Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The new calcium antagonist isradipine was compared with nifedipine retard in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study involving 159 patients with mild hypertension. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 6-week course of treatment with the possibility of dose doubling after 3 weeks, depending on blood pressure (BP) response (target diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg). Systolic and diastolic BPs were reduced by isradipine (mean dose of 3.6 mg daily) from 151/101 to 136/89 mm Hg, by nifedipine (mean dose of 50 mg daily) from 155/101 to 144/90 mm Hg, and by placebo from 155/101 to 154/99 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 64% with isradipine, 56% with nifedipine, and 16% with placebo. Adverse events consisted mainly of flushing, headache, edema, and dizziness. Altogether, 8 patients receiving isradipine experienced adverse events in comparison to 21 taking nifedipine and 4 taking placebo. The superior tolerability of isradipine was paralleled by a significant improvement in the subjective well-being of the patients as assessed by the von Zerssen questionnaire (List of Complaints). With nifedipine and placebo, no statistically significant improvement was observed.
 ...
PMID:Calcium antagonists as first-line antihypertensive agents: a placebo-controlled, comparative trial of isradipine and nifedipine. 169 8

Amlodipine, a basic dihydropyridine derivative, inhibits the calcium influx through 'slow' channels in peripheral vascular and coronary smooth muscle cells, thus producing marked vasodilation in peripheral and coronary vascular beds. Short to medium term clinical trials indicate that amlodipine is effective as both an antianginal agent in patients with stable angina pectoris and an antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In small comparative studies amlodipine was at least as effective as 'standard' agents, including atenolol, verapamil, hydrochlorothiazide or captopril in hypertension, and diltiazem or nadolol in angina pectoris. Amlodipine is well tolerated, and does not appear to cause some of the undesirable effects often associated with other cardiovascular agents (e.g. adverse changes in serum lipid patterns, cardiac conduction disturbances, postural hypotension). The most common adverse effects associated with amlodipine therapy--oedema and flushing--are related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, and are generally mild to moderate in severity. Thus, amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties that should be advantageous in many patients.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. 171 48

Nifedipine antagonises influx of calcium through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache, flushing and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.
 ...
PMID:Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders. 171 8

In this study of the efficacy and safety of isradipine as first-line therapy in hypertension, 1,647 patients enrolled; 1,472 completed the 4-week placebo run-in period and began treatment with isradipine at 2.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. During placebo, 11% (n = 175) of the 1,647 patients withdrew because of normalization of blood pressure, side effects, noncompliance, violation of the study protocol, side effects from concomitant therapy, or other reasons. During isradipine therapy (n = 1,376), blood pressure decreased from 168 +/- 18/102 +/- 8 mm Hg at the end of the placebo period to 155 +/- 17/94 +/- 9 mm Hg after 2 weeks (p less than 0.001) and 151 +/- 16/92 +/- 9 mm Hg after 4 weeks (p less than 0.001). During active treatment, 6.4% (n = 94) were withdrawn because of flushing, headache, edema, palpitations, gastrointestinal side effects, skin rashes, or other side effects, and two patients because of lack of efficacy. The side effect score in the remaining patients worsened for flushing, remained unchanged for edema, but significantly improved for palpitations, fatigue, dizziness, headache, and nervousness. After 4 weeks, 60% of patients had diastolic blood pressures of less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Thus, isradipine is effective and safe as first-line therapy in patients with primary hypertension as seen in general practice.
 ...
PMID:Calcium antagonists as first-line therapy in hypertension: results of the Swiss Isradipine Study. Swiss Hypertension Society. 172 Apr 76

The antihypertensive effect of nitrendipine was examined in 29 outpatients with a mild or moderate hypertension and type II diabetes or a dyslipidemic condition. The drug was administered for 90 days at a daily dose of 10 to 40 mg. Following a washout period, the blood pressure (measured by a Dinamap device) was 181/99 mm Hg supine and 172/104 mm Hg standing. Nitrendipine caused a reduction in both pressures and after 90 days their values were 148/74 and 143/80 mm Hg, respectively. Heart rate was not affected by the drug, which also caused no variation in blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In more than 20% of the cases, treatment was associated with headache and flushing, which did not necessitate discontinuation of treatment. Thus, nitrendipine is an effective antihypertensive agent and causes no untoward metabolic effects.
 ...
PMID:Nitrendipine efficacy and safety in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension. 172 54

In this study, we compared the effects of nitrendipine (20-40 mg daily) and enalapril (20-40 mg daily) in 44 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4-week placebo period, the patients entered a double-blind, crossover study of 16 weeks, divided by a second 4-week placebo period. Sitting and standing blood pressures (standard mercurymeter) were measured every 2 weeks. Ten patients dropped out, so 34 patients were evaluable. Two patients dropped out because of surgery, one patient was withdrawn because of accelerating hypertension, and seven patients discontinued because of side effects (two on placebo, four on enalapril, and one on nitrendipine). Sitting blood pressures decreased from 172 +/- 3/107 +/- 1 to 159 +/- 3/94 +/- 1 mm Hg on nitrendipine (p less than 0.001) and to 157 +/- 4/96 +/- 2 mm Hg on enalapril (p less than 0.001). The heart rate did not change. Both compounds had no significant effect on serum lipids and on renal function. With regard to side effects, flushing occurred in 10 patients on nitrendipine and in 3 on enalapril (p less than 0.05); cough was noted in 3 patients on enalapril. When using a diastolic pressure less than 95 mm Hg as a response, 72% responded on nitrendipine and 64% on enalapril (n.s.). In conclusion, nitrendipine and enalapril, given as monotherapy, were equally effective antihypertensive agents in this group of patients with uncomplicated, moderate, essential hypertension. The use of either of the tested agents seems to be more limited by its specific side effects than the lack of antihypertensive efficacy.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of the effects of nitrendipine and enalapril in essential hypertension. 172 60

Pheochromocytomas may produce several vasoactive peptides. We studied a 39-year-old man who presented with paroxysmal flushing and abdominal pain with normal blood pressure. Laboratory and radiologic studies established the diagnosis of right adrenal pheochromocytoma, and histologic and ultrastructural examination showed the tumor to be a typical pheochromocytoma. Tissue culture yielded large quantities of norepinephrine and epinephrine. However, immunohistochemical studies, tissue assays, and in vitro cultures documented production of several peptides, including calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in tumor cells. The patient has been asymptomatic after tumor resection. Production of multiple peptides by this tumor may account for the flushing and lack of hypertension, despite elevated catecholamine levels in this patient.
 ...
PMID:Pheochromocytoma producing multiple vasoactive peptides. 173 41

Felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist, significantly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris or congestive heart failure (CHF). In hypertensive patients, felodipine does not appear to significantly affect glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, glucose tolerance, or plasma lipoprotein concentrations. Studies comparing felodipine with other agents as monotherapy in mild to moderate hypertension have demonstrated felodipine to be at least as efficacious as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and HCTZ plus amiloride hydrochloride in combination. Comparisons of felodipine with other agents as adjuncts to beta-blocker or diuretic therapy have shown felodipine to be at least as effective as HCTZ, propranolol hydrochloride, prazosin hydrochloride, and nifedipine. Evaluations of patients with chronic stable angina are limited, and additional studies are needed before felodipine can be recommended for the routine management of angina pectoris. Similarly, additional studies are essential to delineate the role of felodipine, if any, in the management of CHF. In the management of hypertension, felodipine 5-40 mg/d significantly reduces systolic and diastolic BP. Although some patients may be controlled throughout the entire dosing interval when felodipine is administered bid, many patients will require more frequent dosing to obtain adequate BP control. Adverse effects associated with felodipine are similar to those of other dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonists and include peripheral edema, headache, dizziness, flushing, and fatigue. A potentially clinically important drug interaction was observed when felodipine was administered concomitantly with theophylline aminopropanol; significant decreases in theophylline concentrations were noted. In summary, felodipine appears to be safe and effective for the management of hypertension when used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. The efficacy of felodipine in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris and CHF requires further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Felodipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist. 176 37

Isradipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a high degree of selectivity for the coronary, cerebral, and skeletal muscle vasculature. The drug has minimal depressant activity on sinoatrial node automaticity and negligible negative chronotropic, dromotropic, and inotropic actions. Isradipine reduces blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance without changes in cardiac output and stroke volume. Renal blood flow is maintained while renal vascular resistance is reduced; this is accompanied by both short- and long-term diuretic and natriuretic effects. Doses of 1.25 to 5 mg twice daily lowers blood pressure effectively over 24 h. In open as well as placebo-controlled trials, 2.5 to 10 mg isradipine twice daily was safe and well tolerated, and reduced systolic and diastolic values in up to 85% of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Efficacy is similar to those of nifedipine and nitrendipine, and potentially superior to those of propranolol, atenolol, prazosin, hydrochlorothiazide, and diltiazem. The drug can be safely combined with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and diuretics. Adverse effects are dose-dependent and secondary to arterial vasodilatation, such as headache, flushing, ankle edema, dizziness, palpitations, and tachycardia. At the recommended dose of 2.5 mg twice daily, the total incidence of side effects does not differ from that with placebo. The antiatherosclerotic, antitrophic, and cerebroprotective effects seen in experimental animal models are promising for the drug in the treatment of human hypertension. Isradipine may not only reduce blood pressure, but may also reduce the risk for the consequences of this peril, namely, cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:The place of isradipine in the treatment of hypertension. 182 26

This study compared the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of open treatment with the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists amlodipine and nitrendipine in mild-to-moderate hypertension. Interim analysis of data from 74 patients (43 male, 31 female) showed that amlodipine normalized diastolic blood pressure (less than or equal to 90 mmHg) in 95% of patients compared with 83% of nitrendipine-treated patients. Nitrendipine produced a statistically significant increase in heart rate at 2 and 4 weeks of therapy but there was no significant change in heart rate in amlodipine-treated patients. Amlodipine-treated patients reported fewer adverse events (26%) than did the nitrendipine-treated group (47%), with two patients from the nitrendipine group discontinuing treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events in the amlodipine-treated group were mild to moderate. The incidence of flushing was higher in nitrendipine-treated patients (25%) than in amlodipine-treated patients (10%). This relative difference in the incidence of vasodilator-related side effects is probably explained by the gradual onset of effect with amlodipine.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine compared to nitrendipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. 183 37


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>