Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (
flushing
)
6,387
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine was assessed in 86 hypertensive patients who had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg and who were randomly allocated to a double-blind comparison of three different dosage regimens: 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg b.i.d., and placebo. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 4-week course of treatment.
Isradipine
reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures dose-dependently; the normalization rate (DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 5% with placebo and 29, 55, and 64% with isradipine 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg b.i.d., respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing at least a 10 mm Hg reduction in sitting DBP was 29, 67, 86, and 91%, respectively. All three dosages proved to be significantly effective compared to placebo. Neither heart rate nor blood pressure regulation in orthostasis were influenced. The main side effects were headache, dizziness, and
flushing
; isradipine 1.25 and 2.5 mg b.i.d. were well tolerated (not significantly different from placebo). In conclusion, isradipine 2.5 mg b.i.d. appears to be the potential dose of first choice, exhibiting a favorable benefit-risk profile.
...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine in essential hypertension. 169 4
Isradipine
is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a high degree of selectivity for the coronary, cerebral, and skeletal muscle vasculature. The drug has minimal depressant activity on sinoatrial node automaticity and negligible negative chronotropic, dromotropic, and inotropic actions.
Isradipine
reduces blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance without changes in cardiac output and stroke volume. Renal blood flow is maintained while renal vascular resistance is reduced; this is accompanied by both short- and long-term diuretic and natriuretic effects. Doses of 1.25 to 5 mg twice daily lowers blood pressure effectively over 24 h. In open as well as placebo-controlled trials, 2.5 to 10 mg isradipine twice daily was safe and well tolerated, and reduced systolic and diastolic values in up to 85% of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Efficacy is similar to those of nifedipine and nitrendipine, and potentially superior to those of propranolol, atenolol, prazosin, hydrochlorothiazide, and diltiazem. The drug can be safely combined with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and diuretics. Adverse effects are dose-dependent and secondary to arterial vasodilatation, such as headache,
flushing
, ankle edema, dizziness, palpitations, and tachycardia. At the recommended dose of 2.5 mg twice daily, the total incidence of side effects does not differ from that with placebo. The antiatherosclerotic, antitrophic, and cerebroprotective effects seen in experimental animal models are promising for the drug in the treatment of human hypertension.
Isradipine
may not only reduce blood pressure, but may also reduce the risk for the consequences of this peril, namely, cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction.
...
PMID:The place of isradipine in the treatment of hypertension. 182 26
Calcium antagonists, particularly those derived from the dihydropyridine class, have shown remarkable efficacy in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders. This review will concentrate on the use of one of the newer compounds in this category, isradipine, in the treatment of arterial hypertension.
Isradipine
is a calcium antagonist with marked vascular selectivity and, in practical terms, is devoid of cardiac effects. Its usefulness in hypertension is well documented, both when used as single drug treatment and in combination with other agents, particularly beta-blockers.
Isradipine
is well tolerated, does not cause metabolic disturbances and, apart from the typical dihydropyridine-type vascular adverse effects, e.g.
flushing
and ankle oedema, it does not cause any specific side effect. Some results obtained with isradipine in animal studies, e.g. the antiatherosclerotic effect and the brain tissue preserving effect seen in experimental stroke, appear to hold great promise for future important clinical applications for isradipine.
...
PMID:Isradipine in hypertension. 215 Jun 33
The calcium antagonists of the dihydropyridine group, isradipine and nifedipine, were compared in 64 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95 to 110mm Hg). A 2-week placebo run-in phase was followed by a double-blind crossover trial comprising two 3-week treatment periods with either calcium antagonist. The (fixed) dosages were isradipine 2.5mg twice daily and nifedipine retard 20mg twice daily. Blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) at baseline was 155/101mm Hg and decreased significantly by 14%/15% on isradipine and by 11%/12% on nifedipine (difference between treatments not significant). The drugs differed significantly with regard to incidence of adverse effects (mostly
flushing
and headache); the total rates were 16% on isradipine and 36% on nifedipine. At the end of the trial, patients were asked which drug or treatment phase they preferred.
Isradipine
was preferred by 50% of patients; only 20% preferred nifedipine. Thus, it is concluded that isradipine, administered in an equally effective antihypertensive dosage regimen is superior to nifedipine with regard to the incidence of adverse effects, resulting in greater patient satisfaction with treatment.
...
PMID:The calcium antagonist isradipine in the therapy of hypertension. A double-blind crossover comparison with nifedipine. 215 Jun 44
Six hundred outpatients aged between 22 and 84 years with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure of at least 95 mm Hg) entered a multinational, multicenter, single-blind trial with dose titration to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of isradipine in doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg twice daily over 12 weeks, following a two-week placebo run-in period.
Isradipine
alone was taken by 321 patients, the remainder receiving, in addition, other antihypertensive drugs. In valid patients receiving monotherapy, the mean final isradipine dose was 3.4 mg (median, 2.5 mg) twice daily, which normalized supine diastolic blood pressure in 85 percent and 64 percent of patients two to four hours and 10 to 14 hours post-dose, respectively. Overall, 242 patients (40 percent) reported adverse events, 39 (7 percent) of whom withdrew from the study for this reason. The most common side effects were
flushing
(11 percent), headache (10 percent), and localized edema (4 percent). None of the pathologic changes in hematologic or biochemical values was attributable to isradipine. It is concluded that a slow titration of isradipine by increments at three-week intervals results in an effective and well-tolerated treatment for essential hypertension, both in mono- and combination therapy.
...
PMID:A multicenter evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of isradipine in the treatment of essential hypertension. 252 65
The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-moderate hypertension. After a 4 week placebo period, 143 patients entered a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study of 12 weeks duration. Patients received either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) 2.5 mg twice daily. Doubling of this dose and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if DBP was > 90 mmHg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively.
Isradipine
monotherapy reduced BP from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mmHg at baseline to 149/91 +/- 14/10 mmHg at week 8 (p < 0.001), while felodipine alone reduced BP from 171/104 +/- 17/6 at baseline to 151/92 +/- 19/9 (p < 0.001). Following the addition of enalapril to 35% of patients in the isradipine group BP was further reduced to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). The addition of enalapril to 24% of the felodipine group further reduced BP to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). No differences in BP were found between the 2 groups while on monotherapy. However, the isradipine group had a significantly lower DBP than the felodipine group at the conclusion of the study (p = 0.008; 95% CI 0.7 to 6.9 mmHg). Similar incidences of headache,
flushing
, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle oedema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (p = 0.028). Overall, ankle oedema was reported more often by female patients and was not associated with an increase in weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group. 820 14
The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of isradipine and felodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week placebo run-in, 143 patients entered a 12-week double-blind multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily. Dose-doubling and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > 90 mm Hg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively.
Isradipine
reduced blood pressure from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mm Hg at baseline to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001) whereas felodipine reduced blood pressure from 171/104 +/- 17/6 mm Hg at baseline to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001). Similar incidences of headache,
flushing
, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle edema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (14% v 30%) (P = .028). It is concluded that isradipine represents a practical improvement over felodipine in the treatment of hypertension.
...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group. 846 25
Isradipine
is a new dihydropyridine-derived calcium antagonist. It possesses marked vascular selectivity, resulting in a powerful vasodilating action, whereas, in practical terms, it is devoid of cardiac effects. The usefulness of isradipine in the treatment of arterial hypertension is well documented, both when used as single-drug treatment and in combination with other agents, particularly, beta-blockers.
Isradipine
is well tolerated and does not negatively affect quality of life or capacity for physical exercise. It does not cause metabolic disturbances and, apart from the typical dihydropyridine-type vascular side-effects, specifically,
flushing
and ankle oedema, there are no specific adverse effects. Even ankle oedema is apparently relatively rare with this compound. Studies in animal models show that isradipine has a potent anti-atherosclerotic effect, and a brain tissue-preserving effect after experimental stroke, in doses that are relevant for antihypertensive treatment. If such results can be confirmed in humans, they will undoubtedly be of great clinical importance.
...
PMID:Isradipine: a profile in essential hypertension. 848 May 3
In order to assess the effective dose, tolerability, and safety of isradipine as a monotherapeutic antihypertensive agent for Chinese patients in Taiwan, an open trial was carried out. This study consisted of a 2-week, placebo, run-in period and an 8-week active treatment period, starting with isradipine 1.25 mg twice daily (bid) for the first 4 weeks, followed by 2.5 mg bid if the blood pressure was not normalized (diastole < 90 mmHg). One hundred and one patients (M/F = 48:53) were valid for efficacy analysis. Their age ranged from 30 to 64 years (mean +/- SD, 52 +/- 8). The blood pressure before active treatment was 160 +/- 2/104 +/- 1 mmHg. At the end of treatment period I (week 4), 12-14 hours after the last dose, 38 (37.6%) patients were normalized and 47 (46.5%) subjects responded (diastolic blood pressure reduction > or = 10 mmHg). At week 8, 68 (67.3%) patients were normalized and 79 (78.2%) subjects responded.
Isradipine
reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressures within 2 weeks of treatment. There were no significant differences in blood pressure reduction between both genders and among age groups. Safety analysis showed two subjects with severe
flushing
, dizziness, and palpitation who used the dose of 1.25 mg bid. They withdrew from the study. The adverse reactions of other patients were transient, mild, and tolerable. Most of the side effects were related to vasodilatation, but edema was not found. There was no change in body weight or heart rate, nor any atrioventricular conduction disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Dose titration study of isradipine in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 848 68
Many children with hypertension, particularly those with new-onset hypertension related to glomerulonephritis, organ transplantation, or other forms of secondary hypertension, require treatment with a short-acting antihypertensive in order to quickly achieve blood pressure (BP) control. We administered isradipine, a short-acting, second-generation calcium antagonist, to 72 such children. Retrospective data collection was undertaken to determine the effects of isradipine treatment. The mean age of children treated with isradipine was 74+/-55 months (mean+/-SD). Nearly all of these children had secondary hypertension and were initially treated as hospital inpatients for newly diagnosed hypertension. Mean isradipine dose was 0.36+/-0.17 mg/kg per day, with no significant variation in dose according to patient age.
Isradipine
was administered three times per day in most instances, but 21% of the time it was administered four times per day. An extemporaneous isradipine suspension was used in 62% of treatment courses. BP control was achieved with isradipine alone in 38 children; the remainder received isradipine in combination with additional antihypertensives. Comparison of pre-treatment BP with BP obtained 8+/-9 days later demonstrated a significant BP reduction with isradipine treatment, with a mean reduction of 14+/-13 mmHg for systolic BP and 13+/-15 mmHg for diastolic BP. There was no effect of isradipine treatment on heart rate. Adverse effects occurred in 9.5% of treatment courses, and included headache,
flushing
, dizziness, and tachycardia. We conclude that isradipine successfully lowers BP in hypertensive children with secondary forms of hypertension. Use of isradipine suspension allows infants and young children to be treated as readily as older children.
...
PMID:Isradipine treatment of hypertension in children: a single-center experience. 1221 29
1