Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0016053 (fibromyalgia)
 4,687 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

(1) Several classes of antidepressants are available. The main difference between these classes is in their short-term pharmacological effects, leading to different patterns of adverse effects. Some antidepressants, especially tricyclics, have positive risk-benefit balances in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. (2) Duloxetine, a compound chemically related to fluoxetine, appears to have a short-term mechanism of action similar to that of venlafaxine. In the European Union, duloxetine was first approved for female urinary stress incontinence. Another brand of duloxetine has since been marketed for depression and neuropathic pain in diabetic patients. (3) Duloxetine at a dose of 60 mg once a day showed moderate efficacy in 2 placebo-controlled trials. At this dose, however, there are no other comparative trials. It is therefore not possible to know whether duloxetine is as effective as other antidepressants. (4) Two placebo-controlled trials involving patients with pain due to diabetic neuropathy concluded that a dose of 60 mg/day had efficacy, although of doubtful clinical relevance. In the absence of comparative trials, however, we do not know if this efficacy is even equivalent to that of a tricyclic antidepressant used as an analgesic. (5) In fibromyalgia, a controversial clinical diagnosis, two double-blind placebo-controlled trials involving 207 and 354 patients failed to prove that duloxetine had tangible analgesic efficacy. It is therefore appropriate that this use is not mentioned in the "Indications" section of the summary of product characteristics (SPC). (6) The assessment of duloxetine in depression and neuropathic pain confirms existing data on its gastrointestinal, neuropsychological and hepatic adverse effects. In these trials, duloxetine increased blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. (7) Duloxetine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP 1A2 and CYP 2D6, creating an important risk of interactions with other drugs. (8) In practice, duloxetine currently has no place in the treatment of depression or diabetic neuropathy. Its efficacy has not yet been demonstrated to be even equivalent to that of other available drugs, and it has too many adverse effects, given this degree of uncertainty.
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine: new indication. Depression and diabetic neuropathy: too many adverse effects. 1712 Dec 11

The primary objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine for reducing pain severity in fibromyalgia patients with or without current major depressive disorder. This was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In total, 520 patients meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to duloxetine (20 mg/day, 60 mg/day, or 120 mg/day) or placebo, administered once daily, for 6 months (after 3 months, the duloxetine 20-mg/day group titrated to 60 mg/day). The co-primary outcome measures were the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain severity score and Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) score. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital sign, laboratory, and ECG measures. Compared with placebo-treated patients, those patients treated with duloxetine 120 mg/day improved significantly more on the co-primary outcome measures at 3 months (change in BPI score [-2.31 vs -1.39, P<0.001] and PGI-I [2.89 vs 3.39, P=0.004]) and at 6 months (change in BPI [-2.26 vs -1.43, P=0.003] and PGI-I [2.93 vs 3.37, P=0.012]). Compared with placebo, treatment with duloxetine 60 mg/day also significantly improved the co-primary measures at 3 months and BPI at 6 months. Duloxetine was efficacious in patients both with and without major depressive disorder. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups in changes in vital signs, laboratory measures, or ECG measures. Study results demonstrated that duloxetine at doses of 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day appears to be safe and efficacious in patients with fibromyalgia.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of duloxetine for treatment of fibromyalgia in patients with or without major depressive disorder: Results from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial. 1898 1

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, tender points, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. FMS leads to high disability levels, poor quality of life, and extensive use of medical care. Effective pharmacological treatment options are rare, and treatment effects are often of limited duration. Duloxetine is a new selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is licensed for the treatment of pain in diabetic neuropathy. So far two randomized, placebo-controlled trials have investigated the short-term safety and efficacy of duloxetine 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day in patients suffering from FMS over a period of 12 weeks. Both dosages were superior to placebo in pain relief, and improvement in quality of life and depressive symptoms. The analgesic effect was largely independent of the antidepressant action of duloxetine. The higher dose of 120 mg/day further reduced the tender point count and elevated the tender point pain thresholds. Only mild to moderate adverse effects were reported. Duloxetine 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day has proven to be beneficial in the treatment of FMS symptoms. As true for other antidepressants further studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of duloxetine as an additional pharmacological treatment option in FMS.
 ...
PMID:New treatment options for fibromyalgia: critical appraisal of duloxetine. 1883 Mar 99

The underlying cause of fibromyalgia is not known, although dysfunction of serotoninergic and noradrenergic neurotransmitters appears to play an important role in the condition. Duloxetine is a newer and better tolerated dual antidepressant that does not induce muscarinic, histaminergic or adrenergic adverse reactions, and at the same time modulates and enhances the endogenous descending system that inhibits nociception. Duloxetine reduces pain symptoms in depression and other diseases and conditions, including fibromyalgia. Over 90% of the observed effect on pain is due to a direct analgesic effect rather than an indirect antidepressant effect. In clinical trials, pain reduction with duloxetine was not associated with its antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in patients with fybromialgia. A meta-analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of duloxetine in the treatment of fibromyalgia showed it to be significantly superior to placebo in providing pain relief, reducing fatigue and improving physical and mental performance. The results of safety studies indicate that duloxetine is safe and well tolerated. Adverse effects tend to be mild, appearing more often at the start of therapy and decreasing or disappearing over the course of continued treatment.
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia. 1913 26

The European marketing authorization committee has ruled against the utilisation of duloxetine (Cymbalta) in the treatment of diffuse idiopathic polyalgic syndrome, alias fibromyalgia. A coherent position, given this psychotropic drug's unfavourable risk-benefit balance.
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine in fibromyalgia: rejection. Marketing authorization rejected and rightly so. 1938 10

Duloxetine is a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor available in delayed-release capsules for oral use. Duloxetine 60 mg/day, compared with placebo, was associated with a greater reduction from baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain severity score, a greater improvement in the patient-rated global impression of improvement (PGI-I) scale in patients with fibromyalgia, with or without major depressive disorder, in two 12- and 15-week phase III studies. In a 27-week, phase III trial, there was no significant difference between duloxetine (60 or 120 mg/day) and placebo for the least squares mean change from baseline to endpoint in BPI average pain scores and the PGI-I score. The significant improvements in efficacy that occurred in patients with fibromyalgia during 8 weeks of open-label treatment with duloxetine 60 mg/day were generally maintained during 52 weeks of subsequent blinded treatment at the same dosage in a phase III trial. Nonresponders during treatment with open-label duloxetine 60 mg/day, demonstrated no increased ability to respond if the duloxetine dosage was up-titrated to 120 mg/day than those who remained on the same dosage during the subsequent 52-week, double-blind phase. Duloxetine was generally well tolerated in studies of up to 1 year in duration, with nausea being the most frequent adverse event and main cause for discontinuing therapy.
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine: in patients with fibromyalgia. 1953 38

Pain is a common cause of disability in osteoarthritis. Duloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), has demonstrated analgesic effects in diabetic peripheral neuropathy and fibromyalgia. Considering its central mechanism of action, duloxetine may be effective in other pain states with evidence of central sensitization. Herein, we report the results of a 13-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine (60-120 mg/day) versus placebo in the treatment of knee pain in 231 patients meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee. Duloxetine was superior to placebo on the primary efficacy measure (weekly mean 24-h pain scores) beginning at Week 1 and continuing through the treatment period (P < or = .05). There was also a significant improvement in the WOMAC physical functioning subscale and several other secondary outcomes. Adverse-event rates did not differ significantly between treatment groups (49.5% for duloxetine 60-120 mg/day, and 40.8% for placebo).
 ...
PMID:Duloxetine, a centrally acting analgesic, in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis knee pain: a 13-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 2042 3

In this article, we investigate the range of treatments prescribed for fibromyalgia. The data suggest that the majority of those treated, 72 percent, receive only one pharmaceutical. An additional 18 percent of patients were prescribed two products and 10% received three products. Pregabalin (Lyrica(R)) monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed regimen (28% of patients) followed by duloxetine (Cymbalta(R)) monotherapy (6%). From a therapeutic class perspective, fibromyalgia patients received pain therapies (42%), antiepileptics (40%), antidepressants (28%), muscle relaxants (14%), and sleep agents (8%). An expert commentary is also included.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of fibromyalgia. 1972 97

(1) Fibromyalgia is characterised by a range of symptoms that include muscle pain, fatigue and sleep disorders. Anxiety and depression are often also present. The cause is unknown. More women than men are affected; (2) The following review focuses on differential diagnoses and available treatments for fibromyalgia, based on a review of the literature using the standard Prescrire methodology; (3) Fibromyalgia is mainly diagnosed by excluding other possibilities. The principal differential diagnoses are rheumatic involvement of the spine, systemic inflammatory disorders, and hypothyroidism. Unlike these other conditions, fibromyalgia is not associated with radiological or laboratory abnormalities; (4) Paracetamol has not been compared with other treatments in fibromyalgia. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have no specific effect; (5) The only two trials assessing tramadol showed little effect; in one study the average pain score was 53 mm in the tramadol group versus 65 mm in the placebo group, on a scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. The adverse effects of tramadol are those of opiates in general, mainly nausea and dependence. Tramadol interacts with numerous other drugs; (6) The efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants is also difficult to quantify. Their limited superiority over placebo lasts no more than a few months. The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (fluoxetine, paroxetine and citalopram), serotonin and nonadrenaline reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine and milnacipran) is even less well established. Duloxetine has been tested in four placebo-controlled trials with unconvincing results; (7) Pregabalin and gabapentin, two antiepileptic drugs, appear to be more effective than placebo but have only been tested in short-term trials. In one trial 44% of patients in the pregabalin group said they felt better after 13 weeks versus 35% of patients in the placebo group. However, adverse effects are frequent and sometimes troublesome (drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, weight gain). In clinical trials, 19% to 33% of patients stopped treatment due to adverse effects after 13 weeks, depending on the dose of pregabalin; (8) Assessments of non-drug treatments in this setting are generally mediocre. The best-assessed alternative therapies (acupuncture and physical exercise) only have a limited effect; (9) In practice, when a patient presents with symptoms compatible with fibromyalgia, the first step is to rule out a treatable condition. Quality of life may be improved by first acknowledging that the pain is real, and possibly by providing psychological, medical, social and occupational support. The limited efficacy of available drugs, and their potential adverse effects, should be discussed with the patient.
 ...
PMID:Fibromyalgia: poorly understood; treatments are disappointing. 1974 61

Milnacipran and duloxetine, serotonin/noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors, and pregabalin, a alpha(2)-delta(1) Ca(2+) channel blocker, are efficacious against fibromyalgia, a condition characterized by diffuse chronic pain and associated with stress. We compared these compounds (i.p. route), in rat models of acute/inflammatory pain (2.5% intraplantar formalin) and stress-induced ultrasonic vocalization (USV: 22kHz calls following presentation of a conditioned stimulus previously associated with foot-shocks). In the formalin test, milnacipran dose-dependently attenuated paw elevation and licking (minimal effective dose, MED: 2.5mg/kg for licking/late phase). Duloxetine was slightly more potent (MED=0.63). Pregabalin also reduced paw licking/late phase (MED=0.63), but was inactive up to 160mg/kg for paw elevation (both phases) and paw licking (early phase). Milnacipran dose-dependently reduced USV (MED=10, near total inhibition at 20mg/kg); duloxetine was less potent (MED=20). Pregabalin (2.5-80mg/kg) was only significantly active at 40mg/kg. Milnacipran, duloxetine and pregabalin possess analgesic activity in the formalin test on paw licking/late phase (corresponding to inflammatory pain with a central sensitization component). In the stress-induced USV model, milnacipran was the most potent and efficacious compound. To summarize, reduction of formalin-induced paw licking/late phase might constitute a useful indicator of potential activity against inflammatory/centrally sensitized pain, as might be expressed in fibromyalgia.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of milnacipran, duloxetine and pregabalin in the formalin pain test and in a model of stress-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in rats. 1988 99


1 2 3 4 Next >>