Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0015672 (fatigue)
 51,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A vaccine that could expand melanoma-specific T cells might reduce the risk of recurrence of resected melanoma and could provide an alternative or adjunct to standard immunotherapy options. We tested the safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine coupling a melanoma-associated peptide with a xenogenic peptide (to promote epitope spreading) and/or resiquimod (to activate antigen-presenting cells). HLA-A2-positive patients with resected stage II, III, and IV melanoma were assigned to treatment on one of three schedules. All patients received three subcutaneous doses of the peptide MART-1a mixed with Montanide. In addition, patients on schedule 1 received the xenoantigen peptide Gag267-274, patients on schedule 2 received topical resiquimod, and patients on schedule 3 received both Gag267-274 and resiquimod. Blood samples were tested for the frequency of antigen-specific T cells by tetramer assay, as well as immune cell subtypes and plasma cytokine levels. Patients enrolled from October 2012 to December 2014, with 10 patients enrolling to each schedule. The most common adverse events were injection site reaction (26 patients) and fatigue (15 patients). Tetramer analysis revealed antigen-specific responses (defined as doubling of MART-1a-specific T cells from pretreatment to post-treatment) in 20, 60, and 40% of patients treated on schedules 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Vaccine treatment consisting of MART-1a peptide, Gag267-274, Montanide, and topical resiquimod was well-tolerated. The addition of the Gag267-274 xenoantigen was not associated with an increase in the response to MART-1a, whereas use of topical resiquimod was associated with a higher frequency of MART-1a-specific T-cell responses that did not meet statistical significance.
Melanoma Res 2019 08
PMID:A pilot clinical trial testing topical resiquimod and a xenopeptide as immune adjuvants for a melanoma vaccine targeting MART-1. 3052 Aug

Given the approval of dabrafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a better understanding of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes with dabrafenib in a clinical setting is warranted. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received dabrafenib in a compassionate use setting through the Named Patient Program (DESCRIBE I study) during December 2010-August 2013 in Europe, New Zealand and Australia. Of the 331 Named Patient Program patients included, the majority (95.8%) had stage IV disease at dabrafenib initiation and 39.9% had brain metastases (BMs). Dabrafenib was used first line in 67.7% of patients, and median treatment duration was 6.4 months. Dabrafenib was well tolerated. Common grade 2/3 adverse events were hyperkeratosis (7.6%), pyrexia/fever (6.6%), fatigue (5.1%), hand-foot syndrome (5.4%) and nausea (3.6%). Overall response rate was 45.9%, median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.2-6.1 months), and median overall survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2-15.0 months). In patients with known brain metastases (n = 132) versus patients without (n = 199), overall response rate was 42.4% versus 48.2%, progression-free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-5.5 months) versus 5.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-7.8 months) and overall survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.7-12.4 months) versus 15 months (95% confidence interval, 11.1-20.5 months), respectively. Safety and effectiveness of dabrafenib in patients with unresectable advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated in an Named Patient Program was similar to the clinical trial experience, demonstrating effectiveness of dabrafenib in a nontrial setting.
Melanoma Res 2019 10
PMID:Effectiveness of dabrafenib in the treatment of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma in a Named Patient Program. 3109 39

Objective: Treatment with immunotherapy has positively changed the long-term outlook of many patients with advanced melanoma; however, fatigue is a common and debilitating side effect. Evidence indicates exercise can improve treatment-related fatigue for patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, currently little is known about exercise behaviors and preferences of patients receiving immunotherapy. This project aimed to describe self-reported levels of fatigue related to immunotherapy; patient perspectives of exercise behaviors; and barriers and facilitators to engagement in exercise for patients receiving, or recently completed immunotherapy for unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma. Method: A cross-sectional purpose-built survey was distributed to members of the Melanoma Patients Australia closed Facebook group via an online survey platform. The survey remained active for 1 month, with 3 posts during this time inviting members to participate. Results: A total of 55 responses were collected. Just over half the participants (n = 31; 56%) described exercising while receiving immunotherapy, with walking as the most common activity (n = 24; 77%). Participants described a range of physical and emotional benefits of exercise, the most predominant being fatigue reduction. Barriers to exercise also included fatigue and competing physical demands at home or work. Patient understanding of what constitutes exercise appeared to differ from clinical classifications. Conclusions: Results from this study indicate that patients are engaging in exercise while receiving immunotherapy, with the intent of mediating treatment-related fatigue. Identification of preferred exercise activities and barriers will assist in developing tailored exercise interventions for this cohort.
 ...
PMID:Exercise Behaviors and Fatigue in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma: A Cross-Sectional Survey via Social Media. 3138 68

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare but life-threatening condition. HLH in infants and young children is usually inherited, which is then classified as primary HLH. Secondary HLH, in contrast, is caused by many different conditions such as infections, cancer or medication and affects mostly adults. HLH is a hyperinflammatory condition, which may mimic an acute septic shock. We report on a 68-year-old patient with malignant melanoma with lymph node metastases. Due to the lymphogenic progression, treatment was switched from nivolumab to dabrafenib and trametinib. Twenty-one days after initiation of BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, the patient presented to our emergency department with clinical signs of infection such as fever and fatigue. Laboratory tests showed excessive inflammation levels without identifying an underlying pathogen. Two days later, the patient developed an increasing pancytopenia. After extending the diagnosis, we found very high ferritin levels, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia and a soluble CD25 receptor. Based on the laboratory results, prolonged fever and splenomegaly, we were able to diagnose HLH as the underlying condition. We immediately initiated treatment with intravenous prednisone, which remarkably improved the clinical symptoms. After full recovery, we reinitiated anti-tumor treatment with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, which was tolerated without side effects. Due to the relatively nonspecific nature of the clinical signs and symptoms and the significant overlap with other diseases such as sepsis, the diagnosis of HLH is often delayed. This explains, in part, the high morbidity and mortality rate. Our case shows that early treatment with steroids is effective. However, much work remains in order to raise awareness and improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of this condition.
Melanoma Res 2020 Nov 23
PMID:Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis of a melanoma patient under BRAF/MEK-inhibitor therapy following anti-PD1 inhibitor treatment: a case report and review to the literature. 3323 45


<< Previous 1 2 3 4