Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: UMLS:C0016382 (flushing)
6,387 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Increasing recognition of the importance of calcium in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease has stimulated research into the use of calcium channel blocking agents for treatment of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. The favorable efficacy and tolerability profiles of these agents make them attractive therapeutic modalities. Clinical applications of calcium channel blockers parallel their tissue selectivity. In contrast to verapamil and diltiazem, which are roughly equipotent in their actions on the heart and vascular smooth muscle, the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are a group of potent peripheral vasodilator agents that exert minimal electrophysiologic effects on cardiac nodal or conduction tissue. As the first dihydropyridine available for use in the United States, nifedipine controls angina and hypertension with minimal depression of cardiac function. Additional members of this group of calcium channel blockers have been studied for a variety of indications for which they may offer advantages over current therapy. Once or twice daily dosage possible with nitrendipine and nisoldipine offers a convenient administration schedule, which encourages patient compliance in long-term therapy of hypertension. The coronary vasodilating properties of nisoldipine have led to the investigation of this agent for use in angina. Selectivity for the cerebrovascular bed makes nimodipine potentially useful in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage, migraine headache, dementia, and stroke. In general, the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are usually well tolerated, with headache, facial flushing, palpitations, edema, nausea, anorexia, and dizziness being the more common adverse effects.
...
PMID:Differential effects of 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: therapeutic implications. 332 59

Lipid abnormalities are seen frequently in renal transplant patients. Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the lipid-lowering drugs, nicotinic acid (short acting) and lovastatin, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Twelve renal transplant patients who had persistent hyperlipidemia despite 6 weeks of dietary treatment participated in this prospective, randomized, open-labeled crossover trial. At 16 weeks, when compared with control values, nicotinic acid (> or = 1.5 g twice a day) significantly reduced the total cholesterol (from 312 +/- 18 [+/- SEM] mg/dL to 229 +/- 19 mg/dL; P = 0.03) and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 218 +/- 15 mg/dL to 142 +/- 13 mg/dL; P = 0.03) and significantly increased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 44 +/- 3 mg/dL to 58 +/- 5 mg/dL; P = 0.03). The triglyceride level was reduced from 255 +/- 40 mg/dL to 150 +/- 23 mg/dL (P = 0.09). At 16 weeks, lovastatin therapy (40 mg/d) significantly reduced the total cholesterol (from 285 +/- 13 mg/dL to 233 +/- 10 mg/dL; P = 0.005) and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 201 +/- 11 mg/dL to 147 +/- 7 mg/dL; P = 0.001). There were no significant changes in the triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Although flushing developed in 67% of patients treated with nicotinic acid, this was not a reason for any of the study dropouts. During this short-term study period no adverse biochemical effects were noted with either of the drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Effects of nicotinic acid and lovastatin in renal transplant patients: a prospective, randomized, open-labeled crossover trial. 770 60

Nicotinic acid and derivatives are effective in numerous forms of hyperlipoproteinemia. Its primary mode of action is to inhibit lipolysis in adipose tissue and to prevent the utilization of free fatty acids for TG-rich lipoprotein synthesis in the liver. Consequently, it decreases the plasma lipoproteins which are considered to be atherogenic--VLDL, LDL and Lp(a), while it increases the antiatherogenic lipoprotein--HDL. A gradual administration of nicotinic acid or derivatives is useful to reduce the side effects such as flushing and itching. In the secondary prevention trials, nicotinic acid therapy with other hypolipidemic drugs asserted protective effects on the development/progression of cardiovascular disease.
...
PMID:[Nicotinic acid and derivatives for therapy of hyperlipoproteinemia]. 785 25

A total of 4676 patients and 1759 patients were treated with lisinopril and nifedipine respectively in a post-marketing surveillance study conducted in general practice in the UK. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Most of the lisinopril patients had hypertension, but a small number (180) had heart failure. Most of the nifedipine patients had uncomplicated hypertension, but some (22.57%) had other cardiovascular disease with or without hypertension. Lisinopril and nifedipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. During the study, 1.5% of hypertensive patients assigned to lisinopril died compared with 1.8% of patients assigned to nifedipine, and 15.1% of lisinopril patients compared with 19.7% of patients in the nifedipine group withdrew because of adverse events. Cough, malaise and fatigue, nausea and vomiting were more frequent causes of withdrawal from lisinopril than nifedipine. Conversely, headaches, pallor and flushing, oedema and palpitations caused more frequent withdrawals from nifedipine. Anaemia was more often encountered on nifedipine treatment than on lisinopril. In hypertensive patients, the frequency of first-dose hypotension was similar on both treatments. Serious events occurred in 0.8% and 0.5% of patients given lisinopril and nifedipine respectively. Lisinopril was well tolerated by heart failure patients: 16 patients (8.88%) died and an incidence of 4.44% of serious adverse events was reported, a pattern to be anticipated in such patients; dizziness, giddiness, dyspnoea, cough, nausea and vomiting were the most frequent causes of withdrawal; the incidence of first-dose hypotension was low (2.22%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Post-marketing surveillance of lisinopril in general practice in the UK. 811 50

The antiaggregation and hemodynamic effects of the new prostacyclin analogue beraprost sodium were investigated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of Latin-square design. Twelve healthy Caucasian males randomly received 8-day oral treatments of 20, 40, and 60 micrograms of beraprost sodium and a placebo. One-week washout periods followed each treatment. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were performed on days 1 and 8 for each period of treatment. All three doses of beraprost sodium significantly inhibited platelet aggregation on day 8 (compared with placebo) during the 1st h after drug intake. Incubation of the 60-micrograms beraprost sodium samples with ADP (2, 5, and 10 microM) and collagen (1.25 micrograms/mL) decreased platelet aggregation by 10, 19, 16, and 6 +/- 4% (mean +/- SE), respectively, compared with placebo. No significant hemodynamic effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and digital pulse were observed. The 60-micrograms dose of beraprost sodium did significantly decrease the IRZ index (which may reflect the left ventricular pre-ejection period) on days 1 and 8. Some subjects experienced headache and facial flushing, effects that were dose dependent and reversible. Beraprost sodium at 20- to 60-micrograms doses exerts platelet antiaggregation (day 8 of therapy) and slight hemodynamic (days 1 and 8 of treatment) effects in Caucasian males. Beraprost sodium hemodynamic effects and potential benefits in patients with cardiovascular disease should be explored further.
...
PMID:Platelet-aggregation inhibition and hemodynamic effects of beraprost sodium, a new oral prostacyclin derivative: a study in healthy male subjects. 896 Mar 77

Immediate-release niacin manifests beneficial effects in cardiovascular disease with respect to dyslipidemic states. It lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), and apoprotein B; at the same time, it increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, HDL2, and apoprotein A-I. However, use of crystalline niacin has drawbacks: therapy requires multidose regimens, and side effects include flushing and pruritus. Slowing absorption with sustained-release formulations succeeds in decreasing flushing and increasing tolerance, but increases in hepatic enzyme levels have raised safety concerns. A new extended-release, once-daily formulation of niacin (Niaspan) shows promise in minimizing flushing while avoiding hepatotoxicity. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of Niaspan enrolled 122 patients with confirmed diagnosis of primary dyslipidemia (LDL cholesterol >4.14 mmol/L [160 mg/dL] and triglycerides <9 mmol/L [800 mg/dL]) into 3 treatment groups: (1) Niaspan 1,000 mg/day; (2) Niaspan 2,000 mg/day; and (3) placebo. The primary treatment endpoint was LDL-cholesterol level. This endpoint was not significantly affected by placebo (0.2% increase), but Niaspan decreased LDL cholesterol by 5.8% (1,000 mg/day) and 14.6% (2,000 mg/day) (p <0.001). Likewise, with placebo there were significant changes in total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), and apoprotein B, whereas both Niaspan 1,000 and 2,000 mg/day significantly (p <0.001) decreased these parameters. In addition, both Niaspan groups showed significant (p <0.001) increases in HDL cholesterol (17% and 23%, respectively), including HDL subfractions. With respect to flushing, 20% of the placebo group reported at least 1 episode, whereas 88% and 83% of the Niaspon 1,000- and 2,000-mg/day groups, respectively, reported episodes. There was no hepatotoxicity as liver enzyme levels remained within clinically accepted limits in all treatment groups. However, Niaspan 2,000 mg/day showed a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase compared with baseline and placebo. This trial demonstrated a cholesterol-modifying effect of Niaspan consistent with those reported for niacin, but demonstrated a better tolerance for flushing. Moreover, in contrast to sustained-release formulations, Niaspan showed relatively mild hepatic effects.
...
PMID:A new extended-release niacin (Niaspan): efficacy, tolerability, and safety in hypercholesterolemic patients. 991 60

Erectile dysfunction is a common condition in men with cardiovascular disease, probably as a result of shared factors that impair hemodynamic mechanisms in the penile and ischemic vasculature. Sildenafil citrate, an orally active, selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety profiles in men with erectile dysfunction of various etiologies. Sildenafil administration is contraindicated in patients who are taking nitrates or nitric oxide donors. This retrospective subanalysis of data from double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessed the efficacy (9 studies) and safety (11 studies) of sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease who were not taking nitrates. Of 3,672 patients randomized to receive sildenafil (5-200 mg) or placebo for 4-24 weeks in 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 357 (10%) reported a history (past or present) of ischemic heart disease and were not taking nitrates. Efficacy was assessed using end-of-treatment responses to Question 3 (ability to achieve an erection) and Question 4 (ability to maintain an erection) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), scores for the 5 domains of male sexual function assessed by the IIEF (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction), and responses to a global efficacy question ("Did the treatment improve your erections?"). The responses to the 2 IIEF questions were graded on a scale of 1 (almost never or never) to 5 (almost always or always), with a score of 0 indicating no attempt at sexual intercourse. At the end of treatment, the mean scores for Question 3 and Question 4 of the IIEF for patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease were significantly higher for the sildenafil group than for the placebo group (p <0.0001). Mean end-of-treatment scores for the IIEF domains also demonstrated significant increases for sildenafil-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (p <0.05). At the end of treatment, improved erections were reported by 70% of patients who received sildenafil and by 20% of those in the placebo group p <0.0001). For the sildenafil group, the incidences of the most common adverse events (headache 25%, flushing 14%, and dyspepsia 12%) for patients with ischemic heart disease were similar to those in patients without this concomitant illness (21%, 15%, and 10%, respectively). Moreover, the overall incidence of cardiovascular adverse events other than flushing was comparable in patients with and without ischemic heart disease for both treatment groups. Since there is a degree of cardiac risk associated with sexual activity, clinicians should consider the patient's cardiovascular status before initiating any treatment for erectile dysfunction. Physicians should be aware that patients with underlying cardiovascular disease could be adversely affected by the vasodilator effects of sildenafil, especially in combination with sexual activity. The results of the present subanalysis indicate that oral sildenafil significantly improves erectile function and is well tolerated in patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease who are not taking nitrate therapy.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with ischemic heart disease. 1007 40

Hypertension (HTN) is a significant problem in pediatric renal transplant (TP) recipients, predisposing the individuals to the development of cardiovascular disease and graft dysfunction. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are considered excellent agents to treat post-TP HTN. We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of the two most commonly prescribed CCBs in our pediatric renal TP population: nifedipine (Procardia, or P) and amlodipine (Norvasc, or N). All patients (n = 24) had been started on a CCB for systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) > 95%. There were no other changes in adjunctive antihypertensive medications or doses during the cross-over period. Post-TP, pretreatment (pretx) SBP was 137.6 +/- 10.9 mmHg. The post-treatment SBP were (in mmHg): 128.5 +/- 11.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.009 vs. pretx); 126.4 +/- 10.0 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.007 vs. pretx); 132.8 +/- 14.4 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.331, NS vs. pretx). The post-TP, pretreatment DBP was 88.2 +/- 11.1 mmHg. The post-treatment DBP were (in mmHg): 78.5 +/- 6.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.03 vs. pretx); 77.2 +/- 7.4 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.008 vs. pretx); 80.7 +/- 6.1 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.063, NS vs. pretx). P and N were equally effective in reducing SBP (p = 0.843, NS) and DBP (p = 0.612, NS). Cyclosporin A (CyA) dose (p = 0.81) and trough levels (p = 0.19) were similar in P- and N-treated patients. Calculated GFR was virtually identical in P- and N-treated patients (p = 0.89). Patients (or parents of) reported a higher incidence of various side-effects while receiving P, including headache, flushing, dizziness and leg cramps. Furthermore, 22/24 (91.7%) reported some degree of gingival hyperplasia during treatment with P, and all these patients reported a stabilization or reduction of hypertrophy after the switch from P to N. We conclude that CCBs (N) are efficacious drugs for the purpose of BP control and renal protection in pediatric renal TP recipients.
...
PMID:Use of calcium-channel blockers in pediatric renal transplant recipients. 1056 73

Men with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are more likely to have erectile dysfunction (ED) than the general population, as both conditions share risk factors and some drugs used to treat CVD may induce ED as a side-effect. This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate for the treatment of ED in men with CVD who were receiving treatment with beta-blockers and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or calcium-channel blockers, but not nitrates. Treatment with sildenafil was associated with significant increases in the mean end-of-treatment scores for the questions from the International Index of Erectile Function that assess the ability to achieve and maintain erections (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, 71% of patients taking sildenafil reported improved erections compared with 24% taking placebo (p = 0.0001). This study also showed that sildenafil was well tolerated in patients with CVD and ED. Besides flushing, no treatment-related cardiovascular adverse events were noted for sildenafil.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with cardiovascular disease. 1135 70

Erectile dysfunction (ED) in men is amenable to correction with Viagra in a majority of patients. The accumulated experience of prescribing Viagra across the broad continuum of men suffering from ED is sufficient for a meaningful assessment of the safety of Viagra in clinical practice. The use of Viagra necessitates caution in cardiac failure and when used within six months of acute myocardial infarction and stroke. It is inadvisable in patients with unstable angina pectoris. The co-administration of Viagra with organic nitrates, for example, glyceryl trinitrate or isosorbide dinitrate, is unsafe. The relative contraindications to Viagra in cardiovascular disease are uncontrolled hypertension and impaired cardiac reserve. With respect to interactions with other drugs, the potential influence on the metabolism of Viagra by medications that affect the cytochrome-P-450 system does not translate into clinical effects. The vasodilatory properties of sildenafil citrate are largely responsible for unwanted effects. The most common side effects are headache, flushing (due to vasodilation), and dyspepsia (due to relaxation of the smooth muscle of the gastroesophageal sphincter with reflux). In the recommended single-dose range (25-100 mg), the use of Viagra for erectile dysfunction, in the absence of contraindications, is extremely safe provided the drug is taken under proper conditions.
...
PMID:The clinical safety of viagra. 1207 89


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>

---