Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015672 (fatigue)
 51,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

"Psychasthenia exists--we meet it every day". Despite this affirmation, Pierre Janet's views remain unappreciated by international psychiatry. Psychasthenia is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III-R). This pathology, described by Janet as both benign and terrible, is presently broken into many diagnostic categories with respect to the principal symptomatology of the patient. When a mood disorder is present, these patients can have diagnostic criteria for major depression or dysthymia. Patients with prevalent anxiety, phobia or obsessive-compulsive symptoms, must also be classified in having anxiety disorders. When somatic complaints are major symptoms, the patient's disease can be, on the whole, attributed to a somatoform disorder. This scale is a global evaluation of psychasthenia. It is made up of three lists of items. The first concerns asthenia or fatigue sine materia. The items in this group allow an evaluation of the physical and mental characteristics of asthenia associated with an inability of acting. Difficulties in mental concentration are measured by items in the second list. Mental processes are associated with doubts and waverings. They are interrupted by interferences caused by obsessions with recurrent and persistent ideas, impulses or images. Physical symptoms without organic pathology or a pathophysiologic mechanism constitute the neurasthenic part of psychasthenia. In the third list, somatic complaints are spelled out in a check-list of these potential symptoms. This scale can be used as a help in the diagnosis. Items 2, 3, 5, 25, 26 and 29 have a specific reference to the history of the disorder.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[A scale to assess psychasthenia]. 129 95

Thirty-four patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were compared with controls with DSM-III-R major depression on the Monospot and VP1 antigen tests. There was no significant difference in the numbers initially VP1 positive in the groups (11/34 and 7/34 positive in the chronic fatigue and major depression group respectively). Four CFS but no depressed patients were Monospot positive initially. No patient was both Monospot and VP1 positive. Patients positive on the tests were offered a repeat 6 months later. Eight of the 11 VP1 positive patients in the CFS group were retested and four remained positive, but none of the four depressed patients retested remained positive. No patient retested remained Monospot positive. The Monospot and VP1 tests appear to have little discriminating ability between these groups as screening tests and their predictive validity is unclear.
 ...
PMID:Monospot and VP1 tests in chronic fatigue syndrome and major depression. 143 20

Persons who contacted the Anorexia/Bulimia Association of Norway for information and stated that they had an eating disorder were asked to participate in this questionnaire study. The answers from the 32 women who fulfilled the DSM-III-R criteria for bulimia nervosa are presented. Usually the women's eating problems had started in the teens after a period of voluntary dieting. The mean duration of bulimia nervosa was six years. 31% had a history of anorexia nervosa. At the time of the study almost all had normal body weight, but nevertheless felt overweight. 78% practised self-induced vomiting, 22% used laxatives and 16% used diuretics to reduce weight. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were common in connection with the overeating episodes, but also more generally, which interfered with everyday life. Somatic symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation, dyspepsia, headache, dry mouth and eyes, parotid gland swelling, muscular symptoms, fatigue, and oligomenorrhoea) were also common.
 ...
PMID:[Bulimia nervosa and self-reported symptoms. A questionnaire study among 32 women with bulimia nervosa]. 147 Nov 6

The use of benzodiazepines for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a safe and effective treatment; however, their potential to produce dependence and impair psychomotor and cognitive functions is a drawback. In this study the efficacy and safety of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, was assessed. Thirty patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for GAD were randomized to either alpidem (225 mg), lorazepam (4.5 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to determine differences in HAM-A scores over time. The results showed a trend for alpidem to be more effective. Half of the alpidem group had a decrease of 50 percent or greater in their HAM-A scores with an almost equal effect on psychic and somatic symptoms. The most common side effects with alpidem and lorazepam were lightheadedness, drowsiness, and daytime tiredness. Moreover, treatment with alpidem did not manifest any withdrawal symptoms. Thus nonbenzodiazepine treatments are effective and safe for GAD.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, and lorazepam in patients with nonpsychotic anxiety. 167 74

A high prevalence of mood disorders has been found among persons with chronic fatigue. The comorbidity of mood disorders and substance use disorders has long been recognized. In this study, the prevalence of substance use disorders among 100 patients with chronic fatigue was examined. Twenty-eight patients met DSM-III-R criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence; ten of these patients had a current diagnosis. Forty-nine patients had no history of substance abuse or dependence but had other lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. Twenty-three patients had no history of substance abuse or psychiatric illness. No differences in demographic characteristics or in the features of chronic fatigue were found among the three groups. Patients with chronic fatigue who had a lifetime history of a substance use disorder reported more lifetime depressive symptoms and were more likely to have had suicidal ideation or attempts.
 ...
PMID:Substance use disorders in patients with chronic fatigue. 174 63

This study examined the strength of relationships between forms of depressive symptoms over a one-year period and the onset of major depression. The data analyzed were collected in 4 sites of the US National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program (NIMH-ECA, 1981-1985). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule's specifications of DSM-III criteria for major depression were employed. Overall, the results indicated a strong positive association between an onset episode and the following depressive symptoms over 1 year: diminished sexual drive, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt and trouble concentrating or thinking. Sleep disturbance among women and fatigue among males were also significantly associated with experiencing an onset of major depression. The implications of the findings for secondary prevention efforts are explored.
 ...
PMID:Affective symptoms associated with the onset of major depression in the community: findings from the US National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. 192 57

Bromazepam was compared with placebo and with chlorprothixene in a randomized, double-blind group-comparative multicenter trial in general practice. Two hundred and forty-five patients with generalized anxiety disorder (DSM-III 1980) were treated for 2 weeks with two daily doses of bromazepam, 3 mg or chlorprothixene, 15 mg or placebo. Median reductions in Hamilton Anxiety rating were 12 (bromazepam), 10.3 (chlorprothixene) and 7.3 (placebo). The study revealed significant superiority of bromazepam over placebo (median differences 3.3, 95% confidence limits: 0.3 and 6.1) but not over chlorprothixene (median difference 1.4, 95% confidence limits -0.8 and +3.5). Significantly higher rates of tiredness, sedation and hypersomnia were found on bromazepam and chlorprothixene compared to placebo. Tolerance was rated as "at least good" in 85.6% on bromazepam, in 86% on chlorprothixene and in 87.8% on placebo. Neither previous psychopharmacological treatment nor presence of psychosocial stress were of perceptible influence. Bromazepam and chlorprothixene are both superior to placebo in generalized anxiety states treated in general practice, but spontaneous improvements/placebo effects are substantial.
 ...
PMID:Bromazepam in generalized anxiety. Randomized, multi-practice comparisons with both chlorprothixene and placebo. 196 72

In the present double-blind study comprising 6 weeks, remoxipride was compared with haloperidol in acute schizophrenic patients (DSM-III). Symptoms assessment was performed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and the Present State Examination (PSE). Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) were assessed using the Simpson and Angus scale. Side effects were also recorded both by spontaneous reports and by active questioning. Seventy-one patients entered the study, 36 in the remoxipride group and 35 in the haloperidol group. There were 10 dropouts, 4 in the remoxipride group and 6 patients in the haloperidol group. The PSE profile revealed a similar reduction in the symptom clusters of psychosis in both treatment groups. Forty-seven percent of the patients in the remoxipride group and 34 percent of the patients in the haloperidol group showed clinically relevant improvement (reduction of total BPRS score by 50% or more). Similar results were obtained with the CGI. All EPS except "glabella tap" occurred significantly less frequently in the remoxipride group compared to the haloperidol group. Substantially lower incidence of EPS was found by active questioning in the remoxipride group compared to the haloperidol group. Also, considerably lower incidences of drowsiness/somnolence, tiredness/fatigue, and concentrating difficulty were observed in the remoxipride group. At the end of treatment, 66 percent of the patients in the haloperidol group and 22 percent in the remoxipride group were using anticholinergics. This study indicates that the newly developed neuroleptic remoxlpride is an effective, clinically safe, and well tolerated antipsychotic compound. In particular, few EPS were induced by remoxipride, as compared to haloperidol.
 ...
PMID:Atypical neuroleptics in acute schizophrenia: a double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and haloperidol. 197 47

In the present 6-week double-blind, randomised, multicentre study, the atypical neuroleptic remoxipride was compared to haloperidol in acute schizophrenic patients (DSM-III). Seventy-one patients entered the study, 36 in the remoxipride group and 35 in the haloperidol group. There were ten early withdrawals, four in the remoxipride group and six patients in the haloperidol group. The Present State Examination (PSE) profile revealed a similar reduction in the symptom clusters of psychosis in both treatment groups. Forty-seven per cent of the patients in the remoxipride group and 34% of the patients in the haloperidol group showed clinically relevant improvement (reduction of BPRS total score greater than or equal to 50%). All extrapyramidal symptoms except "glabella tap" occurred significantly less frequently in the remoxipride group as compared to the haloperidol group. Substantially lower incidences of EPS were found by active questioning in the remoxipride group compared to the haloperidol group. In addition, considerably lower incidences were observed in the remoxipride group with respect to drowsiness/somnolence, tiredness/fatigue and concentrating difficulty. At the end of treatment 66% of the patients in the haloperidol group and 22% in the remoxipride group were using anticholinergics. No consistent changes were found in the mean plasma HVA level in either treatment group. In responders (reduction of BPRS total score greater than or equal to 50%) lower baseline HVA levels were observed in both treatment groups. This study indicates that the newly developed neuroleptic remoxipride is an effective antipsychotic compound, which is clinically safe and well tolerated. In particular, few EPS were induced by remoxipride, as compared to haloperidol.
 ...
PMID:Double blind comparative study of remoxipride and haloperidol in acute schizophrenic patients. 197 48

A double-blind multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of remoxipride in relation to haloperidol was conducted in 160 inpatients with schizophrenic illness diagnosed according to DSM-III. The study period was 4 weeks. The mean daily dose of remoxipride (whether given twice or three times daily) during the last week of treatment was 395 mg; the corresponding dose of haloperidol was 17 mg per day. No significant difference in therapeutic efficacy was found; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) median total scores dropped from 41 to 20 (remoxipride twice daily, n = 51), 43 to 20 (remoxipride three times daily, n = 44) 40 to 19 (haloperidol three times daily, n = 48) at last valid rating. According to Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 68% in the remoxipride twice daily, 58% in the three times daily and 60% in the haloperidol group were very much or much improved. Treatment-emergent extrapyramidal checklist symptoms (hypokinesia, rigidity and tremor) were statistically significantly more frequent and more severe during haloperidol than during remoxipride treatment despite a statistically significantly higher concurrent use of anticholinergic drugs in the haloperidol group. Haloperidol treated patients reported more tiredness and drowsiness than remoxipride treated patients. Also, haloperidol treated patients had a significantly higher frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms on 8 out of 10 items of the Simpson and Angus scale.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind multicentre study comparing remoxipride, two and three times daily, with haloperidol in schizophrenia. 197 71


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>