Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015695 (fatty liver)
 13,941 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous routes of administration for diabetics on CAPD were compared. The comparison included: (1) Control of blood glucose concentration: both methods can provide satisfactory glycemic control for most patients. Changing the method of insulin administration is warranted when one method fails. (2) Effect on plasma insulin levels: intraperitoneal administration can produce a plasma insulin profile similar to the normal profile. This is unusual with subcutaneous administration. Consequences of hyperinsulinemia (hyperlipidemia, hypertension) seem, however, to be similar between the two methods of insulin administration. (3) Effect on peritoneal permeability: permeability characteristics are maintained unchanged, usually, with either method after long-term CAPD. However, insulin is mitogenic in vitro. Theoretically, intraperitoneal insulin could lead to peritoneal fibrosis. (4) Effect on infectious complications of CAPD: a difference in the rate of peritonitis or overall PD catheter-related infections has not been convincingly demonstrated between the two methods of insulin administration. Exit site and tunnel infections with staphylococcus aureus may be more frequent in diabetics receiving insulin subcutaneously. (5) Effect on hepatic structure and function: subcapsular hepatic steatosis was described in diabetics receiving insulin intraperitoneally. The clinical significance of this finding remains to be demonstrated. We conclude that both methods can be applied for insulin administration in diabetics on CAPD. The intraperitoneal method should be tried first in most instances. Prospective studies comparing the two methods are needed.
Adv Perit Dial 1991
PMID:Subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal insulin in the management of diabetics on CAPD: a review. 168 Apr 63

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults has been expanded after becoming the standard for children in many transplant centres. Advantages of LDLT include thorough donor screening, optimization of timing for transplantation and minimal cold ischaemia time. However, the risk of donor morbidity and mortality must be considered. The preoperative evaluation of the donor typically is performed in consecutive stages. Specific donor considerations in LDLT are thrombosis and embolism, hepatic mass and hepatic steatosis. After complete evaluation, only a small proportion of potential donors are satisfactory candidates. The evaluation protocol for LDLT recipients in most centres is not different from that of cadaveric transplantation. More experience and the development of specific selection and evaluation criteria will further increase the benefit for the recipient and decrease the risk of the donor.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004 Jul
PMID:Living-donor liver transplantation: evaluation of donor and recipient. 1524 Aug 43

Severe viral hepatitis with high mortality is the most common cause of liver failure in China. Treatment of severe viral hepatitis by hemoperfusion was initially adopted in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Following 10 years of development in China, a plasma exchange (PE)-centered artificial liver support system (ALSS), principally dependent on PE technology was developed. Based on the condition and symptoms of each patient, PE was given alone, or combined with hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration, hemoperfusion, or plasma perfusion. In the late 1990s, training courses for ALSS were developed, and ALSS began to be carried out across China. Guidelines for artificial liver therapy were formulated and published by the Artificial Liver and Liver Failure Group of the Chinese Society of Infection. In recent years, new methods have been attempted, including small pore-size plasma separators, a molecular adsorbent-based recirculating system (MARS), and a continuous albumin purification system (CAPS). According to a retrospective analysis published in 2004, ALSS therapy significantly (P < 0.001) improved the survival rate of patients with severe hepatitis compared with patients who received only medicines (43.4%, 157/362 vs. 15.4%, 55/358 in chronic patients and 78.9%, 30/38 vs. 11.9%, 5/42 in acute and subacute patients). Furthermore, ALSS has also proved valuable as a bridge to liver transplantation in the treatment of patients with end-stage severe hepatitis in China. More recently, ALSS has been used in the treatment of drug-induced liver failure, acute fatty liver during pregnancy, and other difficult-to-treat disorders in China.
Ther Apher Dial 2006 Apr
PMID:Artificial liver support system in China: a review over the last 30 years. 1668 18