Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

During the past decades, pharmacological treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has become a fairly established modality. Approaches include blockade of alpha-adrenoreceptors and suppression of androgens. Patients eligible for drug treatment are those with mild to moderate symptoms of BPH and no strong indications for surgery. alpha-Receptor blockers generally improve urinary symptoms and peak urinary flow rates 2 to 4 weeks after introduction of therapy. Because of minor adverse effects, selective alpha 1-blockers are preferred over nonselective drugs. Prazosin, terazosin and alfuzosin are extensively studied and widely used in BPH treatment. Terazosin might be preferred to prazosin and alfuzosin because it can be administered once daily, but a disadvantage is higher cost. Doxazosin and tamsulosin (amsulosin; YM 617) are drugs currently under clinical investigation in the treatment of BPH. Antiandrogen therapy induces reduction in prostate volume and relief in symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. However, the only drug which seems to be of major interest in BPH treatment is finasteride. Other drugs [gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, progestogens and flutamide] are associated with frequent and sometimes severe adverse effects, such as impotence, flushing and loss of libido. Finasteride has fewer adverse effects and is well tolerated, but needs to be administered for at least 6 to 12 months to obtain maximum effect. Future approaches in medical treatment of BPH might be combination therapy of alpha 1-blockers and finasteride.
 ...
PMID:Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Current pharmacological treatment. 751 Jun 22

Hypertensive emergencies in hemodialysis require immediate therapy, usually by parenteral drug administration; however, sublingual medications may have potential in this special condition. Sublingual captopril (25 mg), nifedipine (10 mg) and prazosin (2 mg) were prescribed to determine the effectiveness and safety of each medication in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies during hemodialysis. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured continuously up to 120 min postdose. The response rates were 83% for captopril, 90% for nifedipine and 11% for prazosin. The significant hypotensive effects of both sublingual captopril and nifedipine occurred at 10 min and continued up to 120 min. The reduction of systolic blood pressure occurred earlier in nifedipine than captopril (10 vs. 15 min). No significant difference in heart rate between them was noted. There were no side effects in the captopril group but flushing, tachycardia and headache were observed in 4 patients of the nifedipine group. We concluded that sublingual captopril and nifedipine were effective but captopril seemed to have less side effects than nifedipine and may be an excellent alternative to sublingual nifedipine in the urgent treatment of hypertensive emergencies in hemodialysis. Prazosin was not recommended because of its low response rate.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of sublingual captopril, nifedipine and prazosin in hypertensive emergencies during hemodialysis. 824 94