Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015672 (fatigue)
 51,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We compared the safety of a new dihydropyridine calcium entry blocker, isradipine, with an equipotent dose of diltiazem in 174 mild hypertensives (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95 to 105 mm Hg). After appropriate washout and placebo periods, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.25 mg isradipine twice daily (Group I) or 40 mg diltiazem thrice daily (Group D). If DBP remained above 90 mm Hg, doses were increased to a maximum of 5 mg isradipine twice daily or 120 mg diltiazem thrice daily. Active therapy was given for a total of 12 weeks. Only 18 patients (nine from each group) did not complete the protocol. The patients were well-matched at baseline with a mean BP of 149/100 mm Hg for those who were randomized to isradipine and completed the protocol and 153/99 mm Hg for the diltiazem group. The responses to each drug were excellent with 72% of the isradipine patients and 73% of the diltiazem group having DBP less than 90 mm Hg at the completion of the study. Of the 156 patients who completed the protocol, only 18 patients (ten in Group I and eight in Group D) failed to respond. Both drugs were well-tolerated. No adverse reactions were reported by 68 percent of the patients in Group I and 65% of those in Group D. The most common side effect was headache (9.0% in Group I and 7.8% in Group D) followed by fatigue (5.2% in Group I and 3.9% in Group D). Age and race did not predict response to either agent but men responded slightly better to diltiazem than women. We conclude that isradipine and diltiazem are equally well tolerated and can be used successfully as a monotherapy to treat hypertension in a wide variety of patients.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the safety of therapeutically equivalent doses of isradipine and diltiazem for treatment of essential hypertension. 153 28

The antihypertensive and haemodynamic effects of labetalol were compared with those of prazosin both at rest and during bicycle exercise in 38 moderate to moderately severe hypertensive patients (supine DBP 95 to 119 mmHg when untreated). Following a two week open placebo phase to establish baseline BP and baseline exercise performance, patients were randomly and double-blindedly assigned to receive labetalol or prazosin. Drug dose was titrated from 100 to 400 mg labetalol twice daily, or from one to 10 mg prazosin twice daily at weekly intervals until BP was controlled (supine DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg with at least a 10 mmHg decrease from baseline). Eighteen labetalol and twenty prazosin patients achieved BP control and were subsequently reexercised to fatigue on a bicycle ergometer. The mean changes from baseline for heart rate and rate pressure product (heart rate x SBP) were reduced only in the labetalol group; the difference between the labetalol and prazosin groups was significant (P less than 0.01) both at rest and during exercise. This haemodynamic profile of labetalol may be important in selecting a vasodilating antihypertensive for patients with concomitant ischaemic heart disease.
 ...
PMID:The effects of labetalol and prazosin on exercise haemodynamics in hypertensive patients. 204 Oct 34

A double-blind, parallel-group multicentre study has been done to compare the antihypertensive properties, effects on serum lipoproteins and adverse effect profiles of diltiazem and metoprolol given as monotherapy to primary hypertensive patients. 128 patients were included from 10 participating centers. Following a placebo wash-out period of 5 weeks, patients were randomized either to diltiazem or metoprolol treatment according to a forced titration regimen. Each dose was given for a 4-week period in a stepwise regimen. A total of 119 patients, 59 and 60 in the two groups, completed the study. Supine and standing BPs were reduced in a similar, dose-dependent fashion by diltiazem and metoprolol. In the former supine BP fell from 161/101 to 151/91 mmHg at the highest dose level. In the latter patients, supine BP at the highest dose level was reduced from 161/102 to 155/94 mmHg. Target pressures (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or DBP reduction of greater than or equal to 10%) were reached in 63% and 48% of the patients, respectively. HDL-cholesterol was increased in diltiazem-treated patients and decreased in those on metoprolol. Otherwise, serum lipoproteins did not differ significantly between treatments. The incidence and severity of dose-dependent adverse effects did not differ significantly between treatments, although moderate to distressing side effects were reported more commonly by metoprolol-treated patients. Ankle oedema and breathlessness tended to be more common on diltiazem therapy, while tiredness, increased sweating and sleep disturbances appeared to be experienced more frequently by metoprolol-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A comparison of diltiazem and metoprolol in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group. 207 33

A multicentre open study to which 229 investigators participated was carried out to demonstrate the safety of cicletanine, a new therapeutic agent, in routine clinical use. Cicletanine was administered alone for three months and normalized blood pressure (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 63 p. 100 of the 1,238 hypertensive patients who entered the study. There was a significant fall of systolic arterial pressure from 178.4 +/- 14.8 to 151.8 +/- 14.2 mmHg and a similar fall of diastolic arterial pressure from 104.0 +/- 6.7 to 86.3 +/- 6.2 mmHg. The reduction of BP values was accompanied by a significant decrease of differential BP (SBP-DBP) from 72.5 to 65.8 mmHg. The initial dosage (50 mg/day) was doubled in only one-third of the patients. The mean daily dose was 66 mg. This antihypertensive effect was paralleled by a significant and major improvement of signs (dyspnoea, oedema of the lower limbs) and symptoms (mainly dizziness, headache, visual and auditory disorders, asthenia) which existed at inclusion. A modest, but significant, reduction of heart rate from 76.7 to 73.9 beats/mn was also noted. Cicletanine produced no toxic or severe adverse events. Clinical side-effects consisted of pruritus, fatigue, headache, vertigo, lower limb oedema and gastrointestinal disorders. These effects were mild and non-specific (doubtful drug imputability); each of them occurred with an incidence ranging from 4.0 to 1.0 p. 100. They were responsible for the withdrawal of about 30 patients (2.4 p. 100). No significant alteration of biochemical or haematological values was recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with monotherapy in a large population]. 251 75

Endralazine, a novel vasodilator related to hydralazine, exhibits a longer half-life and is only minimally influenced by acetylator status. The antihypertensive action of once daily endralazine has been studied in 17 patients previously controlled with an antihypertensive regimen which included hydralazine and a beta-blocker. Hydralazine was discontinued but other medications were unchanged. Pre-study dosage of hydralazine ranged from 25 mg b.i.d. to 50 mg g.i.d., mean daily dose 126.5 mg. Endralazine was started at a dose of 10 mg o.d. and increased by 10 mg to a maximum of 40 mg o.d. until seated DBP was controlled below 95 mmHg. All 17 patients completed the study. Seated BP significantly decreased from 147.5/99.7 to 133.8/83.9 and standing BP from 145.8/99.2 to 133.6/87.3 mmHg. Ten patients (59%) were successfully controlled with endralazine once daily but 7 patients required twice daily dosage schedules because of lack of BP control at 24 h after dosing or excessive hypotension shortly after dosing. Other adverse effects were headache, palpitations and fatigue. There was a statistically insignificant average weight gain of 1 kg but pedal edema was not observed. Endralazine is an effective antihypertensive agent with adverse symptoms similar to those experienced with hydralazine.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of once daily endralazine in hypertension. 375 43

A controlled multicentre trial was organised to compare the effects of 20 mg Nifedipine tablets (N) and 2,5 mg Indapamide tablets (I) during a 4 months' treatment period after a placebo period, in 59 patients with moderate essential hypertension (n = 59). The results of blood pressure measurements of 18 patients treated by nifedipine (1 tablet twice daily) and 22 patients treated by indapamide (1 tablet every morning) were compared. The systolic blood pressure, after 10 minutes recumbency, fell from 165 +/- 10 mmHg to 148 +/- 13 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and the diastolic pressure from 104 +/- 6 mmHg to 86 +/- 7 mmHg (p less than 0.01) in the patients treated with nifedipine. In the indapamide group, the SBP fell from 164 +/- 13 mmHg to 152 +/- 15 mmHg (p less than 0.01) and the DBP from 100 +/- 4 mmHg to 87 +/- 6 mmHg (p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes of heart rate with either drug; plasma creatinine, potassium and uric acid concentrations were also unchanged. There was a higher incidence of headaches and tiredness in the nifedipine group, whilst patients treated with indapamide complained more often of muscular cramps. Flushing was observed in nearly a quarter of the patients in both groups. These results confirm that both nifedipine and indapamide induce significant and persistant falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Although the fall was greater with nifedipine than with indapamide, the difference was not statistically significant. The tolerance was satisfactory in both groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Comparative effects of nifedipine and indapamide in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. 393 9

The effect of repeated weightlessness exposures on maximal aerobic capacity was determined when seven healthy men (36-48 yr) underwent two 10-d bedrest (BR) periods in the -6 degrees headdown position, which were separated by a 14-d recovery period. No prescribed exercise was performed by the subjects during the course of the experiment. A graded supine cycle ergometer test consisting of 4 min of unloaded pedaling at 60 rpm followed by increased work rate of 15 W X min-1 until volitional fatigue (max) was performed before (pre) and after (post) the first and second BR periods, i.e., BR1 and BR2, and again 14 d after BR2 (REC). During exercise, submaximal and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation (VE), heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures were measured and the gas exchange anaerobic threshold (AT) was determined. Plasma volume (Vp, T-1824) and body composition were measured pre- and post-BR1 and BR2 and following REC. Compared to the respective pre-BR control values, VO2max decreased (p less than 0.05) by 8.7% after BR1 and 5.2% after BR2 but returned to pre-BR values following 14 d REC. Submaximal and maximal HR increased (p less than 0.05) post-BR1 and BR2 but returned to pre-BR levels after REC. The AT and Vp decreased (p less than 0.05) post-BR1 and BR2 but returned to pre-BR levels after REC. Body weight increased (p less than 0.05) gradually during the experiment and did not return to control values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Response to muscular exercise following repeated simulated weightlessness. 401 65

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of moexipril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension. The patient population consisted of 281 hypertensive men and women, 30-84 years old, with seated diastolic BP between 95 and 114 mmHg. The study was a two year multicenter (22 centers), open-label protocol of moexipril monotherapy or combination therapy (with hydrochlorothiazide). Blood pressure, pulse rate, weight, adverse side-effects and laboratory studies were assessed following moexipril dosing at 7.5, 15 or 30 mg once daily or 15-30 mg daily in combination with 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide if the DBP was > or = 90 mmHg. The primary measure of efficacy was change from baseline in seated DBP. Secondary outcome measures included changes in seated SBP, heart rate, laboratory parameters and subjective complaints. Following one year of therapy in 183 patients, the BP fell 13/14 mmHg among patients receiving moexipril monotherapy and 18/15 mmHg those receiving combined therapy compared with baseline (P < 0.001 for both). After two years of treatment, reductions were similar in 161 patients. Forty-four (16%) patients were prematurely withdrawn from the study because of inadequate therapeutic response and 34 (12%) secondary to adverse experiences. There were no changes in pulse rate or postural BP reductions. Four adverse side-effects occurred at a frequency exceeding 2% that were possibly or probably attributable to moexipril: fatigue (3%), headache (2%), dizziness (3%) and increased cough (5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Long-term efficacy and safety of moexipril in the treatment of hypertension. 788 91

An open randomized study was conducted in mild to moderate hypertensive patients to evaluate, over a 3 months treatment period, the efficacy and tolerability of carvedilol 25 mg OD and to compare, in case of insufficient results with 25 mg, the efficacy and tolerance of carvedilol 50 mg and carvedilol 25 mg coadministered with diuretics. Mean office blood pressure (sitting) of the 91 patients who completed the study according to the protocol was reduced from 161/100 to 147/91 mm Hg after 4 weeks of treatment carvedilol 25 mg OD. Continuation of carvedilol 25 mg produced no further reduction in blood pressure. Increasing carvedilol to 50 mg OD or addition of diuretics further reduced blood pressure. Ambulatory blood pressure measurements showed a significant reduction in both SBP and DBP after 3 months treatment in the three groups, as well as with respect to the circadian profile of blood pressure and heart rate. Large differences between ambulatory and office blood pressure were observed: 37% of the patients diagnosed as mild to moderate hypertensives according to office blood pressure before treatment had mean daytime DBP < 90 mm Hg and 39% mean daytime SBP < 140 mm Hg. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced adverse events; they occurred mainly at the beginning of treatment; less than 5% of participants withdrew due to adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were fatigue, vertigo and asthenia. This study showed that carvedilol is safe and effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and that there is a high prevalence (nearly 40%) of low ambulatory blood pressure means in a population labelled as mild to moderate hypertensive.
 ...
PMID:Carvedilol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: experience with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. 805 82

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol (metoprolol CR) was compared with that of a double dose (100 mg) of conventional immediate-release metoprolol tablets in 64 hypertensives in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. At the end of a 6-week placebo run-in period and after each of two 8-week active treatment periods, 3-min bicycle exercise tests were performed at 25, 1.3, and 5 h after dose intake. Twenty-five hours after dose the mean supine SBP/DBP on metoprolol CR 50 mg was 147/95 mm Hg and on conventional metoprolol 100 mg 148/94 mm Hg, respectively. The percentage of responders (DBP less-than-or-equal 90 mm Hg or reduction in DBP greater-than-or-equal 10 mm Hg) was 45% on both regimens. At 25 h after dose, exercise heart rate was lower on 50 mg metoprolol CR (136 versus 140 beats min(minus sign1); p < 0.001) than on 100 mg conventional metoprolol, whereas the opposite was found at 1.3 h (131 versus 107 beats min(minus sign1); p < 0.001) and at 5 h (131 versus 113 beats min(minus sign1); p < 0.001). In agreement with the more even plasma metoprolol concentration and exercise heart rate, the patients perceived less fatigue during exercise on 50 mg metoprolol CR at 1.3 h after dose, the approximate time of maximum plasma concentration for 100 mg conventional metoprolol. The total number of adverse events recorded on metoprolol CR 50 mg and conventional metoprolol 100 mg were 62 and 103, respectively (p < 0.01). Thus, this study has demonstrated that the new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol has made it possible to halve the dose of metoprolol and yet achieve the same blood pressure control as well as greater beta(1)-blockade at the end of 24-h dosing intervals. Corresponding to lower peak plasma metoprolol concentrations, perceived fatigue and overall tolerability was improved on metoprolol CR 50 mg compared to conventional metoprolol 100 mg.
 ...
PMID:Equal Efficacy and Improved Tolerability with 50 mg Controlled-Release Metoprolol Compared with 100 mg Conventional Metoprolol in Hypertensive Patients. 1183 69


1 2 3 Next >>