Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effects of calcium antagonists on psychological well-being, cognitive function, activity and physical symptoms in hypertensive patients are reviewed. Effects on these aspects of quality of life appear to differ according to whether a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist such as nifedipine is employed or verapamil, which is a phenylalkylamine derivative. Nifedipine has been associated with a self-assessment of impaired cognitive function in 2 clinical trials. Nifedipine was also associated with more symptomatic complaints than both atenolol and verapamil in different studies. The problems with nifedipine centred on oedema, flushing and palpitations. Verapamil was associated with constipation. Compared with other classes of antihypertensive drugs, the position of calcium antagonists with respect to the maintenance of patients' quality of life is presently unclear. Verapamil has been associated with improved quality of life compared with propranolol (a beta-blocker) and nifedipine. Verapamil appears to have similar effects on quality of life as atenolol and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril. The position of nifedipine remains unclear.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life in the treatment of hypertension. The effect of calcium antagonists. 128 77

Cadralazine is a peripheral arteriolar vasodilator which, unlike hydralazine or dihydralazine, has a protected hydrazino group. In hypertensive patients the optimal effect, based on the antihypertensive efficacy to tolerability ratio, is seen after a 15 mg dose when the drug is administered as monotherapy. When administered in combination with other antihypertensive agents, a 10 mg daily dosage seems appropriate. Noncomparative trials have shown that, in patients who had failed to respond adequately to a beta-blocker and/or diuretic, the addition of cadralazine 10 to 30 mg once daily reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure by 11 to 19%/13 to 22%. This antihypertensive effect becomes evident over a 2- to 6-week period of therapy and persists during longer term administration. Comparative studies have shown that cadralazine is superior to placebo, and has a similar blood pressure lowering effect to hydralazine, dihydralazine and prazosin in patients not controlled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic but who continued to receive these treatments. Similarly, cadralazine and chlorthalidone were equally effective in reducing blood pressure in resting hypertensive patients but cadralazine shows an advantage in reducing the pressor response in exercising patients. Cadralazine is well tolerated when administered with a beta-blocker or diuretic. Most adverse effects become less frequent and severe with continued use, occur more frequently at dosages of 20 mg/day or more, and do not generally require withdrawal of therapy. Manifestations of the drug's vasodilating properties such as headache, asthenia, dizziness, palpitations and flushing are the most commonly reported symptoms during cadralazine monotherapy, but these may be reduced during combination therapy. The drug does not appear to induce a systemic lupus-like erythematosus syndrome, as may occur with hydralazine, but additional clinical experience is required to completely exclude this possibility. In conclusion, because of its efficacy as a second- or third-line antihypertensive agent, its simple once daily dosage regimen and favourable risk: benefit ratio, cadralazine may have a useful role, particularly in those hypertensive patients who do not respond adequately to established antihypertensive treatments. However, the therapeutic potential of cadralazine cannot be clearly established until the present limited clinical base is expanded to include comparisons with other classes of vasodilating drugs (ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists), and its utility in the management of other indications such as severe hypertension during pregnancy has been adequately explored.
 ...
PMID:Cadralazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension. 208 13

A patient undergoing groin lymph node dissection with spinal and general anaesthesia was receiving enalapril to control hypertension. Infusion of stable plasma protein solution (Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, Australia) was associated with significant hypotension and flushing. A brief review of stable plasma protein solution and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor pharmacology is presented to provide a possible mechanism for these events. This mechanism implies that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy is a relative contraindication to rapid SPPS infusion.
 ...
PMID:Possible interaction between SPPS and enalapril. 233 34

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 245 54

1. To test the hypothesis that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors potentiate the tissue effects of bradykinin, the thickness of weals produced by intradermal injections of bradykinin was measured in 17 hypertensive subjects whose antihypertensive regimen included an ACE inhibitor, and in 12 whose treatment did not. 2. Weal thickness increased linearly with the logarithm of the bradykinin dose in both groups (P less than 0.0001). 3. The patients receiving ACE inhibitors showed a mean response of 1.18 +/- 0.08 mm (mean +/- s.e. mean), compared with a mean response of 0.75 +/- 0.08 mm for patients not receiving an ACE inhibitor (P = 0.002). Mean weal response (1.08 +/- 0.9 mm) was not significantly different in patients taking captopril (n = 11) compared with that (1.29 +/- 0.12 mm) in patients taking enalapril (n = 9). 4. Facial flushing during the experiment occurred in six patients taking ACE inhibitors but none who were not. 5. Dermal responses to bradykinin are enhanced in patients taking ACE inhibitors as routine antihypertensive therapy. This study supports the hypothesis that bradykinin may be responsible for some of the adverse effects of these drugs.
 ...
PMID:The effects of intradermal bradykinin are potentiated by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive patients. 254 53

The efficacy and safety of nicardipine were assessed in 29,104 hypertensive patients (mean age, 64 years) during a 90-day multicenter clinical trial. By treatment day 90, blood pressure was controlled in 60% of the patients taking nicardipine alone. The efficacy of nicardipine combined with another antihypertensive agent was examined in 6,479 of the patients. When nicardipine was added to their treatment regimen, blood pressure was controlled by day 90 in 63% of the patients taking beta-blockers, in 58% of those on diuretics, in 50% of those on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and in 49% of those taking centrally acting antihypertensive agents. Nicardipine was well tolerated; only 11% of the 29,104 patients discontinued treatment because of side effects. Most adverse reactions were transient and were related to vasodilation, and included peripheral edema in 7% of the patients, flushing in 7%, and headache in 4%. The results indicate that nicardipine is suitable as initial therapy in arterial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of nicardipine in 29,104 patients with hypertension. 267 15

Enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, was given to 12 patients with renovascular hypertension: To five of them as a single drug after discontinuing other medications, and to seven patients as a substitute for one of their previous medications. The drug proved effective in controlling hypertension in all patients. Flushing and palpitations occurred in two of them, one of whom also showed a rise in creatinine and mild hyperkalemia. Two patients who had developed side effects while on captopril (renal deterioration in one, and severe rash in the other) tolerated enalapril well. Enalapril effectively reduced the blood pressure in the one patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis without causing renal failure.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril in the treatment of renovascular hypertension. 300 Jun 54

Diltiazem is a benzothiazepine derivative calcium antagonist available in several formulations, some of which enable once daily administration. The drug as monotherapy has demonstrated similar efficacy to diuretics in older patients with hypertension. Data comparing diltiazem with beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are more limited, but available studies suggest at least comparable antihypertensive efficacy. Diltiazem as monotherapy or in combination with a beta-adrenoceptor-antagonist, isosorbide dinitrate, or another calcium antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with effort angina. The drug has also been used intravenously to terminate supraventricular tachycardias and to control the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation or flutter; it also appears to reduce the rate of early reinfarction in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The most common adverse events during diltiazem therapy include headache, flushing, peripheral oedema and hypotension. Atrioventricular block although rare, is the most frequent serious adverse event related to diltiazem therapy and may be exacerbated by coadministration of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, especially in the elderly. Thus, diltiazem appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment for hypertension and angina in older patients and has shown promise as therapy for supraventricular tachycardias and as prophylaxis against early reinfarction in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:Diltiazem. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in older patients. 836 96

Amlodipine belongs to the dihydropyridine class of calcium channel blockers. Both short and long term studies indicate that amlodipine effectively lowers mild to moderately elevated blood pressure and relieves symptoms of angina pectoris. In comparative studies, its antihypertensive efficacy is similar to that of other established agents such as beta-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors and other calcium channel blockers (including the dihydropyridines); limited comparative data are, however, available in patients with angina pectoris. Amlodipine may offer potential in patients with congestive heart failure. Vasodilator adverse events such as oedema, headaches, and flushing are commonly observed with amlodipine. The drug does not appear to cause postural hypotension, reflex tachycardia or cardiac conduction disturbances. Comparative studies suggest that amlodipine is at least as well tolerated as other standard agents. Thus, amlodipine provides an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of hypertension, and offers potential for patients with angina pectoris. Its beneficial effects in patients with congestive heart failure require confirmation in future studies.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. 852 73

GUIDELINES ON DRUG SAFETY: Recent European Union draft guidelines for the safety evaluation of drugs intended for long-term use state that during drug development the safety profile of the new compound should be assessed over a period of time consistent with intended usage. This is in reasonable agreement with guidelines prepared by other regulatory authorities. CLINICAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT: Satisfactory preclinical data on a new compound are used to obtain authorization for human testing from the National Committees on Safety of Medicines. Clinical trials are performed in four phases, ranging from phase I studies performed on healthy volunteers (n = 20-50) to postmarketing (phase IV) studies. The latter are of great importance as they cover large patient populations (n = 2000 to > or = 10,000) and allow detection of rare adverse drug reactions. ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS: Type B reactions are serious, unpredictable reactions to a drug that necessitate treatment withdrawal. Type A reactions are dose-dependent, and represent the majority of adverse reactions. They are often managed by dose reduction rather than drug withdrawal. ADVERSE REACTIONS TO ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS: Examples of type B adverse reactions to antihypertensives are the cutaneous and ocular reactions to practolol, and angioneurotic oedema associated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Lacidipine, a second-generation calcium antagonist, is an example of a modern antihypertensive agent with a favourable safety profile. The adverse reactions associated with lacidipine are mild to moderate and of the A type, the major ones being those typical of calcium antagonists (headache, flushing and pedal oedema due to vasodilation.
 ...
PMID:Assessing the safety profile of a new antihypertensive agent. 882 81


1 2 3 Next >>