Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind controlled, randomized, parallel, multicenter 12-week study was conducted to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril with that of metoprolol in treatment of moderate to severe hypertension. Initially, 118 patients were recruited on lisinopril and 61 on metoprolol; and for the purpose of efficacy analysis at week 8, 115 patients on lisinopril and 60 on metoprolol were included. The doses of lisinopril or metoprolol were 40-80 mg/day and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. At week 4, the pretreatment diastolic blood pressure of 111 mm Hg was decreased to 97 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) with lisinopril: metoprolol decreased the diastolic blood pressure from 110 to 99 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). Similar decreases were noted at week 8; however, the drop in blood pressure with lisinopril was not significantly different from that with metoprolol. Systolic blood pressure also demonstrated a decrease of about 18 mm Hg with lisinopril and 12 mm Hg with metoprolol (p less than 0.01). This larger decrease in systolic blood pressure with lisinopril was statistically significant at week 4 (p less than 0.05). These decreases in systolic blood pressures were maintained at week 8, again with statistical significance (p less than 0.01). Of the 118 lisinopril-treated patients, four were discontinued from lisinopril therapy because of headache, dizziness, rash, flushing, or lymphadenopathy. Four patients out of 61 (9.8%) were discontinued from metoprolol therapy because of fatigue, somnolence, asthenia, weight gain, flatulence, tremor, or bronchospasm. In conclusion, lisinopril 40-80 mg once daily is as effective as metoprolol 100-200 mg once daily in reducing diastolic blood pressure in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril compared to metoprolol in moderate to severe hypertension. 244 53

The serotonergic antagonist ketanserin (K) was compared to nifedipine (N) in a five-center international study on hypertensive patients over the age of 50 years. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive for 3 months either ketanserin (40 mg b.i.d. after 2 weeks of 20 mg b.i.d.) or nifedipine (20 mg N retard b.i.d.). After 1 month, monotherapy patients whose blood pressure was not sufficiently reduced received a diuretic in combination therapy. At the end of the active treatment period, patients who had remained on monotherapy received placebo until hypertension returned or for a maximum of 2 months. One hundred and seventeen patients were entered in the study, 58 on K and 59 on N. More patients switched to combination with a diuretic in the K group (14 patients) than in the N group (6 patients). The overall reduction in blood pressure was similar for K and N. Total response rate was high (96%) for the two drugs. Blood pressure was reduced both at peak and trough drug levels. No orthostatic reactions were observed, and no rebound hypertension occurred at discontinuation of therapy. Ketanserin monotherapy slightly decreased heart rate (-1 beats/min). whereas N produced a significant increase (+6 beats/min). Body weight significantly increased with K (+1.1 kg) and was unchanged with N. More patients complained of adverse reactions during N monotherapy (47%) than during K monotherapy (34%). Flushing and leg edema were more frequent with N.
 ...
PMID:Ketanserin versus nifedipine in the treatment of essential hypertension in patients over 50 years old: an international multicenter study. 244 56

From a hemodynamic point of view, the calcium antagonists represent an interesting way of treating hypertension, because they reduce total peripheral resistance without compromising cardiac output. Blood flow is also maintained during muscular exercise. Verapamil and diltiazem induce slight reduction in heart rate, but this is compensated by increase in stroke volume. Verapamil and diltiazem also prolong atrioventricular conduction time, in contrast to the dihydropyridines. Most clinical data are available for verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine. In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, these compounds seem as effective as diuretics and beta-blockers. They do not induce disturbances in glucose metabolism, serum uric acid, or serum potassium, and unwanted disturbances in blood lipids have not been described. The dihydropyridines may safely be combined with beta-blockers, but the combination of either verapamil or diltiazem with a beta-blocker should be avoided (because of the high risk of bradycardia). The calcium antagonists seem particularly useful in patients with the combination of hypertension and angina pectoris or peripheral vascular diseases or chronic obstructive lung diseases or diabetes. They are also effective in hypertensive crises. They may also be tried as a first line drug in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension, particularly when diuretics or beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary side effects due to vasodilatation (headache, flushing, and palpitations) are seen frequently, particularly on the dihydropyridines. Edema is the most frequent serious side effect of the dihydropyridines, and constipation is most common with verapamil. At this point, few long-term data are available and it is not known whether the calcium antagonists will give better or worse results, with respect to morbidity and mortality, than the beta-blockers, diuretics, or other more recent antihypertensive agents.
 ...
PMID:Clinical use of calcium antagonists in hypertension: update 1986. 245 35

Felodipine was compared with prazosin in patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure was not controlled by a beta-blocking drug. One hundred patients with a supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to mm Hg after 4 weeks or more on a beta-blocking drug and placebo were randomly assigned to felodipine or prazosin tablets. The drugs were titrated at 2-week intervals if diastolic BP was greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Titration steps of felodipine were 5, 10, 20 mg b.i.d. and of prazosin were 1, 2, 4 mg b.i.d. The fall in blood pressure with felodipine 32/21 mm Hg was greater than the fall with prazosin 16/12 mm Hg (p less than 0.001); 36 patients achieved a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg with felodipine, which was a significantly greater number than the 20 patients who obtained such a level with prazosin (p less than 0.01). Both drugs were well tolerated, but more patients complained of vascular type side effects (flushing, peripheral edema) with felodipine than with prazosin. There was significant weight gain with prazosin but not with felodipine. Felodipine was shown to be a well-tolerated, effective antihypertensive agent when used with a beta-blocking drug and to be suitable for people with hypertension who fail to be controlled with a beta-blocking drug.
 ...
PMID:Felodipine compared to prazosin as additional therapy to a beta-blocking drug. 245 50

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 245 54

Throughout the developed world, populations are growing older. Blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, increases with aging, and this increase leads to increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials demonstrate that treatment of hypertension in the elderly reduces overall cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, nonfatal cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, progression to severe hypertension, and strokes. Drug treatment has been well tolerated, but diuretic therapy has been known to increase plasma glucose, uric acid, and creatinine. Therapeutic trials of nonpharmacologic treatment may be indicated in those with mild elevation in blood pressure and no serious end organ disease. However, most people up to age 80 will require drug treatment. Many drugs are effective in the elderly, but, some like beta-blockers, may not be as effective as in younger patients. Controlled clinical trials demonstrate that nitrendipine, a calcium channel blocking drug, significantly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients, (successfully controlling pressure in a high percentage) and was well tolerated. Drug effects persist for 12 h or more. The drug decreased the exercise-induced rise in the rate-pressure product. Although there is a temporary increase in heart rate, this returns to baseline after a short time. Side effects include headache, flushing, dizziness, edema, and palpitations. Therefore, nitrendipine offers a reasonable and useful alternative to many other drugs in the treatment of combined systolic and diastolic hypertension in the elderly.
 ...
PMID:Epidemiologic aspects of elderly hypertensive patients and the results of treatment with nitrendipine. 248 68

Although calcium antagonists may impair insulin release in vitro, clinical studies have produced conflicting results. Felodipine is a highly selective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist effective in the treatment of hypertension. The efficacy of felodipine was assessed in a double-blind randomized placebo cross-over study of 21 Type 2 diabetic patients with primary hypertension, 13 men and 8 women, with an age of 61 (range 46-73) years. Thirteen were controlled on oral hypoglycaemic therapy and 8 on diet alone. Mean (SD) blood pressure (mmHg) was 176(20)/102(8) after a 2-4 week placebo run-in period, 169(21)/101(8) during the subsequent placebo period compared with 151(15)/88(9) after 4 weeks felodipine therapy (p less than 0.001). Nineteen patients required 5 mg twice daily and 2 patients 10 mg twice daily to achieve a target diastolic pressure of 95 mmHg. Side-effects seen with felodipine included ankle oedema, facial flushing, headache, and dizziness. During oral glucose tolerance tests performed after the felodipine and placebo phases, mean (SD) fasting blood glucose was 9.5(3.1) and 9.0(3.0) mmol l-1, respectively (NS), and the 90 min (peak) blood glucose was 19.1(4.8) and 18.1(4.8) mmol l-1, respectively (NS). Glycosylated haemoglobin and fructosamine concentrations likewise showed no significant changes.
 ...
PMID:A trial of the calcium antagonist felodipine in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. 253 42

The antihypertensive effect of nicardipine was evaluated in 89 ambulatory elderly patients with hypertension through a multicenter trial enrolling patients over the age of 65 years. After a baseline period during which they received placebo, subjects were randomized by an unbalanced assignment to a double-blind comparison of nicardipine (n = 57) and placebo (n = 32). The initial dose of nicardipine was 20 mg every 8 hours, which was then increased to 30 mg if needed. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured 1 and 8 hours after doses at each visit with subjects in both the supine and standing positions. Seventy-six per cent of patients who received nicardipine and 55% who received placebo responded (p less than 0.05). During standing, blood pressure did not decrease significantly from supine levels in either group, but a small, transient increase in heart rate occurred with nicardipine. Adverse reactions (apart from failure to respond) occurred in 8% of those who received nicardipine and 3% who received placebo. Three patients were withdrawn: two for symptoms, nausea, or flushing and one for transient and asymptomatic abnormalities on ECG. Nicardipine is effective and safe as monotherapy in elderly patients with hypertension, causing greater reduction in systolic than in diastolic pressure, but without orthostatic hypotension.
 ...
PMID:Nicardipine monotherapy in ambulatory elderly patients with hypertension. 264 84

Nicardipine is an investigational dihydropyridine calcium channel blocking agent. One hundred fifty-one patients with hypertension received either 30 mg nicardipine t.i.d. or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide b.i.d. in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. After 4 weeks of therapy and at the end of the dosing interval, nicardipine reduced arterial pressure by 10/6 mm Hg and 12/6 mm Hg in the supine and standing positions, respectively (all p less than 0.01). In the hydrochlorothiazide group, the reductions were 12/6 mm Hg and 14/6 mm Hg, respectively (all p less than 0.01). The maximum reduction in blood pressure of 16/14 mm Hg supine and 20/15 mm Hg standing occurred within 1 hour after administration of nicardipine. The mean reduction in the hydrochlorothiazide group after 1 hour was 14/11 mm Hg supine and 16/12 mm Hg standing. Neither drug affected autonomic reflexes associated with maximum exercise. Nicardipine increased urinary sodium excretion during the 4-hour period after the first dose. Adverse effects of nicardipine were primarily extensions of its vasodilator effect and included flushing, headache, and edema.
 ...
PMID:Nicardipine and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension. 264

1. The antihypertensive efficacy of a long acting formulation of the calcium channel blocking drug, nicardipine, was assessed using clinic and ambulatory (Remler M2,000) blood pressure measurements. 2. Eleven patients with essential hypertension (mean +/- s.e. mean; 173 +/- 6.6/103 +/- 1.9 mmHg) completed a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. The dose of nicardipine used was 60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. 3. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was reduced from 164 +/- 5.3/97 +/- 2.9 to 151 +/- 5.2/88 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P less than 0.01); this effect was shown to be sustained for 8 h after the morning dose. Mean ambulatory heart rate was not significantly affected by treatment. 4. Clinic lying systolic blood pressure was reduced on treatment from 169 +/- 7.1 to 157 +/- 5.9 mmHg (P less than 0.2) and diastolic blood pressure from 99 +/- 3.6 to 89 +/- 3.9 mmHg (P less than 0.05). 5. One patient was withdrawn because of dizziness and flushing while on nicardipine; vasodilatory side effects such as headache, palpitations and flushing on nicardipine were noted by three patients. 6. We conclude that the long acting formulation of nicardipine studied in a dose of 60 mg twice daily is effective as monotherapy and is relatively well tolerated in mild hypertension. 7. This study highlights the importance of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in detecting significant changes in blood pressure, thereby permitting the study of small numbers of patients.
 ...
PMID:The effect of slow-release nicardipine on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in mild hypertension. 267 16


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>