Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aetiologic factors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease include the free reflux of gastric juice, the composition of refluxed juice, the defensive mechanisms of the oesophagus, which are both mechanical and mucosal, and, sometimes, gastric abnormalities. Symptoms include heartburn, odynophagia, chest pain, dysphagia, regurgitation, and, occasionally, haemorrhage. Respiratory symptoms may occur. Diagnosis is based on determining the pressure and frequency of reflux (for which pH monitoring is preferred), testing for symptoms that may be caused by reflux, and assessing the degree of oesophagitis, for which endoscopy and histology are the only known techniques.
 ...
PMID:Aetiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 306 36

During 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring 52 patients who had angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms underwent exercise testing, as far as their symptoms allowed, on a treadmill to determine whether gastro-oesophageal reflux occurred during exertion. In 11 patients the 24 hour oesophageal pH score was abnormally high; 10 of these showed exertional gastro-oesophageal reflux, and in nine this was associated with their usual chest pain. A further 13 patients had a normal 24 hour pH score but had exertional reflux coincident with chest pain during exercise testing. The mean lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in both of these groups of patients was appreciably lower than that in 28 patients who had a normal 24 hour pH score and no exertional reflux. These findings suggest that exertional gastro-oesophageal reflux accounts for the symptoms of a large proportion of patients who have angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and that oesophageal pH monitoring during exercise testing on a treadmill enables this group of patients to be identified.
 ...
PMID:Exertional gastro-oesophageal reflux: a mechanism for symptoms in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. 311 85

Several clinical situations may justify surgery for hiatal hernia. The approach varies depending on whether the problem is a mechanical complication or a gastro-oesophageal reflux responsible for oesophagitis, peptic stenosis, chest pain, respiratory disorders or Barrett's oesophagus. Recurrence of reflux after surgery raises even more complex problems. Evaluation by modern exploratory techniques helps in establishing precise indications for the operation which must, be reserved to selected cases.
 ...
PMID:[Which hiatal hernias require surgery?]. 315 92

Thirty-seven patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were included in an esophageal manometry study before and six months after fundoplication. The motility pattern of the body of the esophagus in the patient group was compared with that of 15 healthy controls. No differences in swallowing amplitudes were found between patients with different degrees of esophagitis or between GERD patients and controls. Peristaltic activity was slightly impaired in patients with endoscopic esophagitis compared with controls. No correlation was found between dysphagia and chest pain symptoms on the one hand and on peristaltic pattern and swallowing amplitudes on the other. It was concluded that conventional esophageal manometry has little to contribute to the investigation of symptoms such as non-burning chest pain and dysphagia in GERD. Effective anti-reflux surgery eliminates these symptoms with little influence on the esophageal motility pattern.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal body motor disturbances in gastroesophageal reflux and the effects of fundoplication. 324 4

Esophageal motility disorders consist of a complex array of disturbances in normal esophageal function associated with dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux, and noncardiac chest pain. A thorough knowledge of normal esophageal anatomy and physiology is important to a full understanding of these motility derangements. Through a complicated interaction of neuromuscular and hormonal influences, the voluntary act of swallowing transforms into an automated sequence of peristaltic waves propelling food and liquids into the stomach in concert with coordinated relaxation of the sphincters. Anatomic and physiologic barriers exist within the esophagus protecting against gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration. With improvements in diagnostic tools such as barium contrast radiography, scintigraphy, pH measurements, and esophageal manometrics with provocative testing, motility disorders have become better defined and understood. Primary motility disorders consist of achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), "nutcracker esophagus," hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and nonspecific esophageal motility dysfunction (NEMD). A host of secondary and miscellaneous motility disorders also affect the esophagus, including scleroderma and other connective tissue diseases, diabetes mellitus, Chagas' disease, chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and neuromuscular disorders of striated muscle. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may also be promoted by associated motility disturbances. Treatment modalities include surgical myotomy; dilatation; and pharmacologic manipulations, including use of nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, H2-blockers, and psychotropic drugs where appropriate.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal motility disorders. 329 77

Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring is an accurate quantitative test of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). However, it does not answer the question: are the patients' symptoms due to GER? We developed a numerical scale to quantify the percent association between symptoms and pH less than 4--the symptom index (SI). In 100 consecutive patients with heartburn or chest pain, the SI for the chief complaint was either high (greater than 75%) or low (less than 25%) in 77% of cases. A similar bimodal distribution was seen when heartburn or chest pain symptoms were individually evaluated. There was a good association between high SI and the presence of GER (97.5%), as well as low SI and a normal 24-h pH study (81.1%). Endoscopy was normal in 89.5% of patients with low SI, but patients with high SI had esophagitis in only 69.7% of cases. The Bernstein test showed a poor association with the SI. Therefore, the SI gives clinically relevant information regarding the role of acid reflux and patient's symptoms. We believe this simple calculated index should be included in the analysis of 24-h esophageal pH studies.
 ...
PMID:The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. 334 91

When a patient presents with anginalike chest pain, the first objective is to rule out heart disease. Once cardiac problems have been ruled out, the second objective is to determine whether the history and/or symptoms suggest an esophageal abnormality. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux-associated chest pain can occasionally be made from barium radiographic or endoscopic findings. A series of additional esophageal tests--motility studies, Bernstein test, edrophonium test, and balloon distention test--may be performed to help ascertain whether the pain stems from the esophagus. Reassurance should precede specific drug therapy. If any of the test results suggest gastroesophageal reflux, a trial of therapy for this indication, eg, a histamine2 receptor blocker, should be initiated. An esophageal motility disorder may be treated with an anticholinergic agent, nitro-glycerinlike product, or mild tranquilizer. If necessary, use of a calcium channel blocker may be appropriate.
 ...
PMID:Chest pain associated with esophageal disease. 335 67

The role of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility abnormalities in patients with angina-type chest pain and normal coronary angiogram is not clear. The aim of this study was: a) to assess the importance of these two disorders in the same patients, b) to study the diagnostic usefulness of provocation tests, c) to determine final outcome in these patients. Seventeen patients with angina-type chest pain and normal coronary angiograms were studied to determine the diagnostic value of esophageal manometry, postprandial esophageal pH monitoring, provocation tests (methylergometrine stimulation, acid perfusion test) and endoscopy. Baseline esophageal motility was abnormal in 10 patients. Esophageal motility disorders were nonspecific in seven patients. Eight patients had reflux. The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was decreased in these patients as compared with normals, and endoscopy showed a high Z line, and/or a large opening of the cardia in 7 of them. Neither conventional manometry nor postprandial esophageal pH monitoring allowed to consider the esophagus as responsible for chest pain. The methylergometrine test was positive in 4 patients (simultaneous occurrence of familiar pain and esophageal dysmotility). Baseline manometric studies did not allow to forecast the response to methylergometrine injection. The acid perfusion test was negative (no symptoms were reproduced) in all patients. After esophageal evaluation, 16 patients were followed for a mean of 26 +/- 9 months. No cardiac disorders appeared, but all patients continued to have pain, and 7 were incapable of working.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[pHmetry and manometry of the esophagus in patients with pain of the angina type and a normal angiography]. 336 13

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of oesophageal abnormalities and to determine their nature in patients with retrosternal chest pain and normal coronary angiography with a negative coronary spasm provocation test. Oesophageal manometry was carried out in all cases with or without a spasm provocation (usually alkalosis) test. Forty consecutive patients were studied: 19 men (47.7 +/- 10.0 years) and 21 women (54.7 +/- 7.5 years). A history of gastro-intestinal disorder was obtained in 57 p. 100 of cases (hiatal hernia and/or gastro-oesophageal reflux, biliary lithiasis and/or cholecystectomy, gastritis). Seventeen patients had broad based powerful oesophageal contractions which are an established cause of pain; they were recorded under basal conditions in 5 cases and after a provocation test in 12 cases. Two patients had a megaoesophagus without giant waves. Thirteen patients had manometric signs of reflux (malposition and hypotonia of the lower oesophageal sphincter) of whom 7 had giant waves on provocation. In addition, three patients experienced pain during gastro-oesophageal reflux (1 case) or hypotonia of the lower oesophageal sphincter (2 cases). In all, a very probable oesophageal origin of the chest pain was demonstrated in 22 patients (55 p. 100 of cases).
 ...
PMID:[Esophageal motility in cases of chest pain with normal coronarography]. 343 26

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the experience acquired along a 15 years period (1971-1985) in the treatment of achalasia of the esophagus. One hundred and fifty six patients were evaluated. The average age was 50.8 years, and the M/F ratio 0.9/1. Dysphagia was present in 100%, regurgitation in 78.2%, weight loss in 61.5%, and chest pain in 50% of the cases, being the main symptoms. Serology for Chagas disease was positive in 21.2% of the patients. When classified by radiologic criteria the groups were: grate I 18.5%, grate II 53.8%, grate III 14.7% and grate IV 12.8%. The high pressure zone was X 23 mmHg (N 14.8 mmHg) pre dilatation. The incidence of vigorous achalasia was 5.7% and the urecholine test was positive in 61.1%. Only 95 patients were submitted to pneumatic dilatation, and this is the group that we shall analyze in detail. We performed 110 dilatations, since 80 patients were dilated once and 15 received 2 dilatations. The high pressure zone post dilatations was X 12.5 mmHg. We obtained good results in 82.1%, regular in 3.1% and bad results in 14.7% of the patients. The morbidity was 4.5% (3 perforations and 2 gastroesophageal reflux), and the mortality 0.9%. There was relapse in 26.3% of the cases. In 53.3% of the patients submitted to a second dilatation we obtained good results. The average hospital stay was 2.5 days, and the follow up X 32.4 months. Thirty nine patients were sent to surgery with good results in 82%, regular in 2.5%, and bad in 15.6%. The morbidity was 15.3% and the mortality 5.1%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Esophageal achalasia: review of the results after 15 years' experience]. 344 84


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>