Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (
flushing
)
6,387
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
A 20% solution of hydrofluoric acid (HF) was applied to the skin of rats and a biomedical observation of the tissues and sera was made.
Flushing
with running water was effective for HF burns. By applying 2.5%
calcium
gluconate jelly, concentrations of fluoride in the urine and the tissues surrounding the injured region were reduced. Thus, the results proved that irrigation with running water and jelly applications were evaluated as the most effective therapy among various methods tested for HF burns.
...
PMID:An experimental study on the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. 158 4
A study was undertaken to examine the relationship between blood acetaldehyde levels and clinical responses in volunteers receiving the anti-alcohol drugs disulfiram and
calcium
cyanamide. In the first part of this study volunteers received different doses of disulfiram (125 mg and 500 + 250 mg), of
calcium
cyanamide (25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg) and of ethanol (0.2 g/kg orally and 0.5 g/kg intravenously). The ensuing interactions ranged from no reaction at all to an intense hypotensive cyanamide-ethanol reaction (CER). A blood acetaldehyde concentration-effect relationship was suggested. In the second part of this study seven subjects received 50 mg of
calcium
cyanamide 4 hr prior to an intravenous ethanol dose of 0.2 g/kg. The maximum blood level of acetaldehyde ranged from 16 to 241 microM. Aversive interactions started to occur at acetaldehyde levels around 40-60 microM. Changes in
flushing reaction
and diastolic blood pressure appeared best to reflect changing blood acetaldehyde levels. As a rule, however, the expected cyanamide-ethanol and disulfiram-ethanol reactions are more clearly registered as an increase in acetaldehyde levels than as the ensuing physiological responses.
...
PMID:Clinical responses in relation to blood acetaldehyde levels. 159 34
The most frequent site of organ involvement in patients with any form of mastocytosis is the skin. Cutaneous expressions include urticaria pigmentosa, mastocytoma, diffuse and erythrodermic cutaneous mastocytosis, and telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans. The cutaneous lesions tend to appear early in life. Although urticaria pigmentosa has been reported in 12 pairs of twins and one set of triplets, the majority of affected individuals have no familial association. Most patients with systemic mastocytosis have skin lesions; however, an occasional patient will have systemic disease with no other skin features than
flushing
. In lesional cutaneous sites and in non-lesional skin, there is an increase in the number of mast cells. Electron microscopy shows quantitative differences between lesional skin mast cells from patients with and without systemic disease. The mast cells from adult patients with systemic disease have a larger mean cytoplasmic area, nuclear size, and granule diameter. The granules contain predominantly grating/lattice structures. The cutaneous mast cells contain tryptase and chymase. They retain their functional reactivities to relevant secretory stimuli, such as C3a, morphine sulfate, and
calcium
ionophore A23187. Lesional skin contains histamine, leukotriene B4, prostaglandin D2, 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, platelet-activating factor, and heparin. Treatment of the cutaneous manifestations includes the use of H1 and H2 antihistamines, oral disodium cromoglycate, psoralens plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy, and potent topical corticosteroid preparations.
...
PMID:The skin in mastocytosis. 167 36
Felodipine is a dihydropyridine that blocks the slow entry channel for
calcium
. It is highly vascular selective and reduces blood pressure (BP) by dilatation of peripheral arterioles. It reduces BP in mild, moderate, and severe hypertension, and the fall in BP depends upon the initial level. It has been compared with a variety of other drugs as monotherapy or as add-on therapy. In these studies, felodipine (10-40 mg/day) has caused a similar or greater fall in BP and a similar or greater percentage of patients have achieved a diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. The plain tablet of felodipine needs to be given twice a day but an extended-release form can be given once daily. Some patients respond to 5 mg/day and most patients respond to a daily dose of 20 mg or less. The adverse effects are few except for a constellation of symptoms related to the vasodilator ability of the drug. These include palpitations,
flushing
, fatigue, dizziness, and headaches. These occur, if at all, usually within the first 2 weeks and diminish as the drug is continued. They can be limited by starting on a small dose of felodipine (5 mg/day). People who have these adverse effects usually have a good response to the drug. Another adverse effect, which is the most frequent reason for drug withdrawal, is ankle edema. This is more common on the higher doses of the drug. It is due to dilatation of the precapillary resistance vessels rather than sodium and water retention. Felodipine is a useful and effective antihypertensive drug and can be used as monotherapy or added to other antihypertensive drugs. It is effective in people with all grades of hypertension.
...
PMID:A review of the antihypertensive effects of felodipine alone or in combination. 169 35
Hypertensive patients, particularly the elderly, may often suffer from other diseases. Therefore, antihypertensive compounds should not negatively affect such disorders. Felodipine is a
calcium
antagonist that has potentially beneficial effects in angina pectoris and congestive heart failure. Further, it does not adversely affect lung function in asthmatic patients or glucose tolerance in patients with diabetes. Preliminary investigations also indicate that felodipine has no negative influence on plasma lipid levels. Although felodipine seems to be safe in most patients, treatment with felodipine should at present be avoided in pregnant women, since digital anomalies have been observed in rabbit fetuses. The adverse effects seen during treatment with felodipine are usually mild and transient and generally related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, the most common being ankle edema, headache,
flushing
, dizziness, and palpitations. The only significant drug interactions with felodipine occur with inducers and inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 system, which is responsible for the metabolism of felodipine.
...
PMID:The safety of felodipine. 169 36
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new
calcium
antagonist isradipine was assessed in 86 hypertensive patients who had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg and who were randomly allocated to a double-blind comparison of three different dosage regimens: 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg b.i.d., and placebo. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 4-week course of treatment. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures dose-dependently; the normalization rate (DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 5% with placebo and 29, 55, and 64% with isradipine 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg b.i.d., respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing at least a 10 mm Hg reduction in sitting DBP was 29, 67, 86, and 91%, respectively. All three dosages proved to be significantly effective compared to placebo. Neither heart rate nor blood pressure regulation in orthostasis were influenced. The main side effects were headache, dizziness, and
flushing
; isradipine 1.25 and 2.5 mg b.i.d. were well tolerated (not significantly different from placebo). In conclusion, isradipine 2.5 mg b.i.d. appears to be the potential dose of first choice, exhibiting a favorable benefit-risk profile.
...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine in essential hypertension. 169 4
The new
calcium
antagonist isradipine was compared with nifedipine retard in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study involving 159 patients with mild hypertension. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 6-week course of treatment with the possibility of dose doubling after 3 weeks, depending on blood pressure (BP) response (target diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg). Systolic and diastolic BPs were reduced by isradipine (mean dose of 3.6 mg daily) from 151/101 to 136/89 mm Hg, by nifedipine (mean dose of 50 mg daily) from 155/101 to 144/90 mm Hg, and by placebo from 155/101 to 154/99 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 64% with isradipine, 56% with nifedipine, and 16% with placebo. Adverse events consisted mainly of
flushing
, headache, edema, and dizziness. Altogether, 8 patients receiving isradipine experienced adverse events in comparison to 21 taking nifedipine and 4 taking placebo. The superior tolerability of isradipine was paralleled by a significant improvement in the subjective well-being of the patients as assessed by the von Zerssen questionnaire (List of Complaints). With nifedipine and placebo, no statistically significant improvement was observed.
...
PMID:Calcium antagonists as first-line antihypertensive agents: a placebo-controlled, comparative trial of isradipine and nifedipine. 169 8
Amlodipine, a basic dihydropyridine derivative, inhibits the
calcium
influx through 'slow' channels in peripheral vascular and coronary smooth muscle cells, thus producing marked vasodilation in peripheral and coronary vascular beds. Short to medium term clinical trials indicate that amlodipine is effective as both an antianginal agent in patients with stable angina pectoris and an antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In small comparative studies amlodipine was at least as effective as 'standard' agents, including atenolol, verapamil, hydrochlorothiazide or captopril in hypertension, and diltiazem or nadolol in angina pectoris. Amlodipine is well tolerated, and does not appear to cause some of the undesirable effects often associated with other cardiovascular agents (e.g. adverse changes in serum lipid patterns, cardiac conduction disturbances, postural hypotension). The most common adverse effects associated with amlodipine therapy--oedema and
flushing
--are related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, and are generally mild to moderate in severity. Thus, amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties that should be advantageous in many patients.
...
PMID:Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. 171 48
Nifedipine antagonises influx of
calcium
through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache,
flushing
and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.
...
PMID:Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders. 171 8
Efficacy and tolerability of antihypertensive monotherapy with the
calcium
antagonist nitrendipine were investigated in a 6-month open trial in 495 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension from 101 practicing internists and general practitioners. Previous antihypertensive therapy (57.4%) was stopped for 1 week and therapy then started with nitrendipine, 20 mg once daily. Sixty-one patients discontinued therapy prematurely because of unwanted effects, mostly characteristic with dihydropyridines (headaches,
flushing
, and ankle edema), and 23 patients because of insufficient efficacy. In 75% of the remaining 411 patients, the goal blood pressure was achieved by nitrendipine monotherapy (10 mg in 17.6%, 20 mg in 73.3%, and 20 mg b.i.d. in 8%) and diastolic blood pressure was between 90 and 95 mm Hg in another 6%. The reduction in blood pressure did not result in changes of heart rate or weight. Nitrendipine was effective in patients of all age groups but patients older than 60 years of age showed a significantly greater fall in systolic pressure than middle-aged or young patients. At the end of the study, 15 patients still reported side effects. Nitrendipine appears to be well suited for first-line therapy of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
...
PMID:Antihypertensive monotherapy with nitrendipine in general practice. 172 58
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>