Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015672 (fatigue)
 51,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Thirty-four evaluable patients were treated with vinorelbine, a novel, semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. They received vinorelbine 25 mg m-2 i.v. given weekly for a maximum of 16 cycles. Two patients achieved a complete remission and 15 a partial remission, giving a response rate of 17/34 (50%; 95% CI of 34-66%); median response duration was 5.8 months. The median progression-free interval was 4.4 months and median survival 9.9 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Fatigue was the most common side-effect. The main reason for dose adjustments was myelosuppression; 68% of patients had WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and there was one death attributed to neutropenic sepsis. Nausea/vomiting and neuropathy were mild and alopecia was uncommon. This study confirms vinorelbine as a highly active, well-tolerated agent in advanced breast cancer worthy of evaluation in combination chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:A phase II, multicentre, UK study of vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer. 794 9

To explore the augmentation of cyclosporin-induced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we conducted a phase I dose escalation trial of interferon (IFN)-alpha 2a. A dose of either 1 or 3 x 10(6) units of IFN-alpha 2a was given by daily sc injection starting on day 0 of BMT and continuing for 28 days. Cyclosporine (CYA) was also started on day 0 of BMT at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 28 days. We enrolled 22 patients (median age 43 years, range 19-55 years, male/female ratio = 9/13) which included 11 patients with lymphoma, 5 patients with Hodgkin's disease, 4 patients with AML and 1 patient each with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and myeloma. Patients were divided into four groups: two control groups received either CYA or IFN-alpha 2a alone and the other two groups received IFN-alpha 2a at a dose of either 1 x 10(6) or 3 x 10(6) units/day sc concomitantly with CYA for 28 days. IFN-alpha 2a treatment was terminated early in 5 patients: 2 patients receiving IFN-alpha 2a at a dose of 3 x 10(6) units/day developed intractable fatigue, nausea and vomiting and 3 other patients had life-threatening transplant-related complications not related to IFN-alpha 2a (1 patient receiving 3 x 10(6) units/day, and 2 receiving 1 x 10(6) units/day). These patients were considered not evaluable. Of the 17 evaluable patients, all 13 who received IFN-alpha 2a developed GVHD regardless of whether they received CYA whereas only 2 of the 4 patients who received CYA alone developed detectable GVHD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of alpha-interferon augmentation of cyclosporine-induced graft versus host disease in recipients of autologous bone marrow transplantation. 805 15

In a double-blind, randomised, multicentre study, the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron and a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone were compared for the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin in patients previously not entirely protected by tropisetron monotherapy. In all, 160 women with gynaecological cancers were studied during two consecutive courses of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. During the first course (the screening course), all patients received tropisetron monotherapy [5 mg intravenous (i.v.) on day 1 and 5 mg orally on days 2-6] as antiemetic treatment. During the second course (the test course), tropisetron was compared with a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone (20 mg i.v. on day 1 and 4.5 mg twice daily on days 2-6). This part of the study was double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled. Candidates for randomisation were patients with partial control of nausea (< 12 h of nausea) or partial control of vomiting (1-4 episodes of vomiting) during the screening course. Patients with complete control of nausea and vomiting in the screening course continued with tropisetron monotherapy; patients with treatment failure received open rescue treatment in course 2. Total control of acute nausea was achieved in 37% of the tropisetron + placebo group and in 75% of the tropisetron + dexamethasone group (P = 0.001). Significantly more patients on tropisetron-dexamethasone than on tropisetron-placebo were also free of delayed nausea. Acute vomiting was prevented in 40% of the patients in the placebo group and in 75% in the dexamethasone group (P = 0.001). Delayed vomiting was also significantly less frequent in dexamethasone-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients. Tropisetron was well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with dexamethasone. The most frequent adverse events were headache (34%), constipation (12.5%) and fatigue (12.5%). Adding high doses of a corticosteroid did not induce further adverse events or disregulate concurrent diseases.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in comparison with a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. 808 Jun 78

A late Phase II clinical study of KW-2307, a new vinca alkaloid derivative, in previously untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer was jointly carried out in 26 medical institutions. Of 80 enrolled cases, 75 cases were eligible, and PR was attained in 23 cases (30.7%). The main adverse effect of this drug, leukopenia (neutropenia), was observed in 62.7% (83.3%) of Grade 3 and 4 cases, but they recovered rapidly. In addition to decreased hemoglobin in 67% (Grade 3 in 5.7%) of the cases, adverse effects included slight disorder of hepatic function, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, fever, general fatigue, phlebitis, paresthesia and interstitial pneumonia. Peripheral neuropathy such as paresthesia occurred rarely and was slight, if any.
 ...
PMID:[Late phase II clinical study of KW-2307 in previously untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. KW-2307 Study Group (Lung Cancer Group)]. 808 45

A total of 4676 patients and 1759 patients were treated with lisinopril and nifedipine respectively in a post-marketing surveillance study conducted in general practice in the UK. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Most of the lisinopril patients had hypertension, but a small number (180) had heart failure. Most of the nifedipine patients had uncomplicated hypertension, but some (22.57%) had other cardiovascular disease with or without hypertension. Lisinopril and nifedipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. During the study, 1.5% of hypertensive patients assigned to lisinopril died compared with 1.8% of patients assigned to nifedipine, and 15.1% of lisinopril patients compared with 19.7% of patients in the nifedipine group withdrew because of adverse events. Cough, malaise and fatigue, nausea and vomiting were more frequent causes of withdrawal from lisinopril than nifedipine. Conversely, headaches, pallor and flushing, oedema and palpitations caused more frequent withdrawals from nifedipine. Anaemia was more often encountered on nifedipine treatment than on lisinopril. In hypertensive patients, the frequency of first-dose hypotension was similar on both treatments. Serious events occurred in 0.8% and 0.5% of patients given lisinopril and nifedipine respectively. Lisinopril was well tolerated by heart failure patients: 16 patients (8.88%) died and an incidence of 4.44% of serious adverse events was reported, a pattern to be anticipated in such patients; dizziness, giddiness, dyspnoea, cough, nausea and vomiting were the most frequent causes of withdrawal; the incidence of first-dose hypotension was low (2.22%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Post-marketing surveillance of lisinopril in general practice in the UK. 811 50

In a prospective study 519 patients had gastroscopy (393 with and 126 without midazolam-premedication) and 506 patients had colonoscopy (377 with and 129 without midazolam-premedication) to evaluate acceptance, adverse reactions and reactivity after midazolam-premedication in outpatients immediately and 24 hours later by standard telephone interview. Patients could choose whether they would have midazolam or not. Normally 2 mg midazolam for gastroscopy and 4 mg for colonoscopy were given intravenously directly before endoscopy. 71.5% of gastroscopy and 75.3% of colonoscopy patients who received midazolam afterwards accepted endoscopy only with premedication. 27.7% of our gastroscopy and 14.1% of the colonoscopy patients who than received midazolam were beforehand unable to decide about premedication by themselves. 27.5% of the gastroscopy and 13.8% of the colonoscopy group were persuaded to have midazolam by the doctor examining. 12.7% of our gastroscopy- and 27.1% of our colonoscopy-patients who wished to have midazolam were persuaded to withdraw from it. There were no cardio-pulmonal complications but fatigue was found in 35.4% of the gastroscopy Patients with and 11.9% of those without premedication; colonoscopy patients: 50.4% with and 34.9% without premedication. The incidence of headache was: gastroscopy patients: 6.4% vs. 4%; colonoscopy patients: 11.1% vs. 10.9%. Dizziness: gastroscopy patients: 6.4% vs. 3.2%; colonoscopy patients: 7.6% vs. 7%. Nausea and vomiting were rare (0 to 5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Acceptance, side-effects and reactive ability after medicamentous anxiolysis with midazolam. A prospective study with 519 gastroscopy and 506 colonoscopy patients]. 812 88

This randomized, double-blind crossover study was undertaken to compare the antiemetic effectiveness of intravenous prochlorperazine (Compazine) and lorazepam (Ativan) in the management of postchemotherapy symptoms during two initial cycles of therapy. Each patient received at least one treatment as an outpatient. Data from the 24 patients receiving noncisplatin therapy who completed the crossover study were evaluated for antiemetic efficacy and total posttherapy symptom experience. Although results indicated no statistically significant difference between regimens in the control of posttherapy nausea and vomiting, these side effects were completely controlled in 26 of the 48 study treatment cycles. Lorazepam significantly reduced total posttherapy symptom experience by decreasing patients' experience of fatigue and pain. Findings support the value of lorazepam in antiemetic regimens and point to the need for further examination of antiemetic combinations.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of prochlorperazine and lorazepam antiemetic regimens in the control of postchemotherapy symptoms. 833 62

Forty-one patients with advanced renal cell cancer started treatment with recombinant alpha-interferon intramuscularly, beginning at a dose of 5 x 10(6) U x 3/week, progressively increasing doses every week, from 5 x 10(6) U x 3/week to 10 x 10(6) U x 3/week, to the highest dose of 15 x 10(6) U x 3/week. No complete response was achieved, partial response was achieved in 6 (13%) patients with a median duration of 45.2 (13-134) weeks. The majority of side effects from interferon treatment evaluated according to WHO classification were seen during the first 2 months and they were fever (after interferon administration) in 95% patients, chills (51%), flu like syndrome (65%), fatigue (87%), anorexia (80%), worsening in performance status (56%), nausea and vomiting (19%), weight loss (> 10% during therapy) (26%), leukopenia (14%), anemia (75%), neurological symptoms (43%), psychological symptoms (19%) and dyspnea (9%). The results are similar to other studies and toxicity was only moderate.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of renal cell carcinoma with escalating doses of alpha-interferon. 837 Mar 27

A patient-reported checklist was used to assess adequacy of dialysis as measured by 24-hour creatinine clearance in 40 patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. The checklist consisted of 13 symptoms, each scored from 0-5 with 0 = absent and 5 = severe. The total possible score was 0-65. Patients completed the checklist at the time of 24-hour dialysate and urine collections (in those with residual function) for creatinine clearance (CrCl). Arbitrary grouping by total CrCl in liters/week/1.73 m2 placed patients in one of two groups: those with CrCl < or = 48 L/week (n = 12) and those with CrCl > 48 L/week (n = 28). Patient age, sex, diabetes mellitus, months on peritoneal dialysis, mode of peritoneal dialysis, and hematocrit were not different between the two patient groups. More patients with CrCl > 48 L/week had endogenous renal function (19/28 vs 2/12, p = 0.004). The median total scores for the two patient groups were not significantly different (17 in those with CrCl < or = 48 L/week vs 13.5 in those with CrCl > 48 L/week, p = 0.40). The correlation between total score and CrCl was negative in both patient groups and stronger in those with the lower CrCl (-0.55 vs -0.44). Nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and weakness were the best predictors of CrCl < or = 48 L/week (-0.53, -0.56, -0.49, respectively). The checklist can identify patients with low CrCl and may be useful for following patients over time and altering dialysis prescriptions.
 ...
PMID:Patient-reported symptoms and adequacy of dialysis as measured by creatinine clearance. 839 70

Sumatriptan is a potent and selective agonist at the vascular 5HT1 receptor which mediates constriction of certain large cranial blood vessels and/or inhibits the release of vasoactive neuropeptides from perivascular trigeminal axons in the dura mater following activation of the trigeminovascular system. The mode of action of this drug in migraine and cluster headache is discussed. On the basis of a detailed review of all published trials and available data from post-marketing studies, the efficacy, safety, tolerability and the place of oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan in the treatment of both conditions are assessed. A number of double-blind clinical trials have demonstrated that sumatriptan 100 mg administered orally is clearly superior to placebo in the acute treatment of migraine headache and achieves significantly greater response rates than ergotamine or aspirin. In other studies, 70 to 80% of patients receiving sumatriptan 6 mg sc experienced relief of migraine headaches by 1 or 2 h after administration, and patients consistently required less rescue medication for unresolved symptoms. Sumatriptan was also effective in relieving associated migraine symptoms like nausea and vomiting. Sumatriptan was equally effective regardless of migraine type or duration of migraine symptoms. Overall, approximately 40% of patients who initially responded to oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan experienced recurrence of their headache usually within 24 h, effectively treated by a further dose of this drug. In 75% of patients with cluster headache treated with sumatriptan 6 mg sc, relief was achieved within 15 min. Based on pooled study data, sumatriptan is generally well tolerated and most adverse events are transient. Adverse events following oral administration include nausea, vomiting, malaise, fatigue and dizziness. With the subcutaneous injection, injection site reactions occur in approximately 30%. Chest syumptoms are reported in 3 to 5% but have been associated with myocardial ischaemia only in rare isolated cases. The recommended dosage of sumatriptan at the onset of migraine symptoms is 100 mg orally or 6 mg subcutaneously. The recommended dosage for cluster headache is 6 mg sumatriptan sc. Sumatriptan must not be given together with vasoconstrictive substances, e.g., ergotamines, or with migraine prophylactics with similar properties, e.g., methysergide. Sumatriptan should not be given during the migraine aura. It is contraindicated in patients with ischaemic heart disease, previous myocardial infarction, Prinzmetal (variant) angina and uncontrolled hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Migraine and cluster headache--their management with sumatriptan: a critical review of the current clinical experience. 853 93


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>