Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To asses the efficacy of ketotifen (Zaditen; Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) for the treatment of pediatric mastocytosis, eight children who exhibited symptoms as a result of mastocytosis were enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of ketotifen versus hydroxyzine (Atarax; Roerig, New York, N.Y.). Efficacy of each drug was assessed by daily symptom scores and plasma- and 24-hour urine-histamine levels. After completion of the study, symptom scores revealed that seven of the eight children exhibited a greater reduction in symptoms while they were receiving hydroxyzine (p less than 0.05). The symptoms most likely to improve with treatment with hydroxyzine were flushing and abdominal pain. Analysis of plasma- and 24-hour urine-histamine levels at the beginning and end of each trial period of each drug revealed no significant differences (p greater than 0.20). Changes in 24-hour urine-histamine levels, but not plasma-histamine levels, correlated with changes in symptom scores. We conclude that ketotifen offers no advantage over hydroxyzine in the treatment of pediatric mastocytosis.
...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of ketotifen versus hydroxyzine in the treatment of pediatric mastocytosis. 232 20

Parenteral compounds present special drug delivery challenges. This open-label study evaluated a portable infusion pump as a means to deliver intravenous ciprostene, a stable prostacyclin analog. Ten patients with peripheral vascular disease and claudication received ciprostene (titrated to 120 ng/kg/min) infused over 8 hours 1 day per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Patients successfully maintained the pump strapped to the waist. The mean +/- standard deviation delivery error, with volumes of 6 to 10 mL over 8 hours, was -0.895 +/- 3.177%. Accordingly, the pump performed well with a potent drug under these clinical conditions. Headache, flushing, and infusion site irritation during infusion were the most frequent side effects. Blood pressure remained unchanged during infusion; however, heart rate increased significantly (P < .05, maximum increase was 13.9 +/- 2.1 beats per minute [mean +/- standard error of the mean]. Mean (+/- standard error of the mean) relative claudication times on treadmill remained unchanged; however, absolute claudication times increased (P < .05) from 6.6 +/- 1.8 to 10.0 +/- 2.2 minutes. Ciprostene inhibited adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation by 56.0 +/- 12.7% (mean +/- standard error of the mean). Mean template bleeding times and plasma concentrations of platelet-specific proteins (beta-thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4) did not change.
...
PMID:Continuous intravenous dosing with ciprostene using a portable pump in ambulatory patients. 844 Jul 64

The preferable route of iron delivery for most iron-deficient patients is oral. Parenteral iron therapy is used in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in cases in which oral iron is not sufficiently effective. The most frequent indications for parenteral iron therapy are unbearable gastrointestinal side effects induced by oral iron itself, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease symptoms, insufficient intestinal absorption, renal failure-caused anemia that is treated with erythropoietin, and unresolved ongoing bleeding, which would cause the acceptable oral doses of iron therapy to be exceeded. The serious adverse effects of iron dextran that was used in the past could explain the reluctance of medical personnel to prescribe this effective treatment. Patients with iron deficiency anemia were treated with intravenous iron in a primary care clinic. The iron gluconate was given in a dosage of 62.5 mg diluted in 150 mL of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 30 min, while iron sucrose was given in a dosage of 100 mg diluted in the same volume of normal saline and given at the same rate. In total, 724 infusions were administered to 57 patients. Iron sucrose was used in 628 infusions, and iron gluconate was used in the remaining 96. The frequency of the infusion treatments depended on the underlying disease and ranged from three times a week to once a month. Adverse effects were seldom observed and were minor in patients receiving iron gluconate, and were not registered at all in patients treated with iron sucrose. Two cases of flushing with paresthesias occurred. Slowing the infusion rate successfully eliminated these side effects. One case of hypotension was treated successfully with 500 cc of normal saline infusion. One case of dropout occurred, due to the patient's refusal to cooperate. No anaphylactic reactions were observed. Iron gluconate and iron sucrose are effective and safe for use in primary care clinics. The risk of adverse effects is low.
...
PMID:Intravenous iron in a primary-care clinic. 1579 17

This document represents the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines to describe best practices in the selection and care of central venous access devices (CVADs) for the infusion of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) admixtures in adult patients. The guidelines targeted adults >18 years of age in which the intervention or exposure had to include HPN that was administered via a CVAD. Case studies, non-English studies, or studies of CVAD no longer available in the United States were excluded. In total, 564 abstract citations, 350 from Medline and 214 from PubMed/non-MEDLINE databases, were scanned for relevance. Of the 564 citations, 13 studies addressed at least 1 of the 6 guideline-related questions, and none of the studies were prospective and randomized. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to adjust the evidence grade based on assessment of the quality of study design and execution. Recommendations for the CVAD type, composition, or number of lumens to minimize infectious or mechanical complications are based on a limited number of studies and expert opinion of the authors, all very experienced in home infusion therapy. No studies were found that compared best solutions for routine flushing of lumens (eg, heparin versus saline) or for maintaining catheters in situ while treating CVAD mechanical or infectious complications. It is clear that studies to answer these questions are very limited, and further research is needed. These clinical guidelines were approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.
...
PMID:American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Guidelines for the Selection and Care of Central Venous Access Devices for Adult Home Parenteral Nutrition Administration. 3033 87