Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0014848 (achalasia)
 2,804 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Esophageal replacement remains a challenge. Colon and jejunum provide alternative conduits to replace the lower esophagus when stomach is not suitable. Between 1971 and 1991, 41 patients underwent short-segment interposition of the esophagus with jejunum or colon. Indications were failed antireflux procedures (n = 21), nondilatable stricture (n = 9), achalasia (n = 2), moniliasis (n = 2), Barrett's esophagus with carcinoma in situ (n = 2), hemorrhagic esophagitis after esophagogastrectomy (n = 1), motility disorder (n = 1), instrumental perforation (n = 1), carcinoma (n = 1), and leiomyosarcoma (n = 1). Thirty-one patients (75.6%) had prior surgical procedures. Interposition with colon was performed in 22 patients and with jejunum in 19. Major complications occurred in 45% after colon interposition (10/22) and hospital mortality was 4.5% (1/22). Major complications after jejunal interposition occurred in 31% (6/19) and hospital mortality was 10.5% (2/19). A contained anastomotic leak occurred in 1 patient, perforation of a colon segment in 1, and jejunal graft necrosis in a third. Late functional results in 34 patients with a mean follow-up of 87 months were excellent or good in 26, fair in 5, and poor in 1. Colon interposition failed to improve symptoms in 2 patients with gastrointestinal motility disorders. Six patients underwent manometry and barium food provocation study. Two colon segments and 3 jejunal interpositions were hypoperistaltic or aperistaltic according to manometry. There was 1 case of aperistaltic jejunum with a distended afferent loop. When stomach is not available, successful palliation of swallowing can be accomplished with either jejunum or colon. Surgeons involved in the management of esophageal disease should be familiar with the technical details of both procedures.
 ...
PMID:Short-segment intestinal interposition of the distal esophagus. 823 Dec 8

From 1985 to 1995, 60 patients with a mean age of 52 +/- 12 years [24-78] underwent colon interposition for esophageal replacement. Indications were esophageal cancer (n = 37), benign stricture (n = 13), iatrogenic esophageal fistula (n = 5), achalasia with megaesophagus (n = 3), and necrosis of a previous substitute (n = 2). Colon interposition represented only 18.5% of all operations performed for oesophageal replacement during the same period. The colon was selected because of inadequate stomach in 33 cases (55%). Long-segment conduit based on the ascending branch of the left colonic artery was the preferred method and could be used in 52 patients (86.7%). The colon was placed in the esophageal bed in 38 patients (63.3%), substernally in 21 (35%), and subcutaneously in 1. Overall operative mortality and morbidity were 8.3% and 65% respectively. Five-year survival rate was 9% in the 37 patients with esophageal cancer. Seven patients (13.5%) required one or more dilatations of the esophagocolonic anastomosis. At last follow-up, 34 patients (65.4%) had no difficulty eating. Multivariate analysis identified the conduit position in the posterior mediastinum as an independent predictor of good functional result (p = 0.0018). We conclude that colon interposition for esophageal replacement provides satisfactory and durable function; however, early mortality and morbidity are substantial.
 ...
PMID:[Technique and results of colonic esophagoplasties]. 876 61