Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016632 (Fox)
 1,461 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The mammalian Fos and Fos-related proteins are unable to form homodimers and to bind DNA in the absence of a second protein, like c-Jun for example. In order to study the implications of hydrophobic point mutations in the c-Fox leucine zipper on DNA binding of the entire c-Fos protein, we have constructed and purified a set of Fos mutant proteins harboring one or several isoleucine or leucine residues in the five Fos zipper a positions. We show that a single point mutation in the hydrophobic interface of the c-Fos leucine zipper enables the c-Fos mutant protein to bind specifically to an oligonucleotide duplex harboring the TRE consensus sequence TGA(C/G)TCA. This point mutation (Thr196-->Ile) is situated in the a position of the second heptade (a2) of the Fos zipper. The introduction of additional isoleucine residues in the other a positions progressively increases the DNA binding affinity of these homodimerizing Fos zipper variants. Heterodimerization of these c-Fos variants with c-Jun reveals a complex behavior, in that the DNA binding affinity of these heterodimers does not simply increase with the number of isoleucine side chains in position a. For example, a c-Fos variant harboring a wild-type Thr in position a1 aad Ile in the four other a positions (c-Fos4I) interacts more tightly with c-Jun than a variant harboring Ile in all five a positions (c-Fos5I). The same holds true for the corresponding leucine variants, suggesting that the wild-type a1 residue of the Fox zipper (Thr162) is thermodynamically relevant for Fos-Jun heterodimer formations and DNA binding. The c-Fos4I variant forms heterodimers with c-Jun slightly better than the wild-type zipper protein, suggesting that the driving force for Fos-Jun heterodimerization is not the simple fact that the Fos protein is unable to form homodimers. These c-Fos variants were further tested for their transactivation properties in F9 and NIH3T3 cells. At low expression levels the most efficiently homodimerizing variant (c-Fos5I) activates transcription in F9 cells about 6-fold. However part of this activation may be due to the formation of heterodimers with a member of the Jun family (like JunD for example), since a wild type c-Fos expression vector confers a 3-fold activation under these conditions. In the case of the homodimerizing c-Fos variants however, this activation is abrogated at higher expression levels due to a strong inhibition of basal transcription activity.
 ...
PMID:DNA binding and transactivation properties of Fos variants with homodimerization capacity. 930 12

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the most important classes of drug targets. Since the first high-resolution structure of a GPCR was determined by Palczewski and co-workers [K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C.A. Behnke, H. Motoshima, B.A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D.C. Teller, T. Okada, R.E. Stenkamp, M. Yamamoto, M. Miyano, Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G-protein-coupled receptor, Science 289 (2000) 739-745], development of in silico models of rhodopsin-like GPCRs could be rationally founded. In this work, we present a model of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor based on the rhodopsin structure. The transmembrane helices are modeled by homology, while the extra- and intra-cellular loops are modeled in such a way that experimentally determined interactions and microdomains (e.g., hydrophobic cores) are retained. We conclude that specifically tailored models, compared to more automatic approaches, have the benefit that known interactions are easily introduced early in the homology modeling. Furthermore, tailored models, although more tedious to construct, are better suited for drug lead finding and for compound optimization. To test the stability of the receptor, we performed a 1 ns molecular dynamics simulation. Moreover, we docked two agonists (native GnRH and Triptorelin, [dTrp(6)]-GnRH) and two antagonists (Cetrorelix, dNal(1)-dCpa(2)-dPal(3)-Ser(4)-Tyr(5)-dCit(6)-Leu(7)-Arg(8)-Pro(9)-dAla(10)), and the covalently constrained dicyclic decapeptide dicyclo(1,1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly(1)')-dCpa(2)-dTrp(3)-Asp(4)-dbu(5)-dNal(6)-Leu(7)-Arg(8)-Pro(9)-dpr(10)-NH(2)] into the putative receptor binding site. The docked ligand conformations result in ligand-receptor interactions that are generally in good agreement with site-directed mutagenesis and ligand-binding studies presented in the literature. Our results indicate that the binding conformation of the antagonists differs from that of the agonists. This difference can be linked to the activation or inhibition of the receptor.
 ...
PMID:Antagonist and agonist binding models of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. 1595 Sep 33