Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0014848 (achalasia)
 2,804 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Botulinum toxin (BTX) is one of the most potent inhibitors of acetylcholine from nerve endings, and this accounts for its toxic properties as well as its therapeutic application in a variety of neuromuscular syndromes. This review focuses on the growing use of BTX in the so-called 'spastic' disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. These include achalasia, for which the short-term efficacy of the intrasphincteric injection of BTX has been well established. However, because of the chronicity of this condition, repeated injections of the toxin may be required at regular intervals. In contrast, the relatively short duration of action may be an advantage in disorders such as chronic anal fissure, where the benefit of this therapy has now been demonstrated in hundreds of patients. There are many other sphincteric and non-sphincteric syndromes in the gut for which the efficacy of this agent is being actively tested. These include non-cardiac chest pain, post-operative pylorospasm and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Skeletal muscle sphincters, such as the upper oesophageal sphincter or the external anal sphincter/puborectalis muscle, may also be targeted, with good effect. In some of these conditions, the local injection of BTX may serve as a useful therapeutic trial, facilitating the decision to institute more invasive forms of therapy. The cumulative short-term experience with BTX in the gut to date suggests that it is a relatively simple and safe therapy. The use of BTX represents a novel approach for gastrointestinal motility disorders, and the rapidly expanding list of successful applications holds promise for a more widespread use of similar agents in the future. Additional studies on long-term outcome are eagerly awaited.
Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 1999 Apr
PMID:Botulinum toxin for spastic gastrointestinal disorders. 1103 Jun 39

Pneumatic dilation is the most common first-line therapy for the treatment of achalasia. The aim of dilation is a controlled disruption of circular muscle fibres of the lower esophageal sphincter to reduce the functional obstruction. Several types of dilators and different dilation techniques are used, but the achieved results are similar. The mean success rate is about 80% in the short term, but some patients need redilation in the further course (particularly young patients). Best long term results are obtained if the lower esophageal sphincter pressure can be reduced below 10 mmHg. Major complications are rare after pneumatic dilation; the most serious complication is esophageal perforation, which occurs at a mean rate of about 2.5%. Considering the pros and cons of other effective forms of treatment of achalasia (esophagomyotomy and intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin), pneumatic dilation is still the treatment of choice in the majority of patients with achalasia.
 ...
PMID:Pneumatic dilation in achalasia. 1126 73

Squamous cell cancer is the most common neoplasm of the oesophagus worldwide, with an enormous variation in its global incidence. Several risk factors, such as achalasia, Plummer-Vinson syndrome, coeliac disease and nutritional factors, have been identified. The surveillance of patients, especially those with tylosis or caustic ingestion, has been recommended. Vital staining with iodine may improve the diagnosis of early cancer. The endoscopic management of early cancer and dysplasia by minimal invasive techniques such as photodynamic therapy or mucosal resection has become attractive for many of these patients with co-morbidity.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2001 Apr
PMID:Squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus. 1135 14

Motor abnormalities of the oesophagus are characterised by a chronic impairment of the neuromuscular structures that co-ordinate oesophageal function. The best-defined entity is achalasia, which is discussed in a separate chapter. Other motor disorders with clinical relevance include diffuse oesophageal spasm, oesophageal dysmotility associated with scleroderma, and ineffective oesophageal motility. These non-achalasic motor disorders have variable prevalence but they could be associated with invalidating symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. New oesophageal diagnostic techniques, including high-resolution manometry, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound and intraluminal impedance, allow (1) better definition of peristalsis and sphincter function, (2) assessment of changes in oesophageal wall thickness, and (3) evaluation of pressure gradients within the oesophagus and across the sphincters that can produce normal or abnormal patterns of bolus transport. This chapter discusses recent advances in physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of non-achalasic oesophageal motor disorders.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007
PMID:Non-achalasic motor disorders of the oesophagus. 1764 2

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the oesophagus, characterised by the absence of peristalsis and impaired swallow-induced relaxation. These motor abnormalities result in stasis of ingested food in the oesophagus, leading to clinical symptoms, such as dysphagia, regurgitation of food, retrosternal pain and weight loss. Although it is well demonstrated that loss of myenteric oesophageal neurons is the underlying problem, it still remains unclear why these neurons are preferentially attacked and destroyed by the immune system. This limited insight into pathophysiology explains the fact that treatment is limited to interventions aimed at reducing the pressure of the lower oesophageal sphincter. The most successful therapies are clearly pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy with short-term success rates of 70-90%, declining to 50-65% after more than 15 years. The challenge for the coming years will undoubtedly be to get more insight into the underlying disease mechanisms and to develop a treatment to restore function.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007
PMID:Achalasia. 1764 3

As a minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia per-oral endoscopic myotomy( POEM) was developed in 2008. More than 1,100 cases of achalasia-related diseases received POEM. Success rate of the procedure was more than 95%(Eckerdt score improvement 3 points and more). No serious( Clavian-Dindo classification III b and more) complication was experienced. These results suggest that POEM becomes a standard minimally invasive treatment for achalasia-related diseases. As an off-shoot of POEM submucosal tumor removal through submucosal tunnel (per-oral endoscopic tumor resection:POET) was developed and safely performed. Best indication of POET is less than 5 cm esophageal leiomyoma. A novel endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was developed. Anti-reflux mucosectomy( ARMS) is nearly circumferential mucosal reduction of gastric cardia mucosa. ARMS is performed in 56 consecutive cases of refractory GERD. No major complications were encountered and excellent clinical results. Best indication of ARMS is a refractory GERD without long sliding hernia. Longest follow-up case is more than 10 years. Minimally invasive treatments for esophageal benign diseases are currently performed by therapeutic endoscopy.
 ...
PMID:[Minimally Invasive Treatment of Esophageal Benign Diseases]. 2744 38

Currently curative treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is possible only in patients with early-stage, usually asymptomatic disease. In Western countries, where the incidence of ESCC is relatively low, a screening of asymptomatic, average-risk population is untenable. In order to detect early-stage ESCC or its precursor lesions it is important to identify high-risk patients and consider endoscopic surveillance in these groups. These high-risk groups include patients after curative treatment for head and neck cancer, previous endoscopic resection of ESCC, caustic injury, and patients with tylosis or achalasia. This paper discuss the evidence and proposed method of endoscopy surveillance of these high-risk patients.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016 Dec
PMID:Surveillance of patients at high-risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer. 2793 84

The functional luminal imaging probe is a Food and Drug Administration-approved measurement tool used to measure simultaneous pressure and diameter to guide management of various upper gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, this tool is also approved to guide therapy during bariatric procedures and specialized esophageal surgery. Although it has been commercially available since 2009 as the endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP), the functional luminal imaging probe has had limited penetrance into clinical settings outside of specialized centers. This is primarily because of a paucity of data supporting its utility in general practice and a lack of standardized protocols and data analysis methodology. However, data are accumulating that are providing guidance regarding emerging applications in the evaluation and management of foregut disorders. This clinical practice update describes the technique and reviews potential indications in achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and gastroesophgeal reflux disease. Best Practice Advice 1: Clinicians should not make a diagnosis or treatment decision based on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) assessment alone. Best Practice Advice 2: FLIP assessment is a complementary tool to assess esophagogastric junction opening dynamics and the stiffness of the esophageal wall. Best Practice Advice 3: Utilization should follow distinct protocols and analysis paradigms based on the disease state of interest. Best Practice Advice 4: Clinicians should not utilize FLIP in routine diagnostic assessments of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Best Practice Advice 5: FLIP should not be used to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis but may have a role in severity assessment and therapeutic monitoring.
 ...
PMID:Functional Lumen Imaging Probe for the Management of Esophageal Disorders: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the AGA Institute. 2847 99