Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

15-methyl-prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) was injected extraamniotically .92 mg in 5.5 ml Hyskon (dextran 70, 32%) in 660 women 10-20 weeks' pregnant for abortion. 72.6% aborted within 36 hours and 80.3% within 36 hours, but only 32.2% had complete abortions. Mean abortion intervals were 13.1 hours in multigravidae and 16.2 in primigravidae. Infrequent complaints included flushing, nausea, dyspnea, chest pain, headache, and shivering. 1 cervical laceration was reported. 6 woemn required readmission for bleeding or infection of the 53% attending for follow-up. It is concluded that this method is safe and effective for abortion.
 ...
PMID:Prostaglandins and abortion. II. Single extra-amniotic administration of 0.92 mg. of 15-methyl prostaglandin F2alpha in Hyskon for termination of pregnancies in weeks 10 to 20 of gestation: an international multicenter study. World Health Organization Task Force on the Use of Prostaglandins for the Regulation of Fertility. 92 Jul 60

One of the most appealing current pathogenetic concepts is that progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) is a reaction to repeated episodes of endothelial cell injury. Injury of small arteries and capillary endothelium initiates reactions which involve increased permeability of the vessels, platelet adherence, myointimal cell proliferation, luminal narrowing and heightened sensitivity of the vessel wall. Clinical evidence of the vessel damage is Raynaud's phenomenon, involving both skin and viscera. The Authors evaluated the effects of iloprost on Raynaud's phenomenon in patients with PSS. This drug provides prolonged vasodilation, reduces platelet aggregation and promotes endothelial lining function repair. This last pattern is of primary importance because it may stop the vicious circle: endothelial injury-platelet hyperaggregation-microangiospasm. Five females were recruited, aged 41-66 years, suffering from well-documented (ARA criteria) PSS, associated with typical Raynaud's phenomenon. The trial provided for intravenous infusion of iloprost at a rate of 1-2 ng/kg/min. First treatment consisted of six-hour infusions on six successive days. After this first treatment, weekly infusions during the winter months were carried on. Drug effectiveness was considered through subjective and objective parameters. All patients showed prominent reduction of number, duration and severity of attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon, improvement of prehensile strength, healing of finger ulcerations and improvement or normalization of digital photoplethysmography. So far, the treatment has been prolonged for years in our patients and still goes on. The side effects of iloprost (headache, flushing, nausea) have been very poor. Therefore, iloprost proved to be a valid drug in the management of Raynaud's phenomenon in patients with PSS, but the inconvenience of intravenous administration may limit its routine use.
 ...
PMID:[Effects of long-term iloprost therapy on Raynaud's phenomenon in progressive systemic sclerosis]. 128 Dec 97

In one multicenter, double-blind study, 659 hypertensive patients were treated for 16 weeks with either nilvadipine (n = 326) or nifedipine (n = 333). The major objective of the study was to compare the compatibility of the two calcium antagonists with regard to hepatic compatibility and side-effect profiles. The dosages were chosen so that the effective blood pressure reduction in both groups was equally good (mean decreases in systolic pressure of 27 +/- 12 mm Hg with nilvadipine and 26 +/- 15 mm Hg with nifedipine, and in diastolic pressure of 18 +/- 6 mm Hg with nilvadipine and 19 +/- 7 mm Hg with nifedipine). The mean heart rate was slightly lowered by about 2 beats/min by both substances. Although there was no effect on lipid or glucose levels, the serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SPGT) levels were more often found to be raised in the nifedipine group than in the nilvadipine group (p < 0.05). The vasodilator effect of both calcium antagonists was responsible for side effects, of which the most common were flushing, edema, headache, and palpitations. The number of complaints was less in the group treated with nilvadipine than with nifedipine, especially flushing and edema. Significantly more patients in the nifedipine group withdrew from treatment due to undesirable side effects (p < 0.05).
 ...
PMID:The tolerability of nilvadipine compared to nifedipine in patients with essential hypertension. 128 91

The antihypertensive effects of the regular immediate release formulation of verapamil (verapamil IR) and the newer sustained release formulation of verapamil (verapamil SR) were compared in Hispanic patients with untreated essential hypertension. Verapamil IR was given in 3 divided doses (80 or 160mg 3 times daily) and verapamil SR was given either as a single daily dose of 240mg or as 240mg every 12 hours. With both formulations there was a significant reduction in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); a greater lowering of BP was observed with verapamil 480 mg/day than with 240 mg/day. With verapamil SR 480 mg/day, 91% of patients had reductions in SBP and DBP greater than 20 and 15mm Hg, respectively. In addition, 83% of patients reached normotension. With the lower dose (240mg once daily), 83% of patients had decreases in DBP greater than 10mm Hg and 73% of patients achieved normotension. Comparable effects were achieved with verapamil IR. With verapamil IR there was a more rapid fall in BP which peaked 3 to 4 hours postdose, whereas with verapamil SR a more gradual and sustained BP reduction was observed. Only small changes in heart rate (HR) were observed with verapamil IR and verapamil SR. For verapamil SR, the mean increase in HR was 5 beats/min (to 80 beats/min) and the mean decrease in HR was 13 beats/min (to 62 beats/min). Both verapamil SR and verapamil IR prolonged the PR interval of the ECG. An equal degree of PR prolongation was observed with 240 and 480 mg/day. The incidence of side effects (headache, palpitations, dizziness and flushing) was dose dependent, decreased with continuous treatment and was much higher with verapamil IR than with verapamil SR. Steady-state plasma verapamil concentrations were monitored. Compared with verapamil IR, verapamil SR produced a more gradual rise and a more sustained elevation of plasma verapamil and norverapamil concentrations. Comparable trough verapamil concentrations (Cmin) were observed with verapamil IR (98 micrograms/L) and SR (81 micrograms/L); morning Cmin verapamil concentrations were higher than daytime Cmin values. The normalised area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 10 to 20% greater for verapamil IR than SR. The 2-fold increase in oral dose produced a 2.2- and 2.4-fold increase in AUC for verapamil IR and SR, respectively, associated with a 20% reduction in metabolism to norverapamil. Fasting increased the rate and extent of absorption of verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of verapamil SR vs verapamil IR in hypertensive patients. 128 70

Exercise myocardial-thallium scintigraphy plays a fundamental role in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Once exercise is not always feasible, pharmacological stress became a possible alternative. The authors review the mechanism of action, administrations protocols, indications and side effects of the drugs used for this purpose: dipyridamole, adenosine and dobutamine. Dipyridamole causes coronary hyperemia by increasing the interstitial levels of endogenous adenosine. Perfusion defects result from the mismatch of coronary reserve in different coronary territories. The drug administration is classically performed with a 0.142 mg/kg/min dosage e.v. for 4 minutes, total of 0.56 mg/kg. It is possible to use a greater dose of 0.84 mg/kg e.v. for 10 minutes, increasing sensitivity without loss of specificity for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Oral dipyridamole protocols with 300 and 400 mg were used with similar results for sensitivity and specificity. The oral protocol has the disadvantage of delayed onset and longer action. Including several dipyridamole studies, 87% was obtained for sensitivity and 84% for specificity, in the diagnosis of CAD. Dipyridamole scintigraphy has been applied to myocardial infarction risk stratification, cardiac risk evaluation of patients proposed to noncardiac surgery and therapeutic efficacy evaluation of reperfusion techniques (angioplasty and surgery). The secondary effects of dipyridamole are frequent, however mild and well tolerated. They occur in half the patients, the most frequent, facial flushing (2%), dizziness (5%), nausea (4%), vomiting (1%), headaches (11%) and chest pain (26%). Some important complications were reported although rare: myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation and bronchospasm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Role of pharmacologic stimulation with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation of patients with ischemic cardiopathy]. 129 Jun 55

The antihypertensive effects of lisinopril 10-20 mg once daily and felodipine (extended release formulation) 5-10 mg once daily were compared in a double-blind, parallel group study of eight weeks duration involving 219 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. On lisinopril treatment sitting blood pressure fell from 166.3/102.9 +/- 17.5/5.8 mmHg to 146.7/89.7 +/- 19.5/8.7 mmHg and on felodipine blood pressure fell from 166.7/103.3 +/- 18.3/5.4 mmHg to 153.6/92.3 +/- 15.9/7.9 mmHg. The decreases in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly greater on lisinopril than on felodipine treatment (p = 0.019 and p = 0.033). A subgroup analysis in elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) showed that lisinopril and felodipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. In young subjects (age < 65 years) felodipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure less than did lisinopril treatment (p = 0.001). Lisinopril was better tolerated than felodipine. On lisinopril treatment, reports of headache and dizziness were reduced while that of cough increased. On felodipine treatment, dizziness was reduced but reports of flushing and oedema were increased. The results show a better antihypertensive effect and better tolerability for lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine in patients with essential hypertension. Danish Cooperative Study Group. 133 Mar 86

Blood pressure and clinical status of 1,736 patients with cerebrovascular disease were observed during 12 months of treatment with nicardipine. The most common diagnoses were chronic cerebral ischemia (53.2%), transient ischemic attacks (TIA; 25.1%), and cerebral infarct (8.7%); 50.1% of patients were classed as hypertensive [systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 mm Hg]. Most patients (91.2%) received a daily dose of 60 mg nicardipine. Additional treatments included diuretics (37%), beta-blockers (11.5%), other antihypertensive drugs (15.8%), platelet antiaggregants (25.1%), and cardiotonic drugs (15.1%). A total of 282 patients (16.2%) were lost to follow-up, 21 (1.2%) patients withdrew due to side effects, 32 (1.8%) died, and 9 (0.5%) patients had treatment interrupted due to concomitant illness. In the hypertensive subgroup, blood pressure (SBP/DBP) was reduced from a mean baseline value of 175 +/- 22/97 +/- 14 mm Hg to 152 +/- 17/85 +/- 11 mm Hg at 3 months and 149 +/- 23/81 +/- 11 mm Hg after 12 months of treatment. The incidence of TIA or stroke among these patients was reduced from 29 cases (3.5%) during the first 3 months to 11 cases (1.54%) during months 4-12 (p < 0.01). In normotensive patients there were 18 (2.15%) cases during months 1-3 and 13 (1.55%) cases during months 4-12 (difference not significant). In the 280 patients treated with nicardipine alone, the most frequent side effects during the first month were facial flushing (6.8%), gastrointestinal problems (5%), dizziness (3.2%), headache (3.2%), drowsiness (3.2%), and hypotension (1.1%). Most of these side effects were transient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The influence of nicardipine in patients with high risk of stroke. 136 3

At the end of a short-term (3-month) study of antihypertensive treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, 141 of the 200 study patients continued into a 2-year follow-up of isradipine as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Although all 141 patients completed the first year, only 102 completed the study. Twenty-four patients dropped out: 2 with flushing; 1 each with arrhythmia, edema, angina, and headache; 12 who were noncompliant; 2 with disease unrelated to the study drug; and 4 for reasons unknown. Before the follow-up, 70% of the 141 patients were taking isradipine; after 2 years, 63% were still taking isradipine as monotherapy. During the follow-up study, the blood pressure remained stable (142.9/86.8 mm Hg after 3 months, and 142.9/86.2 mm Hg after 2 years), whereas the normalization rate was only slightly changed (73 vs. 75.2%). The incidence of reported adverse events decreased with time. At the end of the short-term study, 44.7% of patients had reported one or more adverse events; after 2 years of treatment, only 14.4% reported adverse events. Two patients had ECG signs of left ventricular hypertrophy: one showed no relevant changes while the other presented clear signs of regression. No clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were noted during the study. In conclusion, isradipine is effective, well tolerated and safe in the long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Long-term (2-year) isradipine data in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. 137 34

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of isradipine was evaluated in 63 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg]. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: group A (n = 41), aged 37-69 years (mean age of 54 +/- 7 years); group B (n = 22), aged 70-80 years (mean age of 72.8 +/- 2.4 years). After a 3-week washout period, group A received 2.5 mg of isradipine twice daily for 6 weeks. Group B received 1.25 mg of isradipine initially, increasing to 2.5 mg twice daily according to treatment response and tolerability. At the end of treatment (week 6), there were statistically significant decreases (p less than 0.01) in supine SBP and DBP in both groups compared with baseline values: the mean SBP in groups A and B decreased from 160.0 +/- 14.7 to 133.6 +/- 10.0 mm Hg and from 161.6 +/- 17.8 to 134.8 +/- 10.9 mm Hg, respectively; the mean DBP in groups A and B decreased from 101.3 +/- 3.0 to 83.6 +/- 5.5 mm Hg and from 101.3 +/- 8.4 to 84.2 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, respectively. Clinical and laboratory parameters did not change significantly during treatment. Side effects (headache, flushing, palpitations, and edema) were mild/moderate and disappeared after the first 2 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, 2.5 mg of isradipine twice daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension regardless of patient age.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy and tolerability of isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in young and elderly patients. 137 36

Twenty-four patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (19 women, 5 men; mean age of 49 +/- 9.1 years) completed a 2-week washout phase followed by 1 week of single-blind placebo. Patients were then given isradipine at 2.5 mg twice daily, which was increased to up to 7.5 mg twice daily according to the blood pressure response, over a 12-month period. Thirteen patients completed the trial. The supine and sitting blood pressure decreased to normal levels within 6 weeks of starting active treatment. Heart rate remained unchanged. Plasma cholesterol and triglycerides did not change significantly. Plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased significantly (p less than 0.05) and a decrease (NS) was observed in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and in the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio. Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol did not change, nor did other biochemical laboratory tests, or electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. The most notable side effects were headache (n = 1), flushing (n = 1), palpitations (n = 3), and pretibial edema (n = 1). In conclusion, our results indicate that isradipine is safe and effective in the long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. It also appears to have beneficial effects on lipid metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Metabolic, hematological, and cardiac effects of long-term isradipine treatment in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. 137 37


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>