia. If no structural cause is found, this is best called 'functional dyspepsia', subclassified into a) ulcer-like b) dysmotility-like c) reflux-like and d) unspecified dyspepsia. This symptom guided classification should be shifted to the first presentation with uninvestigated dyspepsia, prior to any investigations, to define a clinically useful guide to patient care. As there is considerable symptom overlap, it may be useful to combine together the ulcer and reflux-like groups into an acid-related dyspepsia group. In 1998, another approach would be to screen dyspeptic patients with an H. pylori test and classify them as H. pylori positive and negative dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Definitions of dyspepsia: time for a reappraisal. 1002 67

The survival of young patients (< or = 50 years of age) with carcinoma of the oesophagus or stomach has been reported to be poorer than that of their older counterparts. The aim of the current study was to review the outcome of such young patients with oesophagogastric cancer and to compare the outcome in patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus/cardia with patients with carcinoma of the more distal stomach. The study population was 50 patients. Tumour location was oesophagus/cardia (n = 33) and gastric body/antrum (n = 17). The most common presenting symptoms were weight loss (66%), epigastric pain (54%), dysphagia (50%), and heartburn (40%). Seventeen patients had experienced foregut symptoms for a period of > or = 6 months. These patients were more likely to have symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and to have received acid suppression therapy than patients with shorter symptom durations. Only 20 patients underwent a potentially curative resection, while 10 underwent open and close laparotomy. The overall median survival was 7 months and the 5-year survival was 8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical resection and UICC stage were the only factors that significantly influenced survival. There was no difference in the survival of patients with proximally situated tumours compared to those with distally located tumours. Wide variations in clinical practice were seen between different surgeons. Consequently, a multidisciplinary team designed to manage all patients with oesophagogastric cancer according to nationally agreed protocols has been established in our hospital. Earlier diagnosis of these tumours is to be encouraged, even if this necessitates the more liberal use of endoscopy in the evaluation of young patients with persistent foregut symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Outcome of oesophagogastric carcinoma in young patients. 1039 82

The meaning and definition of dyspepsia continues to challenge clinical investigators and has led to the setting up of several international working teams. However, confusion continues to reign around this term. The effort to classify patients with dyspepsia into subgroups according to their most predominant symptoms has failed to provide clues to the underlying disease, or even to discriminate between functional and organic dyspepsia. With these limitations in mind, the question arises: is there any reason for putting further effort into developing a world-wide definition of dyspepsia when, in addition to the aforementioned shortcomings, further variables such as geographical region, ethnic background, culture and sanitary resources come into play? The answer is that only by establishing a reproducible methodology for individual symptom assessment using a well-defined protocol will comparisons of the prevalence of dyspepsia and the impact of different therapeutic interventions become possible around the world. The data on dyspepsia prevalence, nearly all arising from studies in a few developed geographical areas and countries, are of the order of 1-4% of all consultations in all primary care medicine. However, estimates of adults affected by dyspepsia are as high as 20-40%. The magnitude of these statistics underlines the necessity for further work on the concept of dyspepsia and its major functional subgroups, following the exclusion of any organic causes. Issues such as 'investigate dyspepsia before starting with any kind of treatment or treat dyspepsia before further investigation' or the debate about whether to 'eradicate or ignore Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia' will remain unresolved unless studies performed throughout the world use widely comparable and acceptable definitions and criteria for these conditions. Since the first international working party report in 1988, definitions of dyspepsia have included the description of 'upper abdominal pain or discomfort' and, more recently, have specified 'pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen' in order to emphasise further the site of origin as the upper alimentary tract (stomach-duodenum). However, a major change was evident in the more recent Rome I and Rome II reports, in which the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation, and belching were excluded from the definition of dyspepsia because of their relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aerophagia. The intention to define a set of symptoms for dyspepsia is good, but we continue to be faced with overlaps. How should the patient with epigastric pain and heartburn after endoscopic exclusion of duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis be classified: dyspepsia or GERD? In cases of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux, 24-h pH monitoring could help to resolve this dilemma, but what if this investigation turns out to be normal? In this field, we need to perform careful studies. In addition, we need to consider the lifestyle and cultural habits of people around the world when translating upper gastrointestinal symptoms into dyspepsia. A step forward in the definition of dyspepsia was attempted by the recent working party for the Rome II consensus on functional gastrointestinal disorders (N. Talley et al.). In this project, the symptoms of dyspepsia were individually described not by a single term, but by painting a 'word picture', to make it easier for patients to express their symptoms, and give doctors and clinical investigators a better understanding of the 'dyspeptic problem' of each individual. It is advisable to follow this approach, since a clear picture of a patient's symptoms, including their duration and intensity, in association with the modern technical approaches that allow investigation beyond organic causes of dyspepsia, will lead to progress in our understanding and better communication about this problem within the medical community, and ultimately to better treatment.
 ...
PMID:Current concepts in dyspepsia: a world perspective. 1044 9

Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) have gained better recognition over the past few years. GER and LPR usually present as regurgitation, emesis, epigastric pain, failure to thrive, esophagitis, or stricture. Many patients suffer respiratory disorders associated with reflux. Classification of reflux, pathophysiology, manifestations of reflux, diagnosis, and management of the disease are discussed in this article.
 ...
PMID:Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux. 1063 49

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is probably the most frequently occurring benign functional disorder in the Western industrial countries. With the increasing popularity of laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures, issues on the appropriate technique have been revitalized. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication and reflect on the perspective of an increasing frequency of performed operations. The data sampling is based on a literature review and a questionnaire. It can be summarized that reflux recurrence due to breakdown of the wrap or herniation of the wrap can also develop in later years after the primary surgery and amount up to 8%. Persistent dysphagia is a severe problem in the first post-operative year, but usually decreases with time and is limited to rates of 3-5% on the long-term follow-up. Other functional problems, such as gasbloat, meteorism and epigastric pain--the cause often cannot be further detected or specified--limit the quality of life of patients after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in the long-term follow-up in up to 5% of cases. Side effects of laparoscopic antireflux procedures can be limited to 5 to 10%, but not totally avoided.
 ...
PMID:Laparoscopic fundoplication--short- and long-term outcome. 1102 3


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>