Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Aspects of quality of life (symptoms, psychological well-being and activity) were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires in a 4 months randomized double-blind trial of titrated doses of verapamil slow release (n = 41) compared with nifedipine retard (n = 40). An untreated diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 115 mm Hg was required for inclusion in the trial. The mean age in both groups was 55 years. A significant difference between the two drugs was found in the average reporting of symptoms with an increase on nifedipine (p less than 0.01). The reporting of swollen ankles and flushing (p less than 0.05) increased on nifedipine, and nocturia (p less than 0.05) increased on verapamil. Measures of psychiatric morbidity tended to improve on verapamil and deteriorate on nifedipine. Only the change in cognitive function was significant between the drugs, being worse on nifedipine (p = 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in the fall in diastolic blood pressure (average 18 mm Hg on nifedipine and 17 mm Hg on verapamil). There was a significantly greater fall in systolic blood pressure on nifedipine (23 mm Hg) compared with verapamil (13 mm Hg) (p less than 0.01). The two drugs differed in their effects on measures of quality of life. The improvements in symptomatic complaints and psychological well-being on verapamil may have been due to inclusion in a trial, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a drug effect. Conversely the increase in symptoms and self-assessed cognitive impairment on nifedipine were considered to be side-effects of the drug.
 ...
PMID:[A comparison of the effects of verapamil and nifedipine on the quality of life]. 177 57

1. Aspects of quality of life (symptoms, psychological well-being and activity) were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires in a 4 month randomised double-blind trial of titrated doses of verapamil slow release (n = 41) compared with nifedipine retard (n = 40). An untreated diastolic blood pressure of 95-115 mm Hg was required for inclusion in the trial. 2. The mean age in both groups was 55 years. A significant difference between the two drugs was found in the average reporting of symptoms with an increase on nifedipine (P less than 0.01). The reporting of swollen ankles and flushing (P less than 0.05) increased on nifedipine, and nocturia (P less than 0.05) increased on verapamil. Measures of psychiatric morbidity tended to improve on verapamil and deteriorate on nifedipine. Only the change in cognitive function was significant between the drugs, being worse on nifedipine (P = 0.05). 3. There was no difference between the two groups in the fall in diastolic blood pressure (average 18 mm Hg on nifedipine and 17 mm Hg on verapamil). There was a significantly greater fall in systolic blood pressure on nifedipine (23 mm Hg) compared with verapamil (13 mm Hg) (P less than 0.01). 4. The two drugs differed in their effects on measures of quality of life. The improvements in symptomatic complaints and psychological well-being on verapamil may have been due to inclusion in a trial, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a drug effect. Conversely the increase in symptoms and self-assessed cognitive impairment on nifedipine were considered to be side-effects of the drug.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of verapamil and nifedipine on quality of life. 222 15

To determine the effects of reversible medical castration on prostatic size and symptoms we treated 15 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy with a long-acting GnRH analog, leuprolide (1 mg/day sc), for a minimum of 4 months. The men's serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol concentrations fell to very low levels within 4-6 weeks after the initiation of treatment. Transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate demonstrated an average shrinkage of 40% after 4 months of treatment (n = 15) and 46% after 6 months of treatment (n = 11). All 15 men had improvement in urinary flow and, to a lesser extent, in nocturia and frequency. The side-effects of the therapy were decreased potency and flushing. The most dramatic improvement occurred in 4 of the 5 men who had complete urinary obstruction before treatment. One man had a suprapubic cystotomy tube removed during the fifth treatment month. Two other men who had Foley catheters before treatment are voiding well without catheters since their third treatment month. Another man who had a very large prostate (300 g) before treatment had one successful voiding trial, although he still has a suprapubic cystotomy tube. One man decided to stop treatment after 6 months. Two months later his hormone values and prostate size had returned to pretreatment levels. One man treated during the fourth and fifth months with fluoxymesterone in addition to leuprolide had regrowth of his prostate while receiving this androgen. We conclude that leuprolide treatment of men with benign prostatic hypertrophy results in shrinkage of prostatic size and concomitant improvement in the obstructive symptoms of prostatism. The prostatic shrinkage reverses when treatment is discontinued or combined with androgen.
 ...
PMID:Effect of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (leuprolide) therapy on prostatic size and symptoms in 15 men with benign prostatic hypertrophy. 247 65

Preclinical studies indicate that dihydropyridine-type calcium channel antagonists modulate dopamine neurotransmitter function and can reduce cocaine-reinforced behaviors. Amlodipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine-type calcium channel antagonist related to isradipine and nifedipine, was administered in open label fashion for 12 weeks to 26 cocaine-dependent patients. In subjects expressing cocaine craving, craving significantly declined during the course of the 12 weeks. Five individuals reported flushing, headache, fatigue, nocturia, nausea, and lightheadedness. No conclusions regarding efficacy can be made due to the small number of subjects and the open-label design.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine treatment of cocaine dependence. 1043 93

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events and the goal of treating hypertension is to prevent complications due to these events. However, some other properties, including few side-effects and improvement of the quality of life (QOL), are desirable in a drug as well as its antihypertensive effect. Dehydropydine calcium-channel blockers (DCCBs) are the most frequently used antihypertensive agents in Japan. The antihypertensive effect of DCCBs is satisfactory, but side-effects, e.g. nocturia, flushing and palpitations, are a problem. The aim was to evaluate the effects of a change of treatment from DCCBs on the QOL of hypertensive patients. An open study was performed to evaluate the effects of switching treatment from DCCBs to angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on the QOL of hypertensive patients. The ARBs have been reported to be effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drugs. Candesartan cilexetil was selected because it is the most frequently used ARB in Japan. One hundred patients with mild to moderate hypertension, being treated with DCCBs, were randomly selected to receive candesartan cilexetil (8-12 mg once a day). The patients were followed for 3 months, while blood pressure (BP), side-effects and QOL were monitored. BP was equally well controlled before and after the change of antihypertensive therapy. The candesartan cilexetil-treated patients exhibited improvement of several aspects of QOL, including general symptoms, physical symptoms and well-being, work and satisfaction and sleep scale. Emotional state and cognitive function also improved. Patients aged 65 years or younger achieved significant improvement of sexual function. Changing treatment from DCCBs to ARB therapy achieved equal BP control with a lower drug dose. Moreover, the change to cadesartan cilexetil had a positive impact on the QOL.
 ...
PMID:The effects of replacing dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers with angiotensin II receptor blocker on the quality of life of hypertensive patients. 1476 Oct 73