Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The subjects were 24 patients, aged 37 to 66 years, with mild to moderate hypertension, treated with nifedipine retard (mean dose, 47 mg daily) for 7 to 16 weeks. The mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) declined significantly from 158/101 before treatment to 136/87 mmHg after treatment. Daytime BP declined from 160/101 to 133/86 mmHg and nighttime BP from 152/98 to 132/85 mmHg; the diurnal variation in diastolic BP was lost during treatment with nifedipine. The consecutive hourly BPs were all significantly lower after treatment. BPs in response to physiologic tests were significantly reduced after treatment. Heart rate increased significantly during treatment. Side effects (palpitations, pedal edema, and flushing of the face) were reported by four patients. It is concluded that nifedipine retard is safe and effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Nifedipine retard in the treatment of hypertension. A study using ambulatory blood pressure recordings. 228 19

Nicardipine and nifedipine are structurally similar dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. The present study was a prospective randomized trial designed to evaluate the relative incidence of dizziness, flushing, headache, pedal edema, and palpitations during use of these drugs in patients with angina pectoris. Of 250 patients who entered into the comparative treatment part of the study, 140 patients were susceptible to developing symptoms to nifedipine as identified during a 1-month open-label treatment with nifedipine. These patients were compared with a parallel cohort of 110 patients, who were identified during the same open-label period, but remained mostly asymptomatic. After a 1-week washout of nifedipine, equal numbers of patients in each cohort began an 8-week period of randomized, double-blind treatment with nifedipine (20 mg three times daily) or nicardipine (30 mg three times daily). Patients who experienced these symptoms during the open-label nifedipine treatment had a higher incidence of the same symptoms during the blinded treatment regimen. Nicardipine-treated patients had a lower incidence of each of the symptoms than did the nifedipine-treated patients. Statistically significant differences were reported for dizziness, the most common of the side effects. Patients who were free of these symptoms in the open-label period usually remained free of them in the blinded comparison. However, even among those free of dizziness during the open-label nifedipine treatment, more patients reported experiencing dizziness in the blinded phase from nifedipine than from nicardipine (18% vs 6%; p = 0.02).
 ...
PMID:Randomized double-blind comparison of side effects of nicardipine and nifedipine in angina pectoris. The Nicardipine Investigators Group. 240 16

Nicardipine is currently being evaluated in clinical trials as a treatment for angina and hypertension. Over 2,000 patients have received nicardipine, most at dosages of 20 to 40 mg 3 times daily. In 12 double-blind, parallel-group studies (4 of them placebo-controlled) the efficacy of nicardipine was evaluated in mild to moderate hypertension; supine systolic blood pressure was lowered by 10 to 15 mm Hg and supine diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg. A clear dose response is present at dosages from 10 to 40 mg 3 times daily. Patients with angina were treated in 9 double-blind, crossover design studies: 4 of these were placebo-controlled; 3 were comparison studies with beta blockers; 2 were comparisons with nifedipine. Treadmill exercise tests were the major measure of efficacy. Results of these studies showed consistent, statistically significant improvement in exercise tolerance and time to onset of angina, and clinical improvement in patients with chronic stable angina. The effective dosages of nicardipine were 30 or 40 mg 3 times daily. A placebo-controlled study demonstrated remarkable efficacy in patients with vasospastic angina. No deaths or serious adverse reactions were attributed to nicardipine during clinical trials. The most common side effects reported were flushing, palpitations, headache and pedal edema. These appeared to be due to the drug's pharmacologic property of vasodilatation.
 ...
PMID:An overview of the safety and efficacy of nicardipine in clinical trials. 330 Feb 39

The efficacy and safety of high-dose verapamil (480 mg/day) and diltiazem therapy (360 mg/day) were compared in separate cohorts of 26 and 20 patients, respectively. All patients had stable exertional angina and underwent an initial 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase followed by a 12-month open-label period. Angina attacks were reduced by verapamil (6.3 +/- 7.5 to 2.5 +/- 4.1 attacks per week, p less than 0.001) and by diltiazem (9.2 +/- 7.5 to 3.0 +/- 3.1 attacks per week, p less than 0.001), while treadmill time increased with both verapamil (372 +/- 132 to 444 +/- 108 s, p less than 0.001) and diltiazem (412 +/- 175 to 536 +/- 164 s, p less than 0.001) during the short-term study. Both agents continued to show similar salutory effects at the end of one year. The beneficial effects of both drugs appeared to be related in part to a reduction of the rate-pressure product during submaximal exercise (12% by verapamil, 7% by diltiazem, both p less than 0.05). Adverse effects were few and consisted primarily of mild constipation in six patients taking verapamil, and pedal edema and transient flushing in 2 patients each using diltiazem. Thus, high-dose verapamil and diltiazem have similar beneficial effects and are safe for the long-term treatment of effort-related angina pectoris.
 ...
PMID:The efficacy and safety of high-dose verapamil and diltiazem in the long-term treatment of stable exertional angina. 639 71

This study was conducted to assess the therapeutic utility of combining amlodipine with captopril in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. Patients had hypertension of WHO grades I-III, with initial mean sitting and standing diastolic blood pressure of 100-119 mm Hg (phase V) after 2-4 weeks on placebo, and had remained uncontrolled (diastolic blood pressure > 95 mm Hg) despite a further 4 weeks on low-dose captopril. Twenty-nine patients entered the computer-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover comparison of either amlodipine 10 mg once daily or matching placebo added to continued therapy with captopril 25 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. Patients then acted as their own control and received the alternative amlodipine/placebo treatment plus their continued captopril therapy for another 4 weeks. Once-daily amlodipine was shown to be effective when combined with captopril. Mean baseline supine systolic blood pressure decreased from 167 to 149 mm Hg and standing systolic blood pressure from 167 to 144 mm Hg. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure decreased from 105 to 92 mm Hg, and standing diastolic blood pressure decreased from 110 to 96 mm Hg. The placebo-corrected amlodipine differences in mean changes from captopril baseline were -18/-12.2 mm Hg for supine and -20.1/-11.9 mm Hg for standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively (p < 0.001 for all 4 measurements). The most common side effects encountered with amlodipine were flushing and pedal edema. The combination of amlodipine and captopril was well tolerated, and no patient discontinued therapy. No significant treatment-related effects on biochemical and hematologic parameters were noted.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy with amlodipine and captopril for resistant systemic hypertension. 831 Sep 78

The safety and efficacy of Amlodipine (AML) for mild to moderate hypertension was evaluated in a "real life" setting. This open non-comparative trial included 123 men and 143 women (age 30-91 years, mean 59.4). All had sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 115 mmHg, confirmed in most by 2 baseline measurements, 2 weeks apart. Eligible patients were given AML 5 mg daily as add-on or monotherapy and were evaluated 4 weeks later. If DBP was then > 90 mmHg, the daily dose was raised to 10 mg; those with < 90 mmHg remained on 5 mg. AML was continued for 8 weeks. Other BP-lowering drugs were unchanged. Of the original 266 patients 22 (8.2%) withdrew due to adverse events (AE), and others were protocol violators, lost to follow-up or withdrew, leaving 211 available for efficacy analysis. In this major group BP was reduced from 165 +/- 15/101 +/- 4 to 139 +/- 11/83 +/- 5 after 12 weeks of AML (p < 0.05). The reduction was greater in those under 70 years, from 173 +/- 12/100 +/- 5 to 142 +/- 12/80 +/- 4 (p < 0.05). In those with BMI > 30 kg/m2, BP decreased from 165 +/- 15/101 +/- 5 to 140 +/- 12/83 +/- 5 (p < 0.05). Mean change in heart rate was -1.5 bpm (p < 0.05). Mean final AML dose was 5.5 mg/day. The most common AML-related AE requiring cessation of the drug was pedal edema in 2.6% of the 266 patients; in 3.7% it persisted during therapy. Other AE occurring in > 1% were dizziness in 1.8%, headache 1.5%, flushing 1.1% and fatigue 1.1%. We conclude that AML is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive suitable for most hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:[Multicenter community-based trial of amlodipine in hypertension in Israel]. 1095 90

Calcium antagonists (CAs) or calcium-channel blockers, are a common group of antihypertensive medications. These drugs have the property of blocking the calcium channels of the vascular and cardiac smooth-muscle fibers. They have been associated with cutaneous reactions ranging from exanthems to severe adverse events. The frequency of these reactions may be as high as 48 percent. The most common are ankle or pedal edema (up to 30 %), gingival hyperplasia (up to 21 %), and flushing (up to 10 %). Less common are facial or truncal telangiectasia, photosensitivity reactions, new-onset psoriasis (as well as exacerbation of it), purpuric exanthems, pemphigoid manifestations, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, gynecomastia, erythromelalgia, and oral ulcers. Particular adverse manifestations relate to drug potency, degree of vasodilatation, patient age, coexistence of other diseases, co-administration of other cytochrome P450 CYP3A-metabolized medications, fibroblast stimulation, and blood cell effects. Calcium antagonists are associated with a wide range of skin reactions, and the dermatologist should include these in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous diseases.
 ...
PMID:The spectrum of cutaneous reactions associated with calcium antagonists: a review of the literature and the possible etiopathogenic mechanisms. 1499 79