Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Nicardipine hydrochloride, a dihydropyridine calcium entry-blocking drug, was administered to 66 patients with severe hypertension during three protocols designed to examine the efficacy and safety of this investigation drug. It was shown that nicardipine was uniformly effective in lowering blood pressure to a therapeutic goal of 95 mm Hg. Time to achieve therapeutic effect was dose dependent, and steady-state blood levels were achieved after 8 to 12 hours. Reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure but not changes in heart rate were correlated with plasma concentrations of nicardipine. In dose-ranging studies, the minimal effective dose of nicardipine appeared to be 2 mg/hr; 1 mg/hr was an ineffective dose, and little additional effect was seen above 4 mg/hr. Side effects were modest and consisted of those associated with vasodilation--headache, flushing, and feelings of warmth. In the initial group of patients studied, local thrombophlebitis occurred in a substantial number of patients. This was seen only after 14 hours of infusion. In subsequent studies, the infusion site was changed after 12 hours, and no further cases of thrombophlebitis were seen. Nicardipine appears to be therapeutic agent for parenteral use that shows promise in the treatment of severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride: treatment of patients with severe hypertension. 240 13

Nicardipine and nifedipine are structurally similar dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. The present study was a prospective randomized trial designed to evaluate the relative incidence of dizziness, flushing, headache, pedal edema, and palpitations during use of these drugs in patients with angina pectoris. Of 250 patients who entered into the comparative treatment part of the study, 140 patients were susceptible to developing symptoms to nifedipine as identified during a 1-month open-label treatment with nifedipine. These patients were compared with a parallel cohort of 110 patients, who were identified during the same open-label period, but remained mostly asymptomatic. After a 1-week washout of nifedipine, equal numbers of patients in each cohort began an 8-week period of randomized, double-blind treatment with nifedipine (20 mg three times daily) or nicardipine (30 mg three times daily). Patients who experienced these symptoms during the open-label nifedipine treatment had a higher incidence of the same symptoms during the blinded treatment regimen. Nicardipine-treated patients had a lower incidence of each of the symptoms than did the nifedipine-treated patients. Statistically significant differences were reported for dizziness, the most common of the side effects. Patients who were free of these symptoms in the open-label period usually remained free of them in the blinded comparison. However, even among those free of dizziness during the open-label nifedipine treatment, more patients reported experiencing dizziness in the blinded phase from nifedipine than from nicardipine (18% vs 6%; p = 0.02).
 ...
PMID:Randomized double-blind comparison of side effects of nicardipine and nifedipine in angina pectoris. The Nicardipine Investigators Group. 240 16

The antihypertensive effect of nicardipine was evaluated in 89 ambulatory elderly patients with hypertension through a multicenter trial enrolling patients over the age of 65 years. After a baseline period during which they received placebo, subjects were randomized by an unbalanced assignment to a double-blind comparison of nicardipine (n = 57) and placebo (n = 32). The initial dose of nicardipine was 20 mg every 8 hours, which was then increased to 30 mg if needed. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured 1 and 8 hours after doses at each visit with subjects in both the supine and standing positions. Seventy-six per cent of patients who received nicardipine and 55% who received placebo responded (p less than 0.05). During standing, blood pressure did not decrease significantly from supine levels in either group, but a small, transient increase in heart rate occurred with nicardipine. Adverse reactions (apart from failure to respond) occurred in 8% of those who received nicardipine and 3% who received placebo. Three patients were withdrawn: two for symptoms, nausea, or flushing and one for transient and asymptomatic abnormalities on ECG. Nicardipine is effective and safe as monotherapy in elderly patients with hypertension, causing greater reduction in systolic than in diastolic pressure, but without orthostatic hypotension.
 ...
PMID:Nicardipine monotherapy in ambulatory elderly patients with hypertension. 264 84

Nicardipine is an investigational dihydropyridine calcium channel blocking agent. One hundred fifty-one patients with hypertension received either 30 mg nicardipine t.i.d. or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide b.i.d. in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. After 4 weeks of therapy and at the end of the dosing interval, nicardipine reduced arterial pressure by 10/6 mm Hg and 12/6 mm Hg in the supine and standing positions, respectively (all p less than 0.01). In the hydrochlorothiazide group, the reductions were 12/6 mm Hg and 14/6 mm Hg, respectively (all p less than 0.01). The maximum reduction in blood pressure of 16/14 mm Hg supine and 20/15 mm Hg standing occurred within 1 hour after administration of nicardipine. The mean reduction in the hydrochlorothiazide group after 1 hour was 14/11 mm Hg supine and 16/12 mm Hg standing. Neither drug affected autonomic reflexes associated with maximum exercise. Nicardipine increased urinary sodium excretion during the 4-hour period after the first dose. Adverse effects of nicardipine were primarily extensions of its vasodilator effect and included flushing, headache, and edema.
 ...
PMID:Nicardipine and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension. 264

The efficacy and safety of nicardipine were assessed in 29,104 hypertensive patients (mean age, 64 years) during a 90-day multicenter clinical trial. By treatment day 90, blood pressure was controlled in 60% of the patients taking nicardipine alone. The efficacy of nicardipine combined with another antihypertensive agent was examined in 6,479 of the patients. When nicardipine was added to their treatment regimen, blood pressure was controlled by day 90 in 63% of the patients taking beta-blockers, in 58% of those on diuretics, in 50% of those on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and in 49% of those taking centrally acting antihypertensive agents. Nicardipine was well tolerated; only 11% of the 29,104 patients discontinued treatment because of side effects. Most adverse reactions were transient and were related to vasodilation, and included peripheral edema in 7% of the patients, flushing in 7%, and headache in 4%. The results indicate that nicardipine is suitable as initial therapy in arterial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of nicardipine in 29,104 patients with hypertension. 267 15

1. A novel formulation of nicardipine (50% standard (short acting), 50% sustained release) was evaluated in mild hypertension in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, using clinic measurements (Hawksley) augmented by home recorded blood pressures (Copal UA 251). 2. Nicardipine 60 mg twice daily for 28 days produced a highly significant reduction in sitting blood pressure compared with placebo both pre dose (mean difference 17/8 mm Hg) and 2 h post dose (mean difference 34/26 mm Hg). 3. Home recordings confirmed the hypotensive effect and also revealed a consistent 'peak' effect between 2-4 h after dosing (mean difference 32/22) mm Hg). 4. Doppler aortovelography at 2 h post-dose showed a significant increase in in stroke and minute distance (linear analogues of stroke volume and cardiac output respectively) compared with placebo. The increase in stroke distance was linearly related to change in plasma concentration of nicardipine. 5. Of the 14 patients enrolled in the study, nine experienced troublesome adverse effects on nicardipine (headaches, facial flushing, palpitations, ankle oedema) and two of these were unable to complete the study as a result. 6. This formulation of nicardipine, in the fixed dosage used in this study, is characterized by an effective antihypertensive action but also by an unacceptable adverse effect profile, presumably due to an excess of its 'short acting' component.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of a long acting formulation of nicardipine in hypertension by clinic and home recorded blood pressures and Doppler aortovelography. 275 80

Nicardipine is an antagonist of calcium influx through the slow channel of the cell membrane and has been shown to be an effective and relatively well-tolerated treatment for stable effort angina and rest angina due to coronary artery spasm, and mild to moderate hypertension. Although its exact mechanism of action in these disease states has not been precisely defined, the potent coronary and peripheral arterial dilator properties of nicardipine, with concomitant improvements in oxygen supply/demand and reductions in systemic vascular resistance, are of major importance. Clinical studies have shown that nicardipine appears to be effective in the treatment of chronic stable exercise-induced angina pectoris and possibly in angina at rest due to coronary artery spasm. In the treatment of stable angina, nicardipine has proved to be equally as effective as nifedipine. However, haemodynamic and clinical studies indicate that nicardipine may have a further advantage of not depressing cardiac conduction or left ventricular function, even in patients with compromised cardiac pumping ability. Nicardipine also appears to be useful as initial monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs when used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, and may have some advantages over other vasodilators in this regard in that it may not be as frequently associated with fluid retention or weight gain as other similar drugs. In the treatment of hypertension nicardipine has been shown to be as effective as drugs such as hydrochlorothiazide, cyclopenthiazide, propranolol and verapamil in short term studies although confirmation of its long term usefulness in well-designed clinical trials is still required. Similarly, although the use of nicardipine in other disorders such as congestive heart failure and cerebrovascular disease has provided encouraging preliminary results, more studies are needed to clarify its place in their treatment. Side effects appear to be dose related and more frequent within the first few weeks of therapy. Most of these effects are minor and transient in nature and include headache, flushing and peripheral oedema. Thus, there is no doubt that nicardipine provides a suitable alternative to other drugs available for the treatment of angina and hypertension. However, further well-designed comparative clinical trials are needed to clarify its relative place in the long term management of these disorders.
 ...
PMID:Nicardipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. 329 16

Nicardipine is currently being evaluated in clinical trials as a treatment for angina and hypertension. Over 2,000 patients have received nicardipine, most at dosages of 20 to 40 mg 3 times daily. In 12 double-blind, parallel-group studies (4 of them placebo-controlled) the efficacy of nicardipine was evaluated in mild to moderate hypertension; supine systolic blood pressure was lowered by 10 to 15 mm Hg and supine diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg. A clear dose response is present at dosages from 10 to 40 mg 3 times daily. Patients with angina were treated in 9 double-blind, crossover design studies: 4 of these were placebo-controlled; 3 were comparison studies with beta blockers; 2 were comparisons with nifedipine. Treadmill exercise tests were the major measure of efficacy. Results of these studies showed consistent, statistically significant improvement in exercise tolerance and time to onset of angina, and clinical improvement in patients with chronic stable angina. The effective dosages of nicardipine were 30 or 40 mg 3 times daily. A placebo-controlled study demonstrated remarkable efficacy in patients with vasospastic angina. No deaths or serious adverse reactions were attributed to nicardipine during clinical trials. The most common side effects reported were flushing, palpitations, headache and pedal edema. These appeared to be due to the drug's pharmacologic property of vasodilatation.
 ...
PMID:An overview of the safety and efficacy of nicardipine in clinical trials. 330 Feb 39

The efficacy of the calcium-channel blocker nicardipine in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon was assessed in a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial in 20 patients. Each patient received 2 weeks of nicardipine 20 mg three times daily and 2 weeks of placebo. Nicardipine significantly improved the frequency and severity of Raynaud's phenomenon. An open study during 2 months in 30 patients confirmed the effectiveness of nicardipine (20-40 mg 3 times daily). Side effects (headache, flushing, ankle oedema) were frequent but usually mild. We conclude that nicardipine is effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon.
 ...
PMID:[Nicardipine in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon]. 330 87

This study evaluated 1 year the efficacy of therapy with nicardipine in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Twenty-five male patients were entered. After a placebo run-in phase, the patients received nicardipine 30 mg, nicardipine 40 mg, and placebo, three times daily given in random, double-blind manner for 8 weeks. A double-blind, cross-over study comparing nicardipine with placebo was then undertaken. After 5 months of open treatment with nicardipine 90 or 120 mg day-1, patients received either placebo or nicardipine for 3 weeks, each followed by the alternative treatment for an additional 3 weeks and further open-label treatment with nicardipine for another 3-5 months. There were no significant changes in the PR, QRS or QT intervals, or in the QRS pattern during the short-term and long-term studies. There were no significant differences in mean heart rate after nicardipine compared with baseline. During treatment with nicardipine 120 mg day-1, patients reported significantly fewer anginal attacks compared with placebo, and nitroglycerin consumption also decreased. Nicardipine increased treadmill time, time to onset of angina, and time to one mm ST segment depression. These effects were maintained after 6 months of continued nicardipine therapy. Adverse effects were minor and well tolerated and included headache, dizziness, gastrointestinal upset, flushing paraesthesia and pedal oedema. Abrupt withdrawal of nicardipine at the end of the study resulted in a rapid return of the original symptoms but without further deterioration from the baseline measurements. Nicardipine was effective in the treatment of stable effort angina pectoris; this benefit was maintained for the entire year of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Short- and long-term treatment of stable effort angina with nicardipine, a new calcium channel blocker: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, repeated cross-over study. 392 59


1 2 Next >>