Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

There have been major advances in the understanding of the basic pharmacology of drugs acting upon voltage-dependent and receptor-activated calcium channels using patch-clamp techniques. The structure of the L channel is known and the (different) binding sites for various calcium antagonists have been identified using the methods of molecular biology. Although calcium slow-channel antagonists are very widely used in the treatment of hypertension, advances in the clinical pharmacology of angina and, to a lesser extent, cardiac arrhythmias, have not kept up with the basic research in molecular biology. All of the calcium antagonists in current use dilate arteries, and their therapeutic action largely depends on this property. There is evidence of differences in response between arteries and veins, and some degree of selectivity between vascular territories, but the goal of much more specific or localized vasodilation has not been achieved. The most prominent difference between the three main classes of antihypertensive drugs is the mild reflex increase of heart rate seen with the dihydropyridines and the bradycardia seen with verapamil. Most of the side effects of calcium antagonists are also based on vasodilatation, such as flushing and headache. The mild edema often seen with the dihydropyridines probably depends on the changes in capillary pressure brought about by arterial dilatation. Despite their undoubted efficacy as vasodilators, there are no studies thus far which allow any conclusions as to the long-term effect of calcium antagonists on the morbidity and mortality due to hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of calcium antagonists. 202 57

This randomized, double-blind study investigated the effect of ciprostene, a stable epoprostenol (prostacyclin) analog in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) characterized by ischemic ulcers. A total of 211 patients (106 ciprostene, 105 placebo) received IV infusions of ciprostene (120 ng/kg/min in 8-hour daily infusions for 7 days) or placebo. The two groups were comparable with regard to demographic data. Only 45% of the patients receiving ciprostene and 55% of the placebo patients completed the trial. The groups were similar in frequency of amputations, vascular surgery, and development of new ulcers. Among those who completed the trials an insignificantly higher percentage of patients receiving ciprostene had all ulcers heal completely. The reduction of ulcer size by at least 50% was higher in the ciprostene-treated group at month 4 (P = .005). Both ciprostene and placebo reduced the severity of a patient's rest pain. There was no difference in the ankle brachial index between the groups. Ciprostene induced a higher incidence of headache, nausea, and flushing during infusion when compared with the placebo group. The results confirmed inherent problems with studies in PVD, namely, scarcity of patients with ischemic ulcers, inclusion of severely ill patients leading to a high dropout rate, and a high placebo effect. Good tolerance and safety of ciprostene was documented in this patient population, and the therapeutic benefit was limited to partial reduction of ulcer size. Selection of patients with less advanced disease and a longer infusion of ciprostene may improve the clinical benefit of this agent.
 ...
PMID:The effect of ciprostene in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) characterized by ischemic ulcers. The Ciprostene Study Group. 204 33

Improved measurement of plasma concentrations of nitrendipine demonstrates a plasma half-life of 17 to 21 h allowing once daily dosing for antihypertensive treatment. To determine the effectiveness and tolerability of nitrendipine given once versus twice daily, 78 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 12 weeks of treatment with either nitrendipine 20 mg once daily (n = 39) or nitrendipine 10 mg bid (n = 39). Blood pressures measured at the end of the dosing interval were similar on 20 mg once daily and 10 mg bid. Adverse events considered to be drug related (flushing and headaches) occurred mostly at the beginning of active treatment and more frequently on the once daily dosing, resulting in a greater number of patients being withdrawn from the once daily treatment group. Thus, nitrendipine 20 mg once daily lowered blood pressure as effectively as 10 mg bid but was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. These could be minimized by starting at nitrendipine 10 mg once daily and increasing to 20 mg once daily after two to four weeks.
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness and tolerability of once versus twice daily nitrendipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. The Canadian Nitrendipine Study Group. 204 84

The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between Antabus dosage and the disulfiram-alcohol reaction (DAR) after ethanol challenge. Fifty-two healthy volunteers, 29 men and 23 women, aged 20-61 years, were treated with increasing doses of Antabuse (1, 100, 200, 300 mg) for 14 days each. At the end of each 14 days the volunteers were challenged with 0.15 g ethanol/kg body weight. Blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate, and symptoms such as flushing, heat sensation, nausea, vomiting, palpitations, breathlessness, and headache were monitored for the next 50 min. The volunteers left the study when they had experienced a valid DAR. A valid DAR, which was principally defined on the basis of the patients' feeling of discomfort, but for safety reasons also on the basis of unacceptable circulatory changes, was reached in 21 out of 52 volunteers after 100 mg Antabuse, in 27 after 200 mg, and in 4 after 300 mg. Most of them left the study after flushing and circulatory changes, but did not feel ill enough to be convinced that they should abstain from drinking. Ten volunteers with weak subjective symptoms, but with a valid DAR, were therefore rechallenged after the next increased dose and experienced a somewhat stronger reaction. We conclude that a daily dose of 200 mg Antabuse brings about a substantial reaction in volunteers in the presence of alcohol. The possible need for a 300 mg dose of Antabuse to prevent a patient from drinking was discussed.
 ...
PMID:Dose-effect relationship of disulfiram in human volunteers. I: Clinical studies. 205 46

Co-dergocrine mesylate (Cod), which inhibits norepinephrine secretion by stimulating presynaptic dopamine receptors, and has no known metabolic side effect, has an additive antihypertensive effect to that of Nifedipine (Nif). Plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, renin activity and aldosterone have been measured after acute administration of Nif and Cod alone and in combination to 18 patients with a diastolic blood pressure greater than 105 mmHg in a cross-over, randomized, double-blind study. Every patient received 4 mg Cod then 20 mg Nif, placebo then 20 mg Nif and 4 mg Cod then placebo. The second treatment was always given 1 h after the first medication. Blood pressure was measured before and every 15 min during the study period. Blood for measurement of catecholamines, aldosterone and renin activity was collected before medication, 1 h after the first dose and 90 min after the second treatment. Blood pressure was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) where Cod preceded Nif. Cod caused a significant decrease in plasma norepinephrine from 293 to 202 pg.ml-1 and in epinephrine from 67 to 55 pg.ml-1. The Nif-induced increase in norepinephrine from a pre-treatment value of 293 pg.ml-1 with preceding Cod to 331 pg.ml-1 was much less than the increase with placebo as premedication, from 284 to 440 pg.ml-1. Nif caused an increase in renin activity but no increase in aldosterone. Nif-related side effects, such as flushing and headache, occurred in 6 patients of whom 5 had no received Cod as premedication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Co-dergocrine mesylate inhibits the increase in plasma catecholamines caused by nifedipine in essential hypertension. 207 34

Cadralazine is a peripheral arteriolar vasodilator which, unlike hydralazine or dihydralazine, has a protected hydrazino group. In hypertensive patients the optimal effect, based on the antihypertensive efficacy to tolerability ratio, is seen after a 15 mg dose when the drug is administered as monotherapy. When administered in combination with other antihypertensive agents, a 10 mg daily dosage seems appropriate. Noncomparative trials have shown that, in patients who had failed to respond adequately to a beta-blocker and/or diuretic, the addition of cadralazine 10 to 30 mg once daily reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure by 11 to 19%/13 to 22%. This antihypertensive effect becomes evident over a 2- to 6-week period of therapy and persists during longer term administration. Comparative studies have shown that cadralazine is superior to placebo, and has a similar blood pressure lowering effect to hydralazine, dihydralazine and prazosin in patients not controlled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic but who continued to receive these treatments. Similarly, cadralazine and chlorthalidone were equally effective in reducing blood pressure in resting hypertensive patients but cadralazine shows an advantage in reducing the pressor response in exercising patients. Cadralazine is well tolerated when administered with a beta-blocker or diuretic. Most adverse effects become less frequent and severe with continued use, occur more frequently at dosages of 20 mg/day or more, and do not generally require withdrawal of therapy. Manifestations of the drug's vasodilating properties such as headache, asthenia, dizziness, palpitations and flushing are the most commonly reported symptoms during cadralazine monotherapy, but these may be reduced during combination therapy. The drug does not appear to induce a systemic lupus-like erythematosus syndrome, as may occur with hydralazine, but additional clinical experience is required to completely exclude this possibility. In conclusion, because of its efficacy as a second- or third-line antihypertensive agent, its simple once daily dosage regimen and favourable risk: benefit ratio, cadralazine may have a useful role, particularly in those hypertensive patients who do not respond adequately to established antihypertensive treatments. However, the therapeutic potential of cadralazine cannot be clearly established until the present limited clinical base is expanded to include comparisons with other classes of vasodilating drugs (ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists), and its utility in the management of other indications such as severe hypertension during pregnancy has been adequately explored.
 ...
PMID:Cadralazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension. 208 13

A cutaneous test has been applied in examination of the flushing response to ethanol and acetaldehyde in 402 Chinese of Han ethnicity. Using this noninvasive method, five response subtypes have been observed: (A) fast flushing to both ethanol and acetaldehyde; (B) fast flushing only to ethanol but not to acetaldehyde; (C) slow flushing to ethanol only; (D) no response either to ethanol or to acetaldehyde; (E) vasoconstriction to ethanol, or to both ethanol and acetaldehyde. A total of 94% in subtype (A) are reported to be flushers, while only 25% was reported in subtype (D). Other physiological responses, such as tachycardia, dizziness, headache, drowsiness, and nausea are less frequent after alcohol ingestion. The recent history of consumption of alcohol of the subjects in different subtypes was also obtained. Although alcohol-induced flushing is thought to be a deterrent factor to heavy consumption of alcohol, the frequency of drinking of alcoholic beverages was not found to be different between flushers and nonflushers.
 ...
PMID:Cutaneous vasomotor sensitivity to ethanol and acetaldehyde: subtypes of alcohol-flushing response among Chinese. 208 31

The calcium antagonists of the dihydropyridine group, isradipine and nifedipine, were compared in 64 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95 to 110mm Hg). A 2-week placebo run-in phase was followed by a double-blind crossover trial comprising two 3-week treatment periods with either calcium antagonist. The (fixed) dosages were isradipine 2.5mg twice daily and nifedipine retard 20mg twice daily. Blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) at baseline was 155/101mm Hg and decreased significantly by 14%/15% on isradipine and by 11%/12% on nifedipine (difference between treatments not significant). The drugs differed significantly with regard to incidence of adverse effects (mostly flushing and headache); the total rates were 16% on isradipine and 36% on nifedipine. At the end of the trial, patients were asked which drug or treatment phase they preferred. Isradipine was preferred by 50% of patients; only 20% preferred nifedipine. Thus, it is concluded that isradipine, administered in an equally effective antihypertensive dosage regimen is superior to nifedipine with regard to the incidence of adverse effects, resulting in greater patient satisfaction with treatment.
 ...
PMID:The calcium antagonist isradipine in the therapy of hypertension. A double-blind crossover comparison with nifedipine. 215 Jun 44

Hypertensive crises require immediate therapy, usually by parenteral drug administration. Sublingual nifedipine has been shown to be highly effective. However, the blood pressure fall following nifedipine is frequently associated with side-effects. The use of sublingual captopril has recently been indicated in hypertensive crisis, assuming that by this route, there would be a faster absorption and thus a more rapid effect on blood pressure than with the oral route. To verify this hypothesis, we have compared the hypotensive effects of sublingual nifedipine and sublingual captopril in 52 patients with hypertensive emergencies: 25-mg captopril and 10-mg nifedipine were administered sublingually to 28 and 24 patients, respectively. Blood pressures and heart rates were continuously measured up to 240 min postdose. A significant (P less than 0.001) hypotensive effect of both sublingual captopril and nifedipine therapy occurred at 5 min and persisted for 240 min. Heart rates increased with nifedipine, but decreased with captopril. We observed no side-effects in the captopril group, but flushing, tachycardia and headache were observed in 6 patients in the nifedipine group. We conclude that sublingual captopril is effective in patients with hypertensive emergencies and that captopril may be an excellent alternative to sublingual nifedipine in the urgent treatment of hypertensive crisis.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of sublingual captopril and sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies. 217 5

1. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and the tolerability of treatment with atenolol (50-100 mg once daily), nitrendipine (20-40 mg once daily) and their combination (atenolol 50 mg + nitrendipine 20 mg) once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 2. The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel groups design: blood pressures were measured at 'trough' effect (i.e. 24 h after dosing) to assess the adequacy of once-daily treatment. 3. Mean blood pressures (mm Hg) recorded on four occasions over 12 weeks of treatment were significantly lower both with atenolol (155/97 sitting: 155/104 standing) and with the combination of atenolol plus nitrendipine (153/96 sitting: 152/104 standing) than with placebo (169/108 sitting: 169/114 standing). Nitrendipine alone had no significant effect on blood pressure 24 h after dosing (165/104 sitting: 165/110 standing). 4. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were more common during treatment with nitrendipine: 7/32 of the patients experienced adverse effects attributable to intense systemic vasodilatation (e.g., flushing, erythema, headache). 2/37 patients taking atenolol were withdrawn: one because he developed a psoriatic rash and the other because of impaired peripheral circulation. Of the 35 patients taking combination treatment, two were withdrawn: one developed headaches and dyspnoea, and the other asthma. 5. The results suggest that once daily dosing with nitrendipine does not control blood pressure throughout the 24 h period in the majority of patients, and is associated with a considerable burden of adverse effects. Combination treatment was better tolerated but appeared to offer no advantages over atenolol alone in terms either of blood pressure control or adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of once daily atenolol, nitrendipine and their combination in mild to moderate essential hypertension. 218 68


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>