Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Esophageal pH-metry is the test of choice for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux. However, although it allows acid refluxes to be distinguished, it is of limited value for identifying alkaline or mixed (acid mixed with alkaline material) refluxes. To evaluate the ability of dual pH-metry to identify alkaline or mixed refluxes, the gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux pattern were evaluated simultaneously in 64 patients with mild-moderate esophagitis, in 28 patients with severe or complicated esophagitis, and in 20 healthy subjects. A dual esophageal gastric pH-probe allowed three different types of esophageal reflux to be distinguished: (a) acid refluxes, defined as a drop in esophageal pH to values less than 4 together with a gastric pH less than 4; (b) mixed refluxes, defined as a drop in esophageal pH from baseline to values greater than 4 associated with rises in gastric pH to greater than 4 values; (c) alkaline refluxes, defined as a rise in esophageal pH to greater than 7 associated with a simultaneous increase in gastric pH to greater than 4. Gastric acidity was more significantly reduced in patients with severe or complicated esophagitis than it was in healthy subjects (P less than 0.01). The reflux pattern in both mild-moderate and severe esophagitis was characterized by mainly acid refluxes and a marked increase in the time the esophagus mucosa was exposed to acid (P less than 0.001). Pure alkaline refluxes were rare (less than 1%) in both healthy subjects and esophagitis patients. The number of mixed refluxes was considerably higher in severe esophagitis patients than it was in either mild-moderate esophagitis patients or controls (P less than 0.05). The finding of mixed refluxes in severe or complicated esophagitis suggests that biliary acids and/or pancreatic enzymes are involved in the pathogenesis of severe forms of esophagitis.
 ...
PMID:Gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux patterns in patients with esophagitis. 844 Apr 52

Esophageal clearance responses were studied by a new technique comprising a miniature electronic strain gauge attached to an inflatable balloon in 30 normal volunteers and 48 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The pressure changes around the balloon and traction forces acting on the balloon were measured during graded balloon distention (0-12 mL of air for 30 seconds each inflation) in the lower and midesophagus. All normal volunteers responded to distention with development of swallow independent contractions above the balloon [65 mm Hg/30 s (range, 45-100 mm Hg/30 s)] together with generation of an aboral traction force [15 g (range, 9-20 g)]. Patients with reflux esophagitis showed a higher distention threshold for initiation of these responses, induced fewer proximal contractions [24 mm Hg/30 s (range, 0-38 mm Hg/30 s); P less than 0.01 vs. normal], and generated weaker traction forces [4 g (range, 0-6 g) at 10 mL P less than 0.01 vs. normal]. Patients with the most severe esophagitis showed greatest impairment of the clearance response (correlation = 0.7, P less than 0.01) and the greatest esophageal residence of refluxed acid (correlation = 0.5, P less than 0.01). These abnormalities appear to be of relevance to the pathophysiology of esophageal reflux disease although it remains to be determined whether they are the cause, or the result, of the esophagitis.
 ...
PMID:Identification of an abnormal esophageal clearance response to intraluminal distention in patients with esophagitis. 149 44

Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis (EIPD) is an uncommon entity in which distended esophageal mucous glands form flask-like outpouchings from the esophagus. Its relationship with esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux, and benign stricture suggests that it is a consequence of inflammation.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal pseudodiverticulosis: two new cases in children. 150 87

Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring is increasing in popularity as the means to measure esophageal exposure to gastric juice and document the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, particularly before surgical therapy. Normal values for pH exposure were obtained from 50 asymptomatic healthy subjects. Receiver operating characteristic curves constructed from another 25 asymptomatic healthy subjects and 25 selected patients with other markers of increased esophageal acid exposure showed that a composite score and the percent total time pH less than 4 provide the most efficient interpretation of the test with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 98% for the composite score, and a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96% for the percent total time pH less than 4. Repeat monitoring of healthy volunteers and symptomatic subjects in the inpatient and outpatient environment showed no significant difference, with the exception that the number of reflux episodes was significantly greater during the outpatient recording in volunteers. This did not affect the clinical accuracy of the test. Esophageal pH probes were well tolerated, but caused belching and coughing during the early part of the monitored period. We conclude that computerized ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring in the outpatient setting provides accurate and reproducible results.
 ...
PMID:Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. 151 62

We recorded esophageal alkaline exposure time (AET) in 52 patients with gastroesophageal reflux and in 20 control subjects to determine whether esophageal pH monitoring can measure reflux of bile acids and trypsin from the duodenum. Patients underwent a further 16-h study (divided into 2-h periods) in which AET was correlated with bile acid and trypsin concentrations in esophageal aspirates. Patients had greater nocturnal AET than controls (22.7 versus 0.9%, p = 0.005). Patients with a stricture had a greater AET than patients with erosive esophagitis (25.2 versus 13%, p less than 0.05). There was no relationship between esophageal bile acid concentrations and AET, and total bile acid concentrations were similar regardless of whether a 2-h period contained alkaline episodes. Esophageal bile acid concentrations were no different, in patients with a normal esophagus, esophagitis, stricture, or Barrett's esophagus. Trypsin was found in only 5% of aspirates, and could not be predicted by AET. We conclude that measurement of AET is not useful in the clinical evaluation of duodeno-esophageal bile reflux, and bile acids and trypsin are not important in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.
 ...
PMID:Bile acids and trypsin are unimportant in alkaline esophageal reflux. 155 3

Twenty-three consecutive patients who had persistent respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology were evaluated to determine the presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its relationship to their respiratory complaints. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures and the characteristics of the peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus were determined. Esophageal acid exposure 5 cm and 20 cm above the LES was measured using a pH probe with two antimony sensors. Aspiration was diagnosed when respiratory symptoms occurred during or within 3 minutes after a reflux episode, recorded at both levels of the esophagus. Based on these criteria, 12 patients were considered nonaspirators (group A), and 11 were categorized as aspirators (group B). Aspirators had: (1) lower LES pressure (6.1 +/- 3.1 versus 12 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, p less than 0.01); (2) decreased amplitude of peristalsis in the proximal esophagus (34 +/- 16 versus 59 +/- 21 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and distal esophagus (46 +/- 25 versus 91 +/- 28 mm Hg, p less than 0.01), and higher incidence of simultaneous, nonperistaltic waves (30% versus 4%); and (3) lower UES pressure (44 +/- 23 versus 74 +/- 38 mm Hg). Impaired peristalsis in aspirators caused a higher acid exposure (11.4% +/- 8.0% versus 1.0% +/- 0.7% of time pH less than 4, p less than 0.01) and delayed clearance (5.5 +/- 6.5 versus 0.7 +/- 0.4 min) in the proximal esophagus. Our study shows that, in patients with respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring will identify a subgroup of true aspirators. These patients suffer from a panesophageal motor dysfunction that affects all three barriers to aspiration: the LES, the esophageal "pump mechanism," and the UES.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux. 155 80

Gastric contents regurgitation into the oesophagus during induction of anaesthesia may easily fail to be recognized. The incidence of this complication was investigated in 59 consecutive patients. They were scheduled for elective thoracic surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone (6 mg.kg-1), fentanyl (3 micrograms.kg-1), and either atracurium (0.4 mg.kg-1), vecuronium (0.1 mg.kg-1) or suxamethonium (1.5 mg.kg-1). Oesophageal pH was monitored with an oesophageal pH probe, connected to a portable computer. The pH probe had a virtually instantaneous response time and was positioned in the lower oesophagus. Acid reflux was defined as a decrease in pH to less than 4.0. During the course of induction, three patients (5%) presented an episode of acid reflux. No patient presented any clinical or radiological signs of pulmonary aspiration. This study suggests that monitoring oesophageal pH is a simple method of detecting gastric reflux during the period of induction.
 ...
PMID:Measurement of lower oesophageal pH during induction of anaesthesia: use of oesophageal probe. 157 69

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) entails the identification of patients with esophagitis and its complications as well as patients who have symptoms but no mucosal disease. Endoscopy is mandatory to establish a diagnosis of reflux esophagitis, to exclude other esophageal disease and to permit directed biopsy if columnar metaplasia, dysplasia or carcinoma is suspected. The lesions of reflux esophagitis--erosions, ulceration, stricturing and metaplasia--should be identified and graded independently, using a classification system such as the recently described "MUSE" (Metaplasia, Ulcer, Stricture, Erosions) system. Fluoroscopy can identify associated structural changes such as stricturing or esophageal shortening. Measures of esophageal acid exposure time may be used to quantify reflux before and after treatment; however, if the patient has typical symptoms but no esophagitis, a temporal association between symptoms and episodes of esophageal acidification should be sought. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring with accurate event-marking provides recordings suitable for an objective statistical analysis, which was evaluated prospectively in 14 patients. Computerized analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH recordings diagnosed 5 patients as having acid-related symptoms although only 3 of 5 patients fulfilling the criteria for pathological reflux had pH-related chest pain. This finding was confirmed by 5 experts who analyzed all recordings visually, unaware of the result of the computer analysis. The Bernstein test should be reserved for patients whose symptoms are too infrequent to permit an objective assessment of symptom occurrence during pH monitoring. In conclusion, i) endoscopy is the test of choice for the diagnosis of esophagitis but it should be supplemented by a standardized and reliable scoring system for disease severity; ii) ambulatory esophageal pH recording with accurate event-marking is the test of choice for the diagnosis of GER-related symptoms, but it should be supplemented by an objective assessment of the temporal relationship between symptoms and esophageal pH; and iii) esophageal manometry is the test of choice for evaluating esophageal peristalsis and LES (lower esophageal sphincter) function but, in the context of GERD, its main indication is the assessment of GERD patients who are being considered for surgery. The widespread use of other tests for clinical purposes must await a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms which can lead to the development of GERD.
 ...
PMID:Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical? 157 93

Collis-Nissen gastroplasty fundoplication is a widely accepted operation for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease complicated by oesophageal shortening. Assessment of this operation by 24 h oesophageal pH monitoring has not previously been reported. Our aim was to correlate clinical and endoscopic results with 24 h pH studies. Twenty-nine patients had a gastroplasty fundoplication, as a result of which twenty-five (86%) had an excellent clinical result, 2 (7%) had a good result and 2 (7%) had a poor result. The two poor results were in patients who had previously undergone anti-reflux surgery. All 29 patients had pre-operative pH monitoring. Twenty-three patients had postoperative pH studies. Oesophageal acidification times were normal postoperatively in 16 of 23 patients however, 7 still had an abnormal study. One of the two patients with a poor clinical result was studied and persistent severe oesophageal acidification was demonstrated. The remaining 6 patients with abnormal studies were asymptomatic. Five of the 6 asymptomatic patients also had a normal oesophagogastroscopy with no macroscopic oesophagitis. We conclude that 24 h pH monitoring after the Collis-Nissen operation should only be performed to assess clinically and endoscopically poor results.
 ...
PMID:Collis-Nissen gastroplasty fundoplication for complicated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 158 1

During the session on diagnostic testing, various diagnostic tests used to identify the cause of chest pain were discussed. This critique of diagnostic assessments of the complex etiology of chest pain is presented as a contribution toward further investigation and clarification of this difficult clinical syndrome. The first step in the evaluation process is to exclude coronary artery disease. Patients with angina and normal coronary artery flow may have atypical disease, such as microvascular angina or syndrome X. The precise relationship between these disorders and esophageal disease or gastroesophageal reflux, as well as their possible involvement in chest pain of undetermined origin, requires further definition. A limitation of esophageal provocation tests is that they may identify the esophagus as the source of pain without determining the specific esophageal disorder that causes the pain. Problems associated with 24-hour pH and pressure monitoring include (a) poor correlation between reflux episodes and heartburn symptoms, (b) the lack of a good functioning swallowing signal, and (c) the huge amount of data that must be analyzed, along with shortcomings in computer-aided analysis. Nevertheless, the various available diagnostic tests can provide important information to the clinician.
 ...
PMID:Critique of the session on diagnostic testing. 159 70


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>