Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a double-blind, parallel-group comparative study, once-daily administration of a modified-release formulation of isradipine (Im, n = 189) was compared with twice-daily administration of the standard formulation (Is, n = 191). Following a 3- to 5-week placebo period, patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (sDBP) of greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg but less than or equal to 120 mm Hg were randomized to receive either Im at 5 mg once daily or Is at 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. A double-dummy technique was used to maintain blindness and no dosage titration was made. Blood pressure was always recorded in the morning before drug administration (12 h after the previous administration of Is or 24 h after the previous administration of Im). The mean sDBP was reduced significantly (p less than 0.001) and equally in both groups, and the normalization rate (sDBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 54% with Im and 55% with Is. Adverse events were slightly less frequent overall in the patients receiving Im than Is (23 vs. 28%, respectively) as was the incidence of typical dihydropyridine side effects such as flushing and headache. The results show that once-daily administration of 5 mg of Im is as effective and better tolerated than 2.5 mg twice daily of Is while providing adequate blood pressure control at the end of the 24-h dosing interval.
...
PMID:Clinical equivalence of once-daily administration of a modified-release formulation of isradipine and twice-daily administration of the standard formulation. Multicentre Study Group. 137 39

We studied the effects of nifedipine on blood pressure and on clinical and analytical parameters in hypertensive patients. Seven male and eight female subjects (mean age of 46.27 +/- 5.38 years, range of 41-56 years) with essential arterial hypertension were given nifedipine (20 mg b.i.d.) for 3 months. Before and after treatment, history, blood pressure, and biochemical values were recorded [blood: Na, K, Ca, creatinine, uric acid, triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, antidiuretic hormone (ADH), and aldosterone; urine: Na, K, Ca, creatinine, ADH, aldosterone, and percentage fraction of Na, K, and Ca excreted]. After 3 months of treatment, we found (a) significant decreases in systolic (147 +/- 18 vs. 166 +/- 16 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (90 +/- 8 vs. 107 +/- 8 mm Hg, p less than 0.0007), triglycerides (107 +/- 47 vs. 120 +/- 49 mg/dl, p less than 0.0007), and cholesterol (236 +/- 4 vs. 257 +/- 44 mg/dl, p less than 0.00075) in blood, and in K excretion (50 +/- 19 vs. 46 +/- 19 mEq/g of creatinine, p less than 0.0007) and excreted fraction of K (49 +/- 6% vs. 8 +/- 5%, p less than 0.0012) in urine; (b) significant increases in HDL cholesterol (65 +/- 13 vs. 58 +/- 13 mg/dl, p less than 0.001) in blood, and in Na (115 +/- 73 vs. 109 +/- 69 mEq/g of creatinine, p less than 0.0007) in urine; and (c) no significant change in the remaining biochemical parameters, or in heart rate. Secondary effects included flushing (34%), headache (20%), ankle swelling (17%), dizziness (13%), palpitations (4%), and pruritus (4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of nifedipine in hypertensive patients. 137 8

Iloprost is an analogue of epoprostenol (prostacyclin; PGI2; a potent but short-lived prostanoid mainly produced in the vascular endothelium) and mimics the pharmacodynamic properties of this compound, namely: inhibition of platelet aggregation, vasodilatation and, as yet ill-defined, cytoprotection. Improved metabolic and, in particular, chemical stability enhance the clinical utility of iloprost. When administered as an intermittent intravenous infusion at less than or equal to 2 ng/kg/min for 2 to 4 weeks, iloprost reduced rest pain and improved ulcer healing in 40 to 60% of patients with critical leg ischaemia, including diabetic patients, and delayed amputation in the majority of responding individuals. Similar benefits have been seen in thromboangiitis obliterans and, in patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon, shorter courses of therapy reduced the frequency, intensity and duration of ischaemic episodes for at least 6 weeks. The very few comparative trials reported to date (i.e. vs nifedipine in Raynaud's phenomenon; vs low-dose aspirin in thromboangiitis obliterans) have favoured iloprost, but comparisons with more established agents are needed to assess this drug's value in less severe forms of peripheral ischaemia, such as intermittent claudication. At present, iloprost is administered intravenously and this is a limitation to treatment. The potent, rapidly reversible antiplatelet activity of iloprost suits it for use in extracorporeal circulation and for the intraoperative management of heparin-induced platelet activation. Although results in animal models of ischaemic myocardial injury are encouraging, preliminary clinical experience in patients with myocardial ischaemia or infarction has been disappointing. Most patients tolerate iloprost infusion rates of up to 2 ng/kg/min. Headache and flushing are extremely common and are the suggested end-point of dose titration, as higher doses are associated with a significant incidence of gastrointestinal distress and, ultimately, hypotension. Thus, iloprost provides a pharmacotherapeutic option for patients with severe peripheral vascular disease, a condition for which few alternative drug therapies exist. Its potent but short-lived effects make it well-suited to certain therapeutic niches such as the management of intraoperative platelet activation. Prostanoid analogues have far-reaching therapeutic potential and further experience with iloprost will no doubt help to define its clinical applications.
...
PMID:Iloprost. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in peripheral vascular disease, myocardial ischaemia and extracorporeal circulation procedures. 137 60

The quality of life (QL) was evaluated in a 6 month double-blind trial in six European countries. Patients with a sustained supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP), phase V, of 95 mm Hg or more on bendrofluazide, 5 mg daily (or an equivalent dose of a thiazide diuretic) were randomised to additional pinacidil (n = 127), 25 mg up to 100 mg daily, or nifedipine (n = 130), 20 mg up to 80 mg daily. The treatment groups were similar at entry for QL scores, average DBP of 103 +/- 6 (SD) mm Hg, and average age of 56 +/- 10 (SD) years. Eighteen patients on pinacidil and 12 on nifedipine withdrew due to side effects, such as oedema (both drugs) and flushing (nifedipine). The maximum antihypertensive effect was achieved within 6 weeks and maintained, resulting in a significant fall in SDBP of 13.7 mm Hg on pinacidil and 15.5 mm Hg on nifedipine at the end of the trial. There was no significant difference in the antihypertensive effect. The target SDBP was achieved in 57% of pinacidil-and 63% of nifedipine-treated patients. The average number of symptomatic complaints fell in both groups, with significant decreases in the reporting of blurred vision and headaches on nifedipine. Complaints of growth of body and facial hair increased on pinacidil but there were no significant between-drug comparisons with respect to side effects. In measures of psychological well being, patients on pinacidil showed a significant (p less than 0.05) improvement in total and cognitive function scores compared to nifedipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Quality of life on antihypertensive therapy: a double-blind trial comparing quality of life on pinacidil and nifedipine in combination with a thiazide diuretic. European Pinacidil Study Group. 138 18

The usefulness of the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test (12-lead and two-dimensional [2-D] echo monitoring during dipyridamole infusion) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease recently has been suggested. However, the intravenous form of dipyridamole is not available for clinical use in some countries and therefore the administration of oral dipyridamole has been employed in combination with echocardiography. In order to evaluate the relative usefulness of the oral (300 mg of pulverized tablets) vs the intravenous (up to 0.84 mg/kg in 10 min) dipyridamole-echocardiography test, we performed the two tests, on different days and in random order, in 28 inhospital patients: 21 had coronary artery disease (seven had one-vessel disease, eight had two-vessel disease, and six had three-vessel disease); seven patients had no significant coronary artery disease. For both tests, the diagnostic end-point was the development of a transient dyssynergy of contraction. Sensitivity was 95 percent for the intravenous and 52 percent for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test (p < 0.01); in positive cases, the dyssynergy after the dipyridamole administration appeared at 6.5 +/- 2.5 min for the intravenous and at 27.8 +/- 12.4 min for the oral test (p < 0.01). Specificity was 100 percent for both the intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test. One or more extracardiac side effects (headache, gastrointestinal upset, flushing, etc) occurred in 61 percent of the intravenous and 68 percent of the oral tests (p = ns). Nine patients with a positive intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test also had a positive exercise-electrocardiography test. A significant correlation between exercise time (ie, the time from onset of exercise and 0.1 m V of ST segment shift) and dipyridamole time (ie, the time from onset of dipyridamole administration and the development of frank dyssynergy) was present for the intravenous (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) but not for the oral test. We conclude that the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test, in comparison with the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test, has a lower sensitivity and requires a substantially longer imaging time. The dipyridamole time is related to exercise time for intravenous but not for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test.
...
PMID:Oral vs intravenous dipyridamole echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease. 139 66

The development of vasodilator drugs that open the K+ channels in blood vessels has been of great academic and practical interest. The discoveries of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel and the glibenclamide-sensitive K+ channel have promoted these interests. In relation to this channel, the cardioprotective effectiveness of a K+ channel opener (Aprikalim) in doses that did not change haemodynamics or collateral blood flow were demonstrated in infarct dog heart. The effects were antagonized by glibenclamide. Thus, ATP-sensitive K+ channels seem to play an important role in this effect. Clinical evaluations of the K+ channel openers are reviewed. The hypotensive effects of the drugs are well-recognized. At present, however, the clinical usefulness of K+ channel openers has not been accepted widely, because of their side-effects including reflex tachycardia, edema, flushing and headache. An approach to reduce these side-effects is critical if these K+ channel openers are to be used as good hypotensive drugs. The K+ channel opener nicorandil has been evaluated as a highly effective antianginal drug. It seems likely that the clinical benefits of nicorandil result from both its K+ channel opening properties and its ability to stimulate smooth muscle guanylate cyclase. Clinical data on the pure-selective K+ channel opener cromakalim (lemakalim) as an antianginal drug is limited. However, on the basis of the vasodilator profile of this drug, it is expected to be useful for this purpose. The application of K+ channel openers to treat other disorders such as bladder instability is limited because of its hypotensive action.
...
PMID:[The recent development and the present status of K+ channel opener]. 139 33

The effects of histamine administered in samples of fish to eight healthy volunteers (4 females and 4 males), aged 21-30 years, were studied. The subjects were given 0, 45 and 90 mg of histamine that had been metabolized from histidine by photobacteria in the fish and 90 mg of histamine added to fresh fish, for breakfast. The subjects were observed during 6 h after breakfast. Special attention was paid to clinical symptoms, blood pressure and ECG. The pH of the gastric contents was recorded continuously from 5 min before to 6 h after the meal. Blood samples to measure the histamine concentration were taken at intervals during 24 h after breakfast. Two of the subjects showed effects (facial flushing, headache) that could be attributed to the ingestion of histamine. No significant changes were observed in the blood pressure and ECG. The pH of the gastric fluids did not decrease significantly. The histamine concentration in plasma correlated closely with the histamine dose ingested (p < 0.001, r = 0.996). The Cmax of the dose of 90 mg did not differ statistically significant from the Cmax of the dose of 90 mg histamine added to unspoiled fish.
...
PMID:The effects of histamine administered in fish samples to healthy volunteers. 143 29

The efficacy of the repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine (DHE) inpatient protocol for refractory headache is well established. We conducted a retrospective and prospective study of long-term headache patients at our clinic to evaluate this regimen in an outpatient setting. Treatment consisted of oral metoclopramide and four doses of DHE, with the total dose equaling 4 mg., administered over two days. Patients were followed for up to 10 weeks while they continued to receive prophylactic medication. Responsiveness was rated in terms of decreased frequency or severity of headache: excellent (75% to 100%), moderate (50-75%), mild (25-50%), and none (0-25%). In the retrospective study, 69% (43/62) of patients with chronic daily muscle-contraction-type headache and severe migraine had an excellent response at two days. An excellent or moderate response was sustained over three weeks in 65% (32/49) of the study group (13 patients were dropped from the study for failing to comply with record keeping requirements). At the 6- and 10-week follow-up evaluations, the majority of patients (76% and 70%, respectively) reported mild or no relief. Among patients with refractory daily headache or frequent severe migraine studied prospectively, 80% (28/35) reported an excellent response at two days. After six weeks, 66% (23/35) showed excellent or moderate relief. For both groups combined, 73% (71/97) of patients showed an excellent response to DHE at two days, with 43% (33/77) sustaining excellent or moderate relief at six weeks. Side effects, including nausea, leg cramps, facial flushing, increased blood pressure, diarrhea, burning at the injection site, and tightness in the throat and/or chest, were generally mild and transient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Headache 1992 Oct
PMID:Outpatient repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine. 144 90

A 6-week open study of the introduction of isradipine treatment was conducted in general practice in Hong Kong. 303 Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension entered the study. Side effects were reported in 21% of patients and caused withdrawal from the study in 3 patients. The main side-effects were headache, dizziness, palpitation and flushing and these were not more frequent than reported in other studies with isradipine or with placebo. Supine blood pressure was reduced (P less than 0.01) from 170 +/- 20/102 +/- 6 mmHg to 153 +/- 19/92 +/- 8, 147 +/- 18/88 +/- 7 and 144 +/- 14/87 +/- 6 mmHg at 2, 4 and 6 weeks respectively in evaluable patients. Similar reductions occurred in standing blood pressure and there was no evidence of postural hypotension. Normalization and responder rates at 6 weeks were 86% and 69% respectively. Dosage was increased from 2.5 mg b.d. to 5 mg b.d. at 4 weeks in patients with diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg and their further response was greater than those remaining on 2.5 mg b.d.
...
PMID:Isradipine treatment for hypertension in general practice in Hong Kong. 145 44

Nine hypertensive children (mean age: 5.0 years (SD: 4.5), range: 10 months to 15 years) were administered nifedipine (capsule) rectally (0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg) when their blood pressures were over 170 mmHg systolic and/or over 110 mmhg diastolic, independent of their ages. The causes of hypertension were acute glomerulonephritis (n = 2), chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 2), renovascular hypertension (n = 4), and polycystic kidney (n = 1). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell in all children after rectal administration of nifedipine, although the response of blood pressure was weak in one child with renovascular hypertension. Blood pressures were lowest at 30 to 60 minutes, and remained under 140 mmHg systolic and 80 mmHg diastolic at least for three hours. Side-effects were headache in one child, palpitations in two children, and facial flushing in three. All of these symptoms were mild, and no special treatment was required. These findings suggest that rectal administration of nifedipine may be effective and the most reliable way to treat young children with severe or urgent hypertension.
...
PMID:Rectal administration of perforated nifedipine capsules in acute severe hypertension in children. 145 94


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>