Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

After Phase I studies of benzisoquinolinedione (amonafide) in solid tumors identified myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicity, we conducted a Phase I study in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia to define the optimal dose. Amonafide was given i.v. over 2-4 h daily for 5 days. The starting dose was 600 mg/m2/day with subsequent escalation to 750, 900, 1100, 1400, and 1800 mg/m2/day. Thirty-eight courses were administered to 24 patients, of whom 12 participated in concomitant pharmacological studies. Nausea and vomiting, transient orange discoloration of the skin, and tinnitus occurred at all dose levels. The latter symptom, along with lightheadedness and flushing, was related to infusion duration; this was increased to 4 h with doses greater than or equal to 900 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis and painful skin erythema which occurred in all 4 patients treated with 1800 mg/m2. No remissions occurred. Clearing of peripheral blood blasts occurred in 67% of patients treated with 1100 mg/m2 and in all patients treated with greater than or equal to 1100 mg/m2/day. A decrease in marrow leukemic infiltrate (% blasts x % cellularity) to less than 10% occurred in 15 and 50% of patients treated at these levels, respectively. There were 10 deaths (42%), which were unrelated to dosage. The harmonic mean terminal plasma half-life was 4.6 h (range, 2.5-35.5 h). Three patients had long drug half-lives of 9.7, 16.4, and 35.5 h and each had initial bilirubin levels greater than 1.0 mg/dl. The average urinary excretion of amonafide over 5 days was 3.5% of the total dose. This establishes 1100-1400 mg/m2/day for 5 days as the maximally tolerated dose of amonafide for studies in acute leukemia.
 ...
PMID:Phase I clinical investigation of benzisoquinolinedione (amonafide) in adults with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia. 198 34

Taxol inhibits cell division by promoting the assembly and stabilization of microtubules. This report describes the results of a phase I trial of taxol administered as a short iv infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. Sixteen patients with refractory malignancy received 21 courses of taxol at five doses between 5 and 40 mg/m2/day X 5. The first nine patients received taxol as a 60-minute infusion. Two patients experienced anaphylactoid reactions, one at the 5-mg/m2/day and the second at the 15-mg/m2/day X 5 dose levels. These reactions were characterized by facial flushing, tachypnea, and hypotension within several minutes of drug administration. These anaphylactoid reactions occurred on the first day of treatment in the first patient and on the first day of the second course in the second patient. These reactions may be related to the rapid administration of the polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cremophor EL) vehicle in which taxol is formulated. No anaphylactoid reactions were observed in the seven patients who received taxol as a 6-hour infusion with antihistamine and prednisone premedication. Dose-related myelosuppression was seen; leukopenia (wbc count less than 1000/mm3) and granulocytopenia (granulocytes less than or equal to 200/mm3) occurred on Days 8 and 9 in two of two patients treated at the 40 mg/m2/day X 5 level. Thrombocytopenia was mild, with a platelet nadir of 87,000-95,000/mm3 at the highest dose level. Premedication with glucocorticoids and antihistamines coupled with a prolonged 6-hour infusion permitted taxol to be administered at 30 mg/m2/day X 5 safely without immediate life-threatening reactions.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of taxol administered as a short i.v. infusion daily for 5 days. 289 42

Melphalan has a steep dose-response curve, but the use of high doses results in unacceptable myelosuppression. Strategies to circumvent this dose-limiting myelosuppression would allow for the administration of higher, more effective doses of melphalan. Amifostine (WR-2721) has been shown in preclinical studies to protect the bone marrow from the myelotoxicity of melphalan, and in clinical trials, to protect from the myelotoxicity of other alkylating agents. A Phase I trial of the combination of amifostine and melphalan was performed in children with refractory cancers to: (a) define the acute toxicities of amifostine and its maximum tolerated dose (MTD); and (b) to determine whether the dose of melphalan could be safely escalated when administered in combination with amifostine. Amifostine was administered i.v. as a 15-min infusion 30 min before melphalan. The starting dose of amifostine was 750 mg/m2, with planned dose escalations in 30% increments. Melphalan was administered as a 5-min infusion using the previously defined MTD in heavily pretreated patients, 35 mg/m2, as the starting dose. The dose of melphalan was escalated by 30% increments. Nineteen patients, ranging in age from 3 to 24 years (median, 15 years), were entered on trial. The dose of amifostine was escalated to 2700 mg/m2, which is approximately 3-fold higher than the adult recommended dose, without reaching a MTD. Fifteen patients experienced nondose-limiting (< 25%), transient decreases in blood pressure after the amifostine infusion. Other nondose-limiting toxicities of amifostine included mild nausea and vomiting, flushing, anxiety, diarrhea, and urinary retention. Six patients, three each at the 2100 and 2700 mg/m2 amifostine dose levels were treated with an escalated dose of melphalan (45 mg/m2). All of these patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia (< 500/mm3), and five of six patients had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The duration of this dose-limiting myelosuppression exceeded 7 days in four of six patients. Although no dose-limiting (grade 3 or 4) toxicity was attributed to amifostine, significant anxiety and reversible urinary retention occurred at the two highest amifostine dose levels. A dose of 1650 mg/m2 for pediatric Phase II trials is recommended. High doses of amifostine, however, do not appear to allow for escalation of melphalan beyond its single agent MTD of 35 mg/m2.
 ...
PMID:A phase I trial of amifostine (WR-2721) and melphalan in children with refractory cancer. 766 82

Sixteen patients with intracerebral tumors received intraarterial cisplatin, teniposide, and BCNU combined with intravenous cisplatin, teniposide, and cytosine arabinoside. Oral glycerol and intravenous mannitol were given along with the intravenous chemotherapy in an attempt to increase drug delivery to tumor by augmenting tumor blood flow. Thirteen additional patients were treated with the same regimen, but received all the chemotherapy intravenously. Of the 16 patients receiving intraarterial chemotherapy (median survival, 14 weeks), none responded, 5 (31%) were stable for > 8 weeks, 8 (50%) failed, and 3 (19%) were unevaluable due to early death. Of the 13 patients receiving all their treatment intravenously (median survival, 13 weeks), 3 (23%) responded, 1 (8%) was stable, 7 (54%) failed, and 2 (15%) were unevaluable due to early death. In the patients receiving intraarterial chemotherapy, toxicity included ipsilateral retinal toxicity (2 patients), ocular pain or headache (10), periorbital swelling and flushing (6), increased brain edema with focal neurological deficits and drowsiness (5), and catheter-related carotid artery thrombosis followed by fatal herniation (1). Myelosuppression was worse in patients who received all their treatment intravenously than in those receiving intraarterial chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Neutropenic sepsis developed in 4 patients on the intraarterial arm (1 fatal) and in 5 patients on the intravenous arm (2 fatal). Other toxic effects were similar whether or not patients received intraarterial treatment or only intravenous treatment. Overall, toxicity of this regimen was excessive, and response rates were lower than would have been expected with single agent therapy.
 ...
PMID:Feasibility study of intraarterial vs intravenous cisplatin, BCNU, and teniposide combined with systemic cisplatin, teniposide, cytosine arabinoside, glycerol and mannitol in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors. 812 May 74

The dose limiting toxicities of the short infusion trial of the dacarbazine analog, CB10-277, were nausea and vomiting which appeared to be related to the peak plasma level of the parent drug. In addition, based on mouse studies, these dose limiting toxicities occurred at a less than optimal level of the monomethyl metabolite, the presumed species required for antitumour activity. An alternative schedule that would avoid the parent drug peak plasma levels of short infusion, while possibly allowing an increase in the amount of monomethyl metabolite produced was considered. Thus, a 24 h continuous infusion schedule, repeated every 21 days was explored. Twenty-two patients received 42 courses with a dose range of 4,700-15,000 mg m-2. The dose limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia and thrombocytopenia). Although nausea and vomiting also occurred, it was manageable with routine antiemetic therapy. Other toxicities included diarrhoea, hallucinations, malaise, muscle ache, headache and flushing and all were < or = WHO grade 2. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with 13 courses which included all dose levels. The mean t1/2 of the parent drug was 178 min. Area under the concentration x time curve (AUC) at the highest dose for the parent drug and the monomethyl metabolite were 2,350 and 9 mM x minutes, respectively. This monomethyl metabolite AUC and the associated myelosuppression showed a more favourable comparison to the preclinical data determined in mice than the results from the short infusion trial of CB10-277. Therefore, the recommended Phase II dose and schedule of this drug was 12,000 mg m-2 given by 24 h continuous infusion.
 ...
PMID:Phase I trial with pharmacokinetics of CB10-277 given by 24 hours continuous infusion. 843 68

A large study of tumors of low malignant potential confirmed the favorable survival in this group of patients compared to invasive epithelial ovarian tumors. Only 8% of patients died with recurrent disease after surgery. Patients with stage IA borderline tumors with mucinous histology tended to recur later and carried a poorer prognosis than patients with serous histology and similar stage. The group at highest risk for relapse were age greater than 70, stage II or III tumors, and histology other than serous. Long-term survival in this group was less than 75%. This high-risk group of patients should be targeted for innovative adjuvant treatment strategies. This year several well-designed studies with large sample sizes showed DNA ploidy to be an important new independent prognostic factor in stage I ovarian carcinoma. In patients with well-differentiated early stage ovarian cancer, DNA flow cytometric analysis may indicate subgroups with less favorable prognostic characteristics. This method of analysis may be beneficial in determining the need for additional treatments after surgery for early stage ovarian carcinoma. Recommendations for the definitive management of early stage ovarian cancer awaits completion of current GOG and European randomized prospective studies. Paclitaxel given in combination with platinum-containing agents is an intense area of research for treatment of advanced stage disease. Early data from a prospective randomized trial of patients with advanced ovarian cancer showed a higher response rate and longer disease-free survival in patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin compared to a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. The impact of this treatment on long-term survival awaits maturation of data. Preliminary results evaluating G-CSF in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin for dose escalation was reported. Paclitaxel, 250 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, were the maximally tolerated doses, with peripheral neuropathy or myalgias the dose limiting toxicities. Further studies are now underway to test the effect of dose-response with escalation therapies and to determine the optimal dose and schedule for the management of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. IL-3 significantly ameliorated neutropenia but did not prevent cumulative platelet toxicity in a regimen utilizing high-dose carboplatin. This mild improvement in myelosuppression was obtained at the cost of significant toxicity. Nausea, vomiting, malaise, bone pain, headache, fever, chills and facial flushing were frequent. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was tested as a means of consolidation treatment for patients after having a negative second-look laparotomy. These treatments were shown to be feasible; however, prospective randomized trials will be necessary to determine a benefit over operative therapy alone. Several studies addressed to problem of residual disease after primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. A large phase II study conducted by the GOG confirmed the activity of salvage cisplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer with favorable pretreatment characteristics. Whether intraperitoneal platinum-based therapy represents an advantage over systemic platinum therapy is being addressed in a prospective SWOG study. The use of six additional cycles of CAP for treatment of residual disease after primary treatment of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve complete pathological response and survival. Prolonged duration of chemotherapy above six cycles is not likely to impact treatment for residual disease. A regimen of high dose carboplatin was compared to whole abdominal radiotherapy for treatment of residual disease after initial chemotherapy. There was no difference in survival or disease-free survival between treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
 ...
PMID:Gynecological malignancies. 863 1

A phase I/II study was carried out to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in combination with a fixed dose of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6 by Calvert method) given on an every-3-week schedule to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cohorts of patients were entered at increasing dose levels of paclitaxel: six at dose level I (paclitaxel 150 mg/m2), six at dose level 2 (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2), 11 at dose level 3 (paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2), 21 at dose level 4 (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2), and five at dose level 5 (paclitaxel 250 mg/m2). The patients comprised 31 men and 18 women with a median age of 62 years (age range, 46 to 81 years) and a median Southwest Oncology Group performance status of I (range, 0 to 2). Twenty-three patients had unresectable stage III NSCLC and 26 had stage IV NSCLC. Fortynine patients and 176 treatment courses are evaluable for toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3 arthralgias/ myalgias or sensory neuropathy were the most significant toxicities of therapy. In addition, two patients (dose levels 2 and 3) experienced acute chest pain, flushing, and hypotension, and had electrocardiogram changes during the paclitaxel infusion; one had mild creatine phosphokidnase MB elevation. Both recovered uneventfully, were not re-treated with paclitaxel, and account for two of only four hospitalizations for toxicity management in this trial. At this time, 42 patients with objectively measurable disease are evaluable for responses: two complete responses and 24 partial responses (62% objective response rate) have been observed. These data imply that the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel is 250 mg/m2 with dose-limiting toxicity consisting primarily of grade 3 osteo/arthralgias-myalgias or cumulative sensory neuropathy; paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m2 given by 3-hour infusion combined with carboplatin at a calculated target area under the concentration-time curve of 6 is a well-tolerated outpatient treatment regimen and highly active in NSCLC; myelosuppression is mild and rarely dose limiting. Most notably, paclitaxel appears to decrease carboplatin's pharmacodynamic effects on thrombopoiesis.
 ...
PMID:Preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. 894 2

The optimal schedule for paclitaxel administration has not yet been determined. This phase I/II study was carried out to evaluate the safety of paclitaxel administration by 1-h infusion in the outpatient setting. A total of 43 patients with advanced pretreated malignancies (18 breast, 18 ovarian, and 7 non-small-cell lung cancers) received at least 2 cycles of paclitaxel given at 175 mg/ m2 in a single dose by 1-h i.v. infusion. This protocol was repeated every 21 days. All patients were premedicated as follows: promethazine given i.m. at 50 mg, dexamethasone given at 16 mg in 250 ml normal saline by i.v. infusion for 20 min and ranitidine given i.v. at 50 mg in 250 ml normal saline over 15 min, all premedication being carried out 1 h before the paclitaxel infusion. In a total of 156 cycles, only 1 patient presented with a hypersensitivity reaction (grade 2 urticaria in 1 cycle) and another patient developed transient facial flushing (in 1 cycle: this was resolved by slowing of the infusion rate) on this schedule of paclitaxel administration. Other adverse side effects were usually mild and well tolerated. Alopecia was universal; myelosuppression was uncommon because our patients were supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, lenograstim) given at 34 IU/day in the presence of a neutrophil count of < 500 microliters; neutropenia was seen in 50/156 (32%) cycles and was mild. Neurotoxicity was the most serious adverse effect, and all patients experienced mild to severe neuro-muscular toxicity, mainly in the form of peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy and myalgias. In conclusion, 1-h paclitaxel administration is safe and reduces the duration of treatment, making its use more convenient and easy in the outpatient setting. A prospective comparison of 1-h versus 3-h paclitaxel infusion in terms of efficacy and toxicity is the subject of our current randomized study.
 ...
PMID:A feasibility study of 1-h paclitaxel infusion in patients with solid tumors. 922 55

DACA, also known as XR5000, is an acridine derivative active against both topoisomerase I and II. In this phase I study, DACA was given as a 3-h intravenous infusion on 3 successive days, repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 41 patients were treated at 11 dose levels between 9 mg m(-2) d(-1) and the maximum tolerated dose of 800 mg m(-2) day(-1). The commonest, and dose-limiting, toxicity was pain in the infusion arm. One patient given DACA through a central venous catheter experienced chest pain with transient electrocardiogram changes, but no evidence of myocardial infarction. At the highest dose levels, several patients also experienced flushing, pain and paraesthesia around the mouth, eyes and nose and a feeling of agitation. Other side-effects, such as nausea and vomiting, myelosuppression, stomatitis and alopecia, were uncommon. There was one minor response but no objective responses. DACA pharmacokinetics were linear and did not differ between days 1 and 3. The pattern of toxicity seen with DACA is unusual and appears related to the mode of delivery. It is possible that higher doses of DACA could be administered using a different schedule of administration.
 ...
PMID:Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DACA (XR5000): a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II. CRC Phase I/II Committee. 1046 97

Several disease-modifying agents (DMAs) are approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, including three interferon (IFN)-beta products, glatiramer acetate and mitoxantrone. This article reviews the adverse event profiles of these DMAs based on the pivotal phase III trials, and provides practical guidelines for managing adverse effects. In general, the most common adverse events associated with IFN beta therapy are flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills and myalgias, and headache. The flu-like symptoms typically resolve within 24 hours and may be mitigated by over-the-counter anti-inflammatory agents. Adverse events related to glatiramer acetate therapy include injection-site reactions and a systemic reaction consisting of flushing, chest tightness, palpitation, anxiety or dyspnoea. The systemic reaction is transient (30 seconds to 30 minutes) and self-limited. Mitoxantrone may cause nausea, vomiting, alopecia, amenorrhoea and myelosuppression; isolated cases of acute leukaemia and dose-related cardiotoxicity have been reported in the literature. Longer-term tolerability data on mitoxantrone as a treatment for multiple sclerosis are needed. It is important for physicians to counsel patients on DMA-related adverse effects, most of which are transient and of mild-to-moderate severity. Various strategies that can be employed to prevent or manage these adverse effects and lessen their impact on the patient are discussed.
 ...
PMID:US FDA-approved disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: review of adverse effect profiles. 1574 Jan 78


1 2 Next >>