Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The esophageal origin of angina-like noncardiac chest pain can be identified with certainty only when spontaneous chest pain episodes are associated with gastroesophageal reflux, abnormal esophageal motility, or both. Since noncardiac chest pain typically occurs infrequently, prolonged monitoring is required to establish such an association. Ambulatory esophageal monitoring offers the additional advantages of studying the patient in everyday life and avoiding hospital admission. Although the amplification and storage of 24-hour signals in a portable recorder no longer poses technical problems, the complexity of the analysis of the recorded signals should not be underestimated. For noncardiac chest pain, the most relevant part of the analysis is the association between chest pain episodes and the recorded esophageal signals. To determine whether contraction amplitude or duration during chest pain episodes is abnormal, their measurements are compared with baseline values from the same patient. Fully automated analysis by computer is feasible and, since it avoids observer bias, preferable. The yield of 24-hour monitoring in noncardiac chest pain reported by different groups of investigators varies considerably. Motor abnormalities have been identified as the cause of chest pain in 4.5-18% of patients studied, and reflux in 4.5-25%. In addition, some patients had both dysmotility- and reflux-related pain episodes. As expected, the yield of the technique is higher in patients with frequent pain episodes. In patients who do not experience pain during 24-hour monitoring, the technique cannot provide a firm diagnosis of pain of esophageal origin. Recently, a much higher yield of 24-hour monitoring was reported in patients with noncardiac chest pain admitted to a coronary-care unit. A total of 76% of these patients were found to have either reflux- or dysmotility-related chest pain. Despite its relatively low yield, the addition of esophageal pressure monitoring to ambulatory pH monitoring is worthwhile and probably also cost-effective in patients with frequent episodes of unexplained chest pain.
 ...
PMID:Ambulatory esophageal monitoring in noncardiac chest pain. 159 69

During the session on diagnostic testing, various diagnostic tests used to identify the cause of chest pain were discussed. This critique of diagnostic assessments of the complex etiology of chest pain is presented as a contribution toward further investigation and clarification of this difficult clinical syndrome. The first step in the evaluation process is to exclude coronary artery disease. Patients with angina and normal coronary artery flow may have atypical disease, such as microvascular angina or syndrome X. The precise relationship between these disorders and esophageal disease or gastroesophageal reflux, as well as their possible involvement in chest pain of undetermined origin, requires further definition. A limitation of esophageal provocation tests is that they may identify the esophagus as the source of pain without determining the specific esophageal disorder that causes the pain. Problems associated with 24-hour pH and pressure monitoring include (a) poor correlation between reflux episodes and heartburn symptoms, (b) the lack of a good functioning swallowing signal, and (c) the huge amount of data that must be analyzed, along with shortcomings in computer-aided analysis. Nevertheless, the various available diagnostic tests can provide important information to the clinician.
 ...
PMID:Critique of the session on diagnostic testing. 159 70

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a ubiquitous problem, although therapeutic options continue to evolve. Effective therapy calls for understanding the pathogenesis. Key factors associated with GERD include incompetence of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal clearance, gastric contents, tissue resistance, and potency of the refluxate. Phase-type directed therapy remains the best treatment approach and histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists are now the cornerstone of therapy for patients not responsive to conservative measures. In a subset of patients with severe esophagitis who do not respond to conventional H2-receptor antagonist therapy, efficacy has been demonstrated with high-dose therapy. The acid suppressant omeprazole, highly effective in erosive esophagitis, is the drug of choice for esophagitis resistant to H2-receptor antagonists. Despite effective forms of therapy, relapse rates are high in patients with severe GERD, and maintenance therapy typically is required. With near uniformity, efficacy end points for these agents have been directed toward relief of heartburn, regurgitation, and dyspepsia. Few data exist correlating relief of GERD and improvement of chest pain. Although therapeutic strategies for treating GERD have improved, empiric treatment of suspected GERD in the patient with noncardiac chest pain does not appear to be the optimal approach and should be reserved for cases where diagnostic testing is limited or unavailable.
 ...
PMID:Medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. 159 72

Treatment of patients with an esophageal source of chest pain remains a challenging problem. Although a variety of measures--including nitrates, anticholinergics, sedatives, calcium channel antagonists, esophageal dilation, and psychological reassurance--are available for the management of esophageal chest pain, none has emerged as the treatment of choice. Studies of nitrate preparations for the treatment of painful motility disorders are limited by a small number of patients and the lack of randomized, placebo-controlled investigations. The efficacy of anticholinergic drugs in hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders has not been reported. In the only prospective placebo-controlled trial using an anti-depressant, trazodone was superior to placebo in relieving symptoms in patients with a variety of esophageal motility disorders. Conflicting results have been described in placebo-controlled trials of the calcium channel antagonists nifedipine and diltiazem in patients with "nutcracker esophagus" or diffuse spasm. Information about the efficacy of verapamil and hydralazine is limited. Esophageal dilation has been useful in selected patients. For many patients, esophageal chest pain may be associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Treatment of these patients with nitrates, calcium channel antagonists, or anticholinergics may aggravate their reflux. The mechanisms of esophageal chest pain remain unknown. Recent studies have suggested that abnormal motility may not be the only factor associated with chest pain. An important number of patients have behavioral abnormalities, increased nociception, impaired coronary vasodilatory reserve, or a diffuse abnormality of smooth muscle. Research into rational therapy for chest pain patients should take into account the contribution of these other factors.
 ...
PMID:Current medical therapy for esophageal motility disorders. 159 73

The frequency and the possible age-related characteristics of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) were investigated in 195 consecutive elderly subjects (mean age 74 years), referred to endoscopy for abdominal symptoms or sideropenic anaemia. In the 105 of these patients in whom there was any suspicion of GORD, 24-hour pH monitoring was carried out. All the patients were interviewed before the examinations. Erosive or complicated (grade 2-4) oesophagitis was found in 18% of patients. The main symptoms in these patients were dysphagia, respiratory symptoms and vomiting. Chronic cough, hoarseness or wheezing were present in 57% of patients with oesophagitis compared with 33% of those without oesophagitis (p less than 0.001). The occurrence of heartburn and regurgitation did not differ significantly between patients with or without oesophagitis, although the mean symptom scores were higher in those with oesophagitis. Dyspepsia and chest pain were not typical symptoms in oesophagitis. Of patients with oesophagitis 29% had no typical symptoms of GORD; only 24% of patients with regurgitation had oesophagitis. In 24-hour pH monitoring, a significant increase in the occurrence of symptoms was not seen until total reflux time pH less than 4 exceeded 10%. The occurrence of heartburn did not correlate with the extent of reflux in the pH study. In conclusion, typical symptoms of GORD in the aged were regurgitation, dysphagia, respiratory symptoms and vomiting rather than heartburn.
 ...
PMID:Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in elderly people. 175 93

The Bernstein test has been used as a test of oesophageal acid sensitivity for over 30 years but its clinical value has been challenged by the advent of ambulatory pH monitoring. Furthermore, the relation between mucosal acid sensitivity, symptomatic reflux, and abnormal oesophageal acid exposure time is unclear. This study examined the relation between these three parameters in patients referred for pH monitoring with unexplained chest pain or heartburn. Fifty consecutive patients were studied - nine with non-cardiac chest pain and 41 with a history of heartburn. Symptomatic reflux was defined as a greater than or equal to 50% temporal association between pain episodes and reflux events (pH less than 4) during pH monitoring. A positive acid perfusion test (in which the patient's usual symptoms were evoked by acid, though not saline) had a 100% sensitivity, 73% specificity, and 81% accuracy for the detection of symptomatic reflux. All 10 patients with symptomatic reflux during pH monitoring had evidence of mucosal acid sensitivity. A negative acid perfusion test made symptomatic reflux unlikely. However, symptomatic reflux or a positive acid perfusion test, or both, were found in some patients with a normal oesophageal acid exposure time during pH monitoring. Mucosal acid sensitivity, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure time, and symptomatic reflux should be regarded as separate, though related aspects of reflux disease. The Bernstein test is simple, safe, and easily performed. A positive test helps to identify an oesophageal cause of symptoms, particularly in patients in whom other aspects of 'gastro-oesophageal reflux disease' are absent, or who do not have symptoms during pH monitoring.
 ...
PMID:Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 186 28

35 patients with angina-like chest pain underwent esophageal manometry after a coronary artery disease had been ruled out by angiography. Furthermore, patients after gastric or esophageal surgery, with pathologic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or with pathologic gastroesophageal reflux as seen on 24-hour-pH-metry were excluded from this study. 29 out of 35 patients (83%) had a normal manometric study, six patients (17%) had a motility disorder; five of these showed an unspecific dismotility pattern and were asymptomatic while the study was done; only one patient presented with esophageal spasm. Since only this latter patient was symptomatic while the study was done, a correlation between symptoms and this motility disorder seems likely. --If pathologic gastroesophageal reflux has been ruled out, esophageal manometry can establish a diagnosis in only 3% of patients with angina-like chest pain without esophageal symptoms (dysphagia, odynophagia, heartburn or regurgitation). We conclude that this complicated examination should not be done in these patients.
 ...
PMID:[Esophageal motility disorders with thoracic pain of unknown origin]. 188 9

Esophago-gastric 24 h pH-metry recording is a diagnostic technique that allows ambulatory monitoring of acid esophageal reflux during 24 h while the patient pursues his everyday activities. Prolonged pH recording allows evaluation of the correlation of esophageal or extraesophageal symptoms (i.e. arrhythmias, chest pain, asthma) with intraesophageal pH. It permits us to evaluate the effectiveness of antireflux therapy, to modify therapy, or change daily dosages.
 ...
PMID:[24-hour esophago-gastric pH-metry: clinical indications]. 189 26

Patients with recurrent chest pain free of significant coronary artery disease account for 10% to 30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Recent studies suggest that gastroesophageal reflux disease may be very common in these patients. The cause of this chest pain seems to be related primarily to an acid-sensitive mucosa regardless of the presence of esophagitis. Unfortunately, a careful history will not distinguish chest pain arising from a cardiac versus an esophageal source. Therefore, all patients must undergo a thorough cardiac evaluation before assuming that acid reflux is the cause of their complaints. Initial gastroenterology evaluation will usually include upper GI endoscopy or barium studies, possibly with acid perfusion (Bernstein) testing, or both. However, the more sensitive and specific test for acid-related disease is prolonged esophageal pH monitoring. This study quantifies the amount of acid reflux but, more importantly, identifies the relationship between chest pain and acid reflux episodes. Patients should be studied in the outpatient setting with emphasis placed on performing activities that replicate their chest pain. Although we presume that acid-induced chest pain responds as well as heartburn to vigorous antireflux regimens, there are few studies to address this issue. Nevertheless, I have had great success in treating these patients with either high-dose H2 blockers or omeprazole therapy.
 ...
PMID:Gastroesophageal reflux disease as a cause of chest pain. 189 6

Functional tests of the esophagus have become increasingly popular over the last 10 years. Here we present a cost/benefit analysis model to evaluate the real contribution to diagnosis with reference to the cost of these tests. All of the patients referred to the digestive physiopathology laboratory at the Institute of Surgical Semiotics, from 1988 to 1990, were evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (152 cases), dysphagia (27 cases) and chest pain (12 cases). The cost of each modified diagnosis was L. 508,250 in the first case, L. 315,772 in the second case and L. 262,446 in the third case. Additionally, concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease, the cost of medical therapy based on endoscopic diagnosis alone was compared to that of medical therapy guided by these functional tests. Hence it was demonstrated that it is economically advantageous to study functionally all of the symptomatic patients, except the cases of esophagitis, and patients with atypical symptoms or with mild symptoms and endoscopic esophagitis of the first degree. It is not worthwhile investigating patients with second, third or fourth degree esophagitis, regardless of the symptoms, and patients with typical severe symptoms and first degree esophagitis. These functional tests are economically practical in all cases in which morphologic alterations are either absent or minimal.
 ...
PMID:[Esophageal manometry and pH-monitoring: cost-benefit analysis]. 190 49


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>