Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0014848 (achalasia)
 2,804 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Transhiatal esophagectomy has been performed in 583 patients with diseases of the intrathoracic esophagus: 166 (28%) benign and 417 (72%) malignant (6% upper, 28% middle, and 66% lower third and cardia). The benign esophageal diseases included strictures (40%); neuromotor dysfunction-achalasia (24%), esophageal spasm (8%); recurrent gastroesophageal reflux (16%); acute perforation (5%); acute caustic injury (2%); and others (3%). Among the patients with benign disease, 60% had undergone at least one prior esophageal operation. Transhiatal esophagectomy was possible in 97% of patients in whom it was attempted, 19 patients (13 with benign disease and 6 with carcinoma) requiring addition of a thoracotomy for esophageal resection. Esophageal resection and reconstruction were performed in a single operation in all but 5 patients. The esophageal substitute was positioned in the posterior mediastinum in the original esophageal bed in 96%. Stomach was used to replace the esophagus in 553 patients (95%) and colon in 28 (5%) who had undergone prior gastric resections. Overall hospital mortality was 5% in patients with benign disease and 5% in those with carcinoma. There was 1 intraoperative death caused by uncontrollable hemorrhage. Complications included intraoperative entry into a pleural cavity necessitating a chest tube (74%), anastomotic leak (9%), recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (3%), and chylothorax and tracheal laceration (< 1% each). Three patients required reoperation for mediastinal bleeding. Average intraoperative blood loss was 875 ml (1023 ml for benign disease and 817 ml for carcinoma). Of the surviving patients, 88% were discharged able to swallow within 3 weeks of operation and 78% within 2 weeks. The actuarial survival of the patients with carcinoma is similar to that reported after more traditional transthoracic esophagectomy. Among patients with benign disease, good or excellent functional results have been achieved in nearly 70% after a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Although approximately 44% have required one or more anastomotic dilations within 1 to 3 months of operation, true anastomotic strictures have developed in 10%. Clinically troublesome nocturnal reflux has occurred in 3%. Transhiatal esophagectomy is feasible in most patients requiring esophageal resection for either benign or malignant disease and is a safe, well-tolerated operation if performed with care and for the proper indications.
 ...
PMID:Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease. 842 54

Background: A few decades ago, esophageal substitution was mainly dedicated particularly in postcaustic esophageal stenosis; currently, the reconstruction has expanded its palette of indications to other areas of benign esophageal pathology (severe motor disorders, esophageal achalasia with multiple relapses, peptic stenosis, etc.) but has also become a quasi-obligatory final time in the esophagectomy for cancer whenever it is possible. The techniques of esophageal reconstruction using the stomach, regardless of the indication and the chosen technical option, remain a valuable and effective method. A number of striking arguments advocate for one or another type of gastric graft: anatomic factors more than convenient (vascularization, sufficient length, a wall structure favorable for suture, etc.) and a sustainable surgical intervention (length, approach, complexity of the surgical steps digestive disorders after surgery, post-therapeutic functionality, etc.). Choosing a technique or another, beyond pathological arguments, should take into account remote functionality, with a clear impact on metabolic status and quality of life. So, according to this criterion, can we functionally justify a type or another of gastric restoration? Finally, the proof of an adequate solution is relatively easy to appreciate: has swallowing been restored and if so, the result has been maintained over time? For oncological cases, the assessment should also take into account the chronological criterion of the postoperative survival rate. Methods: The statistically rated lot ranged from 1981 to 2016 and included 268 patients with surgical interventions for esophageal stenosis, distributed according to etiopathogenesis and indication in 201 reconstructions for post-caustic stenosis, and 67 for post-esophagectomy replacement for neoplasm. The techniques used for remote functional evaluation included: barium swallow, endoscopy + biopsy, and in cases with obvious changes pH measurement/24 h and manometry and, only in exceptional cases, scintigraphy with marked foods. Results: two types of problems have been identified: a particular type of neuro-motor dysfunction of the esophageal substitute in 6 patients (1 patient with Gavriliu reconstruction and 5 with Nakayama reconstruction, using the whole stomach), with difficulty, delayed gastric graft evacuation, with major stasis and abdominal discomfort vomiting, inability to eat, aspiration phenomena) respectively a reflux pathology - 8 patients, being proved by a specific simptomatology, barium lunch, endoscopic examination and pH-metric examination. Reflux was alkaline in 7 patients, all with pyloroplasty, 5 with whole stomach and 2 with Akiyama procedure; in 1 case with Gavriliu procedure the reflux was acid. Conclusions: Stomach is a good option in esophageal substitution. Concerning the remote results, a good functionality is found with a reasonable metabolic status. The two phenomena on which the function of the graft depends - secretory activity and motor activity - seem to be restored in time but these does not occur concurrently, the recovery of the secretory function being much faster.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal Reconstruction with the Stomach, a Functional Dilemma? 2950 34