Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
 6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To investigate the influence of the mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) genotype on the clinical features of diabetes, 212 Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (154 males and 58 females aged 17-83 years; mean age 58.2 years) were investigated. Genotyping of ALDH2 was performed by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The pattern of inheritance of diabetes and various clinical parameters was compared between active and inactive ALDH2 groups. Of the 212 subjects, 120 had active ALDH2 and 92 had inactive ALDH2. The percentage of patients with a diabetic mother was higher in the inactive ALDH2 group (32.6%) than in the active ALDH2 group (19.2%) (p < 0.05). The prevalence of proliferative retinopathy was lower in the inactive ALDH2 group than in the active ALDH2 group (p < 0.05). However, other clinical parameters showed no difference. We conclude that maternal inheritance of diabetes was common in the inactive ALDH2 group. The finding is suggestive of a relationship between alcohol intolerance and inheritance of diabetes. We speculate that the interaction between mitochondrial DNA and ALDH2 inactivity causes an increase of mitochondrial DNA mutations or deletions, thereby inducing the maternal inheritance of diabetes. The relationship of the ALDH2 genotype with proliferative retinopathy is interesting, because it resembles that of chlorpropamide alcohol flushing with severe diabetic retinopathy. The interaction of aldehyde dehydrogenase isoenzymes might have an aetiological role, since aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 plays an important part in oxidation of retinal to retinoic acid. However, the number of affected patients with proliferative retinopathy was small, hence, our result should be considered as a preliminary finding.
 ...
PMID:Association of aldehyde dehydrogenase with inheritance of NIDDM. 887 97

Usual risk factors for coronary artery disease account for only 25-50% of increased atherosclerotic risk in diabetes mellitus. Other obvious risk factors are hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. However, hyperglycemia is a very late stage in the sequence of events from insulin resistance to frank diabetes, whereas lipoprotein abnormalities are manifested during the largely asymptomatic diabetic prodrome and contribute substantially to the increased risk of macrovascular disease. The insulin-resistant diabetes course affects virtually all lipids and lipoproteins. Chylomicron and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants accumulate, and triglycerides enrich high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), leading to high levels of potentially atherogenic particles and low levels of HDL cholesterol. Hyperglycemia eventually impairs removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, the accumulation of which accentuates hypertriglyceridemia. As triglycerides increase-still within the so-called normal range-abnormalities in HDL and LDL became more apparent. Thus, when triglycerides are >200 mg/dL, LDL particles are small and dense (when they are <90 mg/dL, the particles are of the large, buoyant variety). The atherogenicity of small, dense LDL particles is attributed to their increased susceptibility to oxidation, but in many patients they may be a marker for insulin resistance or the presence of atherogenic VLDL. Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with atherosclerosis because (1) it is a marker for insulin resistance and atherogenic metabolic abnormalities; and (2) the small size of triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins enables them to infiltrate the blood vessel wall where they are oxidized, bind to receptors on macrophages, and ingested, leading to the development of the atherosclerotic lesion. Various studies (primary prevention with gemfibrozil: Helsinki Heart Study; secondary prevention with simvastatin and pravastatin: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study [4S] and Cholesterol and Recurrent Events [CARE], respectively) have demonstrated that lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes is effective in decreasing the number of cardiac events. Risk reduction was 22% to 50% (statins) and approximately 65% (fibrate) relative to placebo. It was also noted (in 4S and CARE) that the risk of major coronary events in untreated diabetic patients was 1.5-1.7-fold greater than in untreated nondiabetic patients. Although gemfibrozil (fibric acid derivative) is more effective in decreasing triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol in diabetic patients than the statins, it does not change and may even increase LDL-cholesterol levels (fenofibrate may be an exception, decreasing LDL cholesterol by 20-25% in some studies). However, gemfibrozil does increase LDL particle size. Nevertheless, the statins are the current lipid-lowering drugs of choice because the change in LDL-cholesterol-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio is better than with gemfibrozil. Moreover, the diabetic patient may be more likely to benefit from statin therapy than the nondiabetic patient. It should be noted that, in theory, nicotinic acid can correct or improve all lipid or lipoprotein abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, it is relatively contraindicated because it causes insulin resistance and may precipitate or aggravate hyperglycemia (in addition to its other well-known side effects such as flushing, gastric irritation, development of hepatotoxicity, and hyperuricemia). It is unknown at present whether newer formulations such as once-daily Niaspan may be better tolerated in diabetes. In any case, most patients with type 2 diabetes have risk factors for coronary artery disease and qualify for aggressive LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy. At the same time, it is presently unknown whether improved glycemic control decreases coronary artery disease risk in such patients.
 ...
PMID:Diabetic dyslipidemia. 991 65

The sulphonylurea drugs have been the mainstay of oral treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus since they were introduced. In general, they are well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects, although there are some differences between the drugs in the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Over the years, the drugs causing the most problems with hypoglycaemia have been chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), although this is a potential problem with all sulphonylureas because of their action on the pancreatic beta cell, stimulating insulin release. Other specific problems have been reported with chlorpropamide that occur only rarely, if at all, with other sulphonylureas. Hyponatraemia secondary to inappropriate antidiuretic hormone activity, and increased flushing following the ingestion of alcohol, have been well described. The progressive beta cell failure with time results in eventual loss of efficacy, as these agents depend on a functioning beta cell and are ineffective in the absence of insulin-producing capacity. Differences in this secondary failure rate have been reported, with chlorpropamide and gliclazide having lower failure rates than glibenclamide or glipizide. The reasons for this are unclear, but the more abnormal pattern of insulin release produced by glibenclamide may be partly responsible and, indeed, may explain the increased risk of hypoglycaemia with this agent. Previously reported increased mortality associated with tolbutamide therapy has not been substantiated, and more recent data have shown no increased mortality from sulphonylurea treatment. Indeed, benefit from glycaemic control, regardless of the agent used--insulin or sulphonylurea--was reported by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Nevertheless, there is still ongoing controversy in view of the experimental evidence, mainly from animal studies, of potential adverse effects on the heart from sulphonylureas, but these are difficult to extrapolate into clinical situations. Most of these studies have been carried out with glibenclamide, which makes comparison of possible risk difficult. Other cardiovascular risk factors may be modified by gliclazide, which seems unique among the sulphonylureas in this respect. Its reported haemobiological and free radical scavenging activity probably resides in the azabicyclo-octyl ring structure in the side chain. Reduced progression or improvement in retinopathy has been reported in comparative trials with other sulphonylureas, and the effect is unrelated to improvements in glycaemia. There are differences between the sulphonylureas in some adverse effects, risk of hypoglycaemia, failure rates and actions on vascular risk factors. As a group of drugs, they are very well tolerated, but differences in overall tolerability can be identified.
 ...
PMID:Comparative tolerability of sulphonylureas in diabetes mellitus. 1078 25

Impotence, a common problem especially among older men, can now be treated with Viagra, This oral pill, unlike previous approved treatments mostly involving local injections, does not directly cause penile erection, but increases response to sexual stimulation. It acts by enhancing the relaxant effects of nitric acid on smooth muscle, and thus increases blood flow to certain areas of the penis, leading to erection. It has been evaluated in many randomized trials and in all was more successful in inducing erection than placebos. The most common side-effects include headache, flushing and indigestion, but there have also been reports of fatalities. We describe a 75-year-old man who had an acute myocardial infraction in the past and who had maturity-onset diabetes and hypertension. In the week prior to admission he had a cardiac scan following a few weeks of exacerbation of anginal pain for which he had been taking nitrites. He took a Viagra pill without prescription or medical advice and 2 hours later, during intercourse with his wife, developed audible respiratory distress and lost consciousness. His wife started cardiac massage but not mouth-to-mouth breathing. The emergency team found ventricular fibrillation and gave 5 electrical shocks and amines and atropine. He remained unconscious, but his pulse returned and he was hospitalized. He then had several generalized convulsions treated with i.v. valium. 20 minutes after admission there was asystole and all attempts at resuscitation failed. Cardiovascular status must be considered prior to prescribing Viagra, and the associated risk evaluated.
 ...
PMID:[Viagra--the first oral treatment for impotence that is not lacking in fatal effects]. 1090 27

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neoplasms originate from any of the various cell types belonging to the neuroendocrine system. A general characteristic of GEP endocrine tumours is that the vast majority produce and secrete a multitude of peptide hormones and amines. Many patients with malignant metastasising tumours present clinical symptoms related to hormone hyperproduction. These include the so-called carcinoid syndrome, characterised by flushing, diarrhoea, wheezing and right heart disease, which is predominantly associated with the serotonin- and tachykinins-producing carcinoids of the midgut. Several types of syndrome associated with GEP endocrine tumors are caused by overproduction of a specific hormone. For instance, the well-known Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is gastrin-mediated. The so-called 'insulinoma syndrome' depends on excessive production of insulin and proinsulin, resulting in hypoglycemia. The 'glucagonoma syndrome' is characterised by necrolytic migratory erythema, diabetes and diarrhoea. The Verner-Morrison syndrome, which is brought about by high circulating levels of vasointestinal peptide (VIP). produces severe secretory diarrhoea. Finally the 'somatostatinoma syndrome' involves gallbladder dysfunction and gallstones, diarrhoea with or without steatorrhea, and impaired glucose tolerance. The biochemical diagnosis of endocrine digestive tumors is based on general and specific markers. The best general markers are chromogranin A (CgA) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP). Specific markers for endocrine tumors include insulin, gastrin, glucagon, vaso intestinal polypeptide (VIP), somatostatin and the primary cathabolic product of serotonin, 5-hydroxyndoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). Localisation procedures commonly applied, in the diagnosis of endocrine tumours include ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS).
 ...
PMID:Epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours. 1176 60

Vardenafil selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), an enzyme which hydrolyses cyclic guanosine monophosphate in the cavernosum tissue of the penis. Inhibition of PDE5 results in increased arterial blood flow leading to enlargement of the corpus cavernosum. Because of the increased tumescence, veins are compressed between the corpus cavernosum and the tunica albuginea, resulting in an erection. Vardenafil has a high bioavailabilty and is rapidly absorbed. An erection of >60% rigidity was maintained for approximately twice as long following visual stimulation in patients treated with vardenafil 10 or 20mg than in recipients of placebo. In a large, placebo-controlled trial in patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction (ED), vardenafil 5, 10 or 20mg taken as needed over a 12-week period significantly improved the scores in questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The rate of successful attempts at intercourse with ejaculation was also significantly higher with vardenafil (71 to 75%) than in the placebo group (39.5%), and significantly more patients treated with vardenafil than placebo responded 'yes' to a Global Assessment Question (GAQ) asking if treatment had improved erections. In a 26-week trial in 736 men with ED of varied aetiologies and severity patients receiving vardenafil 5, 10 or 20mg experienced significantly improved erections with 85% of vardenafil 20mg recipients reporting improved erectile function (assessed using the GAQ) compared with 28% of placebo recipients. Treatment with vardenafil also significantly improved scores in response to questions 3 and 4 of the IIEF compared with placebo. A 12-week trial in 452 men with ED associated with diabetes mellitus demonstrated that treatment with vardenafil 20mg compared with placebo significantly improved IIEF erectile function domain scores and the rate of positive responders to the erectile improvement GAQ. Similar results were reported in a placebo-controlled trial of vardenafil 10 to 20mg involving 440 patients with ED after radical prostatectomy. Adverse events associated with vardenafil were those commonly associated with PDE5 inhibitors: headache, flushing, dyspepsia and rhinitis. These were mostly dose-dependent and mild to moderate in intensity.
 ...
PMID:Vardenafil. 1202 79

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in chronic renal failure in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral sildenafil (50 mg) administered as required in HD patients with ED was designed. Patients on HD for at least 6 mo and who had a stable relationship with a female sexual partner were included. Patients older than 70 yr with penile anatomic abnormalities, cirrhosis, diabetes, angina, severe anemia, and those who were on nitrate treatment or with a recent history of stroke or myocardial infarction were not included. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) was employed to evaluate ED and treatment response. Forty-one patients were evaluated (21 received placebo, and 20 sildenafil). Baseline clinical and demographic parameters were similar in both groups. Sildenafil was associated with improvement in the score of all questions and domains of the IIEF, except those related to sexual desire. Using the erectile function domain to evaluate primary efficacy, improvement was observed in 85% of the sildenafil patients compared with 9.5% of placebo patients. Sildenafil use resulted in normal EF scores in 35% of sildenafil patients. Sildenafil was well tolerated. Headaches and flushing occurred in both groups. Dyspepsia was reported by two patients in the sildenafil group. In conclusion, oral sildenafil seems to be an effective and safe treatment for ED in selected patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of oral sildenafil in hemodialysis patients with erectile dysfunction. 1239 48

The efficacy and safety profiles of various forms of niacin for treating dyslipidemia are described. Niacin is well recognized for treating dyslipidemia in adults and has been shown to be effective in reducing coronary events. It has a broad range of effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins, including lowering total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Niacin is the most effective lipid-modifying drug for raising high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and has been shown to lower Lp(a) lipoprotein. Niacin reduces triglycerides and very-low-density-lipoprotein and LDL cholesterol synthesis, primarily by decreasing fatty acid mobilization from adipose tissue. Niacin appears to raise HDL cholesterol by reducing hepatic apolipoprotein A-l clearance and enhancing reverse cholesterol transport. Niacin is metabolized through a conjugation or nicotinamide pathway. Standard immediate-release niacin is metabolized primarily through the conjugation pathway, which results in a high frequency of flushing. Long-acting niacin is metabolized through the nicotinamide pathway, which results in less flushing but increases the risk of hepatotoxicity. Extended-release niacin has a more balanced metabolism and causes fewer of both types of adverse effects. Improved serum lipid levels during niacin therapy have been associated with clinical and angiographic evidence of reduced coronary artery disease, especially when combined with statins. Niacin is particularly useful for managing high triglyceride and low HDL cholesterol levels as well as the lipid abnormalities associated with metabolic syndrome, including those commonly encountered in patients with diabetes. Several niacin products are available with significant differences in their safety and efficacy profiles. Health care providers must consider the differences between agents when recommending niacin for dyslipidemia treatment.
 ...
PMID:Niacin for dyslipidemia: considerations in product selection. 1278 70

We report a potential pitfall of 123I-metaiodobenzylguanine (MIBG) scan. Magnetic resonance imaging performed for other reasons, showed 2.5 cm tumor in the left adrenal gland. On questioning patient had episodic palpitations, flushing and hypertension suggestive of pheochromocytoma. Urinary metanephrine level was of borderline value but serum chromogranin A level was clearly elevated. 123I-MIBG scan showed accumulation of the tracer in the upper left abdomen and the finding was suspected to be intra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. During operation two separate tumors, adrenocortical adenoma in the left adrenal gland, and another smaller, extra-adrenal paraganglioma locating very close to the adenoma, were found. Thus the positive MIBG finding was caused by a paraganglioma with the concurrent presentation of nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenoma.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2003 Aug
PMID:A pitfall of metaiodobenzylguanidine scan: paraganglioma in close proximity to adrenocortical adenoma. 1295 37

Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) is the prefered mode of therapy in pemphigus in India because it is relatively free from the side effects seen with heavy doses of daily oral steroids. One hundred forty-six pemphigus patients treated with DCP were observed for side effects of this regimen. One hundred forty mg of dexamethasone was administered IV in 200 ml of 5% dextrose over a period of 60-90 minutes on 3 consecutive days. Five hundred mg of cyclophosphamide was added on first day of the pulse and 50 mg given orally daily in the intervening period. DCP was repeated every 4 weeks and continued for 6 months after subsidence of the disease (no new lesions). Flushing over the face was the most common event recorded during the adiministration in 78 subjects followed by palpitations in 11, hiccups in 9, and numbness of feet in 6. Fourteen patients had polyurea, and 3 developed skin rash. Shivering, shooting pains along thighs, breathlessness, seizure and unilateral limb edema were observed in one patient each. Generalized weakness/malaise was the most troublesome delayed side effect in 81 (55.4%) patients; it lasted for 8-15 days after the pulse. Thirty-six (24.6%) had inadequate sleep syndrome, 23 (15.7%) had headache, 21 (14.3%) complained of arthralgias, 19 (13%) experienced alteration in taste, and 13 (9%) had diffuse hair loss. 28 females developed menstrual disturbances, and 14 (9.5%) had blurring of vision (glaucoma in 3 and posterior subcapsular cataract in 1). Thirteen of eighteen diabetics had an increase in blood sugar requiring higher doses of insulin. Five NIDDM patients needed insulin. Four (2.7%) developed hypertension. Pulse therapy is not absolutely free from side effects. Hypertension and diabetes occur less frequently as compared to conventional steroid therapy. Generalized weakness, flushing, headache and taste alteration occur exclusively with pulse therapy.
 ...
PMID:Immediate and delayed complications of dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy. 1468 52


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>