Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cyclosporine is known to be effective in the treatment of psoriasis. In this study, we have used oral cyclosporine (6 mg/kg per day) given for 5 to 30 weeks to 24 patients for the treatment of 12 different dermatoses. Patients with the following diseases demonstrated a marked response or total clearing: 1 patient each with pyoderma gangrenosum, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, and psoriasis of the acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau type. Moderate to marked response occurred in both patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and the patient with hidradenitis suppurativa. Minimal to moderate responses were obtained in both patients with granuloma annulare, 1 of 2 with acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau, both patients with Darier's disease, and 1 of 6 patients with vitiligo. Little or no response was noted in both patients with sarcoidosis, all 3 patients with pityriasis rubra pilaris, 5 of 6 patients with vitiligo, 1 patient with pemphigus foliaceous, and 1 with pemphigus vulgaris. Clinical side effects were mild and transient and included dysesthesia, fatigue, hypertrichosis, nausea, and flushing. The most frequent clinically significant abnormalities were hypertension and renal dysfunction, with all factors normalizing within 1 month of discontinuation of cyclosporine therapy.
 ...
PMID:Oral cyclosporine in the treatment of inflammatory and noninflammatory dermatoses. A clinical and immunopathologic analysis. 217 58

The long acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril was compared with the calcium channel blocker nifedipine as sustained-release formulation in 136 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This multicentre study was carried out in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion by 28 cardiologists in private practice. After a 2-week placebo period, patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups; the first group received enalapril 20 mg daily (n = 68), and the second group received sustained-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 68). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. In both groups, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was added at week 4 if diastolic blood pressure remained greater than 90 mm Hg. At week 8, if the target diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg was not achieved, the dosage of hydrochlorothiazide was increased to 50mg. The clinical characteristics of the patients in each group were comparable. After 4 weeks of treatment, the reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (12.1 mm Hg in the enalapril group vs 10.3 mm Hg in the nifedipine group). Moreover, although the difference between the groups was more noticeable after 12 weeks of treatment (16.3 vs 13.9 mm Hg, respectively), it did not reach significance. The number of patients experiencing clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group than in the enalapril group [33 (48.5%) vs 18 (26.5%), respectively]. The most common complaints of patients administered nifedipine included swollen ankles, flushing and headaches, whereas complaints in the enalapril group included cough, asthenia, and epigastralgia. Three patients were withdrawn from the study because of side effects in the enalapril group and 10 were withdrawn from the nifedipine group. These results indicate that enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine are equally effective in controlling mild to moderate hypertension. However, enalapril was much better tolerated in this study.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy and safety of enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The Enalapril vs Nifedipine French Study Group. 218 26

Prostacyclin (PGI2) is known to cause vasorelaxation and inhibit platelet aggregation by receptor-mediated mechanisms. While cyclic (c)AMP is known to act as a second messenger for platelet aggregation, vasorelaxation by hyperpolarization has been described only recently and may provide an explanation, in addition to stimulation of cAMP, for the PGI2 mechanism of action on blood vessels. When PGI2 is infused into healthy volunteers it reduces blood pressure only at infusion rates that also cause significant side effects, primarily nausea, emesis, flushing, diphoresis and restlessness. In hypertensive patients blood pressure responses are complex and are influenced to some extent by secretion. PGI2 stimulates renin secretion by a direct effect on the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and also has an indirect effect by activating the sympathetic nervous system. Thus it is useless as an antihypertensive agent even apart from its debilitating side effects. Vascular PGI2 is synthesized endogenously by both the endothelial cells and the muscularis of arteries. While the endothelial cells undoubtedly synthesize larger amounts of PGI2, the muscularis comprises a much larger tissue mass so that the overall synthesis is about equally distributed between the endothelial and muscle cells. In patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension and some patients with essential hypertension, endogenous synthesis of PGI2 has been evaluated by measuring 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1 alpha and has proved to be defective. Some drugs (cicletanine, thiazides, propranolol) have been shown to stimulate PGI2 synthesis, and inhibition of cyclooxygenase has been shown to abolish their antihypertensive effects. Whether stimulation of PGI2 synthesis affects the antihypertensive efficacy of these drugs is not yet known.
 ...
PMID:Prostacyclin in hypertension. 225 88

The subjects were 24 patients, aged 37 to 66 years, with mild to moderate hypertension, treated with nifedipine retard (mean dose, 47 mg daily) for 7 to 16 weeks. The mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) declined significantly from 158/101 before treatment to 136/87 mmHg after treatment. Daytime BP declined from 160/101 to 133/86 mmHg and nighttime BP from 152/98 to 132/85 mmHg; the diurnal variation in diastolic BP was lost during treatment with nifedipine. The consecutive hourly BPs were all significantly lower after treatment. BPs in response to physiologic tests were significantly reduced after treatment. Heart rate increased significantly during treatment. Side effects (palpitations, pedal edema, and flushing of the face) were reported by four patients. It is concluded that nifedipine retard is safe and effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Nifedipine retard in the treatment of hypertension. A study using ambulatory blood pressure recordings. 228 19

We prospectively evaluated infusion-related toxicities in 82 recipients of autologous bone marrow grafts. The grafts were cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide and stored in liquid nitrogen. All grafts were concentrated and buffy-coat cells were collected. Forty-seven grafts were treated ex vivo with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC) at 100 micrograms/mL; 26 grafts were further processed using density-gradient separation and treated with 4-HC at 60 micrograms/mL. Nine buffy-coat concentrates were frozen without drug treatment. Before infusion, patients were medicated with mannitol, hydrocortisone, and diphenhydramine. Grafts were rapidly thawed and immediately infused without further manipulation. During the infusions, 33 (70%) recipients of treated buffy-coat, 5 (56%) recipients of untreated buffy-coat, and 6 (23%) recipients of density-gradient separated grafts experienced varying symptoms including nausea, abdominal cramping, and flushing. Forced vital capacities for 83% of the recipients of treated buffy-coat concentrates decreased after the graft infusion; six of these patients complained of dyspnea and one patient experienced an acute episode of respiratory decompensation. Decreased heart rates were observed in 98% of the recipients of treated buffy-coat cells with asymptomatic bradycardia occurring in 45%. Forty-five patients (96%) in this group experienced transient hypertension, with 18 (38%) requiring additional medications within 6 hours after the infusion for control of blood pressure. Similar cardiovascular changes were observed in the recipients of untreated buffy-coat concentrates. One recipient of an untreated buffy-coat concentrate had 2 degrees heart block after the graft infusion. Twenty-three (88%) recipients of density-gradient separated grafts had decreased heart rates and 21 (81%) had increased blood pressure. However, the degrees of change were less than those experienced by the recipients of treated buffy-coat cells (P less than .01). Forced vital capacities were not affected by the infusion of the density-gradient separated grafts. No renal failure or obvious hemolytic episodes occurred for any patient group. Minor to moderate toxicities were associated with cryopreserved graft infusions. Recipients of buffy-coat separated grafts, both treated and untreated, experienced more complications than the recipients of density-gradient separated grafts. These toxicities may relate to the volumes of cryoprotectant and cell lysis products infused, which were less for the more highly purified density-gradient separated grafts.
 ...
PMID:Clinical toxicity of cryopreserved bone marrow graft infusion. 229 78

A patient undergoing groin lymph node dissection with spinal and general anaesthesia was receiving enalapril to control hypertension. Infusion of stable plasma protein solution (Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, Australia) was associated with significant hypotension and flushing. A brief review of stable plasma protein solution and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor pharmacology is presented to provide a possible mechanism for these events. This mechanism implies that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy is a relative contraindication to rapid SPPS infusion.
 ...
PMID:Possible interaction between SPPS and enalapril. 233 34

The anti-hypertensive effects of slowly absorbable nifedipin in doses of 20-40 mg twice daily and 25-50 mg captopril twice daily were investigated in a randomized cross-over trial on 19 patients with slight to moderate hypertension. Both of these preparations caused significant reduction in the diastolic blood pressure (BT) measured two and 12 hours after the last dose. Nifedipin caused 5% reduction of the diastolic blood pressure measured 12 hours after the last dose more frequently than did captopril. Where both preparations were concerned, the blood pressure measured two hours after the last intake of medicine was significantly lower than after 12 hours. Neither of the two anti-hypertensive preparations resulted in changes in the clinical-chemical variables measured here. No changes in weight of over 5% were observed. Treatment with nifedipin frequently resulted in headache and flushing during the first days of treatment. Three of the patients did not wish to continue nifedipin treatment and one did not wish to continue captopril treatment after the period of observation. Six patients experienced considerably improved general health during captopril treatment and three during nifedipin as compared with their condition prior to treatment.
 ...
PMID:[The effects of nifedipine and captopril on blood pressure, clinical chemical parameters and general health]. 240 56

Nicardipine hydrochloride, a dihydropyridine calcium entry-blocking drug, was administered to 66 patients with severe hypertension during three protocols designed to examine the efficacy and safety of this investigation drug. It was shown that nicardipine was uniformly effective in lowering blood pressure to a therapeutic goal of 95 mm Hg. Time to achieve therapeutic effect was dose dependent, and steady-state blood levels were achieved after 8 to 12 hours. Reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure but not changes in heart rate were correlated with plasma concentrations of nicardipine. In dose-ranging studies, the minimal effective dose of nicardipine appeared to be 2 mg/hr; 1 mg/hr was an ineffective dose, and little additional effect was seen above 4 mg/hr. Side effects were modest and consisted of those associated with vasodilation--headache, flushing, and feelings of warmth. In the initial group of patients studied, local thrombophlebitis occurred in a substantial number of patients. This was seen only after 14 hours of infusion. In subsequent studies, the infusion site was changed after 12 hours, and no further cases of thrombophlebitis were seen. Nicardipine appears to be therapeutic agent for parenteral use that shows promise in the treatment of severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride: treatment of patients with severe hypertension. 240 13

We assessed the efficacy of long-acting nifedipine as monotherapy in 52 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, controlled crossover study. Good blood pressure control was achieved in 34 of 40 patients (85%) receiving nifedipine (mean daily dose, 52 mg in 2 divided doses) compared with 23 of 40 patients (58%) receiving metoprolol (mean daily dose, 155 mg in 2 divided doses). After treatment for 4 weeks, the mean blood pressures with nifedipine (149.7 +/- 16.6/88.7 +/- 11.1 mm of mercury) and metoprolol administration (163.9 +/- 23.3/94.2 +/- 10.2 mm of mercury) were significantly lower than with placebo (176.7 +/- 17.3/100.9 +/- 7.1 mm of mercury) (P less than .05). The mean systolic pressure during nifedipine treatment was 14.2 mm of mercury lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9 to 24.5 mm of mercury) and mean diastolic pressure 5.5 mm of mercury (95% CI, 0.3 to 10.7 mm of mercury) lower than with metoprolol therapy. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated, and intolerance requiring withdrawal was encountered in 3 of 45 (7%) patients receiving nifedipine, compared with 1 of 45 (2%) of those taking metoprolol and placebo, respectively. Adverse effects of nifedipine, most of which were transient, included palpitations, headache, facial flushing, and ankle edema. Long-acting nifedipine is a promising agent when given alone for mild to moderate hypertension and can be safely administered in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Long-acting nifedipine versus metoprolol as monotherapy for essential hypertension. A randomized, controlled crossover study. 240 30

Felodipine lowers blood pressure by reducing peripheral vascular resistance through a highly selective action on smooth muscle in arteriolar resistance vessels. The selective action may be considered a safeguard against untoward effects on cardiac contractility and conduction. Felodipine does not cause orthostatic hypotension since it has no effect in clinical doses on venous smooth muscle. Felodipine has a natriuretic/diuretic effect, which counteracts the salt and water retention that is often seen during treatment with other potent vasodilators. In clinical studies, felodipine has proved more effective than several established antihypertensive drugs. The combination of felodipine and a beta-adrenergic blocker appears to be a good alternative to standard triple treatment, and felodipine is often effective in patients with previously "refractory" hypertension. The antihypertensive effect of felodipine is dose related. In patients with moderate hypertension, a dose regimen of 5 mg twice a day is usually sufficient, and doses greater than 10 mg twice a day are not often required. Felodipine is generally well tolerated. The most common adverse effects are those expected from a potent arteriolar dilator: ankle swelling, headache, dizziness, flushing, etc. Adverse effects are usually transient or diminish in intensity with continued treatment. The overall frequency of adverse effects with felodipine appears to be similar to that for the established antihypertensive drugs, although the adverse effects differ. Felodipine is a potent arteriolar dilator with therapeutic advantages, especially for patients with moderate to severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Felodipine in hypertension--a review. 244 9


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>