Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0014547 (focal epilepsy)
 1,627 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effectiveness of lamotrigine as a monotherapeutic agent for a variety of pediatric epilepsies was reviewed retrospectively. Children were categorized as having focal vs generalized epilepsy and according to whether they were antiepileptic drug naive or drug exposed. Data collected included dosages, side effects, length of follow-up, number of prior drugs, and treatment response. Treatment was considered successful if the patient was seizure free for 6 months or more. Eighty-three children were identified (average age = 8.7 years); 43 had focal epilepsy, 32 had generalized epilepsy, and eight were not classified. Twenty-nine patients were classified as having specific syndromes. Fourteen patients were drug naive. The median follow-up period was 8 months (mean = 8.5). Overall, 45% were seizure free, 44% with focal epilepsy and 36% with generalized epilepsy. All children with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood were seizure free, although not all had been treated for at least 6 months. One third of drug-naive patients were seizure free. Rash was the most common side effect and was reported in five patients (6%); two patients discontinued the drug. None had Stevens-Johnson syndrome. One quarter of children experienced nonquantifiable improvements, namely increased alertness and improved behavior regardless of seizure control. Lamotrigine is effective as a monotherapeutic agent in children for both focal and generalized epilepsies. Side effects are relatively uncommon. Lamotrigine may be an effective firstline agent.
 ...
PMID:Lamotrigine monotherapy in children. 1102 Jun 42

Lamotrigine (LTG) has shown to confer broad-spectrum, well-tolerated control of epilepsy. Monotherapy is preferable over polytherapy because of better compliance, fewer adverse events, less interactions, lower teratogenicity and lower cost. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LTG monotherapy on seizure control in a cohort of children and adolescents with epilepsy. We retrospectively reviewed the records of children and adolescents treated with LTG monotherapy at our institution between 2001 and 2006. Data collected included demographics, seizure type, etiology of seizures, age at onset of seizures and at initiation of LTG treatment, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prior to LTG, dose of LTG, length of follow-up, treatment response, and adverse events. Seventy-two children and adolescents were identified (mean age 12.1 years); 37.5% had mental retardation. Age at onset of epilepsy was 5.7 years (0-16). Twenty three percent had symptomatic focal epilepsy, 15.5% idiopathic focal epilepsy, 19.4% symptomatic generalized epilepsy and 41.6% idiopathic generalized epilepsy. LTG was used as first-line monotherapy in 26.4% of patients and as a second-line monotherapy in 73.6%. Age at initiation of LTG therapy was 10 years (2.8-19). Mean number of AEDs tried prior to LTG was 1.3 (0-6). Mean dose of LTG was 5.5mg/kg/day (1.1-13.7). Mean follow-up period was 33 months (3 weeks to 11.5 years). The degree of seizure reduction was as follows: seizure free in 42%, 75-90% reduction in 17.4%, 50-74% in 11.6%, 25-49% in 10%. Sixteen percent had no change in seizure control and 3% became worse. The most common adverse event was rash (6.9%). Six (8.3%) patients discontinued LTG because of the adverse events. No patient had Stevens-Johnson syndrome. In conclusion, LTG was effective and well-tolerated as monotherapy in children and adolescents for both focal and generalized epilepsies.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine monotherapy in children and adolescents with epilepsy. 1858 41

Severe skin reactions occur less frequently with eslicarbazepine (ESL) than with the other aromatic anticonvulsants. We report the first case of cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) to ESL and co-sensitization between ESL and betalactams. A 41-year-old white woman developed focal epilepsy due to a meningioma that was removed. As post-operatory complication, she suffered meningitis as well as a maculo-papular erythema caused by the treatment with meropenem. Subsequently, ESL was started and gradually increased until 800 mg/day. Twenty-five days later, the patient developed an Erythema Multiforme Major (EMM). Strong positive immediate reaction was induced by prick test with carbamazepine (CBZ) and ESL at 0.01 and 0.1% within 15 and 30 minutes; however the delayed reading at 48 hours was negative. The patient was not carrier of the HLA alleles A3101 and B1502 associated with CBZ induced EMM. The hypersensitivity pathogenic mechanism of EMM is unclear and a delayed hypersensitivity process is speculated. However, the patch and intradermal tests in our patient did not show a delayed reaction but an immediate cutaneous one. A first allergic episode may elicit a massive nonspecific activation of the immune system, providing an enhanced expression of co-stimulatory molecules that decreases the level of tolerance to other drugs. When prescribing ESL, we suggest ruling out previous CADR, especially to CBZ and oxcarbazepine but also other chemically unrelated drugs such as beta-lactams.
...
PMID:Cutaneous adverse drug reaction type erythema multiforme major induced by eslicarbazepine. 2542 74

Oxcarbazepine is an antiepileptic drug (AED) commonly used as a first-line treatment option for focal epilepsy. Several AEDs, including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and phenytoin are associated with various delayed-hypersensitivity reactions such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis. The Food and Drug Administration-approved label for oxcarbazepine currently presents information regarding a pharmacogenomic association with the HLA antigen allele HLA-B*15:02 and hypersensitivity reactions in certain ancestry groups with a high incidence of this allele. However, unlike carbamazepine, screening for the presence of this allele is not routinely recommended before administration of oxcarbazepine. In practice, even with carbamazepine, HLA antigen testing is not always performed before initiating treatment because of lack of physician awareness of the recommendations and because of the desire to initiate treatment without delay. We present the clinical course of a pediatric patient with focal epilepsy refractory to several AEDs who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms after oxcarbazepine administration. The pharmacogenomic testing for various HLA antigen alleles was performed post hoc, and results were evaluated for structural similarities between AEDs and their molecular associations with HLA antigen proteins. In addition, we review the population-wide prevalence of various hypersensitivity reactions to AEDs and associated HLA antigen alleles. Finally, we discuss the potential utility of preemptive pharmacogenomic screening of patients before pharmacological treatment of epilepsy to assess the risk of developing hypersensitivity reactions.
 ...
PMID:HLA-A*31:01 and Oxcarbazepine-Induced DRESS in a Patient With Seizures and Complete DCX Deletion. 2961 Jan 67

Phenytoin (PHT) is an antiepileptic drug widely used in the treatment of focal epilepsy and status epilepticus, and effective in controlling focal seizures with and without tonic-clonic generalization and status epilepticus. The metabolization of PHT is carried out by two oxidative cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C9 and CYP2C19; 90% of this metabolization is done by CYP2C9 and the remaining 10% by CYP2C19. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C9 may reduce the metabolism of PHT by 25-50% in patients with variants *2 and *3 compared to those with wild-type variant *1. The frequency distribution of CYP2C9 polymorphism alleles in patients with epilepsy around the world ranges from 4.5 to 13.6%, being less frequent in African-Americans and Asians. PHT has a narrow therapeutic range and a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile; hence, its poor metabolization has significant clinical implications as it causes more frequent and more serious adverse effects requiring discontinuation of treatment, even if it had been effective. There is evidence that polymorphisms of CYP2C9 and the use of PHT are associated with an increase in the frequency of some side effects, such as cerebellar atrophy, gingival hypertrophy or acute cutaneous reactions. The presence of HLA-B*15:02 and CYP2C9 *2 or *3 in the same patient increases the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis; hence, PHT should not be prescribed in these patients. In patients with CYP2C9 *1/*2 or *1/*3 alleles (intermediate metabolizers), the usual PHT maintenance dose (5-10 mg/kg/day) must be reduced by 25%, and in those with CYP2C9 *2/*2, *2/*3 or *3/*3 alleles (poor metabolizers), the dose must be reduced by 50%. It is controversial whether CYP2C9 genotyping should be done before starting PHT treatment. In this paper, we aim to review the influence of CYP2C9 polymorphism on the metabolization of PHT and the clinical implications of poor metabolization in the treatment of epilepsies.
 ...
PMID:CYP2C9 polymorphisms in epilepsy: influence on phenytoin treatment. 2963 28