Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of patients with chronic unexplained dyspepsia and compare the symptoms with peptic ulcer and biliary pain, and determine the prevalence of symptoms that may indicate psychoneurotic traits and measure chronic illness behaviour (days lost from work and doctor visits). Studied were: 113 patients with essential dyspepsia, defined as endoscopically confirmed non-ulcer dyspepsia where gallstones, the irritable bowel syndrome and gastro-esophageal reflux have been excluded and there is no ascertainable cause for the dyspepsia; 55 patients with dyspepsia and peptic ulceration at endoscopy; and 53 patients with diagnosed biliary pain and cholelithiasis, proven at cholecystectomy. All patients completed a detailed structured history questionnaire in the presence of one investigator. More patients with peptic ulcer than with essential dyspepsia experienced night pain, pain relieved by food, and vomiting, while more patients with essential dyspepsia than with cholelithiasis experienced epigastric pain, lack of radiation of pain, continuous pain, mild to moderate pain, pain before meals, pain relieved by food and antacids, pain aggravated by food and alcohol, and an absence of vomiting (all p less than 0.01). Symptoms suggesting psychoneurosis, aerophagy symptoms, and chronic illness behaviour were similar in all groups. We conclude that certain symptoms may be of value in diagnosing the underlying cause of dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the clinical features and illness behaviour of patients presenting with dyspepsia of unknown cause (essential dyspepsia) and organic disease. 346 12

Patients with symptoms of GERD and dyspepsia are among the most common consulters in general practice and are different from their counterparts in the community who choose not to consult although they suffer from similar symptoms. They represent a heterogeneous group with considerable symptom overlap. They have a relatively poor quality of life and endoscopic findings can only explain symptoms in about half of these patients. Thus psychosocial factors which could contribute to their morbidity should be explored. While some studies have methodological shortcomings, main findings are that key psychological factors are anxiety, tension, neuroticism, somatization, fears of malignancy, negative assessment of health, depression, a poor social network and less effective coping strategies. Physical illness is likely to bring on psychological distress due to discomfort or threat of ill health. Cognizance of psychosocial factors will facilitate an understanding of the underlying problems and will improve diagnosis and selection of optimal treatment.
 ...
PMID:Psychosocial factors and their role in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia. 889 45

The available evidence from randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses on the therapeutic efficacy of psychotropic drugs and, specifically, of antidepressants, in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGD), are recent and still fairly limited. The use of these drugs is based on the frequent association of anxiety and depression or neurosis in patients with FGD who seek medical care and on the demonstrated efficacy of these drugs in relieving chronic pain, whatever its origin or localization, for more than 30 years. Antidepressants, even in doses under the antidepressant range, are antinociceptive due to their central and peripheral neuromodulatory effect, which is completely independent of anticholinergic, spasmolytic or antidepressant effects. This has been demonstrated in both animals and humans and, as occurs with another antinociceptive drugs such as clonidine, is mediated by alpha-adrenoreceptors. The choice of antidepressant depends both on the evidence of its analgesic activity (in general greater with tricyclic antidepressants than with the more modern selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and on the presence of drug-related adverse effects, which include not only anticholinergic adverse effects but also the possibility of hypotension or cardiotoxicity, which should be avoided. The main selection criteria are demonstrated efficacy and safety. Antidepressants have been shown to be effective in the specific field of non-coronary chest pain probably originating in the esophagus unrelated to gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially mianserin and trazodone, and the effect is maintained in the long term in nearly three-quarters of treated patients. Tricyclic antidepressants have also been shown to be effective in the treatment of abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, with an OR of 4.2 and an NNT of 3.2 in comparison with placebo. In contrast, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of antidepressants in functional dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:[Antidepressant therapy in functional gastrointestinal disorders]. 1618 84

The aim is to study the characteristics of the operation of psychological defenses in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. On the example of a survey of 60 patients showed that the actual mental status of patients, being an inpatient at the endoscopically negative GERD, characterized by a high degree of neuroticism in comparison with GERD patients under reflux esophagitis. This fact is considered in terms of imperfect mental protection, among which the most common in these patients is the suppression of the negative emotional experiences. As one of the possible causes of resistance to therapy is considered the psychological phenomenon of "secondary gain from illness".
 ...
PMID:[Endoscopic negative GERD: psychogenic nature of somatic complaints]. 2262 51