Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Different prevalences of chlorpropamide alcohol flushing (CPAF) have been reported by different authors in either type I or type II diabetics or in normal subjects and this could be due to different methodological approaches or to different criteria of evaluation of CPAF. Previous studies in small series of patients have also suggested the existence of an association between type I diabetes and the fast acetylator phenotype (AP). The first aim of this study was to find reliable criteria for the assessment of CPAF. The second was to evaluate the prevalence of CPAF and of AP in a large series of type I and type II diabetics; and the third was to evaluate possible associations of CPAF and AP. AP and CPAF were evaluated separately in 256 diabetics (110 with type I and 146 with type II diabetes) and in 183 diabetics (74 with type I and 109 with type II diabetes), respectively. In 156 of these subjects, the two markers were evaluated together. The occurrence of CPAF was studied by subjective and objective assessment and by thermographic recording; CPAF was quantified by the differential value of skin temperature increase [delta T(C-P)] and by the value of differential speed of ascent, expressed in angle-degrees [delta a(C-P)], after treatment with placebo and with chlorpropamide. The fast AP was more frequent in type I than in type II diabetics, was not related to family history of diabetes, sex of the patients, age at onset and duration of diabetes or metabolic control. The most reliable assessment of CPAF was represented by thermographic recording of speed of ascent of skin temperature. CPAF was more frequent in females than in males, more frequent in diabetics than in healthy controls, similarly frequent in type I and in type II diabetes and showed no relationship with family history of diabetes, age at onset, duration of diabetes or metabolic control. An association between fast AP and CPAF was found in type II, but not in type I diabetics: fast acetylators were more frequently CPAF-positive, while slow acetylators were more frequently CPAF-negative. In addition, a linear relationship was found between rate of acetylation and speed of ascent of facial skin temperature after chlorpropamide and alcohol in type II diabetics, not in type I diabetics. The meaning of this association is not clear and deserves further investigations.
Acta Diabetol Lat
PMID:Association between chlorpropamide-alcohol flushing and fast acetylator phenotype in type I and type II diabetes. 386 8

We report here 2 patients with somatostatin-secreting tumours and hypersomatostatinaemia. One subject, a 36 year old woman with diabetes, flushing, labile blood pressure and diarrhea, had elevated basal plasma levels of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLIR) and calcitonin. Plasma SLIR increased further following tolbutamide administration. Plasma levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), normal in the basal state, showed exaggerated responses to pentagastrin and secretin, respectively. Immunocytochemistry of the tumour tissue revealed cells containing somatostatin-, calcitonin-, PGE2- and PP-like immunoreactivity. The other patient, a 52 year old male, had an SLIR-secreting tumour of the proximal duodenum and elevated basal and post-tolbutamide SLIR levels but no signs or symptoms suggestive of increased SLIR production. Tumour tissue revealed cells containing somatostatin- and calcitonin-like immunoreactivity. We conclude that patients with somatostatinomas do not always exhibit a predictable syndrome. Patients with these tumours may exhibit a range of clinical, biochemical and immunocytochemical features typical of endocrine tumours of mixed-cell origin, such that the dominant signs and symptoms associated with these neoplasms cannot readily be ascribed to overproduction of any single hormone.
 ...
PMID:Somatostatinoma syndrome: does a clinical entity exist? 629 17

In this report we review the pharmacology of the hypoglycemic sulfonylurea drugs. The early work with sulfonylureas is briefly described. The pharmacokinetics of first-generation sulfonylureas, such as tolbutamide, chlorpropamide, acetohexamide and tolazamide, are described. The first-generation sulfonylureas are compared with second-generation sulfonylureas such as glyburide, glipizide and glibornuride. These latter drugs have a more nonpolar or lipophilic side chain, which results in a marked increase in their hypoglycemic potency. Because of the low serum concentration required for effective therapy, it is necessary to measure the serum concentration of second-generation sulfonylureas by gas-liquid chromatography or radioimmunoassay. The second-generation sulfonylureas do not produce facial flushing after ethanol ingestion (Antabuse effect) and are not uricosuric. Glyburide (but not glipizide or glibornuride) has been evaluated for its effect on water excretion. Glyburide not only does not increase water retention but in fact also increases free water clearance. The second-generation sulfonylureas bind to human serum albumin by nonionic forces in contrast with tolbutamide and chlorpropamide which bind by ionic forces. Thus, anionic drugs such as phenylbutazone, warfarin and salicylate do not displace glyburide from albumin as they displace tolbutamide and chlorpropamide. Therefore, it may be safer to administer the second-generation sulfonylureas than the more polar sulfonylureas when concurrent administration of other pharmacologic agents is likely. The sulfonylurea drugs lower plasma glucose concentrations in diabetic patients by stimulating insulin secretion and by potentiating the biologic effect of the insulin on such tissues as skeletal muscle, fat and liver. The mechanism of the latter so-called extra-pancreatic effect may be activated by increasing the deficient numbers of insulin receptors on muscle, fat or liver cells.
 ...
PMID:The pharmacology of sulfonylureas. 678 41

One hundred and eight non insulin-dependent diabetics were tested for alcohol flushing after chlorpropamide administration (CPAF test). The overall prevalence of patients who flushed at the first challenge was 32%. However, nearly half of them still flushed after alcohol administration, when placebo was given instead of chlorpropamide, so that the prevalence of 'true' flushers was only 17%. Even though the distribution of retinal lesions was similar in 'true' flushers and in non flushers, severe loss of visual acuity was confined to the non flushers and aspecific flushers. The frequency of pathological ECG findings and of peripheral pulse reduction or abolition was significantly higher in the non flushers and aspecific flushers. Blood pressure, serum lipids and hemostatic parameters were similar in the two groups, and therefore do not explain the differences in prevalence of lesions. This study confirms the previous findings of a lower prevalence of large vessel lesions in flushers; however, the prevalence of 'true' CPAF phenomenon in our out-patient population appears to be much lower than previously reported.
Acta Diabetol Lat
PMID:Chlorpropamide-alcohol flushing in non insulin-dependent diabetes: prevalence of small and large vessel disease and or risk factors for angiopathy. 711 75

The oral ethanol loading test (0.5 g/kg body mass given as 40% solution) was carried out in 5 groups, each of 10 out-patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes before and after 10 days of treatment with one of the following sulphonylurea derivatives: tolbutamide (CAS 64-77-7) 0.5 t.i.d., chlorpropamide (CAS 94-20-2) 0.5 once daily morning, glibornuride (CAS 26944-48-9) 0.025 t.i.d., glibenclamide (CAS 10238-21-8) 0.005 t.i.d. and glipizide (CAS 29094-61-9) 0.005 t.i.d. The response to alcohol (facial flush, heart rate, blood pressure) were compared, and blood concentrations of ethanol, acetaldehyde, pyruvate, lactate, hydrocarbonates as well as blood pH, pO2 and pCO2 were determined in fasting state and during 6 hours after alcohol ingestion. In all patients the family history of diabetes and the presence and degree of vascular complications were registered. Evident flushing phenomenon was observed in 6 patients treated with chlorpropamide, in 3 treated with tolbutamide, in 2 treated with glibenclamide, in one receiving glibornuride and in none treated with glipizide. All drugs caused a greater rise of blood ethanol and acetaldehyde levels in relation to the control tests, but the difference reached statistical significance only in the group receiving chlorpropamide. Moreover, patients (pooled) with positive thermographic response had also significantly higher blood levels of ethanol and acetaldehyde during the second test. The ratio of acetaldehyde to ethanol concentration in blood (mumol:mmol) was not significantly changed in any group indicating parallel impairment of both steps of ethanol metabolism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Alcohol tolerance in patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes treated with sulphonylurea derivatives. 805 71

The oral ethanol loading test (0.5 g per kg b.m. given as 40% solution) was carried out in 5 groups, each of 10 patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes before and after 10 days of treatment with one of the following sulphonylurea derivatives: tolbutamide 0.5 t.i.d., chlorpropamide 0.5 once daily morning, glibornuride 0.025 t.i.d, glibenclamide 0.005 t.i.d. and glipizide 0.005 t.i.d. The response to alcohol (facial flush, heart rate, blood pressure) were compared, and blood concentration of ethanol, acetaldehyde, pyruvate, lactate, carbonates as well as blood pH, pO2 and pCO2 were determined in fasting state and during 6 hours after alcohol ingestion. In all patients the family history of diabetes and the presence and degree of vascular complications were registered. Evident flushing phenomenon was observed in 6 patients treated with chlorpropamide, in 3 treated with tolbutamide, in 2 treated with glibenclamide, in one receiving glibornuride and in none treated with glipizide. All drugs caused a greater rise of blood ethanol and acetaldehyde levels in relation to the control tests, but the difference reached statistical significance only in the group receiving chlorpropamide. Moreover, patients (pooled) with positive thermographic response had also significantly higher blood levels of ethanol and acetaldehyde during the second test. The ratio of acetaldehyde to ethanol concentration in blood (mumol:mmol) was not significantly changed in any group indicating parallel impairment of both steps of ethanol metabolism. All studied drugs intensified to a similar degree the alcohol-induced hypoglycaemia, but had no significant effect on the decrease of blood pyruvate level neither on the increase of blood lactate level. They didn't change the post-alcohol decrease of blood bicarbonate and pH, and didn't modify the behaviour of partial gas pressure. There was also no difference between pooled groups of patients with positive and negative thermographic reaction with respect to family history of diabetes and frequency and intensity of vascular complications. It is concluded that in patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes the second generation sulphonylurea derivatives are associated with lower risk of alcohol intolerance in case of its incidental ingestion in small amounts. The hypothesis of association of positive thermographic reaction to alcohol during treatment with sulphonylurea derivatives with more frequent occurrence of diabetes in family members and lower tendency to vascular complications was not confirmed.
 ...
PMID:[Alcohol tolerance in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (type 2) treated orally with drugs--derivatives of sulphonylurea]. 841 9

The sulphonylurea drugs have been the mainstay of oral treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus since they were introduced. In general, they are well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects, although there are some differences between the drugs in the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Over the years, the drugs causing the most problems with hypoglycaemia have been chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), although this is a potential problem with all sulphonylureas because of their action on the pancreatic beta cell, stimulating insulin release. Other specific problems have been reported with chlorpropamide that occur only rarely, if at all, with other sulphonylureas. Hyponatraemia secondary to inappropriate antidiuretic hormone activity, and increased flushing following the ingestion of alcohol, have been well described. The progressive beta cell failure with time results in eventual loss of efficacy, as these agents depend on a functioning beta cell and are ineffective in the absence of insulin-producing capacity. Differences in this secondary failure rate have been reported, with chlorpropamide and gliclazide having lower failure rates than glibenclamide or glipizide. The reasons for this are unclear, but the more abnormal pattern of insulin release produced by glibenclamide may be partly responsible and, indeed, may explain the increased risk of hypoglycaemia with this agent. Previously reported increased mortality associated with tolbutamide therapy has not been substantiated, and more recent data have shown no increased mortality from sulphonylurea treatment. Indeed, benefit from glycaemic control, regardless of the agent used--insulin or sulphonylurea--was reported by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Nevertheless, there is still ongoing controversy in view of the experimental evidence, mainly from animal studies, of potential adverse effects on the heart from sulphonylureas, but these are difficult to extrapolate into clinical situations. Most of these studies have been carried out with glibenclamide, which makes comparison of possible risk difficult. Other cardiovascular risk factors may be modified by gliclazide, which seems unique among the sulphonylureas in this respect. Its reported haemobiological and free radical scavenging activity probably resides in the azabicyclo-octyl ring structure in the side chain. Reduced progression or improvement in retinopathy has been reported in comparative trials with other sulphonylureas, and the effect is unrelated to improvements in glycaemia. There are differences between the sulphonylureas in some adverse effects, risk of hypoglycaemia, failure rates and actions on vascular risk factors. As a group of drugs, they are very well tolerated, but differences in overall tolerability can be identified.
 ...
PMID:Comparative tolerability of sulphonylureas in diabetes mellitus. 1078 25