Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Nitroglycerin was administered to eight healthy volunteers in the form of sublingual tablets, oral sustained-release tablets, and an oral solution. Blood samples were collected for measurement of nitroglycerin and its two isomeric glyceryl dinitrate metabolites. Blood pressure and pulse rate were monitored; subjective evaluations of headache, dizziness, facial flushing, skin irritation, and gastrointestinal upset were made. Nitroglycerin itself was virtually undetectable after the solution and tablet preparations; the metabolites were consistently detectable from a few minutes after dosing to 24 h later. Mean total (nitroglycerin plus metabolite) concentrations were comparable in the 15 min following sublingual administration, and the 8 h following tablet administration. The relative bioavailability of the tablets in comparison with the oral solution was 70 per cent based on metabolite concentrations. Nitroglycerin sustained-release tablets appear to exert their beneficial effects in the prolonged prophylaxis of angina through active metabolites.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of nitroglycerin and its metabolites after administration of sustained-release tablets. 155 Sep 9

Intravenous dipyridamole planar thallium-201 imaging is a safe and effective test for detection and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the general population. The relative diagnostic accuracy and side-effect profile of dipyridamole thallium-201 stress imaging in women is not defined. Forty-three consecutive female and 71 male patients who underwent dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging (0.56 mg/kg) within 3 months of cardiac catheterization were studied. Scans were considered abnormal if fixed or reversible perfusion defects were detected. Stenosis severity of greater than or equal to 50% luminal diameter reduction of any artery defined CAD. Overall sensitivity for detection of CAD was 0.87 in women and 0.94 in men; specificity was 0.58 in women and 0.63 in men (p = not significant). Sensitivity for detection of 1-vessel CAD was 0.60 in women and 0.94 in men (p = 0.001). The sensitivity for detection of multivessel CAD (with or without surgical revascularization) was 1.0 and 0.94 in women and men, respectively. Adverse effects were reported in 62% of women and in 38% of men (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidences of chest pain, headache, nausea, flushing or electrocardiographic changes. The incidences of severe ischemia and dizziness were higher in women. Possible explanations for this difference in adverse effects include gender differences in the volume of distribution of dipyridamole due to varied fat-to-muscle ratios and different subjective nocioceptive sensitivities to the effects of dipyridamole. Overall sensitivity and specificity are comparable between the sexes.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease and side-effect profile of dipyridamole thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging in women versus men. 162 2

In a randomized, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril (n = 412; average dose 18.8 mg) reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (change = 20.2/13.8 mmHg; P less than 0.01/P less than 0.01) more than nifedipine (n = 416; average dose 37.4 mg; change = 13.3/11.2 mmHg) after 10-week treatment in patients, aged 40-70 years, with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Lisinopril was better tolerated than nifedipine. The withdrawals from treatment were fewer in the lisinopril-treated group (11 versus 46; P less than 0.01). The frequency of adverse experiences reported after a general question of discomfort was significantly lower for lisinopril than for nifedipine (P less than 0.01). When questioned on specific symptoms, frequency of coughing was higher with lisinopril (P less than 0.01), while flushing, edema, palpitations, dizziness, tiredness and rash were reported more frequently (P less than 0.01, for all) in the nifedipine-treated group. Quality of life was assessed by both patients and spouses. No significant changes in wellbeing were observed for either drug, except for the highest dose level of nifedipine which caused a deterioration.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients. 166 65

A randomized multicentre between-patient study comparison has been made of the efficacy and tolerability of cadralazine and prazosin, both administered for 6 weeks to hypertensive patients with a supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 95 mmHg whilst on a beta-adrenoceptor-blocker. The doses of the beta-adrenoceptor-blocker (metoprolol SR 200 mg once daily) and cadralazine (10 mg once daily) were held constant during the study, while prazosin was individually titrated from 0.5 mg to a maximum of 2 mg tds. 108 patients (50 m and 58 f; mean age 54 y) were enrolled in 12 centres. Twelve patients withdrew due to adverse effects or poor efficacy (5 patients on prazosin and 7 on cadralazine). Both treatments induced a similar significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP, allowing normalization of BP in 58% of subjects on cadralazine and 55% on prazosin. Heart Rate (hR) increased significantly from 67 to 72 beats.min-1 in those on cadralazine and from 65 to 69 beats.min-1 on prazosin. Body weight was unchanged. Adverse effects were mild and typical of vasodilators, such as headache, flushing and dizziness. Physician evaluation of drug efficacy was not different between drugs, and cadralazine was rated better in terms of tolerability. Thus, in this multicentre study, cadralazine in the fixed dose of 10 mg once daily, as a second-step antihypertensive treatment in patients not satisfactorily controlled by a beta-adrenoceptor-blocker, was as effective and showed a similar side effect profile to prazosin given three times daily.
 ...
PMID:Cadralazine versus prazosin as second-step treatment in hypertensive patients on beta-blockers: a randomized multicentre study. The Italian Multicentre Study Group. 167 90

Hypertensive patients who had previously taken part in double-blind, controlled studies were treated with open-label felodipine for 1 year: 377 had felodipine added to a beta-blocker and 94 were receiving monotherapy. In the first group, supine blood pressure (BP), measured at the beginning of the double-blind period, was reduced from 172 +/- 23/107 +/- 8 to 140 +/- 20/86 +/- 8 mm Hg at the end of 1 year of therapy. In the monotherapy group, BP was reduced from 170 +/- 22/101 +/- 7 mm Hg measured before treatment to 149 +/- 17/90 +/- 9 mm Hg after 1 year. The most common adverse experiences that led to withdrawal were peripheral edema, headache, flushing, and dizziness. No development of tolerance was noted.
 ...
PMID:Long-term treatment of hypertension with felodipine. 169 11

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine that blocks the slow entry channel for calcium. It is highly vascular selective and reduces blood pressure (BP) by dilatation of peripheral arterioles. It reduces BP in mild, moderate, and severe hypertension, and the fall in BP depends upon the initial level. It has been compared with a variety of other drugs as monotherapy or as add-on therapy. In these studies, felodipine (10-40 mg/day) has caused a similar or greater fall in BP and a similar or greater percentage of patients have achieved a diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. The plain tablet of felodipine needs to be given twice a day but an extended-release form can be given once daily. Some patients respond to 5 mg/day and most patients respond to a daily dose of 20 mg or less. The adverse effects are few except for a constellation of symptoms related to the vasodilator ability of the drug. These include palpitations, flushing, fatigue, dizziness, and headaches. These occur, if at all, usually within the first 2 weeks and diminish as the drug is continued. They can be limited by starting on a small dose of felodipine (5 mg/day). People who have these adverse effects usually have a good response to the drug. Another adverse effect, which is the most frequent reason for drug withdrawal, is ankle edema. This is more common on the higher doses of the drug. It is due to dilatation of the precapillary resistance vessels rather than sodium and water retention. Felodipine is a useful and effective antihypertensive drug and can be used as monotherapy or added to other antihypertensive drugs. It is effective in people with all grades of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:A review of the antihypertensive effects of felodipine alone or in combination. 169 35

Hypertensive patients, particularly the elderly, may often suffer from other diseases. Therefore, antihypertensive compounds should not negatively affect such disorders. Felodipine is a calcium antagonist that has potentially beneficial effects in angina pectoris and congestive heart failure. Further, it does not adversely affect lung function in asthmatic patients or glucose tolerance in patients with diabetes. Preliminary investigations also indicate that felodipine has no negative influence on plasma lipid levels. Although felodipine seems to be safe in most patients, treatment with felodipine should at present be avoided in pregnant women, since digital anomalies have been observed in rabbit fetuses. The adverse effects seen during treatment with felodipine are usually mild and transient and generally related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, the most common being ankle edema, headache, flushing, dizziness, and palpitations. The only significant drug interactions with felodipine occur with inducers and inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 system, which is responsible for the metabolism of felodipine.
 ...
PMID:The safety of felodipine. 169 36

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine was assessed in 86 hypertensive patients who had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg and who were randomly allocated to a double-blind comparison of three different dosage regimens: 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg b.i.d., and placebo. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 4-week course of treatment. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures dose-dependently; the normalization rate (DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 5% with placebo and 29, 55, and 64% with isradipine 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg b.i.d., respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing at least a 10 mm Hg reduction in sitting DBP was 29, 67, 86, and 91%, respectively. All three dosages proved to be significantly effective compared to placebo. Neither heart rate nor blood pressure regulation in orthostasis were influenced. The main side effects were headache, dizziness, and flushing; isradipine 1.25 and 2.5 mg b.i.d. were well tolerated (not significantly different from placebo). In conclusion, isradipine 2.5 mg b.i.d. appears to be the potential dose of first choice, exhibiting a favorable benefit-risk profile.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine in essential hypertension. 169 4

The new calcium antagonist isradipine was compared with nifedipine retard in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study involving 159 patients with mild hypertension. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 6-week course of treatment with the possibility of dose doubling after 3 weeks, depending on blood pressure (BP) response (target diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg). Systolic and diastolic BPs were reduced by isradipine (mean dose of 3.6 mg daily) from 151/101 to 136/89 mm Hg, by nifedipine (mean dose of 50 mg daily) from 155/101 to 144/90 mm Hg, and by placebo from 155/101 to 154/99 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 64% with isradipine, 56% with nifedipine, and 16% with placebo. Adverse events consisted mainly of flushing, headache, edema, and dizziness. Altogether, 8 patients receiving isradipine experienced adverse events in comparison to 21 taking nifedipine and 4 taking placebo. The superior tolerability of isradipine was paralleled by a significant improvement in the subjective well-being of the patients as assessed by the von Zerssen questionnaire (List of Complaints). With nifedipine and placebo, no statistically significant improvement was observed.
 ...
PMID:Calcium antagonists as first-line antihypertensive agents: a placebo-controlled, comparative trial of isradipine and nifedipine. 169 8

Nifedipine antagonises influx of calcium through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache, flushing and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.
 ...
PMID:Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders. 171 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>