Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015672 (fatigue)
 51,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

New therapeutic alternatives are needed to improve outcomes in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). For several years, researchers at the National Cancer Institute have been interested in elucidating the importance of angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and in identifying inhibitors of this process. Thalidomide has been shown to inhibit the ability of tumors to recruit new blood vessels. In a recent phase II trial of thalidomide in AIPC, 28% of patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of >40%. The taxane docetaxel also produces PSA and measurable disease responses when used as monotherapy or as a component of combination chemotherapy for AIPC. Thus, based on the single-agent activity of thalidomide and docetaxel, we initiated a randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel with or without thalidomide, 200 mg at bedtime, in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic AIPC. Docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, was administered every 7 days for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. Both regimens have been well tolerated among the first 59 treated patients, with a near absence of grade (3/4) myelosuppression. Fatigue, hyperglycemia, and pulmonary toxicity were seen in both groups. Thrombotic events have been seen in the combination arm. Thirty-five percent (6 of 17) of the patients receiving docetaxel alone and 53% (19 of 36) of those receiving docetaxel and thalidomide have had a PSA decrease of at least 50%. Combining a cytotoxic agent with an angiogenesis inhibitor is a promising area of investigation for prostate cancer management.
 ...
PMID:A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. 1168 31

We conducted a study of docetaxel-carboplatin combination therapy to confirm the efficacy and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive patients with ovarian cancer. Docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-vs.-time curve of 5) were administered consecutively on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for five planned cycles in chemo-naive patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC to IV ovarian cancer with or without successful cytoreductive surgery at staging laparotomy. Twenty-six patients (median age, 53 years; range, 34-76 years) were enrolled into this trial at Niigata University Hospital. The major toxicity with this regimen was neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were 27% (7/26) and 69% (18/26), respectively. However, the neutropenia was brief and reversible with G-CSF support. Nausea/emesis, fatigue, arthralgia/myalgias, and alopecia were the most common nonhematologic toxicities, in which no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed. Neurotoxicity was infrequently observed. Nine of 11 assessable patients responded to the regimen. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin and docetaxel seems to be highly active in ovarian cancer with the major toxicity of neutropenia, and the extremely low incidence of clinically significant neurotoxicity. Randomized controlled clinical trials should be conducted to define a role for this regimen in ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin for chemo-naive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. 1244 46

Background. Docetaxel and irinotecan have additive or synergistic activity in vitro and in vivo as well as differing toxicities and unique mechanisms of action. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel and irinotecan given on a weekly schedule. Methods. Eligible patients had advanced, incurable, solid tumors. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour infusion and escalated over four dose levels (25, 30, 35, and 40 mg/m(2)) followed by irinotecan administered over 30 minutes at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2). Treatment was administered weekly for four weeks followed by two weeks of rest. To improve tolerability, the schedule was modified to weekly administration for two weeks with one week of rest, and irinotecan was escalated over 3 dose levels (55, 60, and 65 mg/m(2)) with docetaxel fixed at 35 mg/m(2). Results. Forty-four patients were treated and the most common dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea observed in 11% of patients. Severe neutropenia was rare (grade 4: 2%, grade 3: 23%). Other nonhematologic toxicities included nausea/vomiting, dehydration and fatigue. Partial responses occurred in two patients with pancreatic cancer, and one patient each with non-small cell lung and esophageal cancer. Conclusions. Weekly docetaxel and irinotecan is a promising non-cisplatin doublet with preliminary evidence of activity in advanced solid tumors. Diarrhea is the predominant dose-limiting toxicity but unlike the every 3 weeks schedule myelosuppression is modest. The recommended phase II doses are docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule. Phase II trials of this regimen are ongoing or planned in lung, head and neck, stomach, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers.
 ...
PMID:Phase I dose escalation trial of weekly docetaxel plus irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer. 1264 88

Docetaxel has demonstrated activity in a broad range of solid tumors. Phase I trials have shown 100 mg/m(2) every 21 d to be the recommended dose. This phase I trial was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients had advanced malignancies and up to two prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS = 0 1, adequate organ function, and gave written, informed consent. Docetaxel was escalated in cohorts of patients starting at 100 mg/m(2) on a 21-d schedule. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered on d 3 10. The DLT was defined as grade IV neutropenia >4 d, febrile neutropenia, grade IV thrombocytopenia, any grade III nonhematologic toxicity, or the inability to receive cycle 2 because of ongoing toxicity. Twenty-three patients were enrolled at doses up to 145 mg/m(2). The median age was 59 yr and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 1. No DLT was observed at 100 mg/m(2), and 2 of 11 patients at 120 mg/m(2) experienced DLT (neutropenic fever and stomatitis). At 145 mg/m(2), one of eight patients had DLT (fatigue). Two of eight patients at 145 mg/m(2) had brief grade IV neutropenia (without fever), and none had grade III-IV thrombocytopenia or anemia. The docetaxel dose can be safely escalated to 145 mg/m(2) every 21 d with GCSF support, a 45% increase above the standard recommended phase II dose. Further studies will clarify the role of dose-intensified docetaxel.
 ...
PMID:Phase 1 dose escalation study of docetaxel with filgrastim support in patients with advanced solid tumors. 1266 78

Docetaxel was chosen for study in the combination chemotherapy of advanced non small-cell lung cancer on the basis of its reproducible high single-agent activity, novel mechanism of action, and relative lack of neurotoxicity. Preclinical and clinical data suggested schedule-dependent synergism with vinorelbine. Trials of docetaxel and vinorelbine have explored a variety of schedules. One approach has been to give docetaxel on day 1 of a 3-week cycle with vinorelbine on day 0 or days 1 and 5. Febrile neutropenia and non-neutropenic infections have been dose limiting, and low-dose intensity (8-13 mg/m2/week) of vinorelbine has been achieved. Our phase I study showed that docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 45 mg/m2 every 2 weeks could be safely given with prophylactic filgrastim. In the ensuing phase II trial, we observed a 51% confirmed response rate in 35 patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-68). With a median follow-up of 12 months, the predicted median and 1-year survivals are 14 months and 60%, respectively. Use of prophylactic filgrastim and the every-2-week schedule of administration allowed for single-agent dose intensity of both drugs to be given. Febrile neutropenia occurred in five patients and 5/384 cycles. Cumulative toxicities of excessive lacrimation, fatigue, and onycholysis were observed. More recently, a weekly schedule of administration for both drugs has been studied. Docetaxel and vinorelbine appear highly active together when given on an every-2-week schedule with prophylactic filgrastim, and the combination may offer one alter-native to cisplatin-based therapy. However, confirmatory phase II and III studies are needed. Certain cumulative toxicities (onycholysis, lacrimation) may limit the duration of therapy. Application of this regimen for a shorter period, such as in induction or postoperative settings, may provide optimal benefit while minimizing toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Trials of vinorelbine and docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non small-cell lung cancer. 1472 39

Docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Bridgewater, NJ) is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent with proven efficacy in a number of solid tumors. However, myelosuppression can be a substantial concern when docetaxel is administered every 3 weeks. Myelosuppression can be particularly problematic in older patients and those being treated with palliative intent. Weekly dosing of docetaxel has been investigated in an effort to reduce toxicity and has been identified as a safe and effective regimen in clinical trials. Weekly docetaxel is generally administered at doses ranging from 30-40 mg/m(2)/week for 6 of 8 weeks or for 3 of 4 weeks. With weekly dosing, though efficacy is comparable, myelosuppression is substantially less, and the overall tolerability profile is better than with every-3-week dosing. Fatigue is a common toxicity associated with weekly docetaxel; other adverse effects that are seen in a minority of patients include hyperlacrimation, nail toxicity, and alopecia. These side effects are dose related and can generally be managed through dose reductions or alterations in the weekly schedule. Because of the favorable tolerability profile, weekly docetaxel is under investigation in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and with novel targeted agents in a variety of tumor types. The results of these ongoing studies will further define the place of weekly docetaxel in cancer therapy.
 ...
PMID:Practical aspects of weekly docetaxel administration schedules. 1547 38

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of single-agent docetaxel administered in daily clinical practice at low-dose regimen in 37 pre-treated elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer previously exposed to chemotherapy. Docetaxel was employed by physician's preference according to a weekly (8 patients, 25-30 mg/m2 every 7 days), bi-weekly (19 patients, 40-50 mg/m2 every 14 days), or tri-weekly (10 patients, 75-100 mg/m2 every 21-28 days) schedule. The median age of patients was 70 yrs, and most of them (84%) had a good PS; visceral metastases were found in 26 patients. Twenty-five patients were pre-treated by two or more chemotherapy lines. Anthracycline or anthracycline/paclitaxel therapy was previously employed in 25 patients (67%). Median delivered dose-intensity of docetaxel was 21 mg/m2/week (range 11-32), without significant differences between the regimens used. Thirty-three patients were evaluable for response. Eight (24%) patients had objective responses (2 complete and 6 partial) to docetaxel, with a median duration of response of 18 months; 14 (42%) patients had stable disease lasting more than 6 months (median 10 months). Median overall time to progression was 6 months. Median overall survival was 16 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 34%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were rare: leucopenia in 18% of patients, neutropenia in 13%, emesis in 8%, diarrhea in 5%, and mucositis in 5%. Severe fatigue was recorded in 4 patients. In conclusion, docetaxel, even when administered at low dose-intensity, demonstrated good disease control and toxicity profile. This approach provides an excellent alternative for pre-treated elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Low dose-intensity docetaxel in the treatment of pre-treated elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. 1594 30

Despite improvements in conventional treatment, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis, leaving a significant unmet need for novel treatments. One such novel, biologically targeted agent is the orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. This open-label pilot trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 2 doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg per day) combined with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Eighteen patients were recruited: 6 received gefitinib 250 mg per day plus docetaxel; 12 received gefitinib 500 mg per day plus docetaxel. Combination therapy was feasible with no overlapping toxicities. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 250 mg per day; 1 patient had 2 DLT events at 500 mg per day (grade 3 rash and diarrhea for >4 days). Adverse events were mild to moderate, including fatigue, mucositis, nausea, anorexia, rash, diarrhea, and fever. Docetaxel did not appear to alter steady-state exposure to gefitinib. The effect of gefitinib on exposure to docetaxel was equivocal; with the exception of 2 patients in the gefitinib 250 mg per day dose group, there appeared to be no trend toward a higher or lower exposure to docetaxel when given in the presence of gefitinib compared with that when given alone. Combination therapy was associated with antitumor activity and responses were seen with gefitinib in 2 of 6 patients at 250 mg per day and 4 of 12 patients at 500 mg per day. This combination is feasible and has an acceptable and predictable safety profile, as well as associated antitumor activity.
 ...
PMID:A pilot trial of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. 1594 94

Treatment options for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) showed unsatisfactory outcomes. Docetaxel-based combinations could offer more promising and tolerated results. A phase II trial was conducted with the combination of zoledronic acid, docetaxel and estramustine. Eligibility consisted of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma with objective progression or rising prostate specific antigen levels (PSA) despite androgen deprivation therapy. Zoledronic acid was given at a dose of 4 mg on day 1, docetaxel (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15, and estramustine orally at 140 mg two times daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled between October 2002 and November 2004. Median age was 68 years (53-83 years). A total of 124 cycles were administered with a median of 4.6 cycles per patient (1-8 cycles). The major toxicities were grades 1 to 3 anemia (55%), fatigue (15%), alopecia (11%) and hypocalcemia (11%). Two patients presented with deep venous thrombosis and died from pulmonary embolism. Another third patient died from Stevens-Johnson syndrome and grade 4 hepatic toxicity. Out of the 25 patients assessed for efficacy, 13 (52%) had a biologic response (>50% PSA decline). Three (21%) patients among the 14 with measurable disease had objective response: 1 complete response (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR). Response duration was 2 months for PR and 4 months for CR. A total of 12 patients (48%) experienced clinical benefit with pain reduction. This combination seemed effective; however toxic deaths especially from venous thrombosis counterbalanced the advantage of this regimen.
 ...
PMID:Weekly docetaxel, zoledronic acid and estramustine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). 1784 4

The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin has shown promising results in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, but with substantial toxicity. The efficacy and safety in anthracycline-naive patients has not been evaluated. Between October 2003 and January 2006, we enrolled 39 patients. None had undergone chemotherapy for metastatic disease or been exposure to adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens earlier. Eligibility criteria included: histologically proven metastatic cancer; WHO performance status (PS) 0-2; and adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function. Docetaxel (70 mg/m) and cisplatin (50 mg/m) were administered every 3 weeks until the patient either refused to continue, or progression, or even unacceptable toxicity occurred. Tumor response was assessed every three cycles. One patient was withdrawn from response analysis because of toxicity. Thirty-eight patients had a complete tumor assessment. Median age was 50 years (range, 28-63); 5.1% had a WHO of PS of 0; 87% a PS of 1; 7.7% a PS of 2; in 69%, two or more organs were involved. A total of 291 cycles (range, 1-9) were administered. Three complete responses and 27 partial responses (intent-to-treat response rate 30/39=76.9%) resulted; disease remained stable in six patients and two had disease progression. Grade III/IV toxicities included diarrhea in 10.2%, asthenia/fatigue in 2.5%, mucositis in 5.1% and neutropenia in 87.3% of patients. Seven patients developed febrile neutropenia (17.9%). The median time to progression was 11.2 months; the timespan was not sufficient to track the median survival. Docetaxel/cisplatin is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, but it is not sufficiently promising as a standard. Further randomized study is warranted.
 ...
PMID:An open-labeled phase II trial of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin as first-line cytotoxic therapy for anthracycline-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer. 1789 23


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>