Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0017168 (gastroesophageal reflux disease)
 11,783 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patients with unexplained chest pain represent a major clinical dilemma for primary-care physicians, gastroenterologists, and cardiologists. References to this prevalent clinical problem date to more than 150 years ago; confusion about its pathophysiology has resulted in the use of a variety of descriptive terms such as "noncardiac," "atypical," and "angiographically negative" chest pain. Since none of these terms applies to all cases, the description "chest pain of undetermined origin" may be preferable. Because the esophagus has a similar location and innervation as the heart, an esophageal source for unexplained chest pain syndromes has been frequently suggested. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of gastroesophageal reflux as a likely component of esophageal pain. Moreover, "irritable esophagus" is an emerging concept that implies a generalized alteration in esophageal pain threshold, that is, abnormal nociception. The potential effects of stress or altered psychological states in this phenomenon must be considered, and the role of "panic attacks" in the production of pain in these patients needs to be clarified. In addition, stress may produce altered esophageal motility and lead to manometric abnormalities such as the "nutcracker esophagus" or a hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter. Finally, the precise contribution of the heart in producing pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms remains unclear because the precise role of microvascular angina has yet to be clarified.
 ...
PMID:Chest pain of undetermined origin: overview of pathophysiology. 159 59

Sixty-three infants, aged from 1 to 4 months, were examined for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) using esophageal pH monitoring. Thirty were examined because of chronic vomiting, 21 were healthy controls examined for GER as part of a screening program for sudden infant death syndrome, and 12 had an acute respiratory disease (RD). The 24-h pH monitoring data were within normal ranges in 26 infants (20 controls, 2 babies with emesis, and 4 with RD). Data were abnormal in 37 infants (1 control, 28 infants with emesis, and 8 with RD). All babies were submitted during a fasting awake period to a 30-min chest physiotherapy session. In the three groups studied, the incidence of GER episodes detected by the pH probe was significantly higher during physiotherapy if compared (a) to the calculated mean incidence during a 30-min period of the 24-h investigation or (b) to the incidence during a fasting awake period such as that during which the physiotherapy was given (p less than 0.001; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). We conclude that chest physiotherapy significantly increases GER incidence. We therefore propose restricting chest physiotherapy to fasting periods. These data add to the confusion that already exists regarding the possible causal relationship between (acid) GER and respiratory disease.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal pH monitoring data during chest physiotherapy. 191 48

Surveys of athletes, primarily runners, have shown that digestive disorders are common, associated both with training and racing. Women, in particular, seem to suffer most commonly. Nearly half have loose stools and nausea and vomiting occur frequently after hard runs. Diarrhoea, incontinence and rectal bleeding occur with surprising frequency. Runners may use medications prophylactically to minimise some of these symptoms. Upper digestive symptoms seem to occur more commonly in multisport events such as triathlons or enduro. The published literature is difficult to analyse and the basic intestinal physiology not well studied. Most gastroenterologists are accustomed to evaluating the fasting patient at rest and exercise physiologists are seldom experienced with digestive techniques. Digestive symptoms occurring with exercise referable to the oesophagus include chest pain, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, or symptoms related to alterations in motility. While little is known of the oesophageal physiology during exercise, it is believed that only minimal changes occur in most subjects. Gastro-oesophageal reflux occurs more frequently with exercise than at rest and may produce symptoms of chest pain suggestive of ischaemic disease. Acid exposure may be reduced by pretreatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Oesophageal symptoms, though common, are rarely disabling to the athlete, and the clinical importance lies in confusion with ischaemic disease. Cases of acute gastric stasis following running have been reported and gastric physiology during exercise, particularly bicycling, has been more actively investigated. Gastric emptying during exercise is subject to a number of factors including calorie count, meal osmolality, meal temperature and exercise conditions. However, it is generally accepted that light exercise accelerates liquid emptying, vigorous exercise delays solid emptying and has little effect upon liquid emptying until near exhaustion. Gastric acid secretion probably changes little with exercise although some have postulated that ulcer patients may increase secretion with exercise. Some exercise-associated digestive symptoms, such as diarrhoea and abdominal pain, have been attributed to changes in intestine function. Small bowel transit is delayed by exercise when measured by breath hydrogen oral caecal transit times and motility may be reduced as well. Intestinal absorption during exercise has not been well evaluated but probably changes little in ordinary circumstances. Passive absorption of water, electrolytes and xylose are not affected by submaximal effort. Colonic transit and function is even more difficult to evaluate and published results have been conflicting. However, it is likely that many of the lower digestive complaints of runners such as diarrhoea and lower abdominal cramps are due to direct effects of exercise upon the colon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The effect of exercise on the gastrointestinal tract. 218 30

Evidence for cow's milk allergy was looked for prospectively in 15 children with recurrent vomiting. Whereas radiological examination showed gastro-oesophageal reflux to be present in all patients, 3 out of 15 children presented an enteropathy associated with an increased number of IgE plasmocytes in small intestinal biopsy tissue. These three patients did not improve with conventional medical therapy but a striking improvement occurred within 24 h on a cow's milk-free diet. We conclude that diagnostic confusion between gastro-oesophageal reflux and cow's milk allergy can occur and that the presence of IgE plasmocytes in small intestinal biopsy tissue indicates IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy. All cases of "intractable" gastro-oesophageal reflux should be suspected of cow's milk allergy and investigated accordingly.
 ...
PMID:Cow's milk protein allergy and gastro-oesophageal reflux. 407 44

There exists great confusion concerning the different techniques for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. For instance, we apply the term fundoplication to different operations that often have nothing to do with the original description, and there is a serious lack of knowledge of the historical origins of many of these operations. This analysis is the result of a large review of the operations, and of the original papers as they were published.
 ...
PMID:An approach to the historical evolution of surgical operations for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. 977 62

There exists, in our times, a great confusion concording the different techniques for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. Today, for instance, we use the name "fundoplication" for different operations that, in many occasions, have nothing to do with the original description of the technique. It can be said that there exists a great lack of knowledge of the historical origins and of the evolution of all of these operations. The authors of this article have done a large-scale review of the original publications, as they appeared, for the first time, in medical literature.
 ...
PMID:[History of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux]. 978 89

The meaning and definition of dyspepsia continues to challenge clinical investigators and has led to the setting up of several international working teams. However, confusion continues to reign around this term. The effort to classify patients with dyspepsia into subgroups according to their most predominant symptoms has failed to provide clues to the underlying disease, or even to discriminate between functional and organic dyspepsia. With these limitations in mind, the question arises: is there any reason for putting further effort into developing a world-wide definition of dyspepsia when, in addition to the aforementioned shortcomings, further variables such as geographical region, ethnic background, culture and sanitary resources come into play? The answer is that only by establishing a reproducible methodology for individual symptom assessment using a well-defined protocol will comparisons of the prevalence of dyspepsia and the impact of different therapeutic interventions become possible around the world. The data on dyspepsia prevalence, nearly all arising from studies in a few developed geographical areas and countries, are of the order of 1-4% of all consultations in all primary care medicine. However, estimates of adults affected by dyspepsia are as high as 20-40%. The magnitude of these statistics underlines the necessity for further work on the concept of dyspepsia and its major functional subgroups, following the exclusion of any organic causes. Issues such as 'investigate dyspepsia before starting with any kind of treatment or treat dyspepsia before further investigation' or the debate about whether to 'eradicate or ignore Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia' will remain unresolved unless studies performed throughout the world use widely comparable and acceptable definitions and criteria for these conditions. Since the first international working party report in 1988, definitions of dyspepsia have included the description of 'upper abdominal pain or discomfort' and, more recently, have specified 'pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen' in order to emphasise further the site of origin as the upper alimentary tract (stomach-duodenum). However, a major change was evident in the more recent Rome I and Rome II reports, in which the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation, and belching were excluded from the definition of dyspepsia because of their relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aerophagia. The intention to define a set of symptoms for dyspepsia is good, but we continue to be faced with overlaps. How should the patient with epigastric pain and heartburn after endoscopic exclusion of duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis be classified: dyspepsia or GERD? In cases of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux, 24-h pH monitoring could help to resolve this dilemma, but what if this investigation turns out to be normal? In this field, we need to perform careful studies. In addition, we need to consider the lifestyle and cultural habits of people around the world when translating upper gastrointestinal symptoms into dyspepsia. A step forward in the definition of dyspepsia was attempted by the recent working party for the Rome II consensus on functional gastrointestinal disorders (N. Talley et al.). In this project, the symptoms of dyspepsia were individually described not by a single term, but by painting a 'word picture', to make it easier for patients to express their symptoms, and give doctors and clinical investigators a better understanding of the 'dyspeptic problem' of each individual. It is advisable to follow this approach, since a clear picture of a patient's symptoms, including their duration and intensity, in association with the modern technical approaches that allow investigation beyond organic causes of dyspepsia, will lead to progress in our understanding and better communication about this problem within the medical community, and ultimately to better treatment.
 ...
PMID:Current concepts in dyspepsia: a world perspective. 1044 9

Laparoscopic fundoplication controls heartburn and regurgitation, but the effects on the respiratory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are unclear. Confusion stems from difficulty preoperatively in determining whether cough or wheezing is actually caused by reflux when reflux is found on pH monitoring. To date, there is no proven way to pinpoint a cause-and-effect relationship. The goals of this study were to assess the following: (1) the value of pH monitoring in establishing a correlation between respiratory symptoms and reflux; (2) the predictive value of pH monitoring on the results of surgical treatment; and (3) the outcome of laparoscopic fundoplication on GERD-induced respiratory symptoms. Between October 1992 and October 1998, a total of 340 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD. From the clinical findings alone, respiratory symptoms were thought possibly to be caused by GERD in 39 patients (11%). These 39 patients had been symptomatic for an average of 134 months. They were all taking H2-blocking agents (21%) or proton pump inhibitors (79%). Seven patients (18%) were also being treated with bronchodilators, alone (3 patients) or in combination with prednisone (4 patients). Median length of postoperative follow-up was 28 months. In 23 patients (59%) a temporal correlation was found during 24-hour pH monitoring between respiratory symptoms and episodes of reflux. Postoperatively heartburn resolved in 91% of patients, regurgitation in 90% of patients, wheezing in 64% of patients, and cough in 74% of patients. Cough resolved in 19 (83%) of 23 patients in whom a correlation between cough and reflux was found during pH monitoring, but in only 8 (57%) of 14 of patients when this correlation was absent. Cough persisted postoperatively in the two patients who did not cough during the study. These data show that pH monitoring helped to establish a correlation between respiratory symptoms and reflux, and it helped to identify the patients most likely to benefit from antireflux surgery. Following laparoscopic surgery, respiratory symptoms resolved in 83% of patients when a temporal correlation between cough and reflux was found on pH monitoring; heartburn and regurgitation resolved in 90%.
 ...
PMID:Effect of laparoscopic fundoplication on gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced respiratory symptoms. 1067 37

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and asthma occur together frequently. The relationship has been recognized for more than 2,000 years but has not been appreciated until recently. Attempts to determine the number of asthmatics that currently have GER (prevalence) have shown a higher-than-expected prevalence. Of the approximately 200 published studies on the relationship between GER and asthma, the true prevalence of GER in asthmatics, however, can be estimated from fewer than 20 of the studies. These studies, which comprise highly selected referred populations, are unlikely to reflect the overall population of patients with asthma. Nevertheless, the estimated prevalence of GER in asthmatics is between 60-80% in adults and 50-60% in children. No attempts have been made to determine the incidence of GER in asthmatics. To identify asthmatics who develop GER over time would be a formidable task, requiring decades of close follow-up of asthmatics who do not now have GER. Despite the lack of data on the incidence of GER, data on the prevalence raise an important issue: If the prevalence of GER in adult asthmatics is similar to the prevalence of GER in child asthmatics, what is the true incidence of GER? There are two potential answers: (1) all of the child asthmatics with GER grow up to become the adult asthmatics with GER (GER incidence = 0%); and (2) some child asthmatics with GER outgrow either the GER or the asthma; some adults with asthma develop GER while others with GER develop asthma (low, medium, or high incidence depending on the numbers). It is not unreasonable to suspect that some child asthmatics with GER become adult asthmatics with GER, and that children with GER who apparently "outgrow" their asthma surface later as adults with both asthma and GER. Because most children leave their pediatricians after adolescence, the information required to demonstrate continued asthma or GER is lost. As a result, the medical community sees two completely different populations, each with very similar conditions: childhood asthma with GER and adult asthma with GER. If the high prevalence of GER in asthmatics is clinically relevant, it should be readily explainable. We suggest that the GER/asthma relationship consists of a self-propagating situation whereby reflux aggravates asthma, which in turn induces further reflux. In the early course of the disease, asthma may not be apparent, as aspiration-induced pulmonary symptoms may occur very infrequently-perhaps once or twice a year. With time, however, aspiration may become more frequent, and the pulmonary tree may become hypersensitive. The individual may be diagnosed as having asthma. The pulmonary tree becomes increasingly hypersensitive, to a variety of stimuli. In such a scenario, the initial contribution of acid aspiration is no longer apparent, as the primary focus is on the asthma. In any individual patient, the emphasis may be placed on the GER if reflux symptoms predominate or on asthma if pulmonary symptoms predominate. The result is confusion over whether a patient with GER has asthma or whether a patient with asthma has GER. The unending debate about whether GER is a cause of the asthma or a result of the asthma becomes the focus of attention. At such a point, the question of whether GER exists in asthmatics or whether pulmonary symptoms exist in refluxers is irrelevant. For the individual patient, gastric contents refluxed into the pulmonary tree is an undesirable event, whether cause or effect, and it is up to the physician to determine how such events can be stopped.
 ...
PMID:Gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma. 1077 68

It is clear that non-ulcer (or functional) dyspepsia is a heterogeneous syndrome that includes a subset of patients with unrecognized gastroesophageal reflux. Patient heterogeneity combined with inadequate study methodology has led to enormous confusion in interpreting the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and non-ulcer dyspepsia. The possibility that H. pylori is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease may explain, in part, the difficulty in establishing a link between non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection. It is unclear whether the prevalence of H. pylori is increased in non-ulcer dyspepsia over and above the background population. H. pylori does not appear to be linked to heartburn or other specific upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms. The results of eradication trials in H. pylori-infected patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia have been equivocal and generally flawed. There is no doubt that H. pylori is not a sufficient cause of non-ulcer dyspepsia, because it is well documented in the literature that dyspepsia can occur in the absence of infection and infection can occur in the absence of symptoms. At this stage, there is insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that H. pylori is etiologically linked to non-ulcer dyspepsia, but data from well designed large randomized controlled trials of eradication therapy, are awaited with great interest.
 ...
PMID:Helicobacter pylori and dyspepsia. 1078 May 76


1 2 3 4 Next >>