Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An H1-receptor blocking antihistamine, clemastine, taken before aspirin gave complete or partial protection against flushing, rhinorrhea, cough, and headache in ten asthmatic patients with idiosyncrasy to aspirin. In five of the ten patients aspirin-precipitated bronchoconstriction was also reduced or prevented after pretreatment with clemastine. Thus histamine appears to play a part in the production of most non-respiratory symptoms occurring after aspirin ingestion in intolerant patients with asthma. Bronchial reactions might depend partly on histamine and partly on the action of other spasmogens. It is suggested that inhibition of prostaglandins of the E series by aspirin-like drugs plays a crucial part in the release of histamine from tissue stores in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients. Clemastine might be of use in the treatment of acute reactions to aspirin.
 ...
PMID:Inhibition of idiosyncratic reactions to aspirin in asthmatic patients by clemastine. 9 16

The antihypertensive effects of lisinopril 10-20 mg once daily and felodipine (extended release formulation) 5-10 mg once daily were compared in a double-blind, parallel group study of eight weeks duration involving 219 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. On lisinopril treatment sitting blood pressure fell from 166.3/102.9 +/- 17.5/5.8 mmHg to 146.7/89.7 +/- 19.5/8.7 mmHg and on felodipine blood pressure fell from 166.7/103.3 +/- 18.3/5.4 mmHg to 153.6/92.3 +/- 15.9/7.9 mmHg. The decreases in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly greater on lisinopril than on felodipine treatment (p = 0.019 and p = 0.033). A subgroup analysis in elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) showed that lisinopril and felodipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. In young subjects (age < 65 years) felodipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure less than did lisinopril treatment (p = 0.001). Lisinopril was better tolerated than felodipine. On lisinopril treatment, reports of headache and dizziness were reduced while that of cough increased. On felodipine treatment, dizziness was reduced but reports of flushing and oedema were increased. The results show a better antihypertensive effect and better tolerability for lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine in patients with essential hypertension. Danish Cooperative Study Group. 133 Mar 86

In a randomized, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril (n = 412) reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure more than nifedipine did (n = 416) after ten weeks treatment in patients (40-70 years) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Lisinopril was tolerated better than nifedipine, with fewer withdrawals. Adverse experiences reported after a general question on discomfort were significantly lower for lisinopril than for nifedipine. Questions referring specifically to symptoms revealed higher frequency of coughing with lisinopril, while flushing, edema, palpitations, dizziness, tiredness and rash were reported more frequently with nifedipine. Quality of life was similarly assessed by both patients and spouses. No significant differences in well-being during treatment were found for either drug, except in the case of the highest dose level of nifedipine, which caused a deterioration of well-being.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment with lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension. A Norwegian multicenter study of the effect, tolerance and quality of life of 828 patients]. 133 84

In a randomized, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril (n = 412; average dose 18.8 mg) reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (change = 20.2/13.8 mmHg; P less than 0.01/P less than 0.01) more than nifedipine (n = 416; average dose 37.4 mg; change = 13.3/11.2 mmHg) after 10-week treatment in patients, aged 40-70 years, with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Lisinopril was better tolerated than nifedipine. The withdrawals from treatment were fewer in the lisinopril-treated group (11 versus 46; P less than 0.01). The frequency of adverse experiences reported after a general question of discomfort was significantly lower for lisinopril than for nifedipine (P less than 0.01). When questioned on specific symptoms, frequency of coughing was higher with lisinopril (P less than 0.01), while flushing, edema, palpitations, dizziness, tiredness and rash were reported more frequently (P less than 0.01, for all) in the nifedipine-treated group. Quality of life was assessed by both patients and spouses. No significant changes in wellbeing were observed for either drug, except for the highest dose level of nifedipine which caused a deterioration.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients. 166 65

In this study, we compared the effects of nitrendipine (20-40 mg daily) and enalapril (20-40 mg daily) in 44 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4-week placebo period, the patients entered a double-blind, crossover study of 16 weeks, divided by a second 4-week placebo period. Sitting and standing blood pressures (standard mercurymeter) were measured every 2 weeks. Ten patients dropped out, so 34 patients were evaluable. Two patients dropped out because of surgery, one patient was withdrawn because of accelerating hypertension, and seven patients discontinued because of side effects (two on placebo, four on enalapril, and one on nitrendipine). Sitting blood pressures decreased from 172 +/- 3/107 +/- 1 to 159 +/- 3/94 +/- 1 mm Hg on nitrendipine (p less than 0.001) and to 157 +/- 4/96 +/- 2 mm Hg on enalapril (p less than 0.001). The heart rate did not change. Both compounds had no significant effect on serum lipids and on renal function. With regard to side effects, flushing occurred in 10 patients on nitrendipine and in 3 on enalapril (p less than 0.05); cough was noted in 3 patients on enalapril. When using a diastolic pressure less than 95 mm Hg as a response, 72% responded on nitrendipine and 64% on enalapril (n.s.). In conclusion, nitrendipine and enalapril, given as monotherapy, were equally effective antihypertensive agents in this group of patients with uncomplicated, moderate, essential hypertension. The use of either of the tested agents seems to be more limited by its specific side effects than the lack of antihypertensive efficacy.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of the effects of nitrendipine and enalapril in essential hypertension. 172 60

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of adenosine in the treatment of episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular trachycardia (PSVT) are reviewed. Adenosine is an endogenous adenine nucleoside that markedly decreases heart rate and prolongs atrioventricular (AV)-nodal conduction. Adenosine is rapidly cleared from plasma by the cellular elements of the blood and by vascular endothelial cells and subjected to enzymatic metabolism. The drug has a half-life of 0.6 to 10 seconds. In noncomparative clinical trials, adenosine terminated 85% to 100% of induced or spontaneous episodes of PSVT involving the AV node in the reentrant circuit. In patients with arrhythmias that do not involve the AV node in the reentrant circuit, adenosine produces AV block and does not restore sinus rhythm. Prospective, randomized trials comparing adenosine with verapamil in adults have not yet been performed. The adverse effects of adenosine include flushing, dyspnea, headache, cough, chest pain, sinus bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and various degrees of AV block. Because of the short half-life of adenosine, these effects are transient and well tolerated. The initial dose of adenosine in treating acute PSVT is 6 mg given by rapid i.v. bolus injection, followed in one to two minutes by up to two additional 12-mg boluses if necessary. Adenosine has been found to be effective in terminating PSVT and thus offers an alternative to verapamil. Prospective, randomized trials comparing adenosine with verapamil are needed to definitively establish adenosine's role in the therapy of PSVT.
 ...
PMID:Adenosine in the episodic treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. 218 71

The long acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril was compared with the calcium channel blocker nifedipine as sustained-release formulation in 136 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This multicentre study was carried out in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion by 28 cardiologists in private practice. After a 2-week placebo period, patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups; the first group received enalapril 20 mg daily (n = 68), and the second group received sustained-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 68). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. In both groups, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was added at week 4 if diastolic blood pressure remained greater than 90 mm Hg. At week 8, if the target diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg was not achieved, the dosage of hydrochlorothiazide was increased to 50mg. The clinical characteristics of the patients in each group were comparable. After 4 weeks of treatment, the reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (12.1 mm Hg in the enalapril group vs 10.3 mm Hg in the nifedipine group). Moreover, although the difference between the groups was more noticeable after 12 weeks of treatment (16.3 vs 13.9 mm Hg, respectively), it did not reach significance. The number of patients experiencing clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group than in the enalapril group [33 (48.5%) vs 18 (26.5%), respectively]. The most common complaints of patients administered nifedipine included swollen ankles, flushing and headaches, whereas complaints in the enalapril group included cough, asthenia, and epigastralgia. Three patients were withdrawn from the study because of side effects in the enalapril group and 10 were withdrawn from the nifedipine group. These results indicate that enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine are equally effective in controlling mild to moderate hypertension. However, enalapril was much better tolerated in this study.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy and safety of enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The Enalapril vs Nifedipine French Study Group. 218 26

We report two cases of recurrent episodes of hoarseness, cough, flushing, pruritus, and rash occurring within 30 minutes of topical exposure to carbonless copy paper. Provocative challenges revealed that alkylphenol novolac resin was the ingredient responsible. Video endoscopy of the larynx was performed and plasma histamine levels were obtained prior to and 30 minutes after cutaneous challenge of a patient with alkylphenol novolac resin. We documented marked laryngeal edema and a sixfold increase in plasma histamine levels after challenge. We conclude that topical exposure to carbonless copy paper may cause mast cell/basophil-mediated acute systemic and potentially life-threatening reactions in susceptible patients.
 ...
PMID:Acute systemic reactions to carbonless copy paper associated with histamine release. 245 72

A case of carcinoid syndrome is presented. Pulmonary adenosquamous carcinoma with hepatic metastasis was found in a 60-year-old Japanese male who was complaining of fever, cough and haemosputum. After the treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over 2 years, he was diagnosed as carcinoid syndrome on the appearance of facial flushing, face edema and watery diarrhea accompanied by high levels of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) in blood and urine. Prednisolone, which was initially effective, was replaced by SMS201-995 due to the considerable dose increase of the former because its effect became insufficient during the course of the treatment. Clinical symptoms were improved by SMS201-995 and blood 5-HIAA level decreased gradually but markedly. Thus better results were obtained by SMS201-995 compared with prednisolone. These results imply that SMS201-995 is appreciated as an effective drug for treatment of carcinoid syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Successful treatment with a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS201-995) in a patient with malignant carcinoid syndrome. 319 61

We studied the effect of ketotifen, an oral antiallergic and antihistaminic drug, on the airway and cutaneous responses to platelet-activating factor (PAF) in a double-blind, randomized, and crossover study in six normal subjects. Ketotifen (three doses of 2 mg taken during a 14-hour period before PAF) did not alter PAF-induced bronchoconstriction and did not prevent the accompanying flushing and coughing. The transient neutropenia (74.5 +/- 4.8% fall; p less than 0.001) and rebound neutrophilia (104 +/- 55% rise) induced by PAF were not affected by ketotifen. On the day placebo was received, airway responsiveness to methacholine increased after PAF exposure with the concentration needed to cause a 40% fall in baseline partial expiratory flow rate (PC40), decreasing from 69.2 mg/ml (geometric standard error of the mean, 2.69) to 23.3 mg/ml (2.34) on day 3 (p less than 0.001). Ketotifen had no effect, because on the day ketotifen was administered, mean PC40 also decreased from 52.7 mg/ml (2.5) to 21.5 mg/ml (2.14) (p less than 0.01). In the skin, ketotifen reduced the flare area (from 8.05 +/- 3.60 to 1.14 +/- 0.29 cm2; p less than 0.05) and the wheal volume (from 0.068 +/- 0.010 to 0.045 +/- 0.008 cc; p = 0.02) induced by intradermal PAF (200 ng). Cutaneous responses to histamine (1 microgram) were significantly inhibited. Thus, the bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness induced by PAF are not inhibited by ketotifen. Ketotifen inhibits PAF-induced wheal and flare in the skin, which is probably histamine dependent. The airway effects of PAF are unlikely to be mediated by histamine release.
 ...
PMID:Ketotifen inhibits the cutaneous but not the airway responses to platelet-activating factor in man. 328 83


1 2 3 4 Next >>