Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Felodipine was compared with prazosin in patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure was not controlled by a beta-blocking drug. One hundred patients with a supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to mm Hg after 4 weeks or more on a beta-blocking drug and placebo were randomly assigned to felodipine or prazosin tablets. The drugs were titrated at 2-week intervals if diastolic BP was greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Titration steps of felodipine were 5, 10, 20 mg b.i.d. and of prazosin were 1, 2, 4 mg b.i.d. The fall in blood pressure with felodipine 32/21 mm Hg was greater than the fall with prazosin 16/12 mm Hg (p less than 0.001); 36 patients achieved a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg with felodipine, which was a significantly greater number than the 20 patients who obtained such a level with prazosin (p less than 0.01). Both drugs were well tolerated, but more patients complained of vascular type side effects (flushing, peripheral edema) with felodipine than with prazosin. There was significant weight gain with prazosin but not with felodipine. Felodipine was shown to be a well-tolerated, effective antihypertensive agent when used with a beta-blocking drug and to be suitable for people with hypertension who fail to be controlled with a beta-blocking drug.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987
PMID:Felodipine compared to prazosin as additional therapy to a beta-blocking drug. 245 50

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987
PMID:Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 245 54

Several neuropeptides cause mild flushing when infused intravenously in humans. However, only calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), vasointestinal peptide, and substance P (SP) cause reproducible falls in blood pressure when infused into normal subjects. Of these, CGRP is of the most interest because it is the most potent and because it is present in vascular nerve endings. This paper summarises the evidence to date suggesting that CGRP release from vascular nerve endings may be of physiological importance in the regulation of blood pressure.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of vasodilator peptides. 245 96

Prostacyclin (PGI2) has proven beneficial effects on organ preservation. Iloprost (ZK 36 374), a stable synthetic analogue with a longer half-life of 14 minutes is reported to have less hypotensive effects than PGI2 while offering increased cytoprotective and antiaggregation action. In this study its effects on lung-preservation were investigated. The heart lung block of 12 Beagle dogs was harvested after flushing of the pulmonary artery with 60 ml/kg modified Eurocollins (MEC) solution, the left lung was stored for 4 hours and then transplanted into 12 weight-matched dogs. Prior to operation the animals were randomized into two groups with MEC solution as the only preservative in group A and an additional i.v. infusion of 1 microgram/kg/min Iloprost during 15 minutes prior to flushing and 15 micrograms/kg Iloprost administered to the perfusate in group B. Arterial pO2, alveolo-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO2) and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) of the transplanted lungs were measured 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours after transplantation during occlusion of the contralateral pulmonal artery. The application of Iloprost resulted in a significant improvement of pO2 (p = 0.047), AaDO2 (p = 0.002) and PAP (p = 0.018) after 1 hour. Results in group B at later time points were improved without reaching statistical significance. Iloprost therefore showed beneficial effects on pulmonary function early after lung preservation with MEC.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989 Jun
PMID:Beneficial effect of iloprost on early pulmonary function after lung preservation with modified eurocollins solution. 247 70

The purpose of the present article is to review a number of studies dealing with the efficacy of calcium antagonists, in particular verapamil, in the treatment of essential hypertension. Several well-controlled studies have shown that verapamil causes a significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic pressure. Blood pressure decrease, which is of the same magnitude as with propranolol, is related to pretreatment values and, according to some authors, to age, but the latter statement is being refuted by others. Using a slow-release preparation, it can be shown that the 24-h blood pressure profile with once-daily administration is quite similar to the profile seen with three-times-daily administration of the regular formulation of verapamil. It has also been documented that the blood pressure decrease persists during 1-year continued administration. Optimal effect is seen at 240-320 mg/day. The most frequent side effects are constipation, flushing, and conduction disturbances. It is often proposed that the addition of a diuretic to verapamil does not increase the antihypertensive effect, but recent studies provide evidence to the contrary. Finally, ambulatory pressure recordings have shown that nifedipine does not decrease blood pressure variability. In general, calcium antagonists seem to be effective antihypertensive drugs but their place in the daily antihypertensive treatment has still to be defined.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989
PMID:Calcium antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension: review of international studies. 247 94

Throughout the developed world, populations are growing older. Blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, increases with aging, and this increase leads to increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials demonstrate that treatment of hypertension in the elderly reduces overall cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, nonfatal cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, progression to severe hypertension, and strokes. Drug treatment has been well tolerated, but diuretic therapy has been known to increase plasma glucose, uric acid, and creatinine. Therapeutic trials of nonpharmacologic treatment may be indicated in those with mild elevation in blood pressure and no serious end organ disease. However, most people up to age 80 will require drug treatment. Many drugs are effective in the elderly, but, some like beta-blockers, may not be as effective as in younger patients. Controlled clinical trials demonstrate that nitrendipine, a calcium channel blocking drug, significantly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients, (successfully controlling pressure in a high percentage) and was well tolerated. Drug effects persist for 12 h or more. The drug decreased the exercise-induced rise in the rate-pressure product. Although there is a temporary increase in heart rate, this returns to baseline after a short time. Side effects include headache, flushing, dizziness, edema, and palpitations. Therefore, nitrendipine offers a reasonable and useful alternative to many other drugs in the treatment of combined systolic and diastolic hypertension in the elderly.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989
PMID:Epidemiologic aspects of elderly hypertensive patients and the results of treatment with nitrendipine. 248 68

The antihypertensive efficacy of a combination of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in severe primary hypertension is well known, but a synergistic action of this drug combination in mild to moderate primary hypertension is still not established. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with nitrendipine (20 mg) or captopril (100 mg), and of their combination (nitrendipine 10 mg plus captopril 50 mg), in patients suffering from mild to moderate primary hypertension, according to a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. After the first 4-week monotherapy period, both nitrendipine and captopril induced a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (p less than 0.001). Furthermore, nitrendipine caused a significant increase in heart rate (HR), while no change in HR was observed in patients treated with captopril. Several side effects were observed, both in the nitrendipine-treated patients (facial flushing, headache, malleolar edema) and in the captopril-treated patients (initial hypotension, dizziness, gastrointestinal disorders). However, these side effects were mild and were well tolerated. In the second combined 4-week therapy period, systolic and diastolic BP of patients treated with 10 mg nitrendipine combined with 50 mg captopril continued to decrease to a degree significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than that observed at the end of the monotherapy period. Simultaneously, no change in HR values occurred when compared to basal values. Furthermore, the incidence and intensity of some side effects observed during the combined therapy period were lower than those of the monotherapy period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1989 Jun
PMID:Calcium-channel blockade (nitrendipine) in combination with ACE inhibition (captopril) in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. 248 3

The major antihypertensive mechanism of calcium antagonists is by decreasing the systemic vascular resistance, modified by the counter-regulatory responses of the baroreflexes and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In severe hypertension, the concept that calcium overload of the vascular myocyte could precipitate or aggravate peripheral vasoconstriction provides a logical basis for the use of these agents as first choice therapy; nifedipine, especially, has been well tested. As monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension each of the three first-generation agents compares well with beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists may have a special role in the therapy of certain patient groups (elderly, black) or in those subjects whose life style involves intense physical or mental exertion (hemodynamics better maintained than with beta-blockade) or in patients with early end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy or renal insufficiency. However, the goal blood pressure may not be reached during monotherapy so that drug combinations may be required. Further indications for these compounds are as follows. Verapamil and diltiazem are frequently used in supraventricular tachycardias including acute and chronic atrial fibrillation. In the arrhythmias of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, there is the potential danger of provocation of anterograde conduction. Further indications for calcium antagonists, still under evaluation, include congestive heart failure (controversial), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (verapamil), primary pulmonary hypertension (high doses required), Raynaud's phenomenon (nifedipine and diltiazem effective), peripheral vascular disease (proof not yet documented), cerebral insufficiency and subarachnoid hemorrhage (nimodipine promising), migraine, exertional bronchospasm, renal disease, atherosclerosis (experimental), and primary aldosteronism (nifedipine inhibits aldosterone release). Second-generation agents include dihydropyridines, such as nitrendipine, nicardipine, felodipine, amlodipine, nisoldipine, nimodipine, and isradipine. From these will be selected agents that are longer acting and provide higher vascular selectivity. New preparations of existing agents include slow-release formulations of nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine. Yet caution is required when calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1988 Mar
PMID:Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications. 315 29

With the correct selection of drug and patient, the calcium antagonists as a group can be remarkably effective at relatively low cost of serious side effects. Almost all side effects are dose related. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil (or diltiazem) is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine which actually has the most marked negative inotropic effect. Yet caution is required when even calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide. The most marked interaction with digoxin is that with verapamil, which may raise digoxin levels by over 50%. Combination therapy of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers is increasingly common, and is probably safest in the case of dihydropyridines. Other combinations being explored are those with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1988 Jul
PMID:Calcium channel antagonists. Part IV: Side effects and contraindications drug interactions and combinations. 315 4

Criteria indicating injury of endothelial cells (craters, protrusion, denudation) in saphenous veins for aorto-coronary bypass grafting have been examined and quantitated by use of light-(LM), scanning electron (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The specimens were fixed either by immersion or under pressure. It was shown that the conventional way of handling saphenous vein grafts prior to implantation results in serious damage of the endothelial lining. The factors responsible are presumed to be hypoxia, manual flushing and distension with isotonic saline for blood removal, control of leakage, and counteracting spasm of the graft. Even samples collected by a "no touch" technique and exposed to a short hypoxic interval sometimes revealed slight injury.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
PMID:A quantitative study of endothelial cell injury in aorto-coronary vein grafts. 348 41


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>