Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Leuprorelin (leuprolide acetate) is a synthetic analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)] which initially stimulates luteinising hormone (LH) and hence testicular androgen release; continuous administration then results in profound suppression of these hormones. Testosterone levels associated with castration are attained within 3 to 4 weeks. A biodegradable subcutaneous or intramuscular depot formulation of leuprorelin 3.75 or 7.5 mg, which releases the drug at a constant rate over 28 days, is available and may be preferred over daily subcutaneous injections. The progression of previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer is delayed in 70 to 90% of men receiving leuprorelin, with median survival of approximately 2 years. The efficacy of leuprorelin is equivalent to that of estrogen therapy, but the tolerability of the GnRH analogue is far better. In contrast to most other studies of GnRH agonists, a slight survival advantage has been reported for combined treatment with leuprorelin and the antiandrogen flutamide. Small noncomparative trials reveal that leuprorelin also causes regression of benign hyperplastic prostate tissue with corresponding relief of obstructive, but not irritative, symptoms although continuous treatment is necessary to maintain remission. Impotence and flushing occur in most leuprorelin recipients but, unlike diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol), cardiovascular toxicity and gynaecomastia are not significant problems. Symptom flare, usually manifested as bone pain in prostate cancer patients and exacerbation of obstructive symptoms in those with benign prostatic hypertrophy, can occur in 4 to 29% at the beginning of treatment. Leuprorelin treatment is therefore an established effective palliative measure in men with previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer, and may have a role in those with benign hypertrophy who are unfit for surgery.
 ...
PMID:Leuprorelin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in prostatic disorders. 179 35

A depot preparation of leuprorelin acetate was assessed in 52 patients with advanced prostatic cancer. Patients received 3.75 mg, or occasionally 7.5 mg, leuprorelin acetate depot subcutaneously every 28 +/- 3 days for up to 2 years. Following treatment, there was one complete remission and 29 partial remissions; in other patients the disease was stable and in five it was progressive, with an estimated median time to progression of 500 days. Significant improvement in performance status, micturition problems and general well-being were reported. Suppression of serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone concentrations was maximal after 28 days and castration levels were maintained for up to 96 weeks. Tumour flare occurred in 15 (29%) patients during the first week of therapy but only one event was serious; sweating and flushing also occurred occasionally during the study. Of all administrations, 97% were free from any adverse local effect, the remaining events being mild in severity. It is concluded that once-monthly administration of leuprorelin acetate depot is effective in the management of advanced prostatic cancer and has an acceptable side-effect profile.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy and safety of a new leuprorelin acetate depot formulation in patients with advanced prostatic cancer. 210 86

Amonafide (benzisoquinolinedione, NSC 308847) is a new synthetic imide antineoplastic agent with DNA intercalative properties that has been evaluated in a phase I clinical trial. The drug was administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 to 120 minutes repeated every 28 days. Ninety-five courses of therapy at doses ranging from 18 to 1,104 mg/m2 were administered to 38 patients with refractory solid tumors. Granulocytopenia was dose limiting. Leukopenia was seen in 13 of 31 courses at doses of 690 mg/m2 or greater. Life-threatening granulocytopenia (less than or equal to 250 microliters) was noted in 1/6 patients treated at 800 mg/m2, 1/8 patients treated at 918 mg/m2, and 2/5 patients treated at 1,104 mg/m2. No definite relationship between myelotoxicity and prior treatment status was noted. Rate-of-infusion dependent, nonhematologic toxicities included diaphoresis, flushing, dizziness, and tinnitus, all of which were ameliorated by increasing the duration of drug infusion to 120 minutes. In addition, nausea and vomiting (grades 1 and 2) were seen in 29/56 courses at doses greater than or equal to 519 mg/m2, but were easily controlled by phenothiazine antiemetics. Amonafide plasma and urine concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Plasma concentrations declined biexponetially with a terminal harmonic mean terminal half-life (t 1/2) of 5.5 h. The mean apparent volume of distribution at steady-state and total body clearance were 532 L/m2 and 84 L/h/m2, respectively. Less than 5% of the total dose of amonafide was excreted unchanged in the urine. Antitumor activity has been noted in one patient with non-small-cell lung cancer (one complete response exceeding 29 months duration) and in one patient with prostatic cancer (complete pain relief and improvement in bone scan for 9 months). The recommended dose for phase II trials with this schedule of amonafide is 918 mg/m2 with dose escalation to amonafide is 918 mg/m2 with dose escalation to myelotoxicity.
 ...
PMID:Phase I clinical investigation of amonafide. 254 5

Seventeen patients with advanced prostatic cancer were treated with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue DSer (tBU)6 AzaGly 10 GnRH (ICI 118630), either as a constant SC infusion, or in the form of a monthly SC slowrelease depot formulation, in which case patients were randomised to receive one of three doses. Six of these patients also received a 250-microgram SC bolus of ICI 118630, for pharmacokinetic studies, before starting the infusion or the depot. Drug levels were measured using a double-antibody radioimmunoassay. In contrast to the SC infusion, which gave a smooth serum 118630 level profile, drug release from the depot preparation was not constant, levels varying in a predictable manner throughout each 28-day period, reaching a peak proportional to the dose of ICI 118630 received, between days 15 and 18 of each cycle. With all methods of administration there was an initial rise in LH, usually followed by a rise in testosterone, after which the SC infusion and the depot were both effective in reducing serum LH to basal levels and testosterone into the castrate range within 1 month. It is too early to make any assessment of clinical response; however, depot treatment was well tolerated: Four patients experienced an initial flare in bone pain, probably related to the initial rise in testosterone, and twelve patients experienced flushing; one patient with pre-existing hydronephrosis and hydroureter developed renal failure, possibly related to a tumour flare reaction. No patients have experienced cardiovascular side effects or local reaction.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetic and endocrinological parameters of a slow-release depot preparation of the GnRH analogue ICI 118630 (zoladex) compared with a subcutaneous bolus and continuous subcutaneous infusion of the same drug in patients with prostatic cancer. 294 68

Prostatic cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in males. Treatment by radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy is useful in the early stages of the disease. Whenever metastases occur, patients are usually treated by surgical (orchidectomy) or medical [gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue] castration. This form of treatment is, however, associated with unwanted adverse effects, such as flushing, loss of libido and potency and all patients ultimately escape therapy after a delay of 1 to 2 years. For this reason antiandrogens have been developed as another means of endocrine ablation therapy. Antiandrogens fall in 2 groups of which the first group, the steroidal antiandrogens such as cyproterone acetate (CPA), have a direct blocking effect at the cellular level but also inhibit testosterone production by their additional gestagenic properties blocking gonadotropin secretion. Except in preventing the flare-up associated with the start of GnRH analogue therapy and in reducing flushing, no evidence exist of any superiority for CPA over classical therapy in terms of adverse effects and survival. The second group, the nonsteroidal or 'pure' antiandrogens, only block androgens at the cellular level without any central effects. In contrast with other forms of castration, patients on pure antiandrogens as monotherapy preserve their sexual function and potency, at the expense of a slightly inferior androgen blockade and gynecomastia. These latter effects are explained by a compensatory rise in androgens as a result of the blockade at the central level, which weakens the androgen blockade, and by peripheral aromatisation of the increased androgens to oestrogens. In addition, some evidence exist that pure antiandrogens improve survival if combined with other forms of castration as they also inhibit the adrenal androgens, the so-called maximal androgen blockade (MAB). If patients escape control under MAB, a trial of stopping the antiandrogen must always be considered, as some tumours have 'learned' to be activated by these drugs. At the moment it is not yet clear if antiandrogens are of any benefit in downstaging the extent of disease before prostatectomy and/or radiotherapy. Of the currently known pure antiandrogens, bicalutamide offers some advantages over flutamide as it possesses a much longer half-life, allowing a once daily regimen, and has advantages over nilutamide in terms of fewer adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiandrogens and their efficacy in prostate cancer. 959 22

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men, between 40 and 70 years of age. In the first major trial of sildenafil in ED, at 24 weeks, improved erections were reported by 77 and 84% of men taking sildenafil 50 and 100mg, respectively. Subsequently, sildenafil has been reported to be effective in men with ED associated with diabetes and prostate cancer, and in psychogenic ED. Sildenafil is safe in men with coronary artery disease, provided it is not used with the nitrates (a contraindication). The most commonly reported adverse effects with sildenafil are headache, flushing and dyspepsia. Vardenafil is more potent and more selective than sildenafil at inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5. Vardenafil is similarly effective to sildenafil in the treatment of ED. The only advantage that vardenafil has over sildenafil is that it does not inhibit phosphodiesterase-6 to alter colour perception, a rare side effect which sometimes occurs with sildenafil. Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Tadalafil is similarly effective as sildenafil in the treatment of ED. In comparison studies, tadalafil is preferred to sildenafil (50/100mg) by men with ED, possibly because of its longer duration of action. Of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, tadalafil may displace sildenafil as the drug of choice among men with ED.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction. 1570 77

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) reduces the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which allows erectile function to occur by relaxation of penile smooth muscle. Three PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) in a range of doses are available. PDE5 therapy, compared with placebo, significantly improves scores on the International Index of Erectile Function and has been found to be effective in special clinical populations, such as those with prostate cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Sildenafil and vardenafil show some interaction with food intake. Time to onset of action is usually 30-120 minutes, but there are reports of shorter times to onset of action. The duration of action of sildenafil and vardenafil is about 4 hours, whereas that of tadalafil is about 36 hours. The overall safety of the treatments is good, even in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, there is a risk of hypotension if nitrates are given concurrently. Increased QTc intervals have been reported, the longest with vardenafil, shortest with tadalafil, and intermediate with sildenafil. Priapism and prolonged erection are rare adverse events. Common side-effects include headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion, and dyspepsia. There may be interactions with other medications metabolized in a similar way, such as erythromycin and HIV protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:The efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors. 1615 23

The discovery that inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) reduces the degradation of cGMP, allowing erectile function to occur by relaxation of penile smooth muscle, represents a revolutionary approach or the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Three PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) are clinically available at this time, and extensive drug design efforts are registered for finding agents with a better activity, enhanced selectivity and reduced side effects. Many classes of such compounds have been reported, belonging to diverse chemical entities. The drug design has been very much facilitated after the report of the X-ray crystal structure of the PDE5 catalytic domain in complex with the three clinically used derivatives. PDE5 inhibitor therapy, has been found to be effective in special clinical populations, such as those with prostate cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The duration of action of sildenafil and vardenafil is of about 4 hours, whereas that of tadalafil is of about 36 hours, and the overall safety of the treatments is good. There is a risk of hypotension if nitrates are given concurrently with the PDE5 inhibitors. Common side-effects include headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion, dyspepsia and transient visual impairment. There are pharmacological interactions between these drugs and other medications metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (P3A4 isoform), such as the azole antifungals, erythromycin and the HIV protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors--drug design and differentiation based on selectivity, pharmacokinetic and efficacy profiles. 1701 39

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous cancer in men in the United States. Treatment of men with prostate cancer commonly involves surgical, radiation, or hormone therapy. Most men with prostate cancer live for many years after diagnosis and may never suffer morbidity or mortality attributable to prostate cancer. The short-term and long-term adverse consequences of therapy are, therefore, of great importance. Adverse effects of radical prostatectomy include immediate postoperative complications and long-term urinary and sexual complications. External beam or interstitial radiation therapy in men with localized prostate cancer may lead to urinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual complications. Improvements in surgical and radiation techniques have reduced the incidence of many of these complications. Hormone treatment typically consists of androgen deprivation therapy, and consequences of such therapy may include vasomotor flushing, anemia, and bone density loss. Numerous clinical trials have studied the role of bone antiresorptive therapy for prevention of bone density loss and fractures. Other long-term consequences of androgen deprivation therapy may include adverse body composition changes and increased risk of insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Ongoing and planned clinical trials will continue to address strategies to prevent treatment-related side effects and improve quality of life for men with prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Management of complications of prostate cancer treatment. 1850

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are the mainstay of treatment for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. GnRH agonists are also an important part of therapy for many men with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Although GnRH agonists improve survival in certain settings, they involve adverse effects including vasomotor flushing, obesity, and osteoporosis. This article describes the evidence that GnRH agonists increase risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease and reviews the potential mechanisms for treatment-related morbidity.
 ...
PMID:Androgen deprivation therapy and risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer survivors. 1876 13


1 2 Next >>